Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T06:29:52.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rainfall, Plagues, and the Prince of Wales: A Chapter in the Conflict of Religion and Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Frank M. Turner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In July, 1872, one of the most curious articles in the history of British journalism appeared in the much respected Contemporary Review. The anonymous essay, entitled “The ‘Prayer for the Sick’ — Hints Towards a Serious Attempt to Estimate Its Value,” challenged the Christians of the nation to conduct an experiment to determine the physical efficacy of prayer. A letter from the physicist John Tyndall, controversial professor at the Royal Institution, introduced the proposal, the author of which was later identified as Henry Thompson, an eminent London surgeon.

Thompson admitted that few prayers were actually open to scientific or quantitative investigation. However, the prayers for the sick in the Book of Common Prayer appeared to constitute a set of petitions “from a study of which the absolute calculable value of prayer … can almost certainly be ascertained.” These fell into two categories — general prayers said every Sunday and specific prayers offered for particular individuals. Thompson desired no one to be deprived of the benefits afforded by general prayers.

But I ask that one single ward or hospital, under the care of first-rate physicians and surgeons, containing certain numbers of patients afflicted with those diseases which have been best studied, and of which the mortality rates are best known, whether the diseases are those which are treated by medical or by surgical remedies, should be, during a period of not less, say, than three or five years, made the object of special prayer by the whole body of the faithful, and that, at the end of that time, the mortality rates should be compared with the past rates, and also with that of other leading hospitals, similarly well managed, during the same period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1974 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “The ‘Prayer for the Sick’—Hints Towards a Serious Attempt to Estimate Its Value,” Contemporary Review, XX (1872), 205–10Google Scholar. Authorship is attributed to Henry Thompson in the British Museum Catalogue and in Cope, Zachary, The Versatile Victorian, Being the Life of Sir Henry Thompson (London, 1951), p. 108Google Scholar.

2. “The ‘Prayer for the Sick,’” Contemporary Review, XX, 207, 210Google Scholar.

3. The major documents of the debate in addition to the initial proposal are the following: Littledale, Richard Frederick, “The Rationale of Prayer,” Contemporary Review, XX (1872), 430–54Google Scholar; Galton, Francis, “Statistical Inquiries into the Efficacy of Prayer,” Fortnightly Review, XVIII (1872), 125–35Google Scholar; Spectator, VL (1872), 846–47, 879–80, 974–75, 1011–13, 1038–39, 1042–44, 1073, 1104–07, 1139Google Scholar; Thompson, H. (anon.), Tyndall, John, McCosh, James, “On Prayer,” Contemporary Review, XX (1872), 763–82Google Scholar; Guardian, XXVII (1872), 1145, 1173, 1201–02Google Scholar; Knight, William A., “The Function of Prayer in the Economy of the Universe,” Contemporary Review, XXI (1873), 183–98Google Scholar; Duke of Argyle, “Prayer: The Two Spheres—Are They Two?” Contemporary Review, XXI (1873), 464–73Google Scholar; Knight, William A., “Prayer: ‘The Two Spheres’: They Are Two,” Contemporary Review, XII (1873), 20–24Google Scholar. See also, Romanes, George John, Christian Prayer and General Laws being the Burney Prize Essay for the year 1873, with an Appendix, The Physical Efficacy of Prayer (London, 1874)Google Scholar; Onslow, Phipps, The Reasonableness of Prayer (London, n.d.)Google Scholar; Newman, F. W., The Controversy about Prayer (London, 1873)Google Scholar; Jellett, John H., The Efficacy of Prayer (London, 1878)Google Scholar; Bickwith, C. A., “The Prayer-Gauge Debate,” in The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, ed. Jackson, Samuel Macauley (New York and London, 1911), IX, 157–58Google Scholar; D'Arcy, Charles Frederick, “Prayer (Christian, Theological),” in Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. Hastings, James (Edinburgh, 1918), X, 175Google Scholar; Brown, Alan, The Metaphysical Society: Victorian Minds in Conflict, 1869–1881 (New York, 1947), pp. 177–80Google Scholar; Irvine, William, Apes, Angels, and Victorians (New York, 1955), p. 256Google Scholar. The debate also roused interest in the United States where Tyndall toured in late 1872 with the infamy of the proposal he had introduced preceding him. See Means, John O. (ed.), The Prayer Gauge Debate (Boston, 1876)Google Scholar.

4. Tyndall, , “On Prayer,” Contemporary Review, XX, 764Google Scholar.

5. Mullet, Charles F., The Bubonic Plague and England: An Essay in the History of Preventive Medicine (Lexington, Kentucky, 1956), pp. 109, 117, 162–63, 183, 187, 201Google Scholar; Thomas, Keith, Religion and the Decline of Magic (New York, 1971), pp. 113–24Google Scholar; Wilson, F. P., The Plague in Shakespeare's London (Oxford; 1927), pp. 52–53, 70–71, 99–100, 154Google Scholar.

6. The nineteenth-century religious pamphlet collection at Pusey House, Oxford, includes a number of sermons and tracts on prayer, pestilence, and harvests. One that most clearly illustrates the role of the church and prayer in time of crisis is Louisa Gulliford or Recollections of the Cholera in 1849 by a Clergyman (Luton, 1863)Google Scholar. See also, Handlist of Proclamations Issued by Royal and Other Constitutional Authorities 1714-1910 in Bibliotheca Lindesiana, VIII (Wingus, 1913), pp. 307–08, 310, 314, 414, 462, 490, 492, 555Google Scholar.

7. Henry Fitzroy for Lord Palmerston to the Moderator of the Presbytery of Edinburgh, October 19, 1853, in Ashley, Evelyn, The Life and Correspondence of Henry John Temple, Viscount Palmerston (London, 1879), II, 265–66Google Scholar. For a discussion of the midcentury theory of disease that lay behind Palmerston's note, see Lambert, Royston, Sir John Simon, 1816-1904, and English Social Administration (London, 1963), pp. 48–56Google Scholar.

8. Kingsley, Charles, “Lord Palmerston and the Presbytery of Edinburgh,” Fraser's Magazine, IL (1854), 47, 51Google Scholar.

9. Quoted in Gutch, Charles, The Gloomy Summer; or God's Threatened Chastisement Deserved for National and Individual Sins (London, 1860), p. 4Google Scholar.

10. Ibid., p. 4.

11. Ibid., pp. 11-15.

12. Kingsley, Charles, Why Should We Pray for Fair Weather? (London, 1860), pp. 8, 9Google Scholar. See also Cannon, Walter F., “Scientists and Broad Churchmen: An Early Victorian Intellectual Network,” Journal of British Studies, IV (1964), 65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Kingsley, Frances E. (ed.), Charles Kingsley, His Letters and Memories of His Life (London, 1891), II, 112–17Google Scholar; Lyell, Katherine M., Life, Letters, and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell Bart. (London, 1881), II, 336–37Google Scholar.

14. Tyndall, John, “Reflections on Prayer and Natural Law—1861,” in Fragments of Science (6th ed.; New York, 1892), II, 6Google Scholar. Tyndall originally published these comments in Mountaineering in 1861 (London, 1862)Google Scholar, but removed it from later editions of the volume.

15. Hobsbawm, E. J., Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour (London, 1971), p. 257Google Scholar.

16. Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modern English Society, 1780-1880 (London, 1969), p. 258Google Scholar.

17. Tyndall, John, Heat Considered as a Mode of Motion (New York, 1864), p. viGoogle Scholar.

18. Burn, W. L.. The Age of Equipoise: A Study in the Mid-Victorian Generation (New York, 1965), pp. 212–16Google Scholar.

19. Guardian, XX (1865), 1003Google Scholar; Handlist of Proclamations, p. 716.

20. Mullett, Charles F., “The Cattle Distemper in Mid-Eighteenth-Century England,” Agricultural History, XX (1946), 144–65Google Scholar. The Handlist of Proclamations includes no prayers for cattle or for the landed interest during the eighteenth century.

21. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 9, 1865, p. 1Google Scholar.

22. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 10, 1865, p. 9Google Scholar. The Times on Oct. 12, 1865, briefly entered the fray by devoting one-and-a-half columns to a castigation of Cardinal Cullen's pastoral letter that had blamed the cattle plague on the skeptical spirit of the age. The Times accused the Irish cardinal of equating the march of intellect, the demise of war, the growth of liberal states, and the independence of the working class with “the anti-Christian phenomena of the latter days.” In a blatantly anti-sacerdotal and anti-Catholic spirit the paper spoke of “something pathetic in the unswerving faith which can look abroad in a world like our own and believe that modern society can ever again be reduced to a state of religious pupilage.” The paper made no comment on the prayer from Lambeth palace. Times, Oct. 12, 1865 p. 9Google Scholar.

23. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 14, 1865, p. 3Google Scholar; Spectator, XXXVIII, Oct. 14, 1865, 1140Google Scholar.

24. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 17, 1865, p. 10Google Scholar.

25. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 12, 1865, p. 4Google Scholar.

26. Pall Mall Gazette, Oct. 19, 1865, p. 3Google Scholar. See also the Guardian, XX, 1192Google Scholar, for more Tyndall correspondence.

27. Playfair, Lyon, “The Cattle Plague,” North British Review, XLIII (1865), 518Google Scholar.

28. Davies, J. Llewelyn, “Nature and Prayer,” Macmillan's Magazine, XIII (1865–1866), 233Google Scholar.

29. Pusey, E. B.. The Miracles of Prayer (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Liddon, H. P., Some Elements of Prayer (London, 1872)Google Scholar. In the second edition of his book (London, 1873), p. xix, Liddon argued for the physical efficacy of prayer. He did so because he felt that without faith in the physical fruits of prayer, men would also give up faith in its spiritual benefits.

30. Davies, , “Nature and Prayer,” Macmillan's Magazine, XIII, 239Google Scholar.

31. Waldegrave, Samuel, The Cattle Plague: A Warning Voice to Britain from the King of Nations (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Times, Feb. 14, 1866, p. 9Google Scholar; Feb. 21, 1866, p. 10; March 9, 1866, p. 5; March 14, 1866, p. 10.

32. J. Tyndall to A. Stanley, March 13, 1866 in Typescript of the Journal of John Tyndall, 1855-1872, III, p. 1318. John Tyndall Papers, Archives of the Royal Institution, London.

33. Times, March 21, 1866, p. 5Google Scholar. Stanley may also have been guided by the suggestion of the propriety of the Lord's Prayer in Savage, Marmion, “Religion and Philosophy Reconciled,” Fortnightly Review, III (1866), 474–76Google Scholar. For a response to the question of prayer similar to Stanley's but from a nonconformist minister, see Dawson, George, On Humiliation and Fast Days (Birmingham, 1866)Google Scholar.

34. Times, March 21, 1866, p. 5Google Scholar.

35. Anon., Prayer and the Cattle Plague (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Benson, R. M., The Free Action of Cod's Love Amidst the Fixed Operations of His Power: A Sermon on the Efficacy of Prayer (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Claughton, T. L., God's Providences and Judgments (London, 1866)Google Scholar; McCaul, Joseph B., Darkness That May Be Felt: A Warning to England at the Present Crisis (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Moore, Daniel, Prayer and Providence: Two Sermons Designated to Vindicate the Use of Prayer in Relation to Plague and Pestilence (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Pritchard, C., The Continuity of the Schemes of Nature and of Revelation (London, 1866)Google Scholar; Smith, B. F., Prayer and the Cattle Plague: Two Sermons (London and Cambridge, 1866)Google Scholar; Swayne, Robert G., The Secret of the Cattle Plague (London, 1866)Google Scholar. For the new prayer, see the Guardian, XXI (1866), 842Google Scholar.

36. Times, Nov. 14, 1866, p. 6Google Scholar; see also Nov. 7, 1866, p. 10.

37. Times, Dec. 11, 1871, p. 9Google Scholar; British Medical Journal, Dec. 9, 1871, pp. 671, 699–700Google Scholar.

38. Davidson, Randall T. and Benham, William, Life of Archibald Tait, Archbishop of Canterbury (London, 1891), II, 106Google Scholar.

39. Karslake, W. H., God's Answer to a Nation's Prayer (Oxford and London, 1871)Google Scholar. Karslake's other writings in regard to prayer include The Efficacy of Prayer (London, n.d.), England's Thanksgiving for God's Answer to Her Prayer (Oxford and London, 1872)Google Scholar, The Theory of Prayer with Special Reference to Modern Thought (London, 1873)Google Scholar, and Modern Thought in Reference to the Subject of Prayer (London, 1873)Google Scholar.

40. Guardian, XXVI (1871), 1512Google Scholar.

41. Handlist of Proclamations, p. 809.

42. Ibid., p. 809.

43. Guardian, XXVII (1872), 276Google Scholar.

44. Ibid., p. 276.

45. Lancet, II (1871), 907Google Scholar.

46. Lancet, I (1872), 123Google Scholar.

47. Lancet, I (1872), 55, 120, 160, 339Google Scholar.

48. British Medical Journal, March 2, 1872, p. 245Google Scholar.

49. Spectator, VL, 846–47Google Scholar.

50. Galton, , “Statistical Inquiries into the Efficacy of Prayer,” Fortnightly Review, XVIII, 127Google Scholar. Galton had originally offered the article to the Contemporary Review. James Knowles turned it down explaining, “I am afraid that after all my courage is not greater than Grove's. You will think that editors are a ‘feeble folk,’ and so perhaps they are, but it is certain that our constituents (who are largely clergymen) must not be tried much further just now by proposals following Tyndall's friend's on prayer—and of similar bold—or as you yourself say, ‘audacious character.’” Pearson, Karl, The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton (Cambridge, 1924), II, 131Google Scholar.

51. Galton, , “Statistical Inquiries,” — Fortnightly Review, XVIII, 132Google Scholar.

52. Spectator, VL, 1012Google Scholar.

53. Knight, , “The Function of Prayer in the Economy of the Universe,” Contemporary Review, XXI, 185Google Scholar.

54. J. A. Froude to S. G. Potter, Sept. 7, 1879, in Potter, S. G., Prayer, As It Affects the Immutability of Nature's God and Nature's Laws (Sheffield, 1879), p. 5Google Scholar.

55. Spencer, Herbert, The Principles of Sociology (New York, 1897), II-3, 247–60Google Scholar; Tyndall, Fragments of Science, II, 135Google Scholar; Thompson, (anon.), “On Prayer,” Contemporary Review, XX, 775Google Scholar.

56. Huxley, Leonard, The Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, (New York, 1900), I, 136Google Scholar; II, 34, 345.

57. Wallace, Alfred Russel, Studies Scientific and Social (London, 1900), II, 235–53Google Scholar.

58. Galton, Francis, English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture (New York, 1875), pp. 193–94Google Scholar.