Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:46:59.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No Agonizing Reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Extract

Every man, according to Bacon, is a debtor to his profession. Although the historian pays his debt by devotion to truth, unless he has thought about truth as well as worshipped it he may — to adapt a figure from Bishop Berkeley — become a thriving earthworm but he will surely make a sorry historian. So vermiculate a metaphor need not prompt every disciple of Clio to compose a penetrating Idea of History, but it may properly incite him to give life to his facts by evoking the universal while documenting the specific, by preferring insights to formulas, and by recalling that historiographical clichés and historical facts — modern saws and ancient instances — go ill together. If the historian of the ancient world benefits from built-in ignorance, the historian of the modern world suffers from built-in knowledge, not merely because of the mountain of fact but because this very mountain permits him to let a tissue of fact do duty for history. Absence of metaphysics is too high a price for erudition.

For some years historians have been revolting against easy generalizations and after-mindedness. Their revolt does not find expression in systems, which carry farthest the very practices exciting revolt, but in analysis of assumptions. The critical historian explores his topic in its own terms, not in terms of later dogmas; he reconstructs ideas and institutions in their own context, not as the shape of things to come; he considers his characters in their own environment, not as ancestors; he replaces anonymous society and impersonal forces with living men and women.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan [Everyman, ed.] (London, n.d.), Bk. I, ch. iv, p. 13 .Google Scholar

2. Browne, Thomas, The Works of Sir Thomas Browne, ed. Sayle, Charles (Edinburgh, 1912), I, 93 .Google Scholar

3. Leclercq, Jean, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God: a Study of Culture, tr. Misrahi, Catherine [Mentor Omega Books] (New York, 1962), p. viii .Google Scholar Here again Sir Thomas Browne is the historian's ally: “… and surely there goes a great deal of conscience to the compiling of an history.” Browne, , Works of Sir Thomas Browne, I, 90. Google Scholar

4. Hexter, J. H., Reappraisals in History (Evanston, Ill. and Aberdeen, 1961).Google Scholar

5. Spelman, Henry, The English Works of Sir Henry Spelman, Kt. Published in His Life-time; Together with His Posthumous Works, Relating to the Laws and Customs of England (London, 1723)Google Scholar, Pt. 2, “Reliquiae Spelmannianae,” p. 57.

6. Quoted in Murray, John, “John Hales on History,” Huntington Library Quarterly, XIX (1956), p. 239 .Google Scholar

7. Selden, John, Historie of Tithes (London, 1618), p. iv .Google Scholar The entire preface is sagacious.

8. Browne, , Works of Sir Thomas Browne, III, 471; Google Scholar I, 153, 99.

9. Hobbes, , Leviathan, Bk. I, ch. vii, p. 32 .Google Scholar

10. For an appreciation of part of this penetration one may profitably consult Rule, John C., Bibliography of the Works in the Philosophy of History, 1945-1957 ('S-Gravenhage, 1961).Google Scholar Rule promises supplementary bibliographies in History and Theory. Two recent articles of value are those of Joynt, Carey B. and Rescher, Nicholas, “On Explanation in History,” Mind, LXVIII (1959), 383–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Mandelbaum, Maurice, “Historical Explanation: the Problem of ‘Covering Laws’,” History and Theory, I (1961), 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Hobbes, , Leviathan, Bk. I, ch. v, p. 18 .Google Scholar

12. Danto, A. C., “Mere Chronicle and History Proper,” Jour. of Phil., L (1953), 174 .Google Scholar This whole article (pp. 173-82), as well as the same author's “On Historical Questioning,” ibid., LI (1954), 89-99, is extremely sympathetic to the historian.

13. For a summary of the correspondence theory of truth and its relevance to history, see Walsh, W. H., Philosophy of History [Harper Torchbooks] (New York, 1960), pp. 7385 .Google Scholar

14. Wedgwood, C. V., The King's Peace, 1637-1641 (London, 1955), p. 16 .Google Scholar

15. Leclercq, , The Love of Learning p. viii .Google Scholar

16. Maurice Powicke, “Supplement to ‘Notes on Some of the Medieval Manuscripts and Manuscript Collections in the Huntington Library’.” [unpublished essay, c. 1936; copy in the writer's possession.]

17. Eliot, T. S., “Gerontion,” The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909-1950 (New York, 1962), p. 22 .Google Scholar

18. The pages immediately following owe their inspiration to a lecture, “Explanation,” delivered by Max Black of Cornell University at the University of Wisconsin on May 9, 1962. His use of “preamble” may be equated with an historical generalization, and that is its meaning here.

19. At least one listener to Pollard's lectures on Tudor England at Barnard College, nearly forty years ago, still remembers that Pollard enjoyed mystifying students with two contrary apothegms, “The Reformation was the greatest child of the national state” and “The national state was the greatest child of the Reformation,” each of which seemed equally true in Pollard's view. Perhaps they are equally true, but not in the sense he assumed. In any case no one had any doubt that in Pollard's mind nationality and Reformation were near allied, if not identical.

20. Balzac's perceptive comment is à propos. “History, telling over and over again the reasons of the rise and fall of all that has been in the world in the past, might be a warning to man that there is a moment when the active play of all his faculties must cease; but neither conquerors … nor writers heed the wholesale admonition …. He [César] did not know the reason of the downfalls of which history is full; nay, neither kings nor peoples have made any effort to engrave in imperishable characters the causes of the catastrophes of which the history of royal and of commercial houses affords such conspicuous examples …. When the effect produced is no longer in direct relation with nor in exact proportion to the cause, disorganization sets in.” de Balzac, Honoré, The Rise and Fall of César Birotteau [Everyman, ed.] (New York, 1912), pp. 5657 .Google Scholar

21. Tolstoy, Leo, War and Peace [Everyman, ed.] (London, 1911), II, Bk. IX, ch. lx, p. 207 .Google Scholar

22. Hobbes, , Leviathan, Bk. I, ch. viii, p. 34 .Google Scholar

23. Butler, Samuel, The Note-Books of Samuel Butler (London, 1926), p. 301 .Google Scholar

24. Hexter, , Reappraisals in History, pp. 3940 .Google Scholar

25. Sorel, Georges, Matériaux d'une théorie du prolétariat (Paris, 1919), p. 7 .Google Scholar Quoted in Carr, E. H., What is History? (New York, 1961), p. 77 .Google Scholar