Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T07:47:46.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's command of plural and possessive marking on Hebrew nouns: a comparison of obligatory versus optional inflections*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2010

RACHEL SCHIFF ,
DORIT RAVID  and
SHANY LEVY-SHIMON
RACHEL SCHIFF*
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University
DORIT RAVID
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
SHANY LEVY-SHIMON
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University and Israeli Ministry of Education
*
[*]Address for correspondence: Rachel Schiff, PhD, Bar Ian University, School of Education & Director, Haddad Center for Dyslexia and Reading Disorders, Rabat Gann 52900Israel. tel: 972-3-5318705; fax: 972-3-5351049; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compare learning of two inflection types – obligatory noun plurals and optional noun possessives. We tested 107 Hebrew-speaking children aged 6–7 on the same tasks at the beginning and end of first grade. Performance on both constructions improved during this short period, but plurals scored higher from the start, with improvement only in changing stems. The main remaining challenge in mastering noun plural marking in grade school is thus to learn the various types of stem changes. In contrast, possessives improved across the board in first grade, with higher success on non-changing stems and first person suffixes respectively. This intense gain in first grade occurs when children learn to read and write and turn to the written modality as their main source of linguistic input. The study thus testifies to the impact of the shift from spoken language to the ‘language of literacy’ on children's construal of Hebrew morphology.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 433 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berman, R. A. (1981). Regularity vs. anomaly: The acquisition of inflectional morphology. Journal of Child Language 8, 265–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 255–371. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1997). Preliterate knowledge of language. In Pontecorvo, C. (ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, 61–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35, 735–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. A. & Ravid, D. (2008). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (eds), Cambridge handbook of literacy, 92–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, B. & Nichols, J. (2007). Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Volume III Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn, 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahana-Amitay, D. & Ravid, D. (2000). Optional bound morphology in the development of text production. In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. & Keith-Lucas, T. (eds), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. I, 176–84. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronoun systems. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition II, 339–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, E. & Szczerbinski, M. (2006). Polish children's productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity. Journal of Child Language 33, 559–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, A. & Gillis, S. (1998). Dutch child language: An overview. In Gillis, S. & De Houwer, A. (eds), The acquisition of Dutch, 1–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1985). The acquisition of English. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 27–140. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gillis, S. & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language 33, 621–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, D. (2008). Relationship between later language knowledge and reading abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Laaha, S., Ravid, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, G. & Dressler, W. U. (2006). Early noun plurals in German: Regularity, productivity, or default? Journal of Child Language 33(2), 271–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lavie, N. (2006). The development of noun plurals. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Communications Disorders, Tel Aviv University [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Levin, I., Ravid, D. & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language 28, 741–69.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. (1980). The acquisition of gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Lieven, E. (2005). Language development: An overview. In Brown, K. (General Editor), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn, Volume 6, 376–91. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, I. (2006). Morphological levels and diachronic change in Modern Hebrew plural formation. Studies in Language 30, 777–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B. (2005). Splitting the notion of ‘agent’: Case-marking in early child Hindi. Journal of Child Language 32 (4), 787–803.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (2005). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. G. (eds), Handbook of orthography and literacy, 339–63. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (2006). Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology 16, 127–48.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Berman, R. (2009). Developing linguistic register in different text types. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(1), 108–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. & Berman, R. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school-age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 30 (1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., Dressler, W. U., Nir-Sagiv, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfeldt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basbøll, H. & Gillis, S. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In Behrens, Heike (ed.), TILAR Series No 6. Trends in Corpus Research, 25–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Levie, R. (2010). Hebrew adjectives in later language text production. First Language 30 (1), 27–55.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Schiff, R. (2009). Morpho-phonological categories of noun plurals in Hebrew: A developmental study. Linguistics 47 (1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. & Shlesinger, Y. (2001). Vowel reduction in Modern Hebrew: Traces of the past and current variation. Folia Linguistica 35(3–4), 371–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1985). The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 525–94. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarzwald, O. R. (2006). Three related analyses in Modern Hebrew morphology. In Goldenberg, G. (ed.), Ancient Egyptian, Neo-Semitic, methods in linguistics in memory of H. J. Polotsky. Jerusalem: The National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. & Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In Harris, M. & Hatano, G. (eds), A cross-cultural perspective on learning to read, 89–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) (1985). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2001). Form–function relations: How do children find out what they are? In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (eds), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 406–449. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tubul, M. (2003). The distribution of plural morphemes in Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bar-Ilan University [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar