Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:24:14.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mad Lord George and Madame La Motte: Riot and Sexuality in the Genesis of Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Iain McCalman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout the first year of the French Revolution The Times newspaper could not decide who was the madder, Lord George Gordon or Edmund Burke. The former as a violent incendiary and convicted libeler had fortunately been safely locked in Newgate the previous year, but Burke was still loose. The newspaper had no doubt that he belonged in Bedlam; there could be no other explanation for his obsessive campaign to impeach Warren Hastings long after everyone else had lost interest in the case. A stream of reports suggested variously that he had checked himself into a lunatic asylum, been forcibly confined in a straitjacket, or become temporarily deranged through physical and mental exhaustion. On first reading The Reflections on the Revolution in France published in November the following year, many of his friends, as well as his foes, felt forced to agree.

Even those who found things to like in the book were puzzled that Burke should have produced such a work. In the first place, how did one explain what Thomas Jefferson called “the revolution of Mr. Burke,” an abrupt political tack from advocating parliamentary reform, religious toleration, and American liberty to denouncing France's fledgling efforts at liberty. Why had he turned so violently against the Dissenters and radicals with whom he had often cooperated in the past? Why did he believe that the apparently innocuous revolution in France was unlike anything that had gone before? And even when events in that country began to move more in line with his predictions, there remained something embarrassing about the tone of the book.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 343 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Times (January 24, February 11, 24, March 2, April 3, June 1, September 16, October 6, 1789).

2 Mitchell, L. G., ed., introduction to The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 8, The French Revolution, 1790–4 (Oxford, 1989), p. 21Google Scholar.

3 For comments on his madness from William Windham, Dr. Milner, and others, see Kelly, Gary, “Revolution, Crime and Madness: Edmund Burke and the Defense of the Gentry,” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1984): 25–26Google Scholar; Mitchell, , ed., Writings and Speeches, p. 25Google Scholar; Lock, F. P., Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (London, 1985), p. 134Google Scholar.

4 Mitchell, , ed., Writings and Speeches, pp. 28–33Google Scholar.

5 Kramnick, Isaac, The Rage of Edmund Burke: Portrait of an Ambivalent Conservative (New York, 1977), pp. 180–85Google Scholar; for cogent criticisms of this analysis, see Lock, , Burke's Reflections, pp. 197–98Google Scholar.

6 Kelly, , “Revolution, Crime and Madness,” pp. 25–28Google Scholar.

7 O'Brien, Conor Cruise, The Great Melody: A Thematic Biography and Commented Anthology of Edmund Burke (London: Sinclair Stevenson, 1993), p. 450Google Scholar.

8 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969), pp. 179–80Google Scholar.

9 Quoted in Monk, Iain Hampsher, “Review,” History of Political Thought 12 (Spring 1991): 179–83Google Scholar.

10 History of Lord George Gordon … (Edinburgh, 1780), p. 5Google Scholar. For this early part of Gordon's political career, see also Watson, Robert, The Life of Lord George Gordon: with a philosophical review of his political conduct (London: H. D. Symonds, 1795), pp. 18, 86, 119Google Scholar; Vincent, William [Holcroft, William], “Anecdotes of the Life of Lord Gordon,” A Plain and Succint Narrative of the late Riots and Disturbance in the Cities of London and Westminster, and Borough of Southwark (London, 1780), p. 59Google Scholar; Irving, J., The Book of Scotsmen (1881), in British Biographical Archive, ed. Sieveking, Paul (London and New York: K. G. Saur, 1984)Google Scholar, microfiche.

11 Watson, p. 8; see also Black, Eugene Charlton, The Association: British Extraparliamentary Political Organization, 1769–1793 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963), p. 148Google Scholar.

12 Sellers, Charles Coleman, Patience Wright: American Artist and Spy in George III's London (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1976), pp. 86–87, 90, 113Google Scholar.

13 Sellers, , Wright, pp. 126–27Google Scholar; Erdman, David, Blake: Prophet against Empire (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1954), pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

14 O'Brien (n. 7 above), pp. 92–93.

15 Donovan, Robert Kent, “The Military Origins of the Catholic Relief Programme of 1778,” Historical Journal 28 (1985): 82Google Scholar.

16 de Castro, J. Paul, The Gordon Riots (London, 1926), pp. 19–20Google Scholar.

17 Donovan, , “Military Origins,” pp. 31–32Google Scholar; History of Lord George Gordon, pp. 9–10, 25–28; “Speech to the House of Commons, 1778” and “Appendix,” in Vincent, Narrative.

18 Public Record Office (PRO), Privy Council Reports (PCR), 1/3127, esp. examinations and correspondence of Ralph Bowie and Rev. David Grant; PRO, Treasury Solicitor's (TS) papers, 11/388/1212, Lord George Gordon's Correspondence—Summary; see also Watson, pp. 13–17; Black, , Association, pp. 149–53Google Scholar.

19 Donovan, Robert Kent, No Popery and Radicalism: Opposition to Roman Catholic Relief in Scotland, 1778–1782 (New York and London: Garland, 1987)Google Scholar, passim.

20 History of Lord George Gordon (n. 10 above), pp. 4–5; Watson (n. 10 above), pp. 6, 11.

21 Watson, p. 6.

22 British Library, Add. MS 42129, “Lord George Gordon's Narrative,” fol. 34; Watson, pp. 2–4.

23 Haydon, Colin, “The Gordon Riots in the English Provinces (1780),” Historical Research 63 (October 1990): 354–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 For the best analysis of this nascent cultural revolution, see Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), esp. pp. 1–68Google Scholar; Gerald Newman has perceptively called Gordon's Protestant Association “a popular counterforce against what was felt to be the un-English conduct of the upper classes in Parliament,” Newman, Gerald, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830 (New York: St. Martins, 1987), p. 209Google Scholar.

25 Rogers, Nicholas, “The Gordon Riots Revisited,” Historical Papers (Canada) (1988): 32–33Google Scholar.

26 See, for example, the handbills collected in PRO, PC/3127, and caricatures in George, Dorothy, British Museum Catalogue of Political and Personal Satires (London, 1938), vol. 5, nos. 5534, 5643, 5671–72, 5703, pp. 319, 381, 401–2, 420Google Scholar.

27 Barnard, James, quoted in Rogers, , “Gordon Riots Revisited,” p. 21Google Scholar; for other examples of Dissenting and Methodist involvement, see Dorothy George, 5:406–7, 410–11, 506–7.

28 Handbill from John Wesley, January 21, 1780, PRO, PC/3127; letter to Public Advertiser, January 27, 1780, quoted in Black (n. 11 above), pp. 157–58; Haydon, , “Gordon Riots in the English Provinces,” p. 355Google Scholar.

29 Priestley, Joseph, A Free Address to those who have petitioned for the repeal of the late Act of Parliament in favour of Roman Catholics (Birmingham, 1780), pp. 3, 6, 11, 21Google Scholar.

30 See, e.g., George, vol. 5, nos. 5633, 5644; PRO, TS 11/388/1212, Examination of Fisher, June 10, 1780, fols. 4–5.

31 PRO, TS 11/389/1214, Petition of Protestant Subjects of the Cities of London, Westminster, Southwark, fol. 3; de Castro (n. 16 above), pp. 27, 130, 232; Sainsbury, John, Disaffected Patriots: London Supporters of Revolutionary America, 1769–82 (Kingston, Ontario, and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1987), pp. 157–58Google Scholar.

32 O'Brien (n. 7 above), pp. 235–36, 241; Donovan, , “Military Origins” (n. 15 above), p. 87Google Scholar; Watson (n. 10 above), pp. 35–36.

33 Burke, , Reflections (n. 8 above), pp. 154–56Google Scholar.

34 Burke, Edmund, The Works of the Rt. Honorable Edmund Burke (London: Rivington, 1815), 4:248–49Google Scholar.

35 Woods, John A., Correspondence of Edmund Burke, vol. 4, 1778–82 (Cambridge, 1963), p. 246nGoogle Scholar.

36 Burke, , Correspondence, Burke to unknown correspondent, June 7, 1780, 4:243Google Scholar; Burke to Richard Shackleton, June 13, 1780, pp. 246–47.

37 Burke, Edmund, “Speech at Bristol, Previous to the Election, 1780,” Works, 3:409Google Scholar.

38 Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, written by himself with a selection from his correspondence edited by his son, 3 vols. (London, 1840)Google Scholar, Romilly to Roget, June 13, 1780, 1:127; SirWraxall, William, Historical Memoirs of my own time, 2 vols. (London: Cadell and Davies, 1815), 1:330Google Scholar.

39 Lewis, W. S.et al., Horace Walpole's Correspondence (London: Oxford University Press; New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press 1965), 33:197Google Scholar.

40 Quoted in de Castro, p. 140.

41 Walpole's Correspondence, 33:354Google Scholar.

42 Walpole's Correspondence, February 6, 1780, 25:11Google Scholar; Vincent [Holcroft] (n. 10 above), p. 11.

43 Reynolds, Frederick, The Life and Times of Frederick Reynolds, 2 vols. (London, 1826), 1:124–25Google Scholar.

44 Norton, J. E., The Letters of Edward Gibbon, vol. 2, 1774–1782 (London, 1956), Gibbon to Dorothea Gibbon, June 8, 1780, p. 245Google Scholar.

45 Cole to Walpole, July 2, 1780, in Norton, 2:226.

46 O'Brien (n. 7 above), pp. 80–81, 86, 145, 147; Black (n. 11 above), p. 168.

47 Gibbon to Dorothea, June 27, 1780, in Norton, 2:245.

48 Mitchell, ed., introduction (n. 2 above), p. 27; Burke, , Correspondence, 4:204Google Scholar.

49 Burke, , “Speech at Bristol,” p. 403Google Scholar; Government surveillance also noted that Gordon was attracting considerable support from Protestant Irish.

50 See De Bruyn, Frans, “Theatre and Countertheater in Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France,” in Burke and the French Revolution: Bicentennial Essays, ed. Blakemore, Steven (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1992), p. 23Google Scholar.

51 Burke, , “Speech at Bristol,” p. 417Google Scholar. Perhaps it was for this reason, as he said, that “a very great part of the lower and some of the middling people of this City … rather approve than blame the rioters,” quoted in Black, , Association, p. 167Google Scholar.

52 Burke to John Noble, August 11, 1780, Correspondence, 4:263–64Google Scholar.

53 Romilly to Roget, October 27, 1780, Memoirs, i, pp. 129, 136–37Google Scholar. For Miles, see PRO, TS 11/388/1212, Gordon's Correspondence—Summary, fol. 29 and 11/388/1213, Evidence of John McQueen, June 17, 1780.

54 George (n. 26 above), vol. 5, no. 5670, p. 401.

55 Burke to Loughborough, June 15, 1780, Correspondence, 4:248–50Google Scholar.

56 Mitchell, , ed., Writings and Speeches, p. 14Google Scholar. Antoine Gorsais also described him as “l'apologiste de Newgate et de la Bastille.”

57 Quoted in de Castro (n. 16 above), p. 44; see also, Vincent, , Narrative, p. 28Google Scholar.

58 Walpole to Lady Ossory, June 23, 1780, Horace Walpole's Correspondence, 33:201Google Scholar; Vincent (n. 10 above), p. 39.

59 Burke, , “Speech at Bristol,” pp. 420–21Google Scholar.

60 Wraxall, 1:348.

61 Quoted in de Castro, p. 143.

62 Horace Walpole's Correspondence, 33:195Google Scholar.

63 Sellers (n. 12 above), p. 147; de Castro, pp. 218–19. These included the auctioneer John Greenwood, Dr. Oliver Smith, John Temple, Ben Bowsy, and Thomas Lloyd.

64 Vincent, , Narrative, p. 44Google Scholar.

65 Wraxall, pp. 337–41.

66 Burke, , Letter to a Noble Lord (1796), in Burke on Revolution, ed. Smith, Robert A. (New York and Evanston, Ill.: Harper, 1968), p. 234Google Scholar.

67 See Solomons, Israel, “Lord George Gordon's Conversion to Judaism,” The Jewish Historical Society of England—Transactions: Sessions 1911–14 (London, 1915), pp. 240–64Google Scholar, for numerous examples of this anti-Semitic literature.

68 McCalman, Iain, “New Jerusalems: Prophecy, Dissent and Radical Culture in England, 1786–1830,” in Enlightenment and Rational Dissent, ed. Haakonssen, K. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in press)Google Scholar.

69 Watson (n. 10 above), pp. 58–59, 76–77.

70 Romilly, , Memoirs, Romilly to Roget, April 12, 1782, 1:217–18Google Scholar. For some of his other antiministerial activities in the immediate aftermath of the riots, see British Library Add. MS 5870, Newspaper cuttings, fol. 189; Add. MS 37835, George III's Correspondence with J. Robinson, November 1779-November 1784, fol. 196.

71 PRO, PC 1/3127, Letter from Lord George Gordon to Elias Lindo and the Portuguese and Nathan Solomon and the German Jews; Solomons, pp. 229–30Google Scholar.

72 The Times (January 4, 1788). For some early examples of anti-Semitic speculations associated with Gordon, see George (n. 26 above), vol. 5, no. 8249, from Rambler's Magazine (October 1, 1785); The Times (September 7, November 11, 1785).

73 See The Times (August 12, November 4, 7, 1786); and the retrospective satirical dialogue between Gordon, and Nicholson, in Town and Country Magazine (October 1790)Google Scholar.

74 PRO, PC1/3127, A Letter to His Grace the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury occasioned by the Excommunication of the Right Hon. Lord George Gordon for Nonconformity to the Mandates of the Spiritual Court of London, 1787, also Calvinus Minor, An Appeal to the Scots; in which the Spiritual Court of the Church of England, is demonstrated to be opposite to the British Constitution and a Part of the Pillar of Popery, 1786; Watson, pp. 67–68; Gentleman's Magazine (1786), p. 993Google Scholar; The Times (November 8, 1785, July 6, 1786—a rare, if not unique, defense of Gordon by the paper's columnist—March 9, 1787, a letter to Gordon on behalf of persecuted Dissenters, signed William Roe).

75 Annual Register, 1787, Appendix to Chronicle, p. 247Google Scholar. See also, A Letter from … Lord George Gordon to the Attorney General of England … (London: James Ridgway, 1787)Google Scholar; PRO, TS 11/388/1212, King vs. Lord George Gordon, Botany Bay—Informations for a libel; The Prisoners Petition to the Right Hon. Lord George Gordon to preserve their lives and liberties and prevent their Banishment to Botany Bay (London: Wilkins, 1787)Google Scholar; Watson, pp. 80, 105–6; George, V, no. 6992, p. 325; no. 7127, p. 387.

76 George, , Catalogue, VGoogle Scholar, no. 7628. It is worth noting that many of these same themes were also canvassed in the satirical dialogue between the bearded Jew, Gordon, , and Nicholson, Margaret published in Town and Country Magazine (October 1790)Google Scholar.

77 Watson, p. 79.

78 See report of a former spy, John King, in ibid., pp. 109–10.

79 Ibid., pp. 69, 75.

80 Thale, Mary, ed., Selections from the Papers of the London Corresponding Society, 1792–99 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. xxii, 24, 50–51, 54Google Scholar. See also the two realist prints with key by Richard Newton in the British Museum, “Soulagement en prison; or comfort in prison,” published by William Holland, August 30, 1793, and “Promenade in the State Side of Newgate,” William Holland, October 5, 1793; Watson (n. 10 above), pp. 81–82, 87–88, 143; LordGordon, George, The Memorial Which Lord George Gordon has written in the prison of Newgate (London, 1789), p. xivGoogle Scholar.

81 Watson, p. 88.

82 Gordon to Gregoire, August 23, 1791, reproduced in ibid., pp. 113–24.

83 The Times (January 28, 1790).

84 The Times (November 11, 14, 1789). For a popular pamphlet which makes a common link between Gordon, Price, Priestley, and the revolutionary sectaries of the seventeenth century, see [Thomas Hastings] Solomon, Rabbi, The Regal Rambler; or Eccentrical Adventures of the Devil in London (London, 1793), pp. 12–29, 96–99Google Scholar.

85 See Mann to Walpole, July 8, 1780, in Horace Walpole's Correspondence (London and New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1971), 25:71Google Scholar; Kite, Eliza S., Beaumarchais and the War of Independence (Boston, 1918), pp. 249–53, 256–62Google Scholar; Maza, Sara, “The Diamond Necklace Affair Revisited (1785–86),” in Eroticism and the Body Politic, ed. Hunt, Lynn (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), pp. 65–70Google Scholar; Darnton, Robert, The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 30–35Google Scholar.

86 PRO, TS 11/46, “Rex vs. P. Stuart—libels against Marie Antoinette, 1784.”

87 An Address to the Public explaining the motives that have hitherto delayed the publication of the Memoirs of Madame La motte (London, 1789), esp. pp. 8–30, 35Google Scholar; Memoirs of the Countess de Valois de la Motte (London: James Ridgway, 1789)Google Scholar; Memoirs of Jane St. Rémy de Valois, 2 vols. (London: John Bew, 1791)Google Scholar. For comment on the circulation of the memoirs, see The Times (February, 3, 10, May 20, 1789). For the effects of the memoirs on other scurrilous publications, see Memoirs of Antonina, Queen of Abo, 2 vols. (London: E. Bentley, 1791)Google Scholar.

88 On Cagliostro and Gordon in London, see Lucia, (pseud.), Life of the Count Cagliostro (London, 1787), p. viiGoogle Scholar; Williams, Claire, ed., Sophie in London, 1786. Being the Diary of Sophie von la Roche (London, 1933), pp. 139, 148–49Google Scholar; LordGordon, George, Letter to the Attorney General (n. 75 above), p. 22Google Scholar.

89 Public Advertiser (August 22, 1786).

90 PRO, TS 11/388/1212, “Informations on Lord George Gordon—Defamatory libels on Queen Marie Antoinette”; Watson (n. 10 above), pp. 36–37, 81. According to Watson, he had been introduced to the queen in Paris in 1782, but rather than being dazzled by Burke's celestial vision had been disgusted by the court flattery, hypocrisy, and luxury at a time of extreme popular misery.

91 Gordon, Lord George, Letter to the Attorney General, p. 16Google Scholar.

92 Mossiker, Frances, The Queen's Necklace (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1961), pp. 529–30Google Scholar.

93 Hunt, Lynn, “The Many Bodies of Marie Antoinette: Political Pornography and the Problem of the Feminine in the French Revolution,” in Hunt, , ed., pp. 108–30Google Scholar.

94 Watson, p. 70.

95 Maza (n. 85 above), p. 82.

96 Watson, p. 91.

97 Burke had actually corresponded with Parkyns Macmahon in 1781; see Burke, , Correspondence, 6:90n, 348nGoogle Scholar. On Macmahon's association with Cagliostro, see Macmahon, Parkyns, Memorial, or Brief for the Comte de Cagliostro … against the King's Attorney-General in the Cause of the Cardinal de Rohan, Comtesse de la Motte and others … (London, 1786)Google Scholar. For details of the background of Macmahon (alias Joseph Perkins) who had been a vicar at Rouen, then an anti-Bourbon politico-pornographer working first on the Morning Herald, then as subeditor of the Courier de l'Europe, before operating as a freelance translator and anti-Bourbon scurrilist, I am deeply grateful to Dr. Simon Burrows, of Otago University. His information is drawn primarily from Manuel, Pierre, La Police de Paris devoilee, 2 vols. (Paris, 1791)Google Scholar. See also Horace Walpole's Correspondence, 25:557, 631Google Scholar; and obituaries in Gentleman's Magazine (1788), p. 85Google Scholar; and The Times (January 16, 1788). Macmahon and his wife became close friends and agents of both the Comte and Comtesse de La Motte, see An Address to the Public Explaining the Motives which have hitherto delayed the publication of the Memoirs of the Countess de Valois de la Motte (London, 1789), pp. 8–9Google Scholar; Life of Jane de St. Rémy, 2 vols. (Dublin, n.d.), 1:211–21, 226, and 232–35Google Scholar (describing her connections with James Ridgway). For more on the last, see also Memoirs of the Countess de Valois de la Motte (London: James Ridgway, 1789)Google Scholar; and Vizetelly, Henry, The Story of the Diamond Necklace (London, 1887), pp. 314–24, 326–29Google Scholar.

98 On Swinton, see Weiner, Margery, The French Exiles, 1789–1815 (London, 1960), pp. 3, 119–20Google Scholar.

99 Quoted in Solomons (n. 67 above), p. 259.

100 The Times (June 9, July 7, 1786). Nicolas Ruault produced some highly colored pornography on the subject and Jeanne La Motte made much of this indignity. Her open letter published from Oxford in 1789 vowed to imprint a mark of shame on Marie Antoinette's brow to match that which has been scorched onto her own breast. See Mossiker, pp. 485, 528.

101 “The Meretricious Friar,” Town and Country Magazine, vol. 17 (1780)Google Scholar.

102 Quoted in de Castro (n. 16 above), p. 247.

103 Solomons, pp. 262–63. See also The Times (January 9, 20, May 26, 1788).