Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:34:36.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Wine in Old Bottles: Recent Contributions to British Foreign Policy and European International Politics, 1789–1848

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Paul W. Schroeder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This review article has a conventional purpose, namely, to assess the contributions made by thirteen recent books, most by British historians, to the history of British foreign policy and the European states system during the revolutionary, Napoleonic, and post-Napoleonic eras. There is, however, a problem. None of the books is conventional diplomatic history. Almost half relate only indirectly to foreign policy, while for the remainder foreign policy constitutes only part of their subject matter. The review therefore consciously runs two risks: that of judging the books by inappropriate standards and that of drawing conclusions about current historiography in this field and period from an inappropriate sample. The reader will have to judge whether the results justify the procedure.

Geoffrey Best's War and Society in Revolutionary Europe illustrates the problem. Best clearly succeeds in his goal of going beyond the study of military organizations to the study of war itself as a “unique human interest and activity.” The book is far-ranging, delightfully written, based on wide reading, and packed with insights. It also contributes substantially to the history of international politics, mainly by demonstrating how powerful an impact armies and combat had. Yet from the political historian's standpoint there is ground for some frustration as well as for pleasure. Best's descriptions of how armies developed from the Old Regime into the nineteenth century and his analyses of the impact of war in 1792–1815 are excellent for France and Britain and adequate for Prussia and Spain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 1: England's Foreign Relations , January 1987 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Best, Geoffrey, War and Society in Revolutionary Europe, 1770–1870 (New York, 1982), p. 9Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., von Aretin, K. O., ed., Der aufgeklärte Absolutismus (Cologne, 1974)Google Scholar.

3 For a different view of Prussia in the War of Liberation, see Ibbeken, Rudolf, Preussen, 1807–1813 (Cologne, 1970)Google Scholar.

4 Blanning, T. C. W., The French Revolution in Germany: Occupation and Resistance in the Rhineland, 1792–1802 (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar. Blanning's important new work, The Origins of the French Revolutionary Wars (London, 1986)Google Scholar, unfortunately appeared too late to be considered in this essay.

5 Elliott, Marianne, Partners in Revolution: The United Irishmen and France (New Haven, Conn., 1982)Google Scholar.

6 Church, Clive H., Europe in 1830: Revolution and Political Change (Boston, 1983)Google Scholar.

7 Boogman, J. C., Nederland en de Duitse Bond, 1815–1851, 2 vols. (Groningen, 1955)Google Scholar; Baack, Lawrence J., Christian Bernstorff and Prussia, 1818–1832: Diplomacy and Reform Conservatism (New Brunswick, N.J., 1980)Google Scholar; Billinger, Robert D. Jr., “The War Scare of 1831 and Prussian-South German Plans for the End of Austrian Dominance in Germany,” Central European History 9, no. 3 (1976); 203–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Reinerman, Alan, Austria and the Papacy in the Age of Metternich, vol. 1, Between Conflict and Cooperation, 1809–1830 (Forest Grove, Oreg., 1979)Google Scholar, and “The Concert Baffled: The Roman Conference of 1831 and the Reforms of the Papal State,” International History Review 5, no. 1 (1983): 20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nada, Narciso, L'Austria e la questione romana dalla rivoluzione di luglio alia fine della conferenzia diplomatica romana (agosto 1830–luglio 1831) (Turin, 1953)Google Scholar.

9 Liss, Peggy K., Atlantic Empires: The Network of Trade and Revolution, 1713–1826 (Baltimore, 1983)Google Scholar.

10 Half of the November 1984 issue of the International History Review (6, no. 4:507–69)Google Scholar is devoted to a discussion of it.

11 For example, Liss's account of the origins of the Spanish American revolutions seems to need some modification in the light of Anna's, Timothy E.Spain and the Loss of America (Lincoln, Nebr., 1983)Google Scholar.

12 Jones, Colin, ed., Britain and Revolutionary France: Conflict, Subversion, and Propaganda (Exeter, 1983)Google Scholar.

13 Duffy, Michael, “British Policy in the War against Revolutionary France,” in Jones, , ed., pp. 11–26Google Scholar; Geggus, David, “The Anglo-French Conflict in the Caribbean in the 1790s,” in Jones, , ed., pp. 27–39Google Scholar.

14 Jones, Raymond A., The British Diplomatic Service, 1815–1914 (Gerrards Cross, 1983)Google Scholar, and The Nineteenth-Century Foreign Office (London, 1971)Google Scholar.

15 For example, Whitcomb, Edward A., Napoleon's Diplomatic Service (Durham, N.C., 1983)Google Scholar; Roider, Karl A. Jr., “The Oriental Academy in the Theresienzeit,” Topic 34 (Fall 1980): 19–28Google Scholar; and Altbauer, Dan, “The Diplomats of Peter the Great,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 28, no. 1 (1980): 1–16Google Scholar.

16 Ehrman, John, The Younger Pitt, vol. 2, The Reluctant Transition (Stanford, Calif., 1983)Google Scholar.

17 Gash, Norman, Lord Liverpool: The Life and Political Career of Robert Jenkinson, Second Earl of Liverpool, 1770–1828 (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

18 Jupp, Peter, Lord Grenville, 1759–1834 (Oxford, 1985)Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., pp. 341, 360.

20 Ibid., p. 237.

21 Chamberlain, Muriel E., Lord Aberdeen: A Political Biography (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

22 Guyot, Raymond, La première Entente Cordiale (Paris, 1926)Google Scholar; Johnson, Douglas, Guizot: Aspects of French History, 1787–1874 (London, 1963)Google Scholar; Bullen, Roger, Palmerston, Guizot and the Collapse of the Entente Cordiale (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Gash, Norman, Sir Robert Peel, 2d ed. (London, 1976)Google Scholar.

23 See, e.g., Kraehe, E. E., Metternich's German Policy, vol. 1, The Contest with Napoleon, 1799–1814 (Princeton, N.J., 1963)Google Scholar.

24 Bourne, Kenneth, Palmerston: The Early Years, 1784–1841 (New York, 1982)Google Scholar.

25 Ibid., p. xiii.

26 Ibid., p. 577.

27 Ibid., pp. 346–48.

28 de Lannoy, Fleury, Histoire diplomatique de l'indépendance Belge (Brussels, 1930)Google Scholar; Martens, F. F., ed., Recueil des traités el conventions, conclus par la Russie avec les puissances étrangères, 14 vols. (St. Petersburg, 1874–1905)Google Scholar.

29 Colenbrander, H. T., Gedenkstukken der algemeene Geschiedenis van Nederland, 1795–1840, 22 vols. (The Hague, 1905–1922)Google Scholar; see also Baack (n. 7 above); and von Arneth, Alfred, Johann Freiherr von Wessenberg, 2 vols. (Leipzig and Vienna, 1898)Google Scholar.

30 Bourne, p. 374.

31 Ibid., p. 381.

32 Ibid., p. 384.

33 Ibid.

34 See esp. ibid., pp. 624–31.

35 Mackesy, Piers, War without Victory: The Downfall of Pitt, 1799–1802 (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar, and Statesmen at War: The Strategy of Overthrow, 1798–1799 (London, 1974)Google Scholar.

36 Mackesy, , War without Victory, pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., pp. 224–30.

38 A possible exception is Edward Ingram; see his The Beginning of the Great Game in Asia, 1828–1834 (New York, 1979)Google Scholar, and Commitment to Empire: Prophecies of the Great Game in Asia, 1797–1800 (New York, 1981)Google Scholar, in addition to numerous articles. For all his emphasis on the great game in Asia and his argument that the British Empire was a land power with its base in India, however, Ingram's basic concept of the European system itself and of Britain's role in it may not really diverge sharply from the standard one.

39 Gall, Lothar, Bismarck der weisse Revolutionär (Frankfurt, 1980)Google Scholar.

40 For a recent discussion of the controversy over historicism and its effect on German national historiography, see Hardtwig, Wolfgang, “Von Preussens Aufgabe in Deutschland zu Deutschlands Aufgabe in der Welt,“ Historische Zeitschrift 231, no. 2 (1980): 265–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Christie, Ian R., Wars and Revolutions: Britain, 1760–1815 (London, 1982), pp. 268–69Google Scholar.