Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:59:26.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of the present perfect: explaining differences in the speech of Scottish and American children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Virginia C. Gathercole
Virginia C. Gathercole
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assesses the role of frequency of input in the acquisition of the present perfect by Scottish and American children. Two questions were addressed: (1) Do adults speaking Scottish English use the present perfect more frequently in speech to children than those speaking American English? (2) If there is a difference in the frequency of input, how does this affect the course of development of this structure in the language of Scottish vs. American children? Cross-sectional data were collected from 12 Scottish and 12 American children aged 3; 0 to 6; 4 and from adults interacting with them in naturalistic settings. The data led to the conclusions that (1) Scottish adults use the present perfect construction in their speech to children much more frequently than American adults do; (2) Scottish children use the present perfect construction in their speech long before their American counterparts; and (3) frequency of input does play a major role in the timing and order of acquisition of the present perfect. However, its role appears to be an interactive one, in which it conspires with factors such as semantic, syntactic, and cognitive simplicity to make some forms easier to learn than others.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , October 1986 , pp. 537 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. JChLang 3. 167–89.Google Scholar
Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D., & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics of adult speech which predict children's language development. JChLang 10. 65–84.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Lg 56. 386–412.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J. P. & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 2. 107–30.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1968). The development of temporal reference during the acquisition of language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1971). The development of the ability to decenter in time. BJPsych 62. 353–65.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1976). The cognitive hypothesis of language acquisition and its implications for child language deficiency. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Directions in normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Cross, T. G. (1978). Mothers' speech and its association with rate of linguistic development in young children. In Waterson, N.. & Snow, C.. (eds), The development of communication: social and pragmatic factors in language acquisition. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquistion of grammatical morphemes in child speech. JPsycholingRes 2. 267–78.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1981). Description and explanation in the acquisition of verb-forms. JChLang 8. 93–108.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K., & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. JChLang 6. 423–42.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E. L. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. JChLang 11. 43–79.Google Scholar
Harner, L. (1980). Comprehension of past and future reference revisited. JExpChPsych 29. 170–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Harner, L. (1981). Children talk about the time and aspect of actions. ChDev 52. 498–506.Google Scholar
Herriot, P. (1969). The comprehension of tense by young children. ChDev 40. 103–10.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some contributions of mothers' speech to their children's syntactic growth. JChLang 12. 367–85.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. J. (1985). The emergence of present perfect verb forms: semantic influences on selective imitation. JChLang 12. 325–52.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. & Daly, M. J. (1979). The development of hypothetical reference in the speech of young children. JChLang 6. 563–79.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1980). Relationships between parental input frequencies and children's language acquisition: a reanalysis of Brown's data. JChLang 7. 105–18.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1981). To attend or not to attend to unwelcome reanalyses? A reply to Pinker. JChLang 8. 627–31.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Carskaddon, G. & Bonvillian, J. (1973). Syntax acquisition: impact of experimental variation in adult verbal interaction with the child. ChDev 44. 497–504.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C.. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, N.J., & Naremore, R. C. (1975). On the acquisition of present perfect ‘have’ in normal children. L & S 18. 219–26.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1981). On the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. JChLang 8. 477–84.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: the emergence of displaced reference in parent–child discourse. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 4. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Eribaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. & Terrell, B. (1983). The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. JChLang 10. 57–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Shatz, M. (1982). On mechanisms of language acquisition: can features of the communicative environment account for development? In Wanner, E.. & Gleitman, L.. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1980). The acquisition of time talk: relations between child and adult grammars. JChLang 7. 263–78.Google Scholar
Toivainen, J. (1980). Inflectional affixes used by Finnish-speaking children aged 1–3 years. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Weist, R. (1983). Prefix versus suffix information processing in the comprehension of tense and aspect. JChLang 10. 85–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Weist, R. (in press). Tense and aspect: temporal systems in child language. To appear in Fletcher, P.. & Garman, M.. (eds), Language acquisition: studies in first language development. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wells, C. G. & Robinson, W. P. (1982). The role of adult speech in language development. In Fraser, C.. & Scherer, K.. (eds), The social psychology of language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar