Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:32:01.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Steps to War: the Scots and Parliament, 1642–1643*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Lawrence Kaplan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Scottish role in the English Civil War, although generally recognized by historians to be a major one, has never been investigated in depth. Every student of the period knows how the resistance in Scotland to the English prayer book impelled Charles to summon first the Short and then the Long Parliament, thereby setting in motion the events leading to the Great Rebellion. Yet the Scots did more than help to precipitate the conflict: just a year after the actual fighting between the King and his Parliament began, they entered the fray as allies of the latter and remained active combatants in the first Civil War until its conclusion. Military aid was just one facet of this alliance. Scottish commissioners in London became embroiled in parliamentary politics, influencing positions taken by the two houses, while Scottish ministers stimulated the religious debate which characterized these years and assisted (despite their annoyance with the outcome) in the establishment of a new church government in England. Quite obviously the English Civil War was never exclusively an English matter.

The Scots' intervention in their neighbors' affairs is also recognized to have resulted in disaster. Not only did they fail to realize their original ambitions; they were eventually forced to endure the humiliation of a military occupation. How then did Scotland manage to become involved in the upheaval taking place in England? The answer usually given by historians is a simple one: the Scottish Kirk, desiring to export Presbyterianism, worked successfully for an alliance with Parliament as a first step toward making England a Presbyterian nation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1970 , pp. 50 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For valuable suggestions in the preparation of this article, I wish to thank Valerie Pearl, J. H. Hexter, and Irwin Polishook. L. K.

References

1. See, e.g., Gardiner, S. R., History of the Great Civil War (London, 1893), I, 226–29Google Scholar.

2. Burnet, Gilbert, History of His Own Time (London, 1724), I, 43–44Google Scholar.

3. Burnet, Gilbert, The Memoirs of James and William, Dukes of Hamilton (London, 1677), pp. 234–36Google Scholar.

4. Peterkin, Alexander (ed.), Records of the Kirk of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1843), p. 343Google Scholar.

5. Ibid.

6. Journals of the House of Lords, V, 227Google Scholar.

7. Peterkin, , Records of the Kirk, p. 329Google Scholar.

8. Historians who concentrate on the religious demands of the Scots tend to give the impression, perhaps unintentionally, that the Kirk was paramount in Scottish affairs.

9. Burrell, Sidney A., “Calvinism, Capitalism and the Middle Classes,” J.M.H., XXXII (1960), 137Google Scholar.

10. Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England, ed. Macray, W. D. (Oxford, 1888), I, 169Google Scholar.

11. Chambers, Robert, A Biographical Dictionary of Eminent Scotsmen (Glasgow, 1835), I, 70Google Scholar; A Speech by the Marquis of Argyll to the Parliament (June 25, 1646), listed in Catalogue of the Pamphlets, Books, Newspapers, and Manuscripts … collected by George Thomason, 1640–1661 (London, 1908), I, 447 (hereafter cited as Thomason Catalogue)Google Scholar.

12. Laing, David (ed.), The Letters and Journals of Robert Baillie (Edinburgh, 1841–1842), I, 115Google Scholar.

13. SirBalfour, James, The Historical Works (London, 1825), II, 377–78Google Scholar.

14. This term was used interchangeably with the “Argyll party” and the “war party” by contemporaries to describe those who supported the Kirk and the Earl of Argyll.

15. D.N.B. for an excellent biographical sketch by S. R. Gardiner.

16. Nobles in alliance with the Duke of Hamilton were the Earls of Buchan, Dunfermline, Galloway, Home, Lindsay, and Roxburgh.

17. Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 195–96Google Scholar.

18. Three “neutrals” were the Earl of Lauderdale, the elder, the Earl of Glencairn, and the Earl of Callendar.

19. Register of the Privy Council of Scotland (1642), II, 264–65Google Scholar.

20. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 57Google Scholar.

21. Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 201–02Google Scholar.

22. BM, Hardwicke Papers, Add. MSS, 35,838, fols. 147-48.

23. Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 201–02Google Scholar.

24. Ibid., p. 209. One clause of the proposal called for the total removal of Episcopacy. See The Proceedings of the Commissioners appointed by the King and Parliament of Scotland for conserving the treaty and peace. With two letters sent to His Majesty by the Lords of his Privy Councell (Mar. 31, 1643), listed in Thomason Catalogue, I, 248Google Scholar.

25. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 66Google Scholar.

26. Clarendon, , History of the Rebellion, II, 59Google Scholar.

27. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 66–67Google Scholar. Lauderdale, whose son John Maitland would play such an important role in future events, joined forces with the war party at this time.

28. Rushworth, John, Historical Collections (London, 1659–1701), V, 78–83Google Scholar.

29. Clarendon, , History of the Rebellion, II, 505Google Scholar.

30. The Earl of Montrose, recognizing the imminence of hostilities, advocated a preventive war, but no one in Oxford took him seriously. Wishart, G., A Complete History of the Wars in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1720), pp. 7–8Google Scholar.

31. Carte, Thomas (ed.), A Collection of Original Letters and Papers (London, 1739), I, 19–20Google Scholar.

32. Register of the Privy Council of Scotland (1643), II, 429–33Google Scholar.

33. H.M.C., Portland MSS, I, 120–21Google Scholar; A Declaration of the Commons Concerning the Rebellion in Ireland (July 25, 1643), listed in Thomason Catalogue, I, 276Google Scholar.

34. Wedgwood, C. V., Thomas Wentworth, First Earl of Strafford (London, 1962), p. 254Google Scholar.

35. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 26Google Scholar.

36. Register of the Privy Council of Scotland (1643), II, 426–27Google Scholar.

37. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 80Google Scholar.

38. Burnet, , Hamilton, p. 228Google Scholar. Glencairn and Callendar were two “neutrals” who began supporting Argyll at this juncture.

39. Register of the Privy Council of Scotland (1643), II, 426–27Google Scholar.

40. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 75Google Scholar.

41. Ibid., II, 79.

42. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 13–14Google Scholar.

43. Ibid., VI, 14-15.

44. Ibid., VI, 19-20.

45. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 81Google Scholar.

46. Lords Journals, VI, 86–87Google Scholar; Firth, C. H. and Rait, R. S. (eds.), Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum (London, 1911), pp. 180–84Google Scholar.

47. Hexter, J. H., The Reign of King Pym (Cambridge, Mass., 1941), ch. vi, passimGoogle Scholar.

48. Gardiner, , Civil War, I, 178Google Scholar.

49. National Library of Scotland, Wodrow MSS, LXVII, fol. 6.

50. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 83Google Scholar.

51. Gardiner, for example, describes how ignorant the Scottish clergy were of English conditions. Gardiner, , Civil War, I, 227–28Google Scholar.

52. Trevor-Roper, H. R., “Scotland and the Puritan Revolution,” in Historical Essays, 1600-1750, Presented to David Ogg, ed. Bell, H. E. and Ollard, R. L. (London, 1963), passimGoogle Scholar.

53. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 85Google Scholar. Baillie wrote, “We did greatly long for the English commissioners, of whose coming we were well near out of hope, many thinking their stay to be from the Lords denying them a commission, and some from their policy to make us do, ourself, without their desire, what they would be at.”

54. The other three were Sir William Armine, Thomas Hatcher, and Henry Darley; the two ministers accompanying the commissioners were Stephen Marshall and Philip Nye.

55. Clarendon, , History of the Rebellion, III, 216nGoogle Scholar.

56. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 36–37Google Scholar.

57. Lords Journals, VI, 140Google Scholar.

58. Clarendon, , History of the Rebellion, III, 221Google Scholar.

59. Gardiner, S. R., Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution (London, 1962), pp. 267–71Google Scholar. This is the final English version.

60. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 42Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Walter Makey.

61. Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 239–40Google Scholar.

62. Sir Simonds D'Ewes, whose political and religious views were opposed to those of Vane, strongly favored the insertion of the two clauses. BM, D'Ewes's Diary, Harl. MSS, 165, fol. 162r and v.

63. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 90Google Scholar.

64. Journals of the House of Commons, III, 223Google Scholar; BM, Yonge's Diary, Add. MSS, 18,778, fol. 44.

65. BM, D'Ewes's Diary, Harl. MSS, 165, fols. 158v-59.

66. By the time the Scots arrived in London, there was little that they could do to change Parliament's additions. Making a virtue out of a necessity, Baillie, after seeing the alterations in the Covenant, claimed that they were “for the better.” Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 101–02Google Scholar. See Pearl, Valerie, “Oliver St. John and the ‘Middle Group’ in the Long Parliament,” E.H.R., LXXXI (1966), 498–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for a discussion of the Covenant's reception in England.

67. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 90Google Scholar.

68. Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 239–40Google Scholar.

69. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 104Google Scholar.

70. Note Argyll's moderation in his speech to Parliament in June 1646.

71. During his trial in 1662 Henry Vane made a reference to Argyll, who had just been executed in Scotland: “That noble person, whose memory I honor, was with myself at the beginning and making of the Solemn League and Covenant.” SirVane, Henry, The Trial of Henry Vane (London, 1662), p. 91Google Scholar.

72. Lords Journals, VI, 228Google Scholar.

73. H.M.C., Portland MSS, I, 129, 136–37Google Scholar.

74. Calendar of State Papers, Venetian, 1643–1647, p. 28.

75. BM, D'Ewes's Diary, Harl. MSS, 165, fol. 126; Commons Journals, III, 141–42Google Scholar.

76. Lords Journals, VI, 290Google Scholar.

77. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 102–03Google Scholar.

78. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 247–49Google Scholar; Lords Journals, VI, 244Google Scholar; Commons Journals, III, 350Google Scholar.

79. N.L. of S., Wodrow MSS, LXV, fol. 85.

80. Commons Journals, III, 350Google Scholar.

81. Rushworth, , Historical Collections, II, 485Google Scholar.

82. Laing, , Letters and Journals of Baillie, II, 103Google Scholar. Baillie writes about the conditions encouraging Scottish people to take the Covenant. “But most of all the Irish cessation made the minds of our people embrace that means of safety.”

83. Ibid.; Burnet, , Hamilton, pp. 248–50Google Scholar.

84. Examples of Royalists who, although they first refused to take the Covenant, did so within the next year are the Earls of Morton, Lanark, Kinnoul, Roxburgh, and Southesk.

85. Spalding, John, The History of Troubles in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1792), II, 119Google Scholar.

86. Examples of Royalists who became soldiers in the cause of the Covenant are Viscount Duddop and Lord Kirkcudbright.

87. The Earls of Kinnoul, Linlithgow, Perth, Wigton, and Annandale.

88. The Earls of Glencairn, Marishall, Buchan, Roxburgh, Home, and Dunfermline.

89. Parliament of Scotland, VI, 50Google Scholar.