Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:01:24.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empire of Goods: The Anglicization of Colonial America, 1690–1776

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

T. H. Breen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Just before Christmas 1721 William Moore, described in court records as “a Pedler or Petty Chapman,” arrived in the frontier community of Berwick, Maine. Had Moore bothered to purchase a peddler's license, we would probably know nothing of his visit. He was undone by success. His illicit sales drew the attention of local authorities, and they confiscated Moore's “bagg or pack of goods.” From various witnesses the magistrates learned that the man came to Berwick with “sundry goods and Merchandizes for Saile & that he has Travelled from town to town Exposeing said Goods to Sale and has Sold to Sundry persons.”

The people of Berwick welcomed Moore to their isolated community. One can almost imagine the villagers, most of them humble farmers, rushing to Phillip Hubbard's house to examine the manufactured goods that the peddler had transported from Boston. Daniel Goodwin, for example, purchased “a yard and halfe of Stuff for handcarchiefs.” Sarah Gooding could not forgo the opportunity to buy some muslin, fine thread, and black silk. She also bought “a yard and Quarter of Lase for a Cap.” Patience Hubbard saw many things that she wanted, but in the end she settled for a “pare of garters.” Her neighbor, Sarah Stone, took home a bundle of “smole trifles.” None of the purchases amounted to more than a few pennies.

Colonial American historians have understandably overlooked such trifling transactions. They have concentrated instead on the structure of specific communities, and though they have taught us much about the people who lived in villages such as Berwick, they have generally ignored the social and economic ties that connected colonists to men and women who happened to dwell in other places.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 4: Re-Viewing the Eighteenth Century , October 1986 , pp. 467 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allen, Neal W. Jr., ed., Province and Court Records of Maine, 6 vols. (Portland, Maine, 1975), 6:72–73, 76Google Scholar.

2 Andrews, Charles McLean, The Colonial Period of American History, 4 vols. (New Haven, Conn., 1934–1938), 1:xiGoogle Scholar. See also Leonard Woods Labaree's introduction to Andrews, C. M., The Colonial Background of the American Revolution (1924; reprint, New Haven, Conn., 1961), p. ixGoogle Scholar; and Gipson, Lawrence Henry, “The Imperial Approach to Early American History,” in The Reinterpretation of Early American History: Essays in Honor of John Edwin Pomfret, ed. Billington, Ray Allen (San Marino, Calif., 1966), pp. 185–200Google Scholar.

3 Andrews, C. M., “Colonial Commerce,” American Historical Review 20 (1914): 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Andrews, C. M., “On the Writing of Colonial History,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 1 (1944): 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ibid., p. 27. Gipson, L. H., The British Empire before the American Revolution, 15 vols. (Caldwell, Idaho, and New York, 1936–1970)Google Scholar; Labaree, Leonard W., Royal Government in America (New Haven, Conn., 1930)Google Scholar.

6 Katz, Stanley N., Newcastle's New York: Anglo-American Politics, 1732–1753 (Cambridge, Mass., 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Henretta, James A., “Salutary Neglect”: Colonial Administration under the Duke of Newcastle (Princeton, N.J., 1972)Google Scholar; Olson, Alison G., Anglo-American Politics, 1660–1775 (New York, 1973)Google Scholar; Pencak, William, War, Politics, and Revolution in Provincial Massachusetts (Boston, 1981)Google Scholar; Greene, Jack P., The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689–1776 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1963)Google Scholar; Schutz, John A., William Shirley: King's Governor of Massachusetts (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1961)Google Scholar; and Abbot, William Wright, The Royal Governors of Georgia, 1754–1775 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1959)Google Scholar.

7 Bushman, Richard L., King and People in Provincial Massachusetts (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1985)Google Scholar.

8 An excellent review of these historiographic trends is Steele, I. K., “The Empire and the Provincial Elites: An Interpretation of Some Recent Writings on the English Atlantic, 1675–1740,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 8 (1980): 2–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Some historians have recently expressed considerable concern over the alleged fragmentation of early American history. They note that the people working in this field have abandoned not only the “imperial” approach but also other frameworks capable of incorporating these proliferating local studies into a larger, coherent interpretation of colonial society. In an attempt to promote at least middle-level generalizations, Jack P. Greene and Jack Pole sponsored in 1981 an international conference of early American historians. In a planning document for this meeting, they observed, “For some time now, it has been clear that the wealth of new information generated annually by students of colonial history has given rise to a severe case of intellectual indigestion …. As scholars have concentrated more and more upon smaller and smaller units in their laudable efforts to recover the context and texture of colonial life in as much detail as the sources and scholarly ingenuity will permit, there has been surprisingly little effort to relate their findings to the larger picture of British-American development over the whole period” (Greene, Jack P. and Pole, Jack, eds., Colonial British America: Essays in the New History of the Early Modern Era [Baltimore, 1984], p. 7Google Scholar). Other conferences have challenged historians in Great Britain and the United States who work in this period to think in more broadly comparative terms, to relate, e.g., social, economic, and demographic trends in the mother country to those in mainland colonies. It is premature to assess what effect these meetings will have on the study of Anglo-American history, but to date few eighteenth-century scholars have shown much interest in producing the kind of grand synthesis that the conference planners apparently envisioned.

9 Hofstadter, Richard, America at 1750: A Social Portrait (New York, 1971)Google Scholar.

10 Murrin, John M., “The Myths of Colonial Democracy and Royal Decline in Eighteenth-Century America: A Review Essay,” Cithara 5 (1965): 52–69, 53–54Google Scholar.

11 Pocock, J. G. A., “The Limits and Divisions of British History: In Search of the Unknown Subject,” American Historical Review 87 (1982): 311–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “British History: A Plea for a New Subject,” New Zealand Historical Journal 8 (1974): 3–21Google Scholar (reprinted in Journal of Modern History 47 [1975]: 601–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

12 Bailyn, Bernard, “1776: A Year of Challenge—a World Transformed,” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (1976): 437–66, 456CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Ibid., p. 456. An interesting attempt to trace one strand of this vast eighteenth-century migration to America is Landsman, Ned C., Scotland and Its First American Colony, 1683–1765 (Princeton, N.J., 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Breen, T. H., “Creative Adaptations: Peoples and Cultures,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds., pp. 195–232Google Scholar.

14 One should note that two historians have launched multivolume studies of the British empire in America. Both works concentrate on economic and political development, and though the authors are often provocative, they have not as yet had much to say about the eighteenth century. See Webb, Stephen Saunders, The Governors-General: The English Army and the Definition of the Empire, 1569–1681 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1979)Google Scholar; and Sosin, J. M., English America and the Restoration Monarchy of Charles II: Transatlantic Politics, Commerce, and Kinship (Lincoln, Nebr., 1980)Google Scholar, and English America and the Revolution of 1688: Royal Administration and the Structure of Provincial Government (Lincoln, Nebr., 1982)Google Scholar.

15 McCusker, John J. and Menard, Russell R., The Economy of British America, 1607–1789 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1985)Google Scholar.

16 Sheridan, Richard B., “The Domestic Economy,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds., p. 67Google Scholar. See also Smith, Daniel Scott, “Early American Historiography and Social Science History,” Social Science History 6 (1982): 267–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Galenson, David W. and Menard, Russell R., “Approaches to the Analysis of Economic Growth in Colonial British America,” Historical Methods 13 (1980): 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 McCusker and Menard, p. 18.

18 Some recent studies that attempt to tie colonial economic development to an expanding world market for American staples are Price, Jacob M., France and the Chesapeake: A History of the French Tobacco Monopoly, 1674–1791, and Its Relationship to the British and American Tobacco Trades, 2 vols. (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1973)Google Scholar, Capital and Credit in British Overseas Trade: The View from the Chesapeake, 1700–1776 (Cambridge, Mass., 1980)Google Scholar, “Economic Function and the Growth of American Port Towns in the Eighteenth Century,” Perspectives in American History 8 (1974): 121–86Google Scholar, and “The Economic Growth of the Chesapeake and the European Market, 1697–1775,” Journal of Economic History 24 (1964): 496–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Clemens, Paul G., The Atlantic Economy and Colonial Maryland's Eastern Shore: From Tobacco to Grain (Ithaca, N.Y., 1980)Google Scholar.

19 McKendrick, Neil, “The Commercialization of Fashion,” in The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, by McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, J. H. (Bloomington, Ind., 1982), p. 53Google Scholar.

20 Some titles that have been most helpful in understanding the transformation of the eighteenth-century British economy are Wilson, Charles H., England's Apprenticeship, 1603–1763 (Cambridge, 1965)Google Scholar; Davis, Ralph, A Commercial Revolution: English Overseas Trade in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (London, 1967)Google Scholar, The Rise of the Atlantic Economies (Ithaca, N.Y., 1973)Google Scholar, and “English Foreign Trade, 1700–1774,” Economic History Review 15 (1962): 285–303Google Scholar; Ashton, T. S., An Economic History of England: The Eighteenth Century (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Clarkson, Leslie A., The Preindustrial Economy in England, 1500–1750 (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Porter, Roy, English Society in the Eighteenth Century (Harmondsworth, 1982)Google Scholar; Perkin, Harold, Origins of Modern English Society (London, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Farnie, D. A., “The Commercial Empire of the Atlantic, 1607–1783,” Economic History Review 15 (1962): 205–18Google Scholar; Beckett, J. V., “The Eighteenth-Century Origins of the Factory System: A Case Study from the 1740s,” Business History 19 (1977): 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Price, Jacob, “The Transatlantic Economy,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds., pp. 18–42Google Scholar.

21 Plumb, J. H., “Commercialization of Leisure,” in McKendrick, et al., p. 273Google Scholar.

22 John, A. H., “Aspects of English Economic Growth in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century,” in Growth of the British Overseas Trade in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. Minchinton, W. E. (London, 1969), p. 178Google Scholar; and Holderness, B. A., “Credit in a Rural Community,” Midland History 3 (1975): 93–115Google Scholar.

23 McCusker and Menard, p. 277; Price, , “The Transatlantic Economy,” pp. 34–35Google Scholar.

24 Bailyn (n. 12 above), p. 447.

25 I am grateful to Harold Perkin for bringing the role of “demand” in the writings of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century economists to my attention.

26 Hirschman, Albert O., Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action (Princeton, N.J., 1982), pp. 49–57Google Scholar. For a comparative perspective, see de Vries, Jan, “Peasant Demand Patterns and Economic Development: Friesland, 1550–1750,” in European Peasants and Their Markets: Essays in Agrarian Economic History, ed. Parker, William N. and Jones, Eric L. (Princeton, N.J., 1975), pp. 168–205Google Scholar. The moral implications of popular consumption are discussed in Sekora, John, Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett (Baltimore, 1977)Google Scholar.

27 Hamilton, Alexander, Gentleman's Progress: Itinerarium of Dr. Alexander Hamilton, ed. Bridenbaugh, Carl (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1948), p. 55Google Scholar. On the danger of forcing people in the past to conform to modern economy theory, see Salinger, Sharon V. and Wetherell, Charles, “Wealth and Renting in Prerevolutionary Philadelphia,” Journal of American History 71 (1985): 826–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Genovese, Eugene D., “Yeomen Farmers in a Slaveholders' Democracy,” Agricultural History 49 (1975): 331–43Google Scholar.

28 This historiography is discussed in Shammas, Carole, “How Self-sufficient Was Early America?” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 13 (1982): 247–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The fullest early statement of this position was Bidwell, Percy Wells and Falconer, John I., History of Agriculture in the Northern United States, 1620–1860 (Washington, D.C., 1925)Google Scholar.

29 Henretta, James A., “Families and Farms: Mentalité in Pre-industrial America,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 35 (1978): 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 For example, Mutch, Robert E., “Yeoman and Merchant in Pre-industrial America: Eighteenth-Century Massachusetts as a Case Study,” Societas 7 (1977): 282Google Scholar, and “The Cutting Edge: Colonial America and the Debate about the Transition to Capitalism,” Theory and Society 9 (1980): 847–63Google Scholar; Merrill, Michael, “Cash Is Good to Eat: Self-Sufficiency and Exchange in the Rural Economy of the United States,” Radical History Review 4 (1977): 42–72Google Scholar; Henretta, James, “Reply to James Lemon,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 37 (1980): 696–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, Christopher, “Household Economy, Market Exchange and the Rise of Capitalism in the Connecticut Valley, 1800–1860,” Journal of Social History 13 (1979): 169–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Bushman, Richard L., “Family Security in the Transition from Farm to City, 1750–1850,” Journal of Family History 6 (1981): 238–43Google Scholar; Stiverson, Gregory A., “Early American Farming: A Comment,” Agricultural History 50 (1976): 37–44Google Scholar.

31 Lemon, James T., “Spatial Order: Households in Local Communities and Regions,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds. (n. 8 above), p. 102Google Scholar.

32 Watson, Harry L., “Conflict and Collaboration: Yeomen, Slaveholders, and Politics in the Antebellum South,” Social History 10 (1985): 273–298, 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hahn, Steven and Prude, Jonathan, eds., The Countryside in the Age of Capitalist Transformation: Essays in the Social History of Rural America (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1985)Google Scholar.

33 Appleby, Joyce, “Value and Society,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds., p. 309Google Scholar.

34 Lemon, p. 102. See Grant, Charles S., Democracy in the Connecticut Frontier Town of Kent (New York, 1961)Google Scholar; Rutman, Darrett B. and Rutman, Anita H., A Place in Time: Middlesex County, Virginia, 1650–1750, 2 vols. (New York, 1984), 1:204–5Google Scholar.

35 Rothenberg, Winifred B., “The Market and Massachusetts Farmers, 1750–1855,” Journal of Economic History 41 (1981): 283–314, 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 See Breen, T. H., “Back to Sweat and Toil: Suggestions for the Study of Agricultural Work in Early America,” Pennsylvania History 49 (1982): 241–58Google Scholar; Clemens (n. 18 above), pp. 19–20.

37 Mitchell, Robert D., Commercialism and Frontier: Perspectives on the Early Shenandoah Valley (Charlottesville, Va., 1977), p. 152Google Scholar.

38 Breen, , “Back to Sweat and Toil,” p. 245Google Scholar; Appleby, Joyce, “Commercial Farming and the ‘Agrarian Myth’ in the Early Republic,” Journal of American History 68 (1982): 833–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lemon, James T., “Household Consumption in Eighteenth-Century America and Its Relationship to Production and Trade: The Situation in Southeastern Pennsylvania,” Agricultural History 41 (1967): 59–70Google Scholar, and The Best Poor Man's Country: A Geographical Study of Early Southeastern Pennsylvania (Baltimore, 1972)Google Scholar.

39 Nash, Gary B., “Social Development,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds., p. 236Google Scholar.

40 Heyrman, Christine Leigh, Commerce and Culture: The Maritime Communities of Colonial Massachusetts, 1690–1750 (New York, 1984), p. 19Google Scholar.

41 Pruitt, Bettye Hobbs, “Self-Sufficiency and the Agricultural Economy of Eighteenth-Century Massachusetts,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 41 (1984): 333–64, 338CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Pruitt, Bettye Hobbs, “Communications,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 41 (1985): 559–62Google Scholar; Norton, Mary Beth, “The Evolution of White Women's Experience in Early America,” American Historical Review 89 (1984): 604–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Shammas, Carole, “Consumer Behavior in Colonial America,” Social Science History 6 (1982): 67–86, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In another essay, Shammas concludes that “the growth of the colonial population, European Atlantic ports, the British shipping industry, indentured servitude, and chattel slavery all stand as testimony to the voracious appetite of Western consumers for new market commodities, and there is no evidence that Americans did not fully participate in that commercial world” (“How Self-sufficient Was Early America?” [n. 28 above], p. 268). Even archaeologists affirm this argument (see Coe, Michael D., “The Line of Forts: Archeology of the Mid-Eighteenth Century on the Massachusetts Frontier,” Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife: Annual Proceedings 2 [1977]: 44–56Google Scholar).

43 Main, Gloria L., “The Standard of Living in Colonial Massachusetts,” Journal of Economic History 43 (1983): 108Google Scholar; Bailyn (n. 12 above), pp. 446–48; McCusker and Menard (n. 15 above), chap. 13.

44 Price, Jacob M., “Colonial Trade and British Economic Development, 1660–1775,” in La Revolution americaine et l'Europe, ed. Fohlen, Claude and Godechot, Jacques (Paris, 1979), p. 225Google Scholar. See also Ormrod, David, “English Re-exports and the Dutch Staplemarket in the Eighteenth Century,” in Enterprise and History: Essays in Honour of Charles Wilson, ed. Coleman, D. C. and Mathias, Peter (Cambridge, 1984), p. 114Google Scholar; Davis, , “English Foreign Trade” (n. 20 above), pp. 289–90Google Scholar, and A Commercial Revolution (n. 20 above), pp. 18–19; Wilson (n. 20 above); and W. E. Minchinton, introduction to Minchinton, ed. (n. 22 above), p. 40.

45 Main, Gloria L., Tobacco Colony: Life in Early Maryland, 1650–1720 (Princeton, N.J., 1982), pp. 5–8, 239Google Scholar; Walsh, Lorena S., “Urban Amenities and Rural Sufficiency: Living Standards and Consumer Behavior in the Colonial Chesapeake, 1643–1777,” Journal of Economic History 43 (1983): 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr, Lois Green and Walsh, Lorena S., “Changing Life Styles and Consumer Behavior in the Colonial Chesapeake” (paper presented at the Conference on Britain and America in the Early Modern Era, 1600–1820, Williamsburg, Va., September 5–7, 1985)Google Scholar.

46 Smith, William, The History of the Late Province of New York … 1762, Collections of the New York Historical Society, vol. 4, pt. 2 (New York, 1829), p. 281Google Scholar. See also Egnal, Marc M. and Ernst, Joseph A., “An Economic Interpretation of the American Revolution,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 29 (1972): 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Price, Jacob M., “Buchanan & Simson, 1759–1763: A Different Kind of Glasgow Firm Trading to the Chesapeake,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 40 (1983): 3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Papenfuse, Edward C., In Pursuit of Profit: The Annapolis Merchants in the Era of the American Revolution, 1763–1805 (Baltimore, 1975), p. 15Google Scholar; McCusker and Menard, pp. 268–70; Botein, Stephen, “The Anglo-American Book Trade before 1776: Personnel and Strategies,” in Printing and Society in Early America, ed. Joyce, William L.et al. (Worcester, Mass., 1983), p. 80Google Scholar.

47 Walsh, p. 111; Shammas, Carole, “The Domestic Environment in Early Modern England and America,” Journal of Social History 14 (1980): 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr and Walsh; Isaac, Rhys, “Radicalised Religion and Changing Lifestyles: Virginia in the Period of the American Revolution,” in The Origins of Anglo-American Radicalism, ed. Jacob, Margaret and Jacob, H. James (London, 1984), pp. 257–67Google Scholar; Bushman, Richard L., “American High-Style and Vernacular Cultures,” in Greene, and Pole, , eds. (n. 8 above), pp. 345–83Google Scholar.

48 Main, , Tobacco Colony, p. 247Google Scholar; Joyce, Rodris, “Tea Drinking in Eighteenth-Century America: Its Etiquette and Equipage,” in Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology, U.S. National Museum Bulletin 225 (Washington, D.C., 1961), pp. 61–91Google Scholar; Smith, Billy, “The Material Lives of Laboring Philadelphians, 1750 to 1800,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 38 (1981): 163–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Mittelberger, Gottlieb, Journey to Pennsylvania (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), pp. 37, 88–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCusker and Menard, p. 287; Walsh, p. 110.

50 Baxter, William T., The House of Hancock: Business in Boston, 1724–1775 (Cambridge, Mass., 1945), p. 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Other valuable studies of major American merchants are Hedges, James B., The Browns of Providence Plantations, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1952–1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; White, Philip L., The Beekmans of New York in Politics and Commerce, 1647–1877 (New York, 1956)Google Scholar; Jensen, Arthur L., The Maritime Commerce of Colonial Philadelphia (Madison, Wis., 1963)Google Scholar; [Johnson, Joshua], Joshua Johnson's Letterbook, 1771–1774: Letters from a Merchant in London to His Partners in Maryland, ed. Price, Jacob M., London Record Society, Publication 15 (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

51 McCusker and Menard, p. 354. See also McClelland, Peter D., “The Cost to America of British Imperial Policy,” American Economic Review 59 (1969): 370–81Google Scholar; Walton, Gary M., “The New Economic History and the Burdens of the Navigation Acts,” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 24 (1971): 533–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barrow, Thomas C., Trade and Empire: The British Customs Service in Colonial America, 1660–1775 (Cambridge, Mass., 1967)Google Scholar, chap. 7.

52 Hedges, 1:8.

53 Price, Jacob M., “The Last Phase of the Virginia-London Consignment Trade: James Buchanan & Co., 1758–1768,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 43 (1986): 64–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Egnal and Ernst; McCusker and Menard, pp. 197–98.

54 Egnal and Ernst, pp. 15–16.

55 Cited in Carr and Walsh, p. 31. Rutman and Rutman (n. 34 above), pp. 205–31; Price, , “Buchanan & Simson,” pp. 4–33Google Scholar; Mitchell (n. 37 above), pp. 154–59; Walsh, p. 116.

56 Weaver, Glenn, Jonathan Trumbull: Connecticut's Merchant Magistrate (1710–1785) (Hartford, Conn., 1956), p. 19Google Scholar.

57 Cited in Carr and Walsh, p. 33. See also Berg, Harry D., “The Organization of Business in Colonial Philadelphia,” Pennsylvania History 10 (1943): 157–77Google Scholar.

58 Carr and Walsh, p. 33.

59 White, pp. 390–91.

60 Baxter (n. 50 above), p. 188.

61 For example, The Colonial Laws of New York from the Year 1664 to the Revolution, 5 vols. (Albany, N.Y., 1894), 4:388–89Google Scholar. On women as traders in early America, see Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher, Good Wives: Image and Reality in the Lives of Women in Northern New England, 1650–1750 (New York, 1980)Google Scholar, chap. 2; Kerber, Linda K., Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1980), pp. 148–50Google Scholar.

62 Hamilton (n. 27 above), pp. 150, 160. See Bushman, Richard L., From Puritan to Yankee: Character and the Social Order in Connecticut, 1690–1765 (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), p. 113Google Scholar; Rutman and Rutman, p. 231.

63 Plummer, Wilbur C., “Consumer Credit in Colonial Philadelphia,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 66 (1942): 385–409Google Scholar; White, pp. 335–485; Walsh, p. 116; Carr, Lois G. and Walsh, Lorena, “Inventories and the Analysis of Wealth and Consumption Patterns in St. Mary's County, Maryland, 1658–1777,” Historical Methods 13 (1980): 81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 On the size and meaning of debt, see Breen, T. H., Tobacco Culture: The Mentality of the Great Tidewater Planters on the Eve of Revolution (Princeton, N.J., 1985)Google Scholar, chap. 4; Evans, Emory, “Planter Indebtedness and the Coming of the Revolution in Virginia,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 19 (1962): 511–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Cited in Berg, p. 171.

66 The term “Anglicization” was originally employed by Murrin, John M. (“Anglicizing an American Colony: The Transformation of Provincial Massachusetts” [Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1966])Google Scholar. James Deetz describes this cultural process as “re-Anglicization” (In Small Things Forgotten: The Archeology of Early American Life [Garden City, N.Y., 1977])Google Scholar, and Coe, Michael D. writes of the “Georgianization” of eighteenth-century American culture ([n. 42 above], pp. 53–54)Google Scholar.

67 Deetz, p. 38.

68 Eddis, William, Letters from America, ed. Land, Aubrey C. (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), pp. 57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Botein (n. 46 above), pp. 79, 80.

70 “The Examination of Benjamin Franklin in t he House of Commons, February 13, 1766,” in Colonies to Nation: 1763–1789, ed. Greene, Jack P. (New York, 1975), pp. 72–77Google Scholar.

71 Pocock, , “British History” (n. 11 above), p. 610Google Scholar.

72 Cited in Freeman, Douglas Southall, George Washington: A Biography, 7 vols. (New York, 1948–1957), 1:168–69Google Scholar. See Pares, Richard, Merchants and Planters, Economic History Review Supplement no. 4 (Cambridge, 1960), p. 50Google Scholar; and Breen, Tobacco Culture, chap. 3.

73 Cited in Hoffman, Ronald, A Spirit of Dissension: Economics, Politics, and the Revolution in Maryland (Baltimore, 1973), pp. 130–31Google Scholar. On the symbolic meaning of goods, see Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Rochberg-Halton, Eugene, The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self (Cambridge, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Douglass, Mary and Isherwood, Baron, The World of Goods: Toward an Anthropology of Consumption (New York, 1979)Google Scholar, chap. 4; Mukerji, Chandra, From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism (New York, 1983)Google Scholar.

74 The revolutionary implications of consumption are explored in Breen, Timothy H., “Baubles of Britain: The Meaning of Things” (paper presented to the United States Capitol Historical Society, March 20, 1986)Google Scholar, which will appear in Hoffman, Ronald and Carson, Cary, eds., Of Consuming Interests: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century (in press)Google Scholar.