Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:35:08.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rise of Colonial Federation as an Object of British Policy, 1850-1870

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Bruce A. Knox
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the third Earl Grey attempted, between 1846 and 1851, to promote federations in Australasia, South Africa, and British North America, he found scant support either at home or in the colonies concerned. He failed (except, in a sense, in New Zealand) partly because his schemes were more visionary than practically suited to existing colonial conditions, and partly because measures “imposed by the imperial authority” were apt to encounter difficulties abroad and, therefore, political trouble at home. Following Grey's departure from the Colonial Office, imperial policy makers refrained from prescribing federal systems for the settlement colonies. His abortive plans, however, had consequences during the next twenty years which, though different from Grey's intentions, amply vindicated the ability of the imperial government to exert its authority, and established, in the end, the desirability of colonial federations. For a decade and a half after 1850, the home government repeatedly and successfully frustrated local proposals for federation in the three continental groups of colonies. Then, between 1864 and 1870, it hurried to completion the union of British North America, and set about promoting that of South Africa. At the same time, it refrained from pressing any such development upon Australia, and actually arranged the dismantling of New Zealand's federal/provincial system.

No inconsistency was involved. Britain's policy towards all these colonies was designed in favor of its own interests, tempered by a remarkable consideration of those of the colonies. The chief imperial object during the period in question (c. 1850-1870) was to reduce the country's military and political commitments; and the chosen device for the purpose was encouragement of colonial self-government, in various forms, including republican independence in the Boer states of South Africa.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , November 1971 , pp. 92 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ward, John M., “The Third Earl Grey and Federalism, 1846-1852,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, III (1957), 31Google Scholar.

2. Galbraith, J. S., Reluctant Empire. British policy on the South African Frontier, 1834-1854 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1963), Chapter XIGoogle Scholar.

3. Ibid., pp. 258-59, 266-68.

4. Melbourne, A. C. V., Early Constitutional Development in Australia (2nd. ed.; Brisbane, 1963), pp. 376–77Google Scholar. Morrell, W. P., British Colonial Policy in the Age of Peel and Russell (2nd ed.; London, 1966), Chapter XVGoogle Scholar.

5. See, e.g., PRO, Confidential Print, “Draft Ordinance for constituting a Parliament for the Cape,” CO 879/1 no. v.

6. Walker, E. A., A History of Southern Africa (London, 1959), pp. 235-244, 269–270Google Scholar.

7. Ward, , “Earl Grey and Federalism,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, IIIGoogle Scholar.

8. Ward, , “Earl Grey and Federalism,” Australian Journal of Politics, III, 29Google Scholar.

9. Ibid., pp. 22-24. The central government abolished the provinces in 1875, by authority of an imperial Act of 1868. As early as 1857 the system was observed to be unsatisfactory: see memo, by Sir W. Denison, summarized in PRO 30/6, Carnarvon Papers, 132, fol. 67.

10. Fraser's Magazine, L (1854), 76Google Scholar.

11. Quarterly Review, CI (1857), 324–352Google Scholar.

12. Galbraith, , Reluctant Empire, p. 276Google Scholar.

13. H. Merivale to W. C. Wentworth, 16 May 1857, printed in Bell, K. N. and Morrell, W. P. (eds.), Select Documents on British Colonial Policy, 1830-1860 (Oxford, 1928), p. 177Google Scholar. Clark, C. M. H. (ed.), Select Documents in Australian History, II (Sydney, 1955), 445Google Scholar. Quick, J. and Garran, R. R., The Annotated Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia (Sydney, 1901), pp. 93–96Google Scholar.

14. Fraser's Magazine, XLVII (1853), 189–190Google Scholar.

15. Blackuwood's Edinburgh Magazine, LXXXII (1857), 118Google Scholar.

16. Gibson, James A., “The Colonial Office View of Canadian Confederation, 1856-1868,” Canadian Historical Review, XXXV (1954), 281–83Google Scholar.

17. Morton, W. L., The Critical Years. The Union of British North America, 1857-1873 (Toronto, 1965), pp. 63–64Google Scholar.

18. PRO, minute, 31 Aug. 1858, on Head to Lytton, 16 Aug. 1858, CO 42/614, fol. 296.

19. Hertfordshire County Record Office (hereafter Herts. CRO), Lytton to Derby, 18 Sept. 1858, Lytton Papers, “Letters, Lytton to Lord Derby.”

20. Herts. CRO, Lytton to Derby, 7 Sept. 1858, Lytton Papers, printed in B. A. Knox, “Sir Edward Lytton and Confederation, 1858,” forthcoming in Canadian Historical Review. Morton, , The Critical Years, pp. 64, 68Google Scholar.

21. PRO, end. in Grey to Lytton, 14 Aug. 1858, CO 48/390, fols. 215-216.

22. Ibid., minutes, 5, 6 Oct. 1858, by Merivale and Lytton, fols. 207-209. Cf. Goodfellow, C. F., Great Britain and South African Confederation, 1870-1881 (Cape Town, 1966)Google Scholar, who argues that Grey had the same right as Lytton to make policy, and that, anyway, he had reason to think that H. M. G. had no such instructions to give (pp. 15-16, 17).

23. PRO, minute, 6 Oct. 1858, CO 48/390, fol. 208.

24. Ibid.

25. PRO, minute by Lytton, 6 Oct. 1858, on Grey to Lytton, 14 Aug. 1858, CO 48/390, fols. 207-209; minute by Merivale, on Grey to Lytton, 14 Aug. 1858 (No. 154), CO 48/390, fol. 200.

26. PRO, minute, 7 Jan. 1859, on Grey to Lytton, 19 Nov. 1858, CO 48/390, printed in Bell & Morrell, , Select Documents, pp. 191–92Google Scholar.

27. PRO 30/6, Carnarvon Papers, 132, fols. 66-67.

28. Clark, , Select Documents, pp. 445–48Google Scholar; Quick, and Garran, , Annotated Constitution, pp. 95–96Google Scholar.

29. Summaries of letters: PRO 30/6, Barkly to unknown person, 10 Oct. 1857; Denison to governor Gore Brown, New Zealand, 24 Apr. 1858, Carnarvon papers, 132, fols. 66-67.

30. Knox, B. A., “Moreton Bay Separation: A Problem of Imperial Government, 1825-1856.” Historical Studies, XIV (1971), 561–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31. Herts. CRO, Lytton to Derby, 7 Sept. 1858, Lytton Papers, “Letters, Lytton to Lord Derby.”

32. Gibson, James A., “The Duke of Newcastle and British North American Affairs, 1859-64,” Canadian Historical Review, XLIV (1963), 153Google Scholar. Gibson, , “Colonial Office View,” Canadian Historical Review, XXXV, 297–298Google Scholar.

33. Goodfellow, , Britain and S. African Confederation, p. 21Google Scholar.

34. Newcastle to Bowen, 25 Aug. 1863, quoted in PRO 30/6, Bowen to Carnarvon, 14 Dec. 1866, Carnarvon Papers, 135.

35. Ibid., Bowen to Carnarvon. Bowen was agitated by republicanism and separationism which, he warned Carnarvon, were associated even with E. Deas Thompson's advocacy of Australian federation. See, however, Quick, and Garran, , Annotated Constitution, pp. 93–97Google Scholar, and the Sydney Morning Herald articles of John West, Jan.-Sept. 1854, reprinted July and Aug. 1867. (For the last reference I am indebted to Professor A. G. L. Shaw, Monash University.)

36. 11 July 1861, in Parliamentary Papers, 1861, XIII, 69–466Google Scholar (including Evidence). Comment in Edinburgh Review, CXV (1862), 104–127Google Scholar.

37. Quoted in Schuyler, R. L., “The recall of the legions: a phase in the decentralisation of the British Empire,” American Historical Review, XXVI (1920), 34Google Scholar.

38. Fraser's Magazine, LXIII (1861), 522Google Scholar.

39. Edinburgh Review, CXV (1862), 121Google Scholar.

40. Smith, Goldwin, The Empire (London, 1863)Google Scholar.

41. Ibid., p. vi.

42. Edinburgh Review, CXX (1864), 578–79Google Scholar.

43. Newcastle to Australian governors, 26 June 1863, quoted Schuyler, , “Recall of the legions,” American Historical Review, XXVI, 34Google Scholar.

44. Knox, B. A., “Colonial Influence on imperial policy, 1858-1866: Victoria and the Colonial Naval Defense Act, 1865,” Historical Studies, Australia and New Zealand, XI (1963), 61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the origins of the Colonial Laws Validity Act, see Swinfen, David B., “Attitudes within the Colonial Office towards imperial control of Colonial legislation, 1826-1865” (D.Phil, thesis, Oxford University, 1964)Google Scholar. The tendency of the Act was to encourage the operations of colonial self-government, and decrease the responsibilities and labor of the Colonial Office.

45. Dalton, B. J., War and Politics in New Zealand, 1855-1870 (Sydney, 1967), pp. 171-73, 243–245, and Chapter VIIIGoogle Scholar. The application of this policy was somewhat less clear-cut than suggested in this paper, but space forbids more complicated treatment.

46. Morton, W. L., “British North America and a Continent in Dissolution, 1861-71,” History, XLVII (1962), 142–48Google Scholar; see Frase's Magazine, LXVIII (1863), 457–58Google Scholar, and below, n. 61.

47. Saturday Review, VI (21 Aug. 1858)Google Scholar; Illustrated London News, 24 July, 1858, editorial; Ibid., 21 Aug. 1858, special article.

48. Edinburgh Review, 100 (1854), 115–163Google Scholar; Quarterly Review, 108 (1860), 128, 160Google Scholar. See PRO, minute by Lytton, 6 Oct. 1858, on Grey to Lytton, 14 Aug. 1858, CO 48/390, fols. 207-209.

49. Quarterly Review, 110 (1861), 256–57Google Scholar.

50. Fraser's Magazine, LXVIII (1863), 549–569Google Scholar; Fortnightly Review, II (1865), 537–548Google Scholar.

51. See Morton, The Critical Years, chapters 8 and 9, for a detailed analysis of this “resumption of the initiative.”

52. Stacey, Gibson, “Colonial Office View,” Canadian Historical Review, XXXV, 302–04Google Scholar. C., P., “Britain's withdrawal from North America, 1864-1871,” Canadian Historical Review, XXXVI (1955), 187–190Google Scholar. Waite, P. B., “Edward Cardwell and Confederation,” Canadian Historical Review, XLIII (1962), 23–25Google Scholar. See Fortnightly Review, I (1865), 122Google Scholar (in which it is remarked: “Wolfe's great conquest stands very much in the same relation to us that Algeria does to France— each is the damnosa haereditas of a former age which cannot well be got rid of.”)

53. Quoted Gibson, , “Colonial Office View,” Canadian Historical Review, XXXV, 303–04Google Scholar.

54. For some opinions to this effect see:

Edinburgh Review, XCIII (1851), 491–93Google Scholar; Pram's Magazine, XLVI (1852), 723Google Scholar;

Edinburgh Review, C (1854), 116–117Google Scholar; Quarterly Review, CI (1857), 577Google Scholar;

Saturday Review, 21 Aug. 18581; Edinburgh Review, CXX (1864), 578–79Google Scholar.

55. Edinburgh Review, CXXI (1865), 181Google Scholar. See also, Saturday Review, 14 Jan., 25 Feb., 1865. The Quarterly Review remained completely silent on the question of British North American federation. Lest this be construed as indicating a lack of interest in the subject on the part of an important segment of public opinion, it must be remembered that this journal was consistently contemptuous of the United States federal system (see above at fns. 12, 49) and could only have found embarrassing any attempt to discuss the application of a similar system to British colonies in North America.

56. E.G., 3 Hansard, 184: 1700-1702 (31 July 1866); Speech to the Canadian delegates, 9 Jan. 1867, Speeches on Canadian Affairs by … Carnarvon, ed. Herbert, R. (London, 1902), p. 84Google Scholar; 3 Hansard, 185:576-576a (19 Feb. 1867).

57. PRO 30/6, Carnarvon to Verdon, 23 Mar. 1867, Carnarvon Papers, 157. The speech was published as a pamphlet by John Murray (London, 1867).

58. See Introduction to Escott, T. H. S., Edward Bulwer, first Baron Lytton (London, 1910)Google Scholar. Cf. Illustrated London News, 17 July 1858, on Lytton's performance in parliament when dealing with colonial government.

59. See also, Fraser's Magazine, LXXV (1867), 138Google Scholar.

60. Blake, R., Disraeli (paperback ed.; London, 1969), p. 455Google Scholar.

61. 3 Hansard, 168:479–485 (18 July 1862)Google Scholar.

62. PRO 30/6, Memorandum, 9 Aug. 1866, Carnarvon Papers, 164. Knox, , “Colonial Naval Defence Act,” Historical Studies, Australia and New Zealand, XI, 76Google Scholar. Dalton, War and Politics in New Zealand, chapter VIII. Carnarvon could hardly complain when, in the midst of controversy over the Granville-Gladstone colonial policy, 1869-70, he read an article in the Edinburgh Review, CXXXI (1870), 99-100, 115–119Google Scholar, which sought to show “that all parties are committed to Granville's line of policy.” Herts. CRO, Carnarvon to Lord Lytton, 17 Jan. 1870, Lytton Papers, XX.

63. PRO 30/6, memoranda by Sir George Barrow, 20 Oct., 8 Dec., 1866, Carnarvon Papers, 172.

64. Goodfellow, , Britain and S. African Confederation, pp. 21–24Google Scholar.

65. de Kiewiet, C. W., British Policy and the South African Republics, 1848-72 (London, 1929), p. 267Google Scholar.

66. Local suggestions for federation were made in the Cape and Natal in 1868: Agar-Hamilton, J.A.I., The Road to the North: South Africa 1852-1886 (London, 1937), p. 44Google Scholar: Mills, Goodfellow, Britain and S. African Confederation, p. 25Google Scholar. In contrast to official optimism, see, e.g., the cold water views of Arthur, , Contemporary Review, II (1869), 235Google Scholar.

67. The quoted phrases are from Schuyler, R. L., “The climax of anti-imperialism in England,” Political Science Quarterly, XXXV (1921), 537–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Bodelsen, C. A., Studies in Mid-Victorian Imperialism (London, 1924)Google Scholar, Part II. For criticism, see sep. Galbraith, J. S., “Myths of the ‘Little England’ era,” American Historical Review, LXVII (1961), 34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Stembridge, Stanley R., “Disraeli and the Millstones,” Journal of British Studies, V (1965), 122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68. Schuyler, , “Recall of the legions,” American Historical Review, XXVIGoogle Scholar.

69. See, e.g., Granville to Gladstone, 25 Jan. 1870, in Ramm, A. (ed.), The Political Correspondence of Lord Granville and Mr. Gladstone, 1868-1876 (London, 1952), I, p. 89Google Scholar.

70. Herbert, A., “Canadian Confederation,” Fortnightly Review, VII (1867), 490Google Scholar. Auberon Herbert was Carnarvon's brother, not yet committed to a life of determined radical eccentricity.

71. “England and the Colonies,” Frater's Magazine, New Series, I (1870), 1–16Google Scholar.

72. Fraser's Magazine, XLVII (1853), 189–190Google Scholar. See also the emphatic and detailed (if not necessarily characteristic) scheme of imperial federation in West minster Review, new series, II (1852), 421–435Google Scholar.

73. Marshall, Peter, “The First and Second British Empires: a question of demarcation”, History, XLIX (1964)Google Scholar.