Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:56:03.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rewards of Office-holding in Tudor England*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Robert C. Braddock
Robert C. Braddock*
Affiliation:
Saginaw Valley College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The compensation of royal officials has been the subject of increasing scrutiny in recent years as historians turn to the study of the court and royal office to discover the realities of power in Elizabethan and Jacobean England. H. R. Trevor-Roper, who sees the growth of the court as the hallmark of the Renaissance state, has declared that royal service was so lucrative that to many persons holding office spelled the difference between penury and financial success. More detailed studies do not completely bear out his contention. Although A. J. Slavin and others have shown how some highly placed officials were able to enhance their financial position dramatically, G. E. Aylmer and Lawrence Stone demonstrated that such cases of spectacular success were exceptional and that most royal servants received only modest compensation for their labors. Furthermore, Wallace MacCaffrey has pointed out that the crown had at its disposal astonishingly few offices whose salaries might justify calling the men who held them a financial elite. The weight of this evidence has not abated the controversy, however. Instead, the debate has shifted from the actual salary to the total amount the official could make his office yield in tips, fees, and other perquisites, both legal and illegal. Trevor-Roper maintains that these extra benefits made royal service very lucrative, while the others question the extent of such additional enrichment, claiming that few grew wealthy in the king's service.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , May 1975 , pp. 29 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was read at the annual meeting of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, April 6, 1973; revision was assisted by a travel grant from Saginaw Valley College.

References

1. A sample of works referred to in this historiographical survey are: Trevor-Roper, H. R., “The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century,” Past and Present, XVI (1959), 31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trevor-Roper, H. R., The Gentry, 1520-1620 (Economic History Review, Supplement I, 1953)Google Scholar; Slavin, A. J., Politics and Profit: A Study of Sir Ralph Sadler, 1507-1547 (Cambridge, 1966)Google Scholar; Simpson, A., The Wealth of the Gentry. 1540-1640: East Anglian Studies (Cambridge, 1963), pp. 142–78Google Scholar; Stone, L., “The Fruits of Office: The Case of Robert Cecil, First Earl of Salisbury, 1596-1612,” in Fisher, F. J. (ed.), Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England in Honour of R. H. Tawney (Cambridge, 1961), pp. 89–116Google Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., The King's Servants: The Civil Service of Charles I, 1625-1642 (London, 1961)Google Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., The State's Servants: The Civil Service of the English Republic, 1649-1660 (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., “Office-holding as a Factor in English History, 1625-42,” History, XLIV (1959), 228–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stone, L., The Crisis of the Aristocracy, 1558-1641 (Oxford, 1965)Google Scholar; Stone, L., “Office Under Queen Elizabeth: The Case of Lord Hunsdon and the Chamberlainship in 1585,” Historical Journal, I (1967), 279–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacCaffrey, W. T., “Place and Patronage in Elizabethan Politics,” in Bindoff, S. T.et al. (eds.), Elizabethan Government and Society: Essays Presented to Sir John Neale (London, 1961), pp. 95–116Google Scholar.

2. Hurstfield, J., “Political Corruption in Modern England: The Historian's Problem,” History, LII (1967), 29Google Scholar.

3. J. Swift, “Upon the horrid plot discovered by Harlequin, the Bishop of Rochester's French Dog,” quoted in Beattie, J. M., The English Court in the Reign of George I (Cambridge, 1967), p. 94Google Scholar.

4. Quoted in Stone, , Crisis of the Aristocracy, p. 385Google Scholar.

5. Hurstfield, , “Political Corruption in Modern England,” p. 18Google Scholar.

6. Simpson, , Wealth of the Gentry, pp. 144, 162Google Scholar.

7. British Museum (BM), Additional Manuscripts (Add. MS) 45716 A, fols. 13-15, 21-26.

8. Percy, T. (ed.), The Regulations and Establishment of … the Fifth Earl of Northumberland … (new edn., London, 1905), pp. 46–48Google Scholar; Batho, G. R., “The Household Accounts of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland” (M.A. Thesis, University of London, 1953), appendix VBGoogle Scholar.

9. Rogers, J. E. T., A History of Agriculture and Prices in England (Oxford, 1866–1900)Google Scholar, summarized in Brown, E. H. P. and Hopkins, S. V., “Seven Centuries of the Building Trade,” Economica, new series, XXII (1955), 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Rogers, , History of Agriculture, IV, ch. xviiGoogle Scholar; ibid., Six Centuries of Work and Wages (10th edn., London 1909), ch. xiiGoogle Scholar; Bridenbaugh, C., Vexed and Troubled Englishmen, 1590-1642 (Oxford, 1968), p. 148Google Scholar.

11. BM, Add. MS 30198, fols. 9v. 32v.

12. For an example see BM, Cotton Manuscripts, Vespasian, C. XIV, fol. 68v.

13. A Collection of Ordinances and Regulations for the Government of the Royal Household … (London, Society of Antiquaries, 1790)Google Scholar, (hereafter, Household Ordinances) p. 192.

14. Ibid., pp. 164, 194.

15. MacCaffrey, , “Place and Patronage,” pp. 106–08Google Scholar.

16. Miller, H., “Subsidy Assessments of the Peerage in the Sixteenth Century,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, XXVII (1955), 18Google Scholar.

17. For two prominent examples, see Simpson, Wealth of the Gentry, ch. iv, and Slavin, Politics and Profit, ch's. viii and ix.

18. BM, Stowe MS 571, fol. 17.

19. Stone, “Office Under Queen Elizabeth.”

20. BM, Lansdowne Manuscripts (Lans. MSS) 34, fols. 82-85.

21. G. E. C[ockayne], The Complete Peerage … (rev. edn., London, 1910–1959), XII, Pt. 2, 757-62Google Scholar; BM, Stowe MS 571, fols. 16, 20v.

22. Brock, R. E. “The Courtier in Early Tudor Society, Illustrated from Select Examples” (Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1964), pp. 316–19Google Scholar.

23. MacCaffrey, , “Place and Patronage,” p. 111Google Scholar.

24. Public Record Office (PRO), E 101/416/11.

25. BM, Add. MS 45716 A, fol. 13.

26. Grose, F. and Astle, T. (eds.), Antiquarian Repertory … (rev. edn., 4 vols., London, 1809), IV, 650Google Scholar.

27. Household Ordinances, p. 213.

28. Ibid., pp. 208-14.

29. BM, Lans. MS 34, fol. 95.

30. BM, Add. MS 30232.

31. Household Ordinances, p. 208.

32. Tout, T. F., Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England (Manchester, 1920–1933), IV, 213–14Google Scholar.

33. For one example see PRO, E 404/109, m. 79.

34. BM, Lans. MS 21, fol. 143v.

35. Slavin, , Prolitics and Profit, p. 175Google Scholar.

36. Ibid., p. 177.

37. Household Ordinances, pp. 211-12.

38. PRO, E 407/1.

39. Calendar of the Patent Rolls (C. P. R.), Edward VI, III (1549–1551), 179Google Scholar.

40. The Cofferer's salary was £100, but when Sir Edmund Peckham resigned in 1547, he was given an annuity of £133 6s 8d. BM, Add. MS 30198, fol. 22v.

41. BM, Lans. MS 21, fols. 131, 146v; Aylmer, , King's Servants, p. 169Google Scholar.

42. PRO, E 361/8; E 351/1795.

43. MacCaffrey, , “Place and Patronage,” p. 111Google Scholar.

44. In addition, Pembroke also received substantial weekly diets for himself and his subordinates as Lord President of the Council of the Welsh Marches. BM, Stowe MS 571, passim.

45. Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic of the Reign of Henry VIII, (hereafter, L. & P.), (London, 1864), XIV, Pt. 2, No. 435 (54)Google Scholar; Household Ordinances, p. 170.

46. PRO, E 101/426/8.

47. BM, Stowe MS 571, fol. 48.

48. C. P. R., Philip and Mary, I (1553–1554), 406Google Scholar.

49. The salary of the new post was fifty percent higher than the old as well. L. & P., XIV, Pt. 2, No. 435 (54); XII, Pt. 1, No. 539 (12); XXI, Pt. 2, No. 754.

50. C. P. R., Philip and Mary, I (1553–1554), 160–61Google Scholar.

51. Somerville, R., History of the Duchy of Lancaster (London, 1953), I, 391–97Google Scholar, 335.

52. Emmison, F. G., Tudor Secretary: Sir William Petre at Court and Home (London, 1961), pp. 69, 85, 179Google Scholar.

53. Goff, C., A Woman of the Tudor Age (London, 1930), p. 274Google Scholar.

54. BM, Lans. MS 86, fols. 128-29.

55. Woodworth, A., Purveyance for the Royal Household in the Reign of Elizabeth (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series XXXV, Pt. 1 [1945]), 65Google Scholar.

56. BM, Add. MS 45716 A, fol. 98v.

57. Neale, J. E., “The Elizabethan Political Scene,” Proceedings of the British Academy, XXIV (1948)Google Scholar.

58. BM, Lans. MS 34, fols. 95-96.

59. BM, Royal Manuscripts, 18 A, xlvi, fols. 1-9.

60. Guilford Muniment Room, Bray Manuscripts, fols. 11-12.

61. BM, Lans. MS 34, fol. 95.

62. Aylmer, , King's Servants, pp. 171–72Google Scholar.

63. Quoted in Neale, J. E., Queen Elizabeth (London, 1934), p. 114Google Scholar.