Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:31:32.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantification and Social History: A Reply to Jeffrey Cox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Albion M. Urdank*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Replies
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

THIS REPLY is to a review of Albion M. Urdank. Religion and Society in a Cotswold Vale: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire, 1780-1865 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), by Jeffrey Cox in “On the Limits of Social History: Nineteenth-Century Evangelicalism,” Journal of British Studies 31, no. 2 (1992): 198-203.

1 Thus Cox praises Boyd Hilton for “ignor[ing] the enormous scholarly investment in the social history of religion of the last few decades” (p. 201), and for treating internal shifts within evangelical thought and practice as wholly autonomous phenomena, causally unrelated to the socioeconomic changes wrought by the Industrial Revolution.

2 Urdank, Albion M., “Religion and Reproduction among English Dissenters: Gloucestershire Baptists in the Demographic Revolution,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 33, no. 3 (July 1991): 511–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.