Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:31:23.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Selling of Newton: Science and Technology in Early Eighteenth-Century England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Larry Stewart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past decade the role of science in the early eighteenth century has come in for close scrutiny and increasing debate. There is specifically one rather large and problematic issue, that is, the relationship between science and technology in England in the first half of the eighteenth century when, it is generally agreed, the Industrial Revolution had not yet made any discernible impact. There are those historians who have insisted that the Newtonian natural philosophy had nothing whatever to do with the mechanical creations and innovations of artisans and craftsmen. This may be understandable because Newtonian science has come to be regarded as fundamentally mathematical and experimental—and not even comprehensible, except in the broadest terms, to the Augustan virtuosos. This has often created the version of science as a purely rational and cerebral activity distanced from and above technology, a science unsullied perhaps by the grime of mechanics' hands. One might speculate on the ideological origins of such a universe, but it seems that one can at least see that such a version of events is determined in part by the question that proposes a direct causal relation between cerebral science and rank technology. The argument evidently is that, if one cannot find the historical evidence that establishes a precise link between Newton's interparticulate forces and the partial vacuum of the Savery engine, then one must conclude that no relationship existed.

But historical associations are never quite so simple. One could easily demonstrate that the Newtonian natural philosophy was deliberately propagated among men whose interests tended to be more practical than philosophical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 178 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hall, A. Rupert, “What Did the Industrial Revolution Owe to Science?” in Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J. H. Plumb, ed. McKendrick, Neil (London, 1974), pp. 129–51Google Scholar; and Mathias, Peter, “Who Unbound Prometheus ?” in Science and Society, 1600–1900, ed. Mathias, Peter (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 54–80Google Scholar.

2 For a recent sophisticated form of this argument, see Fores, Michael, “Constructed Science and the Seventeenth Century ‘Revolution,’” History of Science 22 (1984): 235–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Compare Mathias, Peter, The Transformation of England: Essays in the Economic and Social History of England in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1979), pp. 77–84Google Scholar; and Timmons, George, “Education and Technology in the Industrial Revolution,” History of Technology 8 (1983): 137–38Google Scholar.

3 Compare Mathias, , “Who Unbound Prometheus?” p. 69Google Scholar.

4 Martin, Benjamin, The Philosophical Grammar; Being a View of the Present State of Experimental Physiology, or Natural Philosophy (London, 1735), p. viGoogle Scholar; and Millburn, John R., Benjamin Martin: Author, Instrument-Maker, and “Country Showman” (Leiden, 1976), pp. 13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pemberton, Henry, A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy (London, 1728)Google Scholar. Rohault's system of natural philosophy, illustrated with Dr. Samuel Clarke's notes, taken mostley out of Sr. Isaac Newton's philosophy, with additions, trans. Clarke, John (London, 1723)Google Scholar. Derham, William, Physico-Theology: or, A demonstration of the being and attributes of God, from his works of creation (London, 1713)Google Scholar.

5 Desaguliers, J. T., Physico-Mechanical Lectures. Or, an Account of What is Explain'd and Demonstrated in the Course of Mechanical and Experimental Philosophy … Design'd for the Use of All Such as have seen, or may see Courses of Experimental Philosophy (London, 1717), p.2Google Scholar.

6 Desaguliers, J. T., “A Course of Mechanical and Experimental Philosophy,” Bodleian Library (Bodl.), Rawlinson MS D. 871, p. 14Google Scholar.

7 Desaguliers, John-Theophilus, A Course of Mechanical and Experimental Philosophy (London, 1725), p. 2Google Scholar.

8 Rowbottom, Margaret, ’The Teaching of Experimental Philosophy in England, 1700–1730,” XIe Congres international d'histoire des sciences (1965): Actes IV (1968). pp. 46–53Google Scholar; Cudworth, William, Life and Correspondence of Abraham Sharp, the Yorkshire mathematician and astronomer, and assistant to Flamsteed (London, 1889), p. 81Google Scholar.

9 Until 1710, Hauksbee's shop was located in Giltspur Street, near Christ's Hospital. At that point, Hauksbee moved to Wine Office Court. Fleet Street, near Senex and the Royal Society. (Dictionary of Scientific Biography [New York, 1972], 6: 169Google Scholar).

10 Hans, Nicholas, New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century, 2d impression (London, 1966), pp. 213–14Google Scholar; Davis, Ralph, The Rise of the English Shipping Industry (Newton Abbot, 1972), pp. 124–26Google Scholar.

11 Taylor, E. G. R., Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge, 1954), pp. 141–42, 276Google Scholar; see also Smith, Alan, “Steam and the City: The Committee of Proprietors of the Invention for Raising Water by Fire, 1715–1735,” Transactions of the Newcomen Society 49 (1977–1978): 8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Ayers died in 1715.

12 Loftis, John, “Richard Steele's Censorium,” Huntington Library Quarterly 14 (1950): 43, 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nicolson, Marjorie and Rousseau, G. S., “This Long Disease, My Life”: Alexander Pope and the Sciences (Princeton, N.J., 1968), p. 143Google Scholar.

13 The Weekly-Journal or Saturday's-Post (January 10, 1719).

14 Hans, pp. 138–41; Rowbottom, pp. 47, 51.

15 See Force, James E., William Whiston: Honest Newtonian (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 20–21Google Scholar.

16 Musson, A. E. and Robinson, Eric, Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution (Toronto, 1969), pp. 159–60Google Scholar; Robinson, F. J. G., “A Philosophic War: An Episode in Eighteenth Century Scientific Lecturing in North-East England,” Transactions of the Architectural and Archaeological Society of Durham and Northumberland 2 (1970): 102Google Scholar; Edward, Hughes ,North Country Life in the Eighteenth Century: The North East, 1700–1750 (London, 1952), pp. 99, 343, 376, 417Google Scholar; and Ellis, Joyce M., A Study of the Business Fortunes of William Cotesworth, c. 1688–1726 (New York, 1981), passimGoogle Scholar.

17 There is a reference to a Mr. Horseley in J. Cockburne to [Christian Cole?], October 26, 1721, Scottish Record Office (SRO), York Buildings Society Papers, Gifts and Deposits (GD) 1/170/1/3. Employment with the company and its purchase of the Widdrington Estate is suggested by Horsley, John, “An Account of the Depth of Rain fallen from April 1, 1722 to April 1, 1723, Observed at Widdrington in Northumberland,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 33, no. 377 (May–June 1723): 328–29Google Scholar.

18 Robinson, pp. 103–4. On Desaguliers's interest in the problem, see Royal Society, London, Royal Society MSS, Register Book (C), 19:193–94; and Desaguliers, J. T., “An Account of an Instrument or Machine for changing the Air of the Room of sick People in a little Time, by either drawing out the foul Air, or forcing in fresh Air; or doing both successively, without opening Doors or Windows,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 39, no. 437 (April–June 1735): 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On ventilators, see Allen, D. G. C. and Schofield, R. E., Stephen Hales: Scientist and Philanthropist (London, 1980), pp. 81 ffGoogle Scholar.

19 British Library (BL), Loan 29/2, New River Co., Miscellaneous Papers, May, 1704; Smith, p. 8.

20 J. T. Desaguliers, “A Plan of the Design for bringing Waterfrom the Village of Drayton for the better Supplying the Cities of London and Westminsterwith Water” (marginalia) (March 1720/1), Public Record Office (PRO). MPF 259; and PRO, State Papers (SP) (Domestic) 35/25, no. 104, March 4, 1720/1; Mathias, “Who Unbound Prometheus?” (n. 1 above), p. 68, n. 1.

21 Jno. Warner to [George Cooke?], January 9, 1724[/5?], BL, Lansdowne MS 841. fols. 113–14; Cooke to [Warner?], February 8, 1723/4, BL, Lansdowne MS 841, fols. 120–21.

22 BL, Lansdowne MS 1056, fol. 47. J. T. D—rs, “A Letter to W. Bow—r, Esq:” January 9, 1724/5. See BL, Lansdowne MS 841, fols. 116–18, January 12, 1724/5.

23 Warrant for patent dated June 9, 1720, BL, Hardwicke Papers, Additional (Add.) MS 36123, fol. 5. Vream seems to have been employed as Desaguliers's assistant at this point (see James Brydges to J. T. Desaguliers, February 15, 1719/20, Huntington Library [HL], Stowe MS 57, vol. 17, fols. 11–12).

24 Taylor, E.G. R., Mathematical Practitioners of Hanoverian England (Cambridge, 1966), p. 145Google Scholar.

25 Duke of Chandos to Sir George Beaumont, March 26, 1736, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 47, fols. 171–72.

26 PRO, SP (Domestic) 36/10/95–100, March 8, 1728.

27 Rogers, Pat, “Gulliver and the Engineers,” Modern Language Review 70 (1970): 264Google Scholar, n. 1; BL, Add. MS 36123, fols. 41–42, July 31, 1724. The patent was issued on May 25, 1727 (BL, Add. MS 36276A).

28 Harris, John, Lexicon Technicum: or, An universal English dictionary of arts and sciences (London, 1704–1710)Google Scholar; and Desaguliers, J. T., A Course of Experimental Philosophy (London, 1734–1744)Google Scholar.

29 SirClark, George, Science and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton, 2d ed. (Oxford, 1970), pp. 66–67Google Scholar; BL, Loan 16, Records of the Mines Royal and the Mineral and Battery Works, vol. 2, fol. 233; vol. 3, fol. 98.

30 For some of Billingsley's activities, see Carswell, John, The South Sea Bubble (London, 1960), pp. 167–68, 171–72; and Rogers, pp. 263–64Google Scholar.

31 Case Billingsley to Cole, February 21, 1718[/9?], Billingsley to Cole, January 6, 1718/9, and Billingsley to Cole, January 29, 1718/9, SRO, GD 1/170/1.

32 Dickson, P. G. M., The Sun Insurance Office, 1710–1960 (London, 1960), p. 268Google Scholar.

33 Daily Courant (April 5, 1714); likewise Bodl., Rawlinson MS D. 871, n.d.

34 Daily Courant (January 12, February 25, September 28, and November 11, 1719). With Richard Steele, see Daily Post, no. 26 (November 2. 1719).

35 Musson, and Robinson, (n. 16 above), pp. 41, 119; Holmes, Geoffrey, Augustan England: Professions, State and Society, 1680–1730 (London, 1982), p. 51Google Scholar; and Robischon, Mary M., “Scientific Instrument Makers in London during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, 1983), p.166.Google Scholar

36 Stirling evidently owed his post to the influence of Newton until he left in 1735 for employment with the Scotch Mines Co. at Leadhills in Lanarkshire. Stirling likely was engaged earlier with this group, probably through the connections of Watts. (Musson and Robinson, pp. 41–42; HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 45, fol. 135.) On Stirling, see Tweedie, Charles, James Stirling: A Sketch of His Life and Works along with His Scientific Correspondence (Oxford, 1922)Google Scholar.

37 PRO, SP (Domestic) 36/5/115–20, February 8, 1727/8.

38 PRO, SP (Domestic) 36/5/253–62, March 30, 1728. On Robinson's involvement with the York Buildings Company, see PRO, Treasury Board Papers, Tl/258, fols. 92–93.

39 PRO, SP (Domestic) 36/2/86–109, January 6, 1727; BL, Hardwicke Papers, Add. MS 36142, vol. 714, fols. 135–39, October 23, 1730.

40 Chandos to Mr. Bridges, January 19, 1721/2, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 18, fol. 363; Chandos to Lord Carteret, April 28, 1722, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 20, ms Film 417, fol. 206; Hollister-Short, G. J., “The Introduction of the Newcomen Engine into Europe,” Transactions of the Newcomen Society 48 (1976–1977): 11–12, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On O'Kelly, see Hasquin, Herve, Une Mutation: Le “Pays de Charleroi” aux XVlle et XVIIIe siecles: Aux origines de la Revolution Industrielle en Belgique (Brussels, 1971), pp. 135–36Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Margaret Jacob.

41 Cockburne to [Cole?], October 26, 1721, and Cockburne to [Cole?], November 21, 1721, SRO, York Buildings Society Papers, GD 1/170/1.

42 Essington, John, Billingsley, , and Tho, : Chambers to Cole, March 31, 1721, SRO, GD 1/170. Articles of Agreement Made, Constituted, and Agreed upon upon the twentieth day of July in the Year of our Lord One thousand, seven hundred and twenty. Between the Governor and Company of Copper-Miners in England, of the First Part. Thomas Chambers, jun. of the Transfer-Office in the East-India House, London, Gent, of the Second Part. And John Essington of Wandsworth in the County of Surrey, Esq; James Bradley, and Case Billingsley of London, Merchants, of the Third Part (London, 1725)Google Scholar (BL shelf mark 522.m. 12 [3]).

43 Chandos to James Marye (of the York Buildings Co.), June 25, 1730, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 35, fol. 101; Chandos to Colonel Samuel Horsey (of the York Buildings Co.), July 5, 1730, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 35, fol. 133; Chandos to Horsey, July 16, 1730, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 35, fol. 161; and Chandos to Horsey, August 28, 1730, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 35, fol. 225.

44 BL, Hardwicke Papers, Add. MS 36142, vol. 714, fols. 117–19, August 6, 1730.

45 PRO, Chancery Bills and Answers, C11/1455/8. On Thomas Chambers, see Cyril Hart, The Industrial History of Dean (Newton Abbot, 1971), pp. 105–7.

46 SRO, York Buildings Society Papers, Court of Assistants, GD 1/170; Benjamin Bradley v. Governor and Company of Copper Miners, June 6, 1730, PRO, C11/1483/14. Billingsley's partner, James Bradley, was the son of Benjamin Bradley of the Merchant Taylors' Co. (Guildhall Library, London. Index to Freemen, 1530–1929, s.v. “Merchant Taylors' Co., 1711”).

47 Dickson, (n. 32 above), app. 6; Smout, T. C., “Lead-Mining in Scotland, 1650–1850,” in Studies in Scottish Business History, ed. Payne, Peter L. (London, 1967), pp. 119–20, 124–25Google Scholar; Chandos to Mr. [Thomas] Watts, November 28, 1729, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 34, fols. 3–4.

48 Chandos to Mr.Farquharson (his steward), October 28, 1734, HL, Stowe MS 57, vol. 45,fol. 135; Musson and Robinson (n. 16 above), pp. 41–42.

49 Smout, pp. 115–19; Allen, John S.,“The 1712 and Other Newcomen Engines of the Earls of Dudley,” Transactions of the Newcomen Society 37 (1964–1965): 57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “The 1715 and Other Newcomen Engines at Whitehaven, Cumberland, ” Transactions of the Newcomen Society 45 (1972–1973): 237–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Compare Thackray, Arnold, Atoms and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter-Theory and the Development of Chemistry (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), pp. 235–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.