Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:08:41.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cognitive bases of relational words in the single word period*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Lorraine McCune-Nicolich
Lorraine McCune-Nicolich
Affiliation:
Douglass College, Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research on single-word language has focused on the acquisition of object words, considering relational words such as more, allgone, here, and up only peripherally. These words are considered in relation to the operative schemes of sensorimotor intelligence as suggested by Sinclair (1970). Relational words, like syntactic structure, appear to develop and exist apart from specific content. Study of such words helps clarify the relationship between sensorimotor understandings and the language of the pre-operational child. Data spanning the entire single-word period from five subjects provide an empirical base for analysing the meanings of these words in use. A model is then proposed for considering relational words as coding a set of interrelated meanings reflecting the cognitive organization of the late sensorimotor period.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 15 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Department of Education, Douglass College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. 08903. Helpful comments from Dr D. Ramsay and Dr H. Sinclair are gratefully acknowledged. Credit is due Monica Bach of Rutgers Graduate School of Education for searching and organizing the literature on single relational words. Grant number Ro1 HD11731 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development provided partial support for the preparation of this manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. JChLang 6. 183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloch, O. (1921). Les premiers stades du langage de l'enfant. JPsych 18.Google Scholar
Cited in field, P. Green & Smith, J. (1976), The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 40 (No. 2).Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. (1975). The transformation of sensorimotor morphemes into words: a case study of the development of ‘more’ and ‘mine’. JChLang 2. 233–50.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corman, H. H. & Escalona, S. K. (1969). Stages of sensorimotor development: a replication study. MPQ 15. 351–61.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to stage 6 object permanence development. JChLang 5. 173–89.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (1979). Cognitive correlates of language: differential criteria yield differential results. ChDev 50. 617–31.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development. JPsychRes 4. 423–30.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1974). Sensory-motor intelligence and semantic relations in early child grammar. Cognition 2. 395–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farwell, C. B. (1975). Aspects of early verb semantics: pre-causative development. PRCLD 10. 48–57.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1978). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton: Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1970). Concept development. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. (1976). Communication and the beginnings of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1971). Transitivity in child language. Lg 47. 888–910.Google Scholar
Lord, C. (1975). Variation in the pattern of acquisition of negation. PRCLD 10. 78–86.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 38 (Nos. 1–2).Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 61. 267–85.Google Scholar
Nicolich, L. Me. & Raph, J. B. (1978). Imitative language and symbolic maturity in the single word period. JPsycholingRes 7. 401–17.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1975). The beginnings of speech. PRCLD 8. 26–32.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play dreams and imitation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1969). Genetic epistemology. Columbia Forum 12. 4–11.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ramsay, D. & Campos, J. (1976). The function relations of nonexistence and recurrence and the infant's entry into late-stage 6 of object permanence development. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.Google Scholar
Ramsay, D. & Campos, J. (1978). The onset of representation and entry into stage 6 of object permanence development. DevPsych 14. 79–86.Google Scholar
Rodgon, M. (1976). Single-word usage, cognitive development, and the beginnings of combinatorial speech. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Rodgon, M., Jankowski, W. & Alenskas, L. (1977). A multifunctional approach to single word usage. JChLang 4. 23–45.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1971). Production of utterances and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1970). The transition from sensorimotor to symbolic activity. Interchange 1. 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, S. (1975). The relationship of single words to two-word sentences. ChDev 46. 701–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar