Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:19:12.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attentional priority of the agent in the acquisition of word reference*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Janet Grace  and
George J. Suci
Janet Grace
Affiliation:
Ibadan, Nigeria
George J. Suci
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of agent priority in event perception in word acquisition was investigated using 24 infants at the one-word stage of language production. Nonsense words were presented in narrations referring to agent, recipient or stationary nonsense puppet-actors in filmed events. The nonsense stimuli along with a sense word referring to a sense puppet were presented in a habituation series. Word acquisition was measured by the extent of response recovery to an incorrect pairing of a nonsense word with a sense referent, and by the number of infants accurately choosing named puppets. Both measures were significantly greater for puppets in agent roles than for other puppets. A speech modification condition (exaggerated intonation with repetition) held attention longer but did not facilitate acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angiolillo, C. J. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). Experimental evidence for agent–patient categories in child language. JChLang 9 627–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Braine, M. D. S. & Wells, R. (1978). Case-like categories in children: the actor and some related categories. CogPsychol 9. 100–22.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialog in language acquisition. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R. J. & Levelt, W. (eds), The child's conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. & Odya-Weis, C. (1985). The comprehension of semantic relations by two-year-olds: an exploratory study. JChLang 12.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, D. (1973). Sensorimotor intelligence and semantic relations in early child grammar. Cognition 2. 395–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fritz, J. J. & Suci, G. J. (1982). Facilitation of semantic comprehension at the one-word stage of language development. JChLang 9. 31–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M. (1975). Semantic development in infants: the concepts of agent and recipient. MPQ 21. 181–93.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Kerr, J. L. (1978). Infants' perception of semantically defined action role changes in filmed events. MPQ 24. 53–62.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M. (1966). The response of the human infant to visual movement. JExpPsychol 3. 235–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McHale, C. R. (1973). The development of the semantic concept of action role in preverbal and early verbal infants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. S. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. JChLang 5. 1–15.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, S. S. & Suci, G. J. (1976). Early language and infants' perception of action events. Unpublished paper, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Robertson, S. S. (1980). Event perception by children in the early stages of language production. ChDev 51. 86–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Sachs, J. (1977). The adaptive significance of linguistic input to prelinguistic infants. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. (1978). The agent priority in events in motion and still pictures. Paper presented to the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. & Galang, R. C. (1978). Agent–patient word-order preference in the acquisition of Tagalog. JChLang 5. 47–64.Google Scholar
Shafto, M. (1973). The space for case JVLVB 12. 551–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1976). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Inhelder, B. & Chipman, H. (eds), Piaget and his school. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Suci, G. J. & Hamacher, J. (1972). Psychological dimensions of case in sentence processing of action role and animateness. IJPsycholing 1. 34–48.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1950). The acquisition of word meanings: a developmental study. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 15. No. 51, 1.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wolff, P. H. & White, D. L. (1965). Visual pursuit and attention in young infants. JAmAcadChPsychiat 4. 473–84.Google Scholar