Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:01:17.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Government Borrowing, 1660-1688

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Glenn O. Nichols
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Borrowing was a necessary and important part of government finance during the period from 1660 to 1688. During Charles II's reign, over twelve per cent of the government's receipts were loans paid directly into the Exchequer and, during some years, loans made up as much as one-third of the total receipts. Clearly borrowing was essential. Anticipatory borrowing, for instance, was necessitated by the very nature of government finance. With the exception of the scheduled payments made by private tax collectors, tax revenues were received by the government irregularly during the course of a year. In addition, the government's expenditure was not easily apportioned over the entire year; in most cases, large lump sums were required, and consequently it was necessary for the government to anticipate future revenue receipts by borrowing in order to meet its current expenditure obligations. Of course the government could have solved this problem by accumulating surplus revenue and using it as reserve from which large payments could be made without recourse to borrowing. But during Charles II's reign, the demands on the revenue were generally larger than the income.

Before 1688, in most cases the only guarantee a potential creditor of the government had that the loan would be repaid on time, if at all, was the vague security of the king's word. This was largely the result of the constitutional status of government finance. When Charles II was restored to the throne in 1660, there were no major changes in the constitutional status of government finance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1971 , pp. 83 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. PRO, July 1, 1660-Easter, 1685, Declaration Books and Receipt Books, T.33/1-12; S.P.46/152 (nos. 1-23); E.401/1422, 1948-9, 1951, 1968; E.405/300-1, 303-6, 308, 311, 329, 400, 402, 405-7, 409-12, 422; P.R.O.30/24/34; P.R.O. 30/32/10. Parliament voted several grants of additional revenue during the 1660s with the intention that the revenue be used for extraordinary expenditure, such as paying for the Second Dutch War, or disbanding the army in 1660. Although these grants were generally insufficient compensation, they did raise the total government revenue above £1,200,000 several years before 1671-72. But the ordinary revenue did not exceed £1,200,000 before the year from Easter 1671 to Easter 1672. The present writer does not wholly agree with the interpretation of the history of government revenue during the Restoration offered by Professor C. D. Chandaman in 1954, but, for the moment, Chandaman's dissertation is the best work on the subject. Chandaman, C. D., “The English Public Revenue 1660-88” (Ph.D. thesis, London University, 1954)Google Scholar.

2. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1676-1679 (London, 1911), V, xxxix–xliiGoogle Scholar; Ogg, David, England in the Reign of Charles II (Oxford, 1961), II, 421, 445Google Scholar; Wilson, Charles, England's Apprenticeship 1603-1763 (New York, 1965), pp. 211–13Google Scholar; Kenyon, J. P., The Stuart Constitution 1603-1688 (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 388–89Google Scholar; Scott, William R., The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish and Irish Joint-Stock Companies to 1720 (New York, 1951), III, 487–89Google Scholar.

3. Davies, Kenneth G., “Joint-Stock Investment in the Later Seventeenth Century,” Economic History Review, second series, IV (1952), 287Google Scholar.

4. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 704, 770Google Scholar; Davies, , “Joint Stock Investment,” E.H.R. 2nd Ser., IV, 287Google Scholar.

5. Ashton, Robert, The Crown and the Money Market 1603-1640 (Oxford, 1960), pp. 23, 171Google Scholar; Ashley, Maurice, Financial and Commercial Policy under the Cromwellian Protectorate (London, 1962), p. 99Google Scholar.

6. Scott, , Constitution and Finance, II, 130Google Scholar.

7. A summary of the terms of the charter can be found in Ibid., pp. 130-31.

8. Ibid., p. 131.

9. Ibid., p. 133.

10. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1669-1672 (London, 1908), III, 1323–24Google Scholar; Sainsbury, Ethel B. (ed.), A Calendar of the Court Minutes etc. of the East India Company, 1671-1673 (Oxford, 1932), pp. 26, 159–60Google Scholar.

11. Sainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1671-1673, pp. 172–73Google Scholar; Coleman , D. A., Sir John Banks Baronet and Businessman. A Study of Business, Politics and Society in Later Stuart England (Oxford, 1963), pp. 69–95Google Scholar.

12. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, III, 1323-24, 1325;Google ScholarSainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1671-1673, pp. 172–73Google Scholar.

13. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, III, 1324–25Google Scholar; Sainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1671-1673, p. 180Google Scholar.

14. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1672-1675 (London, 1909), IV, 282, 380, 487, 592, 798, 817Google Scholar; Sainsbury, Ethel B. (ed.), A Calendar of the Court Minutes etc. of the East India Company, 1674-1676 (Oxford, 1935), pp. 150, 165, 166, 172, 193, 194-95, 206, 216Google Scholar.

15. Scott, , Constitution and Finance, II, 135–38Google Scholar.

16. Daniell, F. H. B. (ed.), Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, 1675-6 (London, 1907), pp. 373–74Google Scholar.

17. Daniell, F. H. B. (ed.), Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1676-7 (London, 1909), p. 197Google Scholar.

18. Sainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1674-1676, p. 199Google Scholar; Coleman, , Sir John Banks, p. 75Google Scholar.

19. Sainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1674-1676, p. 343Google Scholar.

20. Daniell, , Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1676-7, pp. 329, 353Google Scholar; Sainsbury, , Calendar of Court Minutes, 1674-1676, pp. 353-54, 355, 356, 359Google Scholar.

21. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 1131Google Scholar.

22. Ibid., p. 1469; Coleman, , Sir John Banks, p. 16Google Scholar. The relationship between the Crown and the East India Company was not entirely one-sided for the Company had received aid from the Crown in suppressing trouble at St. Helena.

23. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1681-1685 (London, 1916), VII, 280, 313, 890–91Google Scholar.

24. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1685-1689 (London, 1923), VIII, 410, 478, 895, 1032, 1100Google Scholar. In return for the Company's presents, its charter was confirmed by James II.

25. Ashton, , The Crown, p. 113Google Scholar.

26. Ashley, , Financial and Commercial Policy, pp. 98–99Google Scholar.

27. Shaw, W. A., “The Beginnings of the National Debt,” Historical Essays in Commemoration of the Jubilee of Owens College, ed. Tout, T. F. and Tait, J. (Manchester, 1907), p. 402Google Scholar.

28. BM, Harleian Manuscripts 1223, f. 211; Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1660-1667 (London, 1904), I, 717Google Scholar. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1667-1668 (London, 1905), II, 5, 30, 52, 81Google Scholar; Richards, Shaw, Calendar of Treasury Books, VII, 567–68Google Scholar; Shaw, , “Beginnings of the National Debt,” pp. 405–06Google Scholar; Richard, D., The Early History of Banking (New York, 1965), p. 108Google Scholar.

29. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, viii–xiiGoogle Scholar; Holdsworth , William, A History of English Law (London, 1966), III, 52Google Scholar.

30. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, III, 991, 997, 1001, 1009, 1102-03, 1190, 1193, 1209, 1274-75, 1334–35Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 190, 195, 226, 408, 504, 511Google Scholar. Daniell, F. H. B. (ed.), Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, 1671-1672 (London, 1897), p. 151Google Scholar. For the use of fee farms to repay loans to individuals, see the example in Coleman, , Sir John Banks, pp. 60–62Google Scholar.

31. Seventh Report of the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts (London, 1879), pt. 1, p. 470Google Scholar.

32. Ibid; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V. 1008Google Scholar.

33. Seventh Report on Historical Manuscripts, pt. 1, pp. 470-71. The amount loaned was £206,962 17s. 3d. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1679-1680 (London, 1913), VI, 157–58Google Scholar. Danby was relatively indiscriminate in applying pressure to obtain loans. An August 22, 1677 notice reminded courtiers of their dependence on Charles's favor, and stated that those who “expect the continuance of his favour in so pressing an occasion, Will not be Wanting to assist his Matle by the Loane of such Money as they are able to furnish.” BM, Egerton Manuscripts 2597, f.194. There is no record of the implied threat being carried out. For an earlier attempt to pressure courtiers for loans see Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II, 181–82Google Scholar.

34. Shaw, W. A. (ed.), Calendar of Treasury Books, 1685-1689 (London, 1923), VIII, 2149-50, 2152, 2156Google Scholar.

35. During the period from 1660 to 1688, the City of London loaned the government just over £1,000,000. Dickson, P. G. M., The Financial Revolution in England. A Study in the Development of Public Credit 1688-1736 (New York, 1967), p. 342Google Scholar.

36. Clapham, John, The Bank of England. A History (Cambridge, 1945), I, 19Google Scholar.

37. BM, Add. MSS, 28078, f.393. It is not possible to verify this estimate made by an unidentifiable subordinate of Danby's. See BM, Harl. MSS, 1898, f.64. A comparison of the farmers' gross receipts and the government's net receipts for two years for which the figures are exact show the farmers to have made a profit of £65,539 7s. 2½d. during the year from Midsummer, 1674 to Midsummer, 1675, and £117,117 9s. 4¼d. for the year from Midsummer, 1675 to Midsummer, 1676. BM, Add. MSS, 28078, ff. 209, 264; BM, Harl. MSS. 1898, f.64. Chandaman estimates that the farmers' profits were almost £130,000 a year during the three years from Midsummer, 1674 to Midsummer, 1677. Chandaman, “The English Public Revenue,” p. 215. This indicates that the estimate of £1,200,000 profit for the farmers over a period of fifteen years is not exaggerated greatly.

38. PRO, July 1, 1660-Easter, 1685, Declaration Books and Receipt Books, T.33/1-12; S.P.46/152 (nos. 1-23); E.401/1422, 1948-9, 1951, 1968; E.405/300-1, 303-6, 308, 311, 329, 400, 402, 405-7, 409-12, 422; P.R.O.30/24/34/ P.R.O. 30/32/10. cf. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, VII, ix–xlGoogle Scholar.

39. BM, Add. MSS, 28078, ff. 392-5; PRO, March, 1683/4, William Lowndes Papers, T.48/30. The importance of farmers' advance loans, and the kind of financial difficulties that prevented the government from abandoning tax farming during the 1670s can be seen in a memo found in PRO, June 30, 1678, William Lowndes Papers, T.48/30. At that time, the expenses of the Army, backpay for the Navy, and the expenses of putting down Bacon's Rebellion threatened to overwhelm the government unless Danby could negotiate a sizeable advance on a new Hearth Money contract.

40. BM, Add. MSS, 28077, f. 1; Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 155–56, 184Google Scholar.

41. BM, Add. MSS, 28074, f. 107; Add. MSS, 28078, ff. 195-7; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 571Google Scholar.

42. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 532-33, 830–32Google Scholar.

43. Ibid., pp. 532-33, 831-32.

44. If the date of John Bence's proposal is accurate, the idea of management was not original with Danby, but Danby was the first Lord Treasurer to realize its potential. PRO, John Bence to the King, July 1, 1671, Shaftesbury Papers, P.R.O.30/24/3, f. 418.

45. For the terms of the 1680 contract, see PRO, undated, Treasury Board Papers, T.1/1, ff. 38-9; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 860-64, 1260Google Scholar. A good description of the termination of farming can be found in Hughes, E., Studies in Administration and Finance 1538-1824 (Manchester, 1934), pp. 156–60Google Scholar, although Hughes' interpretation has been challenged by Chandaman, , “The English Public Revenue,” pp. 193–94Google Scholar.

46. BM, Add. MSS, 28078, f. 438.

47. Although the office of Receiver General and Cashier existed before Kent's appointment, the nature of the office was changed so substantially as to make it virtually a new position. PRO, November 13, 1674-January 22, 1675/6, Excise Declared Account, E.351/1316.

48. BM, Add. MSS, 28078, f. 436. Kent loaned a quarter of a million pounds. PRO, Interest Accounts for 1674-6, State Papers, Domestic (Supplementary), S.P. 46/155; PRO, November 13, 1674-January 22, 1675/6, Excise Declared Accounts, E. 351/1316. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 155Google Scholar.

49. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 807Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 5, 113, 881Google Scholar.

50. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, VI, 30, 32, 443, 579–80Google Scholar.

51. PRO, Interest Accounts for 1668-1685, State Papers, Domestic (Supplementary), S.P.46/155; PRO, Interest Accounts for 1668-1685, State Papers, Domestic (Supplementary), S/P.46/156. Dickson, , Financial Revolution, p. 342Google Scholar. See also Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, VIII, 92-93, 235-36, 514-15, 681, 803-04, 1708Google Scholar. After the Revolution of 1688, William III attempted a variation on the system of requiring large loans from the Excise Commissioners before he would renew their commissions, but this experiment was short lived. Hughes, , Studies in Administration, p. 164Google Scholar; Baxter, Stephen, Development of the Treasury 1660-1702 (Cambridge, 1957), pp. 28–9Google Scholar.

52. Dickson, , Financial Revolution, pp. 415–7Google Scholar; Hughes, , Studies in Administration, p. 173Google Scholar.

53. An excellent explanation of the use of tallies and the procedure of the Lower Exchequer is found in William Lowndes Handbook, BM, Add. MSS, 15898, ff. 101-9. Baxter, , The Development of the Treasury, pp. 133–35Google Scholar provides a convenient and clear summary of the use of tallies. Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” pp. 37–41Google Scholar gives a more detailed, but less lucid account. For a reliable account of the use of tallies in the earlier part of the century, see Ashton, , The Crown, pp. 47–53Google Scholar.

54. For example, see PRO, Declaration Books, Michaelmas, 1676-Easter, 1677, Easter, 1677-Michaelmas, 1677, Michaelmas, 1678-Easter, 1679, Easter, 1679-Michaelmas, 1679, State Papers, Domestic (Supplementary), S.P.46/152 (nos. 8, 9, 12, 13). The farmers were given tallies of pro on the revenue they were collecting and this allowed them to deduct their advance loan from the regular payments into the Exchequer automatically. A good explanation of the tally of pro is BM, Add. MSS, 15898, ff. 108-9; Baxter, , The Development of the Treasury, p. 135Google Scholar; Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” pp. 40–41Google Scholar.

55. Ashton, , The Crown, p. 49Google Scholar.

56. The Statutes of the Realm (London, 1819), V, 570–74Google Scholar: 17 Car. II c. 1. Hyde, Edward, The Life of Edward Earl of Clarendon, Lord High Chancellor of England, and Chancellor of the University of Oxford: in which is included, a Continuation of His History of the Grand Rebellion (Oxford, 1857), II, 215–16Google Scholar; Robbins, Caroline (ed.), The Diary of John Milward, Esq. Member of Parliament for Derbyshire, September, 1666 to May, 1668 (Cambridge, 1938), pp. 87, 104, 116, 178Google Scholar; Witcombe, D. T., Charles II and the Cavalier House of Commons 1663-1674 (New York, 1966), pp. 33–36Google Scholar; Roseveare, Henry, The Treasury. The Evolution of a British Institution (London, 1969), pp. 59–60Google Scholar.

57. Hyde, , Clarendon, II, pp. 216–21Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, I, 691Google Scholar; Baxter, , The Development of the Treasury, pp. 178–79Google Scholar; Roseveare, , The Treasury, p. 61Google Scholar.

58. Hyde, , Clarendon, II, pp. 221–22Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, I, 672, 698, 699, 700Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, III, 2, 761, 987Google Scholar; Shaw, W.A., “The ‘Treasury Order Book,’” The Economic Journal, VI (1906), pp. 37–38Google Scholar.

59. The Statutes of the Realm (London, 1819), V, 573–74Google Scholar: 17 Car. II, c.l, sec. 5-11; Richards, , Early History of Banking, p. 59Google Scholar.

60. Hyde, , Clarendon, II, 219Google Scholar.

61. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II, 208, 222, 225, 239Google Scholar, et passim; Richards, Richard D., “The Stop of the Exchequer,” Economic History, II (1930), 51Google Scholar; Feavearyear, Albert, The Pound Sterling. A History of English Money, (2nd ed. rev; Oxford, 1963), p. 111Google Scholar; Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” p. 558Google Scholar.

62. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II, 168, 169, 177, 183, 195Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, III, xxxviii–ixGoogle Scholar; Richards, , Early History of Banking, pp. 60–61Google Scholar; Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” pp. 45–46Google Scholar.

63. The Statutes of the Realm (London, 1819) V, 616–22Google Scholar: 18 & 19 Car. II, c. 13; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II, 82, 92, 192, 213Google Scholar; Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” p. 557Google Scholar.

64. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II, 604, 605, 606, 607et passimGoogle Scholar; Shaw, , “Treasury Order Book,” The Economic Journal, VI, 40Google Scholar; Chandaman, , “English Public Revenue,” pp. 45, 558Google Scholar.

65. Richards, Richard D., “The Pioneers of Banking in England,” Economic History, I (1929), 490Google Scholar.

66. Anon., The Mystery of the New Fashioned Goldsmiths or Bankers. Their Rise, Growth, State, and Decay, Discovered in a Merchant's Letter to a Country Gent, who desired to bind his son Apprentice to a Goldsmith (n.p., 1676), pp. 2–5Google Scholar; Guiseppi, John, The Bank of England. A History from its Foundation in 1694 (Chicago, 1966), p. 62Google Scholar; Richards, , Early History of Banting, pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Wilson, , England's Apprenticeship, p. 208Google Scholar.

67. Ashton, , The Crown, p. 13Google Scholar; Judges, A.V., “The Origins of English Banking,” History, XVI (1930), 138–41Google Scholar.

68. Clapham, , The Bank of England, I, 7Google Scholar; Richards, , “Pioneers of Banking,” Economic History, I, 496–99Google Scholar. For the activities of the scriveners see Feavearyear, , The Pound Sterling, p. 101Google Scholar; Ashton, , The Crown, pp. 12–13Google Scholar.

69. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, II. p. lxGoogle Scholar; Coleman, , Sir John Banks, p. 31Google Scholar; Richards, , Early History of Banking, p. 60Google Scholar; Browning, Andrew, “The Stop of the Exchequer,” History, XIV (1930), 335Google Scholar. The suspension did not apply to fiduciary orders issued on Parliamentary revenue.

70. PRO, January 5, 1671/2, Privy Council Register, P.C.2/63, ff. 143-45; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Boats, III, 1172Google Scholar; Daniell, F. H. B. (ed.), Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1671-1672, pp. 68, 87–88Google Scholar; Richards, , “Stop of the Exchequer,” Economic History, II, 53Google Scholar; Browning, , “Stop of the Exchequer,” History, XIV, 335Google Scholar.

71. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 222, 243Google Scholar.

72. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, 540Google Scholar.

73. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, xivGoogle Scholar.

74. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 42Google Scholar.

75. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 543Google Scholar. The four per cent gratuity was a convenient ploy used by the government when it was necessary to pay more than the legal rate of six per cent interest.

76. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 542–45Google Scholar; BM, Add. MSS, 28078, f. 474. See also Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 96Google Scholar.

77. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 542–45Google Scholar; BM, Add. MSS, 28078, f. 282. The amount of the debt owed to the goldsmiths was established at £1,173,352 15s. 5d., and the interest compounded annually was stated as being £198,078 13s. 6d., which was £33,468 13s. 8d. less than interest compounded semi-annually. The amount of the entire debt of the Stop of the Exchequer was £1,415,086 17s. 3d. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 545Google Scholar.

78. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 545, 600Google Scholar.

79. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 600Google Scholar; Richards, , Early History of Banking, p. 78Google Scholar.

80. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, V, 434, 458–59Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, IV, xvGoogle Scholar; Richards, , Early History of Banking, p. 81Google Scholar.

81. Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, VI, 620–21, 714Google Scholar; Shaw, , Calendar of Treasury Books, VIII, 1776Google Scholar.

82. Richards, , Early History of Banking, pp. 66–67Google Scholar; Dickson, , Financial Revolution, p. 44Google Scholar.