Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:18:12.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The History of British Political Thought: The Creation of a Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

J. G. A. Pocock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Center for the History of British Political Thought has been established at the Folger Shakespeare Library and will be conducting a series of seminars aimed at covering what is conventionally demarcated as the early modern period: the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries. No comprehensive history of British political thought in this period has to our knowledge been written, and it is an open question of what it should consist and what its organizing themes should be. The purpose of this article is to present a speculative inquiry into its conceptual scope.

The scope and meaning of the word “British” is fundamental to our inquiry. The core component is surely England, and both the weight of literature and the tradition of study render it inescapable that English will be the language and the dominant culture with which most of our program will be concerned. It will be necessary nonetheless to recognize the autonomy of Scottish political culture and its literature and of the cultures formed by English hegemony, whose political thought must be studied both before and after their assertions of independence.

We must further examine what is to be meant by the term “political thought.” A considerable methodological literature has marked the rise in the last two decades of what has been called the “new history” of political thought. This inquiry has become less an adjunct to the practice of political theory and more a history of the terms of discourse in which debate about politics has been carried on.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , July 1985 , pp. 283 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A pilot seminar, covering the whole period, was conducted by Gordon Schochet during the spring semester of 1984, and the first seminar of the planned series, covering the reign of Henry VIII, was directed by J. A. Guy, Bristol University, in the fall of 1984. The remaining five seminars will cover the Elizabethan period (Donald R. Kelley, University of Rochester, spring 1985), the early Stuarts and the Interregnum (William M. Lamont, University of Sussex, fall 1985), the Restoration and Revolution (Howard A. Nenner, Smith College, spring 1986), the eighteenth century to 1760 (Nicholas Phillipson, University of Edinburgh, fall 1986), and the reign of George III (J. G. A. Pocock, Johns Hopkins University, spring 1987). Details may be requested from the Folger Institute of Renaissance and Eighteenth-Century Studies, 201 East Capitol Street, Washington, D.C. 20003. The center is indebted to the National Endowment for the Humanities for its generous grant.

2 Conflict and Compromise: History of British Political Thought, 1593–1900, by Wilfred Harrison, was published by the Free Press of New York in 1965, with an accompanying source volume, but it is selective rather than comprehensive and cannot be said to satisfy the rigorous demands now made in this branch of historiography. The series Political Thought in England, published by the Hume University Library of Modern Knowledge, is older still. The volumes that concern us are Morris, Christopher, Tyndale to Hooker (Oxford, 1953)Google Scholar; Gooch, G. P., Bacon to Halifax (Oxford, 1915)Google Scholar; and Laski, H. J., Locke to Bentham (Oxford, 1920)Google Scholar.

3 See Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1978), vol. 2Google Scholar, s.v. “John Mair.”

4 For example, Hanson, Donald W., From Kingdom to Commonwealth: The Development of Civic Consciousness in English Political Thought (Cambridge, Mass., 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Williamson, Arthur H., Scottish National Consciousness in the Age of James VI (Edinburgh, 1980)Google Scholar; James, Mervyn, English Politics and the Concept of Honour, Past and Present Society (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar; Dwyer, John, Mason, Roger A., and Murdoch, Alexander, New Perspectives on the Politics and Culture of Early Modern Scotland (Edinburgh, 1982)Google Scholar.

6 Ferguson, Arthur B., The Articulate Citizen and the English Renaissance (Durham, N.C., 1965)Google Scholar, and Clio Unbound: Perception of the Social and Cultural Past in Renaissance England (Durham, N.C., 1979)Google Scholar. Earlier works include Caspari, Fritz, Humanism and the Social Order in Tudor England (1954; reprint, New York, 1968)Google Scholar; and Adams, Robert P., The Better Part of Valor: More, Erasmus, Colet and Vives, on Humanism, War, and Peace, 1496–1535 (Seattle, Wash., 1962)Google Scholar.

7 Kantorowicz, Ernst H., The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton, N.J., 1957)Google Scholar.

8 In addition to Ferguson's The Articulate Citizen and the English Renaissance and Clio Unbound, see Fussner, F. Smith, The Historical Revolution: English Historical Writing and Thought, 1580–1640 (London, 1962)Google Scholar.

9 The literatures of Moreana and utopiana are both vast and growing. Among notable recent additions may be mentioned Fox, Alistair, Thomas More: History and Providence (New Haven, Conn., 1983)Google Scholar; and Manuel, Frank and Manuel, Fritzie, Utopian Thought in the Western World (Cambridge, Mass., 1979)Google Scholar. Among earlier studies is Hexter, J. H., More's Utopia: The Biography of an Idea (Princeton, N.J., 1952)Google Scholar.

10 Elton, Geoffrey R., Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell (Cambridge, 1972)Google Scholar, and Reform and Renewal: Thomas Cromwell and the Common Weal (Cambridge, 1973)Google Scholar.

11 For Ponet and Goodman, see Skinner, 2:221–24, 228–30, 236–38; for Knox and Buchanan, see ibid., pp. 239–435. For English Catholic thought, see Holmes, Peter, Resistance and Compromise: The Political Thought of the Elizabethan Catholics (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar.

12 The works of Gordon Donaldson and D. C. Stevenson may be mentioned.

13 Axton, Marie, The Queen's Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession, Royal Historical Society Studies in History (London, 1978)Google Scholar.

14 See, e.g., Greenleaf, W. H., Order, Empiricism and Politics: Two Traditions of English Political Thought, 1500–1700 (Oxford, 1964)Google Scholar, which is better on order; and Daly, James W., “Cosmic Harmony and Political Thinking in Early Stuart England,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 69, no. 7 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Raab, Felix, The English Face of Machiavelli: A Changing Interpretation, 1500–1700 (London and Toronto, 1964)Google Scholar. See further Donaldson, Peter S., ed., A Machiavellian Treatise by Stephen Gardiner (Cambridge, 1975)Google Scholar.

16 Haller, William, Foxe's Book of Martyrs and the Elect Nation (New York and London, 1963)Google Scholar; Christianson, Paul, Reformers and Babylon: English Apocalyptic Visions from the Reformation to the Eve of the Civil War (Toronto, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Firth, Katherine, The Apocalyptic Tradition in Reformation Britain, 1530–1645 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.

17 Williamson (n. 5 above). Lamont, William M., Marginal Prynne, 1600–1669 (London, 1963)Google Scholar, Godly Rule: Politics and Religion, 1603–60 (London, 1969)Google Scholar, and Richard Baxter and the Millennium (London and Totowa, 1979)Google Scholar.

18 The new Folger ed. of the works of Hooker should stimulate a new critical literature. See already Faulkner, Robert, Richard Hooker and the Politics of a Christian England (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1981)Google Scholar.

19 Shellhase's, Kenneth C.Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought (Chicago, 1976)Google Scholar offers a survey, but more detailed studies are needed. For England, see Levy, F. J., Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, Calif., 1967), pp. 249ff.Google Scholar

20 A study of Sarpi's role in England and other Protestant countries is long overdue. For Guicciardini, see Gilbert, Felix, Machiavelli and Guicciardini: Politics and History in Sixteenth-Century Florence (Princeton, N.J., 1965)Google Scholar; and Phillips, Mark, Francesco Guicciardini: The Historian's Craft (Toronto, 1977)Google Scholar.

21 The passage in question occurs in the opening pages of Behemoth.

22 There is a sizable literature on the theme of court and country, of which Zagorin's, PerezThe Court and the Country (New York, 1970)Google Scholar may be taken as the starting point.

23 Neale, J. E., Elizabeth I and Her Parliaments, vol. 1, 1559–1581, vol. 2, 1584–1601 (London, 1953–1957)Google Scholar; Notestein, Wallace, The Winning of the Initiative by the House of Commons (London, 1924)Google Scholar; Elton, G. R., “A High Road to Civil War?” and “The Unexplained Revolution,” in Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1974), vol. 2Google Scholar; Russell, Conrad, The Crisis of Parliaments: English History, 1509–1660 (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar, and Parliaments and English Politics, 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.

24 Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1957)Google Scholar; a reissue with new autocritical material is to be published by the Cambridge University Press in 1985.

25 Arguments in the now exhausted debate over the gentry are presented in Stone, Lawrence, The Causes of the English Revolution, 1529–1642 (London, 1972)Google Scholar.

26 See, most notably, Tuck, Richard, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origins and Development (Cambridge, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 The desideratum here is a study of the impact on both Scottish and English legal thinking of the projected union of the two systems at the accession of James VI and I. On the Scottish side, emphasis would fall on the works of Sir Thomas Craig (see Pocock, chap. 4).

28 See esp. Johnson, Robert C.et al., eds., Commons Debates: 1628 (New Haven, Conn., 1977)Google Scholar.

29 See Tuck.

30 Judson's, Margaret A.The Crisis of the Constitution: An Essay in Constitutional and Political Thought in England, 1603–1645 (1949; reprint, New York, 1976)Google Scholar remains the best study of this theme.

31 It was put forward by Tyacke, Nicholas in “Arminianism in England in Religion and Politics, 1604–1640” (D.Phil, thesis, Oxford University, 1968)Google Scholar.

32 Lamont, Godly Rule (n. 17 above).

33 Breen, T. H., The Character of the Good Ruler: Puritan Political Ideas in New England, 1630–1730 (New Haven, Conn., 1970)Google Scholar.

34 Orr, Robert, Reason and Authority: The Thought of William Chillingworth (Oxford, 1967)Google Scholar.

35 Weston, Corinne C., English Constitutional Theory and the House of Lords, 1556–1832 (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Weston, Corinne C. and Greenberg, Janelle R., Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England (Cambridge, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 A bibliography of the works of Christopher Hill is valuable at this point; there is one in Donald Pennington and Thomas, Keith, eds., Puritans and Revolutionaries: Essays in Seventeenth-Century History Presented to Christopher Hill (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar. Zagorin's, PerezA History of Political Thought in the English Revolution (London, 1954)Google Scholar remains useful.

37 Hill's, ChristopherThe World Turned Upside Down (Harmondsworth, 1972)Google Scholar remains the best introduction to their ways of thinking. See also Capp, Bernard, The Fifth Monarchy Men: A Study in Seventeenth-Century English Millenarianism (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Judson, Margaret A., The Political Thought of Sir Henry Vane the Younger (Philadelphia, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., ed., The Levellers in the English Revolution (Ithaca, N.Y., 1975)Google Scholar; Davis, J. C., Utopia and the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing, 1516–1700 (Cambridge, 1981)Google Scholar; and Hill, Christopher, Reay, Barry, and Lamont, William, The World of the Muggletonians (London, 1983)Google Scholar. The debate over Leveller views of the franchise, begun by Macpherson, C. B. in The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar, continues.

38 Mack, Phyllis, “Women as Prophets during the English Civil War,” Feminist Studies 8 (1982): 19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomas, Keith, “Women and the Civil War Sects,” Past and Present, no. 13 (1958), pp. 72–85Google Scholar; Higgins, Patricia, “The Reactions of Women, with Special Reference to Women Petitioners,” in Politics, Religion and the English Revolution, 1640–1649, ed. Manning, Brian (London, 1973), pp. 190–217Google Scholar. For the debate over patriarchal authority in the family, see Macfarlane, Alan, Family Life of Ralph Josselin (Cambridge, 1970)Google Scholar; Schochet, Gordon, Patriarchalism in Political Thought (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar, chap. 6; Schüking, L. L., The Puritan Family (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; and Stone, Lawrence, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500–1800 (New York, 1977)Google Scholar.

39 The best account remains that in Wallace's, John M.Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell (Cambridge, 1968)Google Scholar. See also Skinner's, Quentin “Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy,” in The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement, 1646–1660, ed. Aylmer, G. E. (London and Hamden, Conn., 1972)Google Scholar, which summarizes his various essays on Hobbes; and Judson, Margaret A., From Tradition to Political Reality: A Study of the Ideas Set Forth in Support of the Commonwealth Government in England, 1649–1653 (Hamden, Conn., 1980)Google Scholar.

40 Pioneer studies are those of Fink, Z. S., The Classical Republicans: An Essay Towards the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England (Evanston, Ill., 1945)Google Scholar; and Blitzer, Charles, An Immortal Commonwealth: The Political Thought of James Harrington (New Haven, Conn., 1960)Google Scholar. Modern studies of the small band of republicans in Parliament are needed.

41 Pocock, J. G. A., ed., The Political Works of James Harrington (Cambridge,1977)Google Scholar.

42 Goldie's, MarkThe Tory Ideology: Politics and Ideas in Restoration England (to be published shortly by the Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar, a study of Restoration political thought, is eagerly awaited.

43 Lacey, Douglas R., Dissent and Parliamentary Politics in England, 1661–1689: A Study in the Perpetuation and Tempering of Parliamentarianism (New Brunswick, N.J., 1969)Google Scholar. The role of Huguenot exiles after 1685 is to be discussed in papers to be presented at the Huguenot Heritage Conference in London, September 1985.

44 Weston and Greenberg. See also Behrens, B., “The Whig Theory of the Constitution in the Reign of Charles II,” Cambridge Historical Journal 7 (1941): 42–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Furley, O. W., “The Whig Exclusionists: Pamphlet Literature in the Exclusion Campaign, 1679–81,” Cambridge Historical Journal 13, no. 1 (1957): 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 This was established by Laslett's, Peter ed. of Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge, 1960)Google Scholar. See further Dunn, John, The Political Thought of John Locke (Cambridge, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Franklin, Julian H., John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty (Cambridge, 1978)Google Scholar; Tully, James, A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries (Cambridge, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ashcraft, Richard L. and Pocock, J. G. A., John Locke: Papers Read at a Clark Library Seminar (Los Angeles, 1980)Google Scholar.

46 Smith, Hilda, Reason's Disciples: Seventeenth-Century English Feminists (Urbana, Ill., 1982)Google Scholar. Daly, James W., Sir Robert Filmer and English Political Thought (Toronto, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and, more largely, Schochet.

47 Lois G. Schwoerer, “Women in English Revolutionary Politics: 1680–1690,” forthcoming; Carolyn A. Edie, “Women in Politics: The Stuart Restoration,” forthcoming.

48 Schwoerer, Lois G., No Standing Armies! The Anti-Army Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England (Baltimore, 1974)Google Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, N.J., 1975)Google Scholar. See also Woolrych, Austin, “The Good Old Cause and the Fall of the Protectorate,” Cambridge Historical Journal 13, no. 2 (1957): 133–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Schwoerer, Lois G., “Propaganda in the Revolution of 1688–89,” American Historical Review 82, no. 4 (October 1977): 843–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Slaughter, T. P., “‘Abdicate’ and ‘Contract’ in the Glorious Revolution,” Historical Journal 24 (1981): 323–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Miller, John, “The Glorious Revolution: ‘Contract’ and ‘Abdication’ Reconsidered,” Historical Journal 25 (1982): 541–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Schwoerer, Lois G., The Declaration of Rights, 1689 (Baltimore, 1981)Google Scholar.

52 Robbins, Caroline, The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman (Cambridge, Mass., 1958)Google Scholar; Schwoerer, The Declaration of Rights; Goldie, Mark, “The Roots of True Whiggism, 1688–94,” History of Political Thought 1, no. 2 (1980): 195–236Google Scholar, and “The Revolution of 1688 and the Structure of Political Argument,” Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 73 (1980): 473–564Google Scholar.

53 Kenyon, J. P., Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party, 1689–1720 (Cambridge, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Jacob, Margaret C., The Newtonians and the English Revolution (Ithaca, N.Y., 1976)Google Scholar, and The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans (London, 1981)Google Scholar; Jacob, James R., Robert Boyle and the English Revolution (New York, 1977)Google Scholar, and Henry Stubbe, Radical Protestantism and the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar.

55 For the course of British political thought in the eighteenth century, see Dickinson, H. T., Liberty and Property: Political Ideologies in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Gunn, J. A. W., Beyond Liberty and Property: The Process of Self-Recognition in Eighteenth-Century Political Thought (Kingston, 1983)Google Scholar; and Jacob, Margaret C. and Jacob, James R., eds., The Origins of Anglo-American Radicalism (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

56 Laprade, W. T., Public Opinion and Politics in Eighteenth Century England to the Fall of Walpole (1936; reprint, New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Downie, J. A., Robert Harley and the Press (Cambridge, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kramnick, Isaac F., Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole (Cambridge, Mass., 1968)Google Scholar: Goldgar, Bertrand A., Walpole and the Wits: The Relation of Politics to Literature, 1722–1742 (Lincoln, Nebr., 1976)Google Scholar; Barrell, John, English Literature in History, 1730–80: An Equal, Wide Survey (London, 1983)Google Scholar; Peters, Marie, Pitt and Popularity: The Patriot Minister and London Opinion during the Seven Years War (Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar.

57 Cressy, David, “Literacy in Seventeenth-Century England: More Evidence,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (Summer 1977): 141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Price, J. M., “A Note on the Circulation of the London Press, 1704–1714,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 31 (1958): 215–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schofield, R. S., “The Measurement of Literacy in Pre-Industrial England,” in Literacy in Traditional Societies, ed. Goody, Jack (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 310–25Google Scholar; Stone, Lawrence, “Literacy and Education in England, 1640–1900,” Past and Present, no. 42 (February 1969), pp. 69–139Google Scholar; Vann, Richard T., “Literacy in Seventeenth-Century England: Some Hearth-Tax Evidence,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 5 (1974): 287–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Bloom, Edward A. and Bloom, Lillian D., Joseph Addison's Sociable Animal (Providence, R.I., 1971)Google Scholar; Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, N.J., 1977)Google Scholar; Browning, Reed, Political and Constitutional Ideas of the Court Whigs (Baton Rouge, La., 1982)Google Scholar.

59 The general phenomenon and the major figures of the Scottish Enlightenment are alike the focus of a growing literature: e.g., Rendall, Jane, The Origins of the Scottish Enlightenment (New York, 1979)Google Scholar; Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Forbes, Duncan, Hume's Philosophical Politics (Cambridge, 1976)Google Scholar; Winch, Donald, Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision (Cambridge, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skinner, A. S., A System of Social Science: Papers relating to Adam Smith (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar; and Haakonssen, Knud, The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar.

60 Brewer, John, Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III (Cambridge, 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Butterfield, Herbert, George III, Lord North and the People (London, 1949)Google Scholar; Christie, Ian R., Wilkes, Wyvill and Reform (Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar; Bonwick, Colin, English Radicalism and the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, N. C., 1977)Google Scholar. These titles are selections from a vast literature.

61 See Fruchtman, Jack G. Jr., The Apocalyptic Politics of Price and Priestley: A Study in Late Eighteenth-Century Republican Millennialism, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (1983)Google Scholar.

62 The language and ideas embodied in the Declaration may perhaps also be rooted in Scottish moral theory (see Wills, Garry, Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence [New York, 1978]Google Scholar).

63 Rossiter, Clinton, Seedtime of the Republic (New York, 1953)Google Scholar.

64 The literature of this subject is too vast for a footnote. Scholars who have done most to develop the perspective described here include Douglas Adair, Bernard Bailyn, J. R. Pole, Gerald Stourzh, and Gordon Wood. For the general question of “republicanism” in American politics, see two useful bibliographical articles by Shallhope, Robert E., “Towards a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American Historiography,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 29 (1972): 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Republicanism and Early American Historiography,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 39 (1982): 334–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 For Canadian political thought, see Condon, Ann Gorman, “The Circuitous Career of Loyalist Plans for Colonial Union in America and Canada, 1754–1914,” in The Treaty of Paris and the International States System (Washington, D.C., in press)Google Scholar. For Anglo-Irish political thought, see Macdowell, R. B., Irish Public Opinion, 1750–1800 (London, 1944)Google Scholar, which seems to be the only study of Irish political ideas during this period.

66 Goodwin, Albert, The Friends of Liberty: The English Democratic Movement in the Age of the French Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1979)Google Scholar; Cookson, J. E., The Friends of Peace: Anti-War Liberalism in England, 1793–1815 (Cambridge, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dozier, Robert R., For King, Constitution and Country: The English Loyalists and the French Revolution (Lexington, Ky., 1983)Google Scholar; Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1963)Google Scholar.

67 See Wardle, Ralph M., Mary Wollstonecraft: A Critical Biography (Lawrence, Kans., 1951)Google Scholar; and Flexner, Eleanor, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Biography (New York, 1972)Google Scholar.

68 Recent studies of Burke include Dreyer, Frederick, Burke's Politics (Waterloo, 1979)Google Scholar; Macpherson, C. B., Burke (New York, 1980)Google Scholar; and Pocock, J. G. A., “The Political Economy of Burke's Analysis of the French Revolution,” Historical Journal 25, no. 2 (1982): 331–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 See Winch (n. 59 above); and A. S. Skinner (n. 59 above).

70 Long, Douglas G., Bentham on Liberty: Jeremy Bentham's Idea of Liberty in Relation to His Utilitarianism (Toronto, 1977)Google Scholar; Thomas, William, The Philosophic Radicals: Nine Studies in Theory and Practice, 1817–1841 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar; Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John, That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 The King's College Research Centre study was conducted by Istvan Hont and Michael Ignatieff; Wealth and Virtue, which they edited (n. 59 above), was the first book to ensue from it.