Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:29:09.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics, the People, and Extra-Institutional Participation in Scotland, c. 1603–1712

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2017

Karin Bowie  and
Alasdair Raffe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines popular political participation in early modern Scotland. In Scotland, some of the preconditions of public politics identified by recent scholars were less obviously present than in England or France. There was no culturally dominant metropolis or royal court; the volume of printed publications, though rising across the period, remained comparatively small. Because of these characteristics, historians of popular involvement in Scottish politics should pay particular attention to the traditional means of participation inherited from the medieval and Reformation periods. The article explores three forms of extra-institutional participation, each of which evolved out of formal, institutional political practices, but were deployed by ordinary Scots seeking to express their views. Protestations––formal statements of dissent from a statute or decision––developed in the courts, but were used in extramural contexts in the seventeenth century. Crowd demonstrations in towns took the place of traditional means of consultation, as urban government became increasingly oligarchical. And after congregational involvement in the appointment of parish ministers was legally instituted in 1690, significant numbers of small landowners and the landless poor claimed to have a say in the choice of their minister.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 797 - 815
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cowan, Brian, “Geoffrey Holmes and the Public Sphere: Augustan Historiography from Post-Namierite to the Post-Habermasian,” Parliamentary History 28, no. 1 (February 2009): 166–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 167.

2 Lake, Peter and Pincus, Steve, “Rethinking the Public Sphere in Early Modern England,” Journal of British Studies 45, no. 2 (April 2006): 270–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 271–73.

3 See, for example, Zaret, David, Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England (Princeton, 2000)Google Scholar; Knights, Mark, Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain: Partisanship and Political Culture (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar; Blanning, T. C. W., The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe, 1660–1789 (Oxford, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Van Horn Melton, James, The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe (Cambridge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Baldwin, Geoff, “The ‘Public’ as a Rhetorical Community in Early Modern England,” in Communities in Early Modern England: Networks, Place, Rhetoric, ed. Shepard, Alexandra and Withington, Phil (Manchester, 2000), 199–215 Google Scholar; Gunn, J. A. W., “Public Opinion,” in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L. (Cambridge, 1989), 247–65Google Scholar, at 250.

5 Warner, Michael, “Publics and Counterpublics,” Public Culture 14, no. 1 (Winter 2002): 49–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a mass communication theory of publics, see Hauser, Gerard A., “Vernacular Dialogue and the Rhetoricality of Public Opinion,” Communication Monographs 65, no. 2 (June 1998): 83–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 85–86.

6 Wilson, Bronwen and Yachnin, Paul, introduction to Making Publics in Early Modern Europe, ed. Wilson, Bronwen and Yachnin, Paul (Abingdon, 2010), 1–21 Google Scholar.

7 Lake, Peter, Bad Queen Bess? Libels, Secret Histories, and the Politics of Publicity in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I (Oxford, 2016), 9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Yael Margalit, “Publics: A Bibliographic Afterword,” in Wilson and Yachnin, eds., Making Publics, 232–43, at 237.

9 Ibid., 234; Raymond, Joad, The Invention of the Newspaper: English Newsbooks, 1641–1649 (Oxford, 1996)Google Scholar; Zaret, Origins of Democratic Culture.

10 Jason Peacey considers both print and participative practices. Peacey, Jason, Print and Public Politics in the English Revolution (Cambridge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Stewart, Laura A. M., Rethinking the Scottish Revolution: Covenanted Scotland, 1637–1651 (Oxford, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chap. 1.

12 Wilson and Yachnin, introduction to Making Publics, 13.

13 Raffe, Alasdair, The Culture of Controversy: Religious Arguments in Scotland, 1660–1714 (Woodbridge, 2012), 9 Google Scholar.

14 Stevenson, David, “A Revolutionary Regime and the Press: The Scottish Covenanters and Their Press, 1638–51,” Library, 6th ser., 7, no. 4 (December 1985): 315–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution; Bowie, Karin, Scottish Public Opinion and the Anglo-Scottish Union, 1699–1707 (Woodbridge, 2007)Google Scholar.

15 Mann, Alastair J., “The Anatomy of the Printed Book in Early Modern Scotland,” Scottish Historical Review 80, no. 2 (October 2001): 181–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 188; idem, The Scottish Book Trade, 1500–1720: Print Commerce and Print Control in Early Modern Scotland (East Linton, 2000), 214–24Google Scholar.

16 Stewart, Laura, “‘Brothers in Treuth’: Propaganda, Public Opinion and the Perth Articles Debate in Scotland,” in James VI and I: Ideas, Authority, and Government, ed. Houlbrooke, Ralph (Aldershot, 2006), 151–68Google Scholar; Ford, John D., “Conformity in Conscience: The Structure of the Perth Articles Debate, 1618–1638,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 46, no. 2 (April 1995): 256–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “The Lawful Bonds of Scottish Society: The Five Articles of Perth, the Negative Confession and the National Covenant,” Historical Journal 37, no. 1 (March 1994): 45–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Waurechen, Sarah, “Covenanter Propaganda and Conceptualizations of the Public during the Bishops Wars, 1638–1640,” Historical Journal 52, no. 1 (March 2009): 63–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Raymond, Joad, Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge, 2003), 172–87Google Scholar; Black, Joseph, “‘Pikes and Protestations’: Scottish Texts in England, 1639–40,” Publishing History 42, no. 1 (January 1997): 5–19 Google Scholar; Spurlock, R. Scott, “Cromwell's Edinburgh Press and the Development of Print Culture in Scotland,” Scottish Historical Review 90, no. 2 (October 2011): 179–203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Spurlock, “Cromwell's Edinburgh Press,” 200–2; Buckroyd, Julia M., “Mercurius Caledonius and Its Immediate Successors, 1661,” Scottish Historical Review 54, no. 1 (April 1975): 11–21 Google Scholar; Cowan, William, “The Holyrood Press, 1686–1688,” Publications of the Edinburgh Bibliographical Society 6, no. 1 (June 1904): 83–100 Google Scholar, at 98; Bowie, Karin, “Newspapers, the Early Modern Public Sphere and the 1704–5 Worcester Affair,” in Before Blackwood's: Scottish Journalism in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Benchimol, Alex, Brown, Rhona, and Shuttleton, David (London, 2015), 9–20 Google Scholar.

19 Raffe, Culture of Controversy; Jackson, Clare, Restoration Scotland, 1660–1690: Royalist Politics, Religion and Ideas (Woodbridge, 2003)Google Scholar; Bowie, Scottish Public Opinion, chaps. 4–5.

20 Baldwin, “‘Public,’” 200; Karin Bowie, “Public, People and Nation in Early Modern Scotland,” Scottish Historical Review (forthcoming).

21 Mann, Scottish Book Trade, 139–48, 163–91, 217–18.

22 See Brown, Keith M. and Tanner, Roland J., eds., Parliament and Politics in Scotland, 1235–1560 (Edinburgh, 2004)Google Scholar; Brown, Keith M. and Mann, Alastair J., eds., Parliament and Politics in Scotland, 1567–1707 (Edinburgh, 2005)Google Scholar; Brown, Keith M. and MacDonald, Alan R., eds., Parliament in Context, 1235–1707 (Edinburgh, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mann, Alastair J., James VII: Duke and King of Scots, 1633–1701 (Edinburgh, 2014)Google Scholar, chap. 4; Rayner, Laura, “The Tribulations of Everyday Government in Williamite Scotland,” in Scotland in the Age of Two Revolutions, ed. Adams, Sharon and Goodare, Julian (Woodbridge, 2014), 193–210 Google Scholar; and Goodare, Julian, The Government of Scotland, 1560–1625 (Oxford, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Among recent exceptions to this institutional focus are Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution; Harris, Tim, Restoration: Charles II and His Kingdoms, 1660–1685 (London, 2005)Google Scholar; and idem, Revolution: The Great Crisis of the British Monarchy, 1685–1720 (London, 2006)Google Scholar.

23 Brown, Keith Mark, “Toward Political Participation and Capacity: Elections, Voting, and Representation in Early Modern Scotland,” Journal of Modern History 88, no. 1 (March 2016): 1–33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 “Protestatio(u)n(e, Protestacio(u)n(e), n.,” s.v., Dictionary of the Scots Language Online, http://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/dost/protestatioune, accessed 11 April 2016.

25 Sir James Dalrymple of Stair, Modus Litigandi, or, Form of Process, Observed before the Lords of Council and Session in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1681), 5 Google ScholarPubMed, 7, 22.

26 Ford, J. D., “Protestations to Parliament for Remeid of Law,” Scottish Historical Review 88, no. 1 (April 2009): 57–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Dalrymple, Modus Litigandi, 22.

28 Keith M. Brown, ed., Records of the Parliaments of Scotland to 1707 (hereafter RPS), 1594/4/36, “Ratificationis in this Parliament to be Salvo Jure Cujuslibet,” 8 June 1594, http://www.rps.ac.uk, accessed 11 April 2016.

29 Donaldson, Gordon, ed., Scottish Historical Documents (Edinburgh, 1970), 150–53Google Scholar.

30 Protestations as a genre remain under-researched within early modern political history. For England and its colonies, see Cressy, David, “The Protestation Protested, 1641 and 1642,” Historical Journal 45, no. 2 (June 2002): 251–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walter, John, Understanding Popular Violence in the English Revolution: The Colchester Plunderers (Cambridge, 1999), 292–96Google Scholar; Vallance, Edward, “Protestation, Vow, Covenant and Engagement: Swearing Allegiance in the English Civil War,” Historical Research 75, no. 4 (November 2002): 408–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Braddick, Michael J., “Prayer Book and Protestation: Anti-Popery, Anti-Puritanism and the Outbreak of the English Civil War,” in England's Wars of Religion, Revisited, ed. Prior, Charles W. A. and Burgess, Glenn (Farnham, 2011), 125–45Google Scholar; and McElligott, Jason, “Atlantic Royalism? Polemic, Censorship and the ‘Declaration and Protestation of the Governour and Inhabitants of Virginia,’” in Royalists and Royalism during the Interregnum, ed. McElligott, Jason and Smith, David L. (Manchester, 2010), 214–34Google Scholar.

31 Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the Kirk of Scotland, 3 vols., Maitland Club no. 59 (Edinburgh, 1839–45), 1:246 Google Scholar.

32 See, for example, ibid., 3:947.

33 On royal management of the general assembly after 1603 in conjunction with a reconstruction of episcopal authority, see Macdonald, Alan R., The Jacobean Kirk, 1567–1625: Sovereignty, Polity, and Liturgy (Aldershot, 1998), 101–47Google Scholar.

34 Burton, John Hill and Masson, David, eds., The Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, 1st ser. (Edinburgh, 1881), 4:465–67Google Scholar.

35 Calderwood, David, The History of the Kirk of Scotland, ed. Thomson, Thomas and Laing, David, Wodrow Society (Edinburgh, 1845), 7:485–87Google Scholar.

36 On the non-compliance campaign, see Stewart, “‘Brothers in Treuth,’” 185–94.

37 The author of the 1638 protestations, Archibald Johnston of Wariston, was aware of the 1621 protestation. His 1638 tract set the protestations in a long-range context encompassing previous clerical protestations. [Archibald Johnston], A Short Relation of the State of the Kirk of Scotland ([Edinburgh], 1638), sig. B.

38 Leslie, John, Earl of Rothes, and Bannatyne Club, A Relation of Proceedings Concerning the Affairs of the Kirk of Scotland, From August 1637 to July 1638, Bannatyne Club no. 37 (Edinburgh, 1830), 63 Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., 60, 64–65.

40 Ibid., 86–89. See also Johnston, Archibald, Diary of Sir Archibald Johnston of Wariston, 1632–1639, ed. Paul, George Morrison, Scottish History Society, 1st ser., 61 (Edinburgh, 1911), 316–18Google Scholar; Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution, 73–75.

41 Rothes, Relation, 67–68.

42 Ibid., 82.

43 [Walter Balcanquhall], A Large Declaration concerning the Late Tumults in Scotland (London, 1639), 98–106 Google Scholar; Johnston, Diary, 360; The Protestation of the Noblemen, Barrons, Gentlemen, Borrowes, Ministers, and Commons, Subscribers of the Confession of Faith and Covenant, lately Renewed within the Kingdome of Scotland, made at the Mercate Crosse of Edinburgh, the 4. of Iulij Immediatly after the Reading of the Proclamation, dated 28. Iune. 1638 ([Edinburgh], 1638).

44 Masson, David and Brown, P. Hume, eds., The Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, 2nd ser. (Edinburgh, 1905), 7:65 Google Scholar.

45 [Balcanquhall], Large Declaration, 137–45.

46 Ibid., 157–73.

47 Johnston, Diary, 392–93.

48 The practice of protestation had been maintained within the church, with a hardline “Protester” group being named for protestations against a 1650 resolution of the Commission of the General Assembly.

49 Rutherglen, Hamilton, and Lanark are in Lanarkshire. Sanquhar is in Dumfriesshire.

50 Wodrow, Robert, The History of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland from the Restoration to the Revolution, ed. Burns, Robert (Glasgow, 1829), 3:207–11Google Scholar; Greaves, Richard L., Secrets of the Kingdom: British Radicals from the Popish Plot to the Revolution of 1688–1689 (Stanford, 1992), 61 Google Scholar.

51 Wodrow, History, 3:66.

52 Donaldson, Scottish Historical Documents, 241.

53 Ibid., 242; [Renwick, James and Shields, Alexander], An Informatory Vindication (Edinburgh, 1707), 191–204 Google Scholar.

54 In addition to Scott's account, see Logue, Kenneth J., “The Life and Death of the Notorious Captain John Porteous,” in The Scottish Nation: Identity and History, ed. Murdoch, Alexander (Edinburgh, 2007), 56–70 Google Scholar; Dickinson, H. T. and Logue, Kenneth, “The Porteous Riot: A Study of the Breakdown of Law and Order in Edinburgh, 1736–1737,” Journal of the Scottish Labour History Society 10 (June 1976): 21–40 Google Scholar; and idem, “The Porteous Riot, 1736: Events in a Scottish Protest against the Act of Union with England,” History Today 22, no. 4 (April 1972): 272–81Google Scholar.

55 See Houston, R. A., Social Change in the Age of Enlightenment: Edinburgh, 1660–1760 (Oxford, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chap. 5; Bowie, Scottish Public Opinion, chap. 7; Whatley, Christopher A., Scottish Society, 1707–1830: Beyond Jacobitism, towards Industrialisation (Manchester, 2000)Google Scholar, chaps. 4–5; and Wallace, Valerie, “Presbyterian Moral Economy: The Covenanting Tradition and Popular Protest in Lowland Scotland, 1707–c. 1746,” Scottish Historical Review 89, no. 1 (April 2010): 54–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Stewart, Laura A. M., Urban Politics and the British Civil Wars: Edinburgh, 1617–53 (Leiden, 2006), 23–44 Google Scholar; MacDonald, Alan R., The Burghs and Parliament in Scotland, c. 1550–1651 (Aldershot, 2007), 34–36 Google Scholar; Mackenzie, William Mackay, The Scottish Burghs (Edinburgh, 1949), 121–23Google Scholar.

57 For a discussion of the burghs' economic position, see John M. Toller, “‘Now of Little Significancy’: The Convention of the Royal Burghs of Scotland, 1651–1688” (PhD diss., University of Dundee, 2010), chap. 3.

58 Extracts from the Records of the Royal Burgh of Stirling, Scottish Burgh Records Society (Glasgow, 1889), 2:38–40 Google Scholar; Petition of Provost John Carnegie, Forfar, 1689, Convention of Royal Burghs [Moses] Bundles, Bundle 212, Edinburgh City Archives; Answers for John Riddell of Hayning, Selkirk, c. 1691, GD123/184/6, National Records of Scotland (hereafter NRS).

59 Linlithgow Burgh Council Minutes, 1673–94, B48/9/4, 763, 766–67, 769, 774 (quotation), NRS. The reluctance to contribute might have arisen partly from Presbyterian dissent.

60 The present discussion focuses on the relationship between crowd demonstrations and urban government, though there were comparable disturbances in rural areas. See John Leopold, “The Levellers' Revolt in Galloway in 1724,” Journal of the Scottish Labour History Society 14 (May 1980): 4–29.

61 Rutherglen Burgh Council Minutes, 1681–92, RU3/1/7, 164–65, 166, 177–79, 187, 210, quotations at 178, Mitchell Library, Glasgow.

62 David Ure, The History of Rutherglen and East-Kilbride (Glasgow, 1793), 111.

63 Extracts from the Records of the Burgh of Peebles, 1652–1714, Scottish Burgh Records Society (Glasgow, 1910), 102–5Google Scholar (hereafter Peebles Extracts); Brown, P. Hume, Paton, Henry, and Balfour-Melville, E., eds., The Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, 3rd ser., 16 vols. (Edinburgh, 1908–70)Google Scholar (hereafter RPC, 3rd ser.), 7:369–70, quotations at 370. For reflections on health drinking in Scotland, see Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution, 298.

64 Peebles Extracts, 106–8.

65 RPC, 3rd ser., 2:514 (quotations), 537, 551. See also Supplication for John Riddell of Hayning against Selkirk, 1668, GD123/184/1, NRS.

66 Information for John Riddell of Hayning against Selkirk, 1672, GD123/184/2, NRS; “Heid, n., adj., v.,” s.v., Dictionary of the Scots Language Online, http://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/heid_n_adj_v, accessed 11 April 2016.

67 Warrant Book of the Secretary for Scotland, 1 March 1687–23 Apr. 1688, SP4/12, 407–8, NRS; Selkirk Court Record and Council Book, 1635–1704, BS1/1/1, fol. 497r, Scottish Borders Archive and Local History Centre, Hawick.

68 Cameron, James K., ed., The First Book of Discipline (Edinburgh, 1972), 96 Google Scholar.

69 Kirk, James, ed., The Second Book of Discipline (Edinburgh, 1980), 179 Google Scholar, 201.

70 RPS, 1592/4/26, “Act for Abolisheing of the Actis Contrair the Trew Religioun,” 5 June 1592.

71 RPS, 1649/1/240, “Act abolishing Patronages,” 9 March 1649; Acts of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, M.DC.XXXVIII.–M.DCCC.XLII (Edinburgh, 1843), 212–13Google Scholar; Whitley, Laurence A. B., A Great Grievance: Ecclesiastical Lay Patronage in Scotland until 1750 (Eugene, 2013), 56, 58–60 Google Scholar, 62–66, 280–83.

72 RPS, 1690/4/114, “Act concerneing Patronages,” 19 July 1690.

73 Wodrow, Robert, Analecta: or, Materials for a History of Remarkable Providences, Maitland Club no. 60 (Edinburgh, 1842), 1:275 Google Scholar.

74 “The Ordinary Method of Calling a Minister from one Congregation to Another in this State of the Church,” CH1/2/1, fol. 66r, NRS.

75 Wodrow, Analecta, 1:275.

76 Greenshields, J. B., ed., Annals of the Parish of Lesmahagow (Edinburgh, 1864), 142–43Google Scholar; Scott, Hew, Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae: the Succession of Ministers in the Church of Scotland from the Reformation, rev. ed., 8 vols. (Edinburgh, 1915–1950), 3:316 Google Scholar.

77 Whyte, Ian D., Scotland before the Industrial Revolution: An Economic and Social History, c. 1050–c. 1750 (London, 1995), 156 Google Scholar.

78 Scott, Fasti, 3:298.

79 Presbytery of Lanark Minutes, 1699–1709, CH2/234/4, 163, 168, 173, 178, NRS.

80 General Assembly Papers concerning Crawfordjohn, 1704–9, CH1/2/28/3, fols. 231r, 233r, 249r, 256r, NRS.

81 Synod of Glasgow and Ayr Minutes, 1705–15, CH2/464/2, 119, 129–31, NRS; General Assembly Register, 1706–10, CH1/1/20, 449–50, 453–55, NRS; Papers concerning Crawfordjohn, CH1/2/28/3, fols. 258, 260r, NRS.

82 Presbytery of Lanark Minutes, CH2/234/4, 321–22, NRS.

83 Papers concerning Crawfordjohn, CH1/2/28/3, fols. 228r, 258, 265r, 266r, 268r, NRS.

84 Presbytery of Lanark Minutes, CH2/234/4, 340–41, NRS; Scott, Fasti, 3:298; Whitley, Great Grievance, 132.

85 Papers concerning Crawfordjohn, CH1/2/28/3, fols. 241, 250r, NRS; Presbytery of Lanark Minutes, CH2/234/4, 254, NRS.

86 Papers concerning Crawfordjohn, CH1/2/28/3, fols. 228, 239r, 273r (quotations), NRS.

87 Ibid., fol. 235r.

88 Ibid., fols. 271, 229Ar; Presbytery of Lanark Minutes, CH2/234/4, 254 (quotation), NRS.

89 Scott, Fasti, 1:75, 3:231; General Assembly Papers concerning Bothwell, 1702, CH1/2/3/4, fols. 375r, 377r, 378r, 383 (quotations), NRS.

90 Presbytery of Hamilton Minutes, 1695–1719, CH2/393/2, 224, 226 (quotation), 227–29, 231, 233, NRS.

91 Ibid., 272, 276, 278–84.

92 Ibid., 313; General Assembly Papers concerning Bothwell, 1707, CH1/2/26/1, fols. 167, 177, NRS.

93 Papers concerning Bothwell, CH1/2/26/1, fol. 176ar, NRS.

94 See Sher, Richard B., “Moderates, Managers and Popular Politics in Mid-Eighteenth Century Edinburgh: The Drysdale ‘Bustle’ of the 1760s,” in New Perspectives on the Politics and Culture of Early Modern Scotland, ed. Dwyer, John, Mason, Roger A., and Murdoch, Alexander (Edinburgh, 1982), 179–209 Google Scholar; Landsman, Ned C., “Liberty, Piety and Patronage: The Social Context of Contested Calls in Eighteenth-Century Glasgow,” in The Glasgow Enlightenment, ed. Hook, Andrew and Sher, Richard B. (East Linton, 1995), 214–26Google Scholar.

95 Sher, Richard and Murdoch, Alexander, “Patronage and Party in the Church of Scotland, 1750–1800,” in Church, Politics and Society: Scotland, 1408–1929, ed. Macdougall, Norman (Edinburgh, 1983), 197–220 Google Scholar; Whatley, Scottish Society, 168–70; Brown, Callum G., “Protest in the Pews: Interpreting Presbyterianism and Society in Fracture during the Scottish Economic Revolution,” in Conflict and Stability in Scottish Society, 1700–1850, ed. Devine, T. M. (Edinburgh, 1990), 83–105 Google Scholar; Logue, Kenneth J., Popular Disturbances in Scotland, 1780–1815 (Edinburgh, 1979)Google Scholar, chap. 7.

96 Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution, 62–70, chap. 2; eadem, “Authority, Agency and the Reception of the National Covenant of 1638,” in Insular Christianity: Alternative Models of the Church in Britain and Ireland, c. 1570–c. 1700, ed. Armstrong, Robert and Ó, Tadhg hAnnracháin (Manchester, 2013), 88–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jamie McDougall, “The Reception of the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant” (Master's thesis, University of Glasgow, 2014).

97 Stewart, Rethinking the Scottish Revolution, 43–62; Houston, Social Change, chap. 5; Bowie, Scottish Public Opinion, 34–35, 42–43, 140–45; Bowie, “Newspapers.”

98 Raffe, Culture of Controversy, chap. 8.

99 Hawes, Claire, “The Urban Community in Fifteenth-Century Scotland: Language, Law and Political Practice,” Urban History (2016): 1–16 Google Scholar, at 5.