Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:11:10.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's judgements of transitivity errors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Judith G. Hochberg
Judith G. Hochberg
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diary studies of English, Hebrew and Portuguese have led to debate on whether there is directionality in children's transitivity errors – that is, whether children are as likely to coin intransitives from transitives (*Bert knocked down) as they are transitives from intransitives (*I falled my cup). The judgements made by 3- and 4-year-olds showed a strong bias in favour of innovative transitives in English. It is argued that this bias results from children's preference for prototypical, highly transitive descriptions of events.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 317 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ammon, M. S. (1980). Development in the linguistic expression of causal relations: Comprehension of features of lexical and periphrastic causatives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ammon, M. S. & Slobin, D. I. (1979). A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences. Cognition 7. 3–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. A. (1982). Verb-pattern alternation: the interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child language. JChLang 9. 169–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowerman, M. (1974). Learning the structure of causative verbs: a study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic, and syntactic development. PRCLD 8. 142–78.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1977). The acquisition of rules governing ‘possible lexical items’: evidence from spontaneous speech errors. PRCLD 13. 148–56.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs. Quaderni di Semantica 3. 5–66.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. MonogSocResChDev 41.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A. (1984). Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Lg 60. 542–90.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueira, R. A. (1984). On the development of the expression of causativity: a syntactic hypothesis. JChLang 11. 109–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg 56. 251–99.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (1978). Children's judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical irregular past-tense verbs. ChDev 49. 319–26.Google Scholar
Lord, C. (1979). ‘Don't you fall me down’: children's generalizations regarding cause and transitivity. PRCLD 17. 81–9.Google Scholar
Platt, C. B. & MacWhinney, B. (1983). Error assimilation as a mechanism in language learning. JChLang 10. 401–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Pratt, C., Tunmer, W. & Bowey, J. (1984). Children's capacity to correct grammatical violations in sentences. JChLang 11. 129–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Schieffelin, B. (1979). A developmental study of word order and case-marking in an ergative language. PRCLD 17. 30–40.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1975). The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus. In Shibatani, M. (ed.), Syntax and semantics: the grammar of causative constructions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1981). The origins of grammatical encoding of events. In Deutsch, W. (ed.), The child's construction of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12. 229–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed