Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:48:17.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child L2 development: A longitudinal case study on Voice Onset Times in word-initial stops*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

ELLEN SIMON
ELLEN SIMON*
Affiliation:
Ghent University
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Ellen Simon, Ghent University, English Department, Rozier 44, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. tel: +32 9 264 36 47; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a longitudinal case study examining the acquisition of the English voice system by a three-year-old native speaker of Dutch. The study aims to examine whether the child develops two different phonetic systems or uses just one system for both languages, and compares the early L2 acquisition process with L1, simultaneous bilingual and late L2 acquisition. The results reveal that the child successfully acquires the English contrast between short-lag and long-lag stops, but gradually changes the Dutch system, which contrasts prevoiced with short-lag stops, into the direction of the English system.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 159 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I am grateful to the child for participating in this study and to the child's parents for generously allowing me to record their son over a period of seven months. I wish to thank John Kingston for many helpful discussions and feedback. Thanks also to Rebecca Danton for help during the data collection and to Christopher Butler and Filip Agneessens for help with the statistics. The paper has benefited from useful suggestions by two anonymous Journal of Child Language reviewers and an Associate Editor. The research reported on in this paper has been made possible by a postdoctoral fellowship of the Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF)/Francqui Foundation and by a postdoctoral research grant of the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (FWO).

References

REFERENCES

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.12) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Cho, T. & Ladefoged, P. (1991). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27, 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, M. & Clark, A. (1996). Early bilingual acquisition of the voicing contrast in English and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 24, 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, M. & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition. Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin/New York: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1982). The voicing contrast between English /p/ and /b/ as a function of stress and position-in-utterance. Journal of Phonetics 10, 335–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eeftink, W. (1987). Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication 6, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C. & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(2), 155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, W. (2004). Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. E. & Wilson, I. L. (2002). Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. The International Journal of Bilingualism 6(3), 271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R., Van der Feest, S., Fikkert, P., Kerkhoff, A. & Zamuner, T. (2007). Representations of [voice]: Evidence from acquisition. In: van der Torre, E. J. & van de Weijer, J. (eds), Voicing in Dutch, 41–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M. M., Lleó, C. & Rakow, M. (2004). Voice onset time in bilingual German–Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessinger, R. H. & Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics 26, 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18(4), 686–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(15), 9096–9101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijpers, C. (1993). Temporal coordination in speech development. A study on voicing contrast and assimilation of voice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20, 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1979). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Spanish: A phonetic and phonological study of word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 433–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pater, J. (2003). The perceptual acquisition of Thai phonology by English speakers: Task and stimuli effects. Second Language Research 19, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E. (2009). Acquiring a new L2 contrast: An analysis of the English laryngeal system of L1 Dutch speakers. Second Language Research 25(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. (1997). Children's acquisition of speech timing in English: A comparative study of voice onset time and final syllable vowel lengthening. Journal of Child Language 24, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suomi, K. (1980). Voicing in English and Finnish stops. A typological comparison with an interlanguage study of the two languages in contrast. Doctoral dissertation, Publications of the Department of Finnish and General Linguistics 10, Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Van Alphen, P. M. (2004). Perceptual relevance of prevoicing in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van der Feest, S. (2007). Building a phonological lexicon. The acquisition of the Dutch voicing contrast in perception and production. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, Prince Productions.Google Scholar
Watson, I. (1991). Phonological processing in two languages. In Bialystok, E. (ed.), Language processing in bilingual children, 25–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. (1977). The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 5, 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar