Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:32:06.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Propaganda: Charles I and the People in the 1620s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Thomas Cogswell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Rous did more than record the news that reached his isolated parish in Suffolk; he also recorded the local discussions of these reports. The latter practice was potentially dangerous. Two recent royal proclamations had expressly prohibited discussions of “affairs of state,” and, as Rous's diary reveals, these private talks could easily become extended critiques of royal policy. Perhaps for that reason Rous, the local parson, consistently sought to be a moderating influence: “I would alwaies speake the best of that our King and state did, and thinke the best too, till I had good groundes” to do otherwise. Unfortunately for Rous, he found it increasingly difficult to “speake the best” in the mid-1620s as Charles I dissolved parliament after parliament, collected taxes of dubious legality, and experimented with the established church; “our Kings proceedings have caused men's mindes to be incensed, to rove, and projecte.” Popular projections, moreover, led to the edge of “an insurrection”; in such an increasingly tense atmosphere, Rous was fearful that one misplaced word would fuel reports that “the whole state were revolting.”

His most severe trial came in 1627 when Charles I interrupted an otherwise disastrous war against Spain to invade France. The motive for the Ré expedition quite simply baffled Rous's parishioners. When the parson refuted the criticism of Mr. Paine, one of his parishioners, Paine simply “would not heare it by any meanes: but fell in generall to speake distastfully of the voyage and then of our warre with France.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 187 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Diary of John Rous, ed. Green, Mary Anne Everett (London, 1856), p. 12Google Scholar. See also Larkin, J. F. and Hughes, P. L., eds., Stuart Royal Proclamations (Oxford, 1973), 1: 495–96 (December 24, 1620), 519–21 (July 26, 1621)Google Scholar.

2 Rous, pp. 12, 19. See also Hirst, Derek, “The Place of Principle,” Past and Present, no. 92 (1981), p. 94Google Scholar.

3 Rous, pp. 11–14. For further details on events of this period, see Russell, Conrad, Parliaments and English Politics, 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Cust, Richard, The Forced Loan and English Politics, 1626–1628 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar.

4 Rous, p. 19.

5 Morrill, J. S., “William Davenport and the ‘Silent Majority’ of Early Stuart England,” Journal of the Chester Archeological Society 58 (1975): 118–21Google Scholar; and Russell, pp. 118–21.

6 Privy Council to the Archbishop of Canterbury, September 20, 1626, Acts of the Privy Council (APC), 41:282–85Google Scholar; and Bargraves, Isaac, A Sermon Preached … on 27 March (London, 1627), pp. 18–19Google Scholar.

7 Morrill, J. S., The Revolt of the Provinces (London, 1980), pp. 14–31Google Scholar; Zagorin, Perez, The Court and the Country (London, 1969), pp. 74–118Google Scholar; and Hibbard, Caroline, Charles I and the Popish Plot (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1981)Google Scholar.

8 Sharpe, Kevin, “Crown, Parliament and Locality: Government and Communication in Early Stuart England,” English Historical Review 100 (1986): 334, 322Google Scholar.

9 Cust, Richard, “News and Politics in Early Seventeenth-Century England,” Past and Present, no. 112 (1986), p. 87 and passimGoogle Scholar.

10 Set Russell, pp. 5–26, against Sommerville, J. P., Ideology and Politics (London, 1986)Google Scholar. On the importance of the concept of the “political” court and country, see Thompson, Christopher, “The Divided Leadership of the House of Commons in 1629,” in Faction and Parliament, ed. Sharpe, K. (Oxford, 1978), p. 277Google Scholar.

11 Sharpe, Kevin, Criticism and Compliment: The Politics of Literature in the England of Charles I (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 3–4Google Scholar.

12 Deloche, M., Autour de la plume de Cardinal de Richelieu (Paris, 1920)Google Scholar; Fagniez, G., “Fancan et Richelieu,” Revue historiques 107 (1911): 59–78, 310–22, and 108 (1912): 75–87Google Scholar; and Church, W. F., Richelieu and Reason of State (Princeton, N.J., 1970)Google Scholar. I am grateful to Jeremy Popkin for this point.

13 See, e.g., Secunda Secretissima Instructio, Gallo-britanno-batava ([Brussels], 1626)Google Scholar; Tertio Secretissima Instructio ([Brussels], 1627)Google Scholar; Eglisham, George, Prodromus Vindictae ([Brussels], 1626)Google Scholar; and Ralph Starkey to Sir John Scudamore, May 1627, Public Record Office (PRO), C115/N4/8578. On the translation and circulation of these tracts, see British Library (BL) Harleian MS 390, fols. 201–3; Cambridge University Library, MS Gg.iv.13, pp. 137–45; and Vere-Cavendish Papers, BL Loan MS 29/235, fols. 73–83v.

14 Elton, G. R., Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell (Cambridge, 1972), p. 171Google Scholar.

15 Countess of Buckingham to the duke of Buckingham, October 1, [1627], Warwick, Warwick County Record Office (RO), Feilding of Newnham Paddox MSS, CR 2017, Cl/22; and earl of Middlesex to [duke of Buckingham], [Summer 1627], Maidstone, Kent Archive Office, Cranfield Papers U269/2, CP 125. On the Ré expedition itself, see Adams, Simon, “The Road to La Rochelle,” Proceedings of the Huguenot Society 22 (1975): 414–29Google Scholar; and Cogswell, Thomas, “Prelude to Re: The Anglo-French Struggle for La Rochelle, 1624–1627,” History 71 (1986): 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Lords Journals, 3:282–83Google Scholar. See also Cogswell, Thomas, The Blessed Revolution: English Politics and the Coming of War, 1621–1624 (Cambridge, 1989), chap. 5Google Scholar.

17 On the domestic crisis, see Cogswell, Thomas, “England and the Spanish Match,” in Conflict in Early Stuart England, ed. Cust, R. P. and Hughes, A. (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

18 Harris, Robert, Gods Goodness and Mercy (London, 1622), p. 16Google Scholar, and Peter's Enlargement (London, 1624), p. 22Google Scholar. For examples of antiwar rhetoric from the period, see Wall, John, Alea Searphicae: the Seraphins Wing (London, 1627), p. 139Google Scholar; Purchas, Samuel, The Kings Towre (London, 1622), pp. 101–2Google Scholar; and Adams, Thomas, Eirenopolis (London, 1622), pp. 171–72Google Scholar.

19 Tisdale, Robert, Pax Vobis (London, 1623), p. 8Google Scholar; and T. Wentworth to Calvert, G., Summer 1624, The Earl of Strafford's Letters and Dispatches (London, 1739), 1:24Google Scholar. For examples of the pointed homilies on obedience, see Tisdale; SirStradling, John, Beati Pacifici (London, 1623)Google Scholar; and SirHayward, John, Christs Prayer on the Crosse (London, 1623)Google Scholar.

20 Lockyer, Roger, Buckingham: The Life and Political Career of George Villiers, First Duke of Buckingham, 1592–1628 (London, 1981), p. 316Google Scholar.

21 SirCole, Edward, Spring Diary, March 20, 1624, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., Houghton Library, English MS 980, p. 144Google Scholar. I am grateful to the kindness of Dr. Mark Kennedy for placing the typescript of the Yale Center at my disposal.

22 Lords Journal, 3:492Google Scholar. See, e.g., Charles's intervention in the Lords' debates in 1621: Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords (London, 1929), pp. 7, 10–11, 16, 19, 20, 27, 33, 34, 37–38, 42, 44–45, 51–52Google Scholar.

23 Alnwick Castle MS, vol. 12, fols. 136–51 (the Relation) and 152–53 (précis); “The Effect of the Relation,” BL Lansdowne MS 498, fols. 35–35v; and Chester City RO, [Earwaker MSS], CR 63/2/19, fols. 37–38.

24 John Beaulieu to William Trumbull, March 5, 1624, Reading, Berkshire RO, Trumbull MSS, 7/151. See also Ruigh, Robert, The Parliament of 1624 (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), pp. 162–65Google Scholar.

25 Commons Journal, pp. 725–27; and Sir Thomas Wentworth's speech at Rotherham, April 23, 1621, in Wentworth Papers, ed. Cooper, J. P. (London, 1973), p. 153Google Scholar.

26 A Forme of Prayer Necessary to be used in these dangerous times of Warre and Pestilence (London, 1626)Google Scholar.

27 [Charles] to the Archbishop of Canterbury, September 20, 1626, APC, 41: 282–85.

28 Sibthorpe, Robert, Apostolike Obedience (London, 1627), p. 19Google Scholar; and Mainwaring, Roger, Religion and Allegiance (London, 1627), p. 44Google Scholar.

29 Du Val, Michael, Rosa Hispani-Anglica (London, [1623]), pp. 51–52Google Scholar. See also Garrard, Edmund, The Countrie Gentleman Moderator (London, 1624)Google Scholar; and Stradling (n. 19 above).

30 Marcelline, George, Epithalamium Gallo-Britannicum (London, 1625), introductionGoogle Scholar. See also Crosse, William, The Dutch Survey (London, 1625), pp. [29]–36Google Scholar.

31 A Declaration of the True Causes which moved his Maiestie to assemble and after inforced Him to dissolve the two last Meetings in Parliament (London, 1626), pp. 13, 24, 27–28Google Scholar. See also His Maiesties Declaration, touching his proceeding in the late assemblie (London, 1622)Google Scholar; His Maiesties dclaration [sic] … of the causes which moved him to dissolve the last parliament (London, 1629)Google Scholar; and Richard Cust's forthcoming article on these tracts.

32 Jansson, M. and Bidwell, W., eds., Proceedings in Parliament 1625 (New Haven, Conn., 1987), p. 461Google Scholar; Slaughter, T., ed., Ideology and Politics on the Eve of the Restoration: Newcastle's Advice to Charles II (Philadelphia, 1984), p. 56Google Scholar.

33 “A Relation concerning the plaister and potion given to King James,” [1626], Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, D.C., V.a.402, fols. 68v–70. See also Eglisham, , Prodromus Vindictae (n. 13 above), and the English translation, Forerunner of Revenge (London, 1642)Google Scholar.

34 Earle, John, Microcosmographie (London, 1628)Google Scholar, no. 27, “The Pot-Poet.”

35 “Hope doe mee no harme,” Yale University, Beinecke Library, New Haven, Conn., Osborn b197, pp. 110–11Google Scholar; and “On the Princes goeing to Spain,” Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, D.C., V.a.162, fol. 48v. For James's contributions, see The Poems of James VI, ed. Craigie, J. (Edinburgh, 1958)Google Scholar.

36 Jonson, Ben, Poems, ed. Donaldson, Ian (Oxford, 1975), pp. 48–49Google Scholar. On the overtly political nature of his masques, see Pearl, Sara, “Sounding to Present Occasions: Jonson's Masques of 1620–25,” in The Court Masque (Manchester, 1984), pp. 60–77Google Scholar.

37 Butler, Martin, Theatre and Crisis (Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar; Heinemenn, Margot, Puritanism and Theatre: Thomas Middleton and Opposition Drama (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar; and Limon, Jerzy, Dangerous Matter (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar.

38 Middleton, Thomas, A Game at Chess (London, 1966)Google Scholar; and John Woolley to William Trumbull, August 20, 1624, Reading, Berkshire RO, Trumbull MSS, 48/136. See also Cogswell, T., “Thomas Middleton and the Court, 1624: A Game at Chess in Context, “ Huntington Library Quarterly 47 (1984), pp. 273–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 “The Duke Returned Againe,” in Poems and Songs Relating to George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, ed. Fairholt, F. W. (London, 1850), p. 19Google Scholar.

40 Valentine, Henry, Noahs Dove (London, 1627), pp. 6–7Google Scholar; and [Charles] to Archbishop Abbot, September 20, 1626, APC, 41: 284.

41 Hampton, William, A Proclamation of Warre (London, 1627), pp. 29 and 31Google Scholar.

42 Anonymous newsletter, August 9, 1628, BL Additional (Add.) MS 383, fol. 65. For another potentially embarrassing play of 1627, see also Massinger, Philip, The Great Duke of Florence, in The Plays and Poems of Philip Massinger, ed. Edwards, P. and Gibson, Colin (Oxford, 1976), 3:95–180Google Scholar.

43 Martyn, William, The Historie and Lives of the Kings of England (London, 1628)Google Scholar; and Fairholt, ed., pp. 13–14.

44 Drayton, Michael, The Battaile of Agincourt (London, 1627Google Scholar; reprint, Oxford, 1932), pp. 4 and 9–72. I am grateful to Dr. Les Timms for several discussions of this work; I will develop my views on Drayton at greater length elsewhere.

45 Joseph Mead to Sir Martin Stuteville, October 20, 1627, BL Harleian MS 390, fol. 305.

46 A Continued Journall of All the Proceedings, August 17, [1627] (London, 1627), pp. 8, 15Google Scholar.

47 See, e.g., Col. Fleetwood, William, “An Unhappy View,” Somers Tracts (London, 1811), 5:398–404Google Scholar; and “A Journall of the Voyage,” BL Add. MS 26,051, fols. 1–23.

48 Rous (n. 1 above), p. 11.

49 Nicholas Fortescue to Sir William Pitt, August 3, 1627, BL Add. MS 29,974, fol. 101; and Lord Savage to the earl of Middlesex, August 25, 1627, Maidstone, Kent Archive Office, U269/2, CP 99.

50 A Continued Journall, October 2, [1627] (London, 1627), p. 6Google Scholar; and Richard Wilbraham to Sir Peter Legh, February 13, 1627, Manchester, John Rylands Library, Legh of Lyme MSS.

51 A Continued Journall, November 2, [1627] (London, 1627), p. 9Google Scholar.

52 A Manifestation or Remonstrances of the … Duke of Buckingham (La Rochelle, 1627), pp. 2 and 8Google Scholar. On the mechanics of publishing this tract, see duke of Buckingham to Lord Conway, July 28, 1627, PRO, State Papers (SP) 16/72/31.

53 Charles I to duke of Buckingham, August 13, 1627, BL Harleian 6988, fol. 34; Arber, E., ed., Transcript of the Register of the Company of Stationers (London, 1877), 4:179Google Scholar; and Nicholas Fortescue to Sir William Pitt, August 31, 1627, BL Add. MS 29,974, fol. 112.

54 Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, July 23, 1627, PRO, SP 16/71/85.

55 Lord Conway to Sir John Coke, July 27, 1627, [Melbourne Hall MSS, old bundle no. 30], BL Add. MS 64,892, fol. 44. I am grateful to Michael Young for assistance in tracking down this letter.

56 Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, July 28, 1627, PRO, SP 16/72/32–33.

57 “The Manifest,” [July 1627], PRO, SP 78/81/182–189v.

58 Ibid., fol. 183v.

59 Ibid., fol. 184.

60 Ibid., fol. 184v.

61 Ibid., fol. 185v.

62 Ibid., fol. 186.

63 Ibid., fol. 187v–188.

64 Sharpe, , “Crown, Parliament and Locality” (n. 8 above), p. 340Google Scholar.

65 Rohan, Duc de, The Apologie of the Reformed Churches (London, 1628), pp. 51, 39, 5–9, and 44–45Google Scholar.

66 “The Manifest,” fol. 182.

67 Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, July 31, 1627, PRO, SP 16/72/48.

68 Present were Lord Keeper Coventry, Lord President Manchester, Lord Treasurer Ley, Chancellor of the Exchequer Weston, Master of the Court of Wards Naunton, Master of the Rolls Caesar, Secretary Coke, and the earls of Carlisle, Totnes, Bridgwater, Dorset. The one exception was the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Sir Humphrey May; APC, 2: 454–69; and Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, July 31, 1627, PRO, SP 16/72/48.

69 Lord Conway to Sir John Coke, July 27, 1627, BL Add. MS 64,892, fol. 44; and Conway's minute of this letter, Calendar of State Papers Domestic, Charles I (CSPD), II, p. 273Google Scholar.

70 Cust, Richard, The Forced Loan (n. 3 above), pp. 13–90Google Scholar, and “Charles I, the Privy Council, and the Forced Loan,” Journal of British Studies 24 (1985): 208–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Sir Edward Greville to earl of Middlesex, January 11, 1627, Maidstone, Kent Archive Office, U269/2, E28; Young, Michael B., Servility and Service: The Life and Work of Sir John Coke (London, 1986), pp. 171–85 and 189Google Scholar, and “The Origins of the Petition of Right Further Reconsidered,” Historical Journal 27 (1984): 449–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 See, e.g., Amerigo Salvetti to the duke of Florence, August 4, 1627, Historical Manuscripts Commission, Skrine [11th Report, part 1], p. 126Google Scholar. I am grateful to Richard Cust for stressing the importance of this point.

73 APC, 2: 437, 440; and Cust, The Forced Loan, pp. 44–45, 55.

74 Joseph Mede to Sir Martin Stuteville, October 28, 1626, BL Harleian MS 390, fol. 148; Fletcher, Anthony, A County Community in Peace and War: Sussex, 1600–1660 (London, 1975), p. 196Google Scholar; and Cust, , The Forced Loan, pp. 25, 29, 45, 55–56, 58–59Google Scholar. On Dorset's popular standing, see Edward Moundsford to Framlingham Gawdy, April 16, 1627, BL Egerton MS 2715, fol. 327; and Francis Clyve to Sir John Newdegate, June 16, 1626, Warwick County RO, Newdegate of Arbury MSS, CR 126/b108, fol. lv.

75 Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, July 31, 1627, PRO, SP 16/72/48. For another assessment of Carlisle's role in this period, see Schreiber, Roy E., The First Carlisle: Sir James Hay, First Earl of Carlisle as Courtier, Diplomat and Entrepreneur, 1580–1636 (Philadelphia, 1984), pp. 100–105Google Scholar.

76 Sir Isaac Wake to Lord Conway, May 25, July 16, and October 1, 1627, PRO, SP [Venice] 99/28/86, 112, and 143.

77 Dudley Carleton the younger to Lord Conway, May 19, 1627, PRO, SP [Holland] 84/133/146.

78 Sir John Coke to Lord Conway, September 6, 1627, PRO, SP [Denmark] 75/8/276; and Lord Conway to SirCoke, John, September 8, 1627, CSPD, 1627–29, p. 337Google Scholar.

79 Sir Isaac Wake to Lord Conway, October 5, 1627, PRO, SP [Venice] 99/28/166; and Sir Isaac Wake to Sir Thomas Roe, June 9, 1627, Trinity College, Dublin, MS 708, vol. 2, fol. 264. For a sampling of the apologias, see [Coke's] “Manifest for the Ambassador of Denmarck,” PRO, SP 75/8/463; Sir Isaac Wake to Lord Conway, August 17, 1627, PRO, SP 99/28/130–133v; Sir John Coke to Sir Robert Anstruther, May 22, 1627, PRO, SP 75/8/107–110; and Sir Isaac Wake to Sir Thomas Roe, [June 9, 1627], Trinity College, Dublin, MSS 708, vol. 2, fols. 301–302v.

80 Rous (n. 1 above), p. 19.

81 Lord Conway to earl of Carlisle, June 5, 1626, [draft], PRO, SP 78/79/64, and [original] BL Egerton MS 2597, fol. 13.

82 “Duke of Buckingham,” 1634, BL Harleian MS 7056, fol. 34.

83 Proclamation (June 14, 1626), in Stuart Royal Proclamations (n. 1 above), 2:90–93Google Scholar; “Instructions for the Bishops, 1633,” in The Stuart Constitution, ed. Kenyon, J. P., 2d ed. (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 142–43Google Scholar. See also Sharpe, Kevin, “The Personal Rule of Charles I,” in Before the Civil War, ed. Tomlinson, Howard (London, 1983), pp. 62–63Google Scholar; and Cope, Esther, Politics without Parliament (London, 1987), pp. 60–66Google Scholar.

84 Frank, J., The Beginnings of the English Newspaper, 1620–1660 (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), pp. 14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomas, P. W., “Two Cultures? Court and Country under Charles I,” in The Origins of the English Civil War, ed. Russell, Conrad (London, 1973)Google Scholar; and Smuts, Malcolm, Court Culture and the Origins of a Royalist Tradition (Philadelphia, 1987)Google Scholar.

85 Sharpe, , Criticism and Compliment (n. 11 above), pp. 99, 264, 290Google Scholar.

86 Morrill, John, “Introduction,” in Reactions to the English Civil War, ed. Morrill, John (London, 1982), p. 4Google Scholar. See also Caroline Hibbard's description of Charles as “painfully obsessive” in the 1630s (n. 7 above), p. 110.

87 Collinson, Patrick, “Puritans, Men of Business and Elizabethan Parliaments,” in Parliamentary History 7 (1988): 101Google Scholar.