¹ Johnson, Donald, A Doctor Returns (London, 1956), 18, 31.Google Scholar

² Ingham, Robert, “Donald Johnson: The Last Liberal Imperialist,” Journal of Liberal Democrat History 25, no. 1 (1999–2000): 31–33.Google Scholar

³ Johnson, Donald, Conservative Government and a Liberal Society (London, 1955), 7–8.Google Scholar

⁴ Johnson to Walker-Smith, 12 December 1958, Johnson to Butler, 15 December 1958, Johnson to Heath, 18 December 1958, Donald Johnson Papers (hereafter Johnson Papers), series 3, file 1, London School of Economics (LSE) Archives. For a selection of Johnson’s parliamentary questions, see “Mental illness (involuntary patients),” 19 December 1955, Parliamentary Debates, Commons, 5th ser. (hereafter PD), vol. 547, col. 1632; “Hospitals, mental patients, certification,” 1 December 1958, PD, vol. 596, cols. 817–18; and “Mental patients (treatment),” 8 February 1960, PD, vol. 617, cols. 26–27.

⁵ Johnson, Donald, A Cassandra at Westminster (London, 1967), 194–96.Google Scholar

⁶ Stacey, Frank, The British Ombudsman (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; Gregory, Roy and Hutchesson, Peter, The Parliamentary Ombudsman: A Study in the Control of Administrative Action (London, 1975).Google Scholar

⁷ Gregory, Roy and Giddings, Philip, The Ombudsman, the Citizen and Parliament: A History of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsmen (London, 2002)Google Scholar; Kirkham, Richard, The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Withstanding the Test of Time, fourth report of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, 2006–7 session (London, 2007).Google Scholar

⁸ The importance of this lower-level work is emphasized in Lowe, Rodney, “Plumbing New Depths: Contemporary Historians and the Public Record Office,” Twentieth Century British History 8, no. 2 (1997): 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ On the subject of transnationalism for two different periods, See Grant, Kevin, Levine, Philippa, and Trentmann, Frank, eds., Beyond Sovereignty: Britain, Empire and Transnationalism (Basingstoke, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kaiser, Wolfram, “Bringing History Back to the Study of Transnational Networks in European Integration,” Journal of Public Policy 29, no. 2 (2009): 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰ Rosanvallon, Pierre, Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust (Cambridge, 2008), 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Jefferys, Kevin, Retreat from New Jerusalem: British Politics, 1951–64 (Basingstoke, 1997), 103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Serota, B., “The Evolution of the Role of the Ombudsman,” in International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Evolution and Present Function, ed. Caiden, G. E. (London, 1983), 28.Google Scholar

¹³ Klein, Rudolf, “Accountability in the National Health Service,” Political Quarterly 42, no. 4 (1971): 363–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Hirschmann, A. O., Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge, MA, 1970), esp. 42, 58, on ombudsmenGoogle Scholar. See Theien, Iselin, “Exit, Voice and Loyalty: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Consumerism,” in Affluence and Activism: Organised Consumers in the Post-war Era, ed. Theien, Iselin and Lange, Evan (Oslo, 2004), 9–20.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Miller, Daniel, “Consumption as the Vanguard of History,” in Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies, ed. Miller, Daniel (London, 1995), 23, 24, 27, 40–41, 47Google Scholar. See Miller’s more recent grass-roots study of “consumer citizenship” and “participation” in Miller, Daniel, The Comfort of Things (Cambridge, 2008), 160–61Google Scholar, and his account of his own views in Stuff (Cambridge, 2009), 1–11.

¹⁶ Cohen, Lizabeth, “From Town Center to Shopping Center: The Reconfiguration of Community Marketplaces in Postwar America,” American Historical Review 101, no. 2 (1996): 1077–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar, offers the best short statement of postwar regional shopping malls’ effects, and, on the gains women and African-Americans made in early consumer movements, see her A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York, 2003), 7–8, 32–33, 97–100.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Igo, Sarah, The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public (Cambridge, MA, 2007), 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ See Needham, Catherine, The Reform of Public Services under New Labour: Narratives of Consumerism (Basingstoke, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Choice in Public Services: ‘No Choice but to Choose,’” in Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, ed. Powell, Martin (Cambridge, 2008), 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ See Kynaston, David, Austerity Britain, 1945–51 (London, 2007), 61, 133.Google Scholar

²⁰ Hilton, Matthew, “Consumer Politics in Post-war Britain,” in The Politics of Consumption: Material Culture and Citizenship in Europe and America, ed. Daunton, Martin and Hilton, Matthew (Basingstoke, 2001), 250–57Google Scholar, and see also Consumerism in Twentieth-Century Britain (Cambridge, 2003), 219–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²¹ Vernon, James, “The Ethics of Hunger and the Assembly of Society: The Techno-Politics of the School Meal in Modern Britain,” American Historical Review 110, no. 3 (2005): 693–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atkins, Peter, “School Milk in Britain, 1900–1934,” Journal of Policy History 19, no. 4 (2007): 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² Beers, Laura, Your Britain: Media and the Making of the Labour Party (Cambridge, MA, 2010), esp. 5, 13, 126, 293Google Scholar, and “Whose Opinion? Changing Attitudes towards Opinion Polling in British Politics, 1937–1964,” Twentieth Century British History 17, no. 2 (2006): 200.Google Scholar

²³ Trentmann, Frank, “Crossing Divides: Consumption and Globalization in History,” Journal of Consumer Culture 9, no. 2 (2009): 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and, addressing Trentmann’s own archival research, Free Trade Nation: Commerce, Consumption, and Civil Society in Modern Britain (Oxford, 2008), 2, 18, 78, 127, 274Google Scholar. See also Kroen, Sheryl, “A Political History of the Consumer,” Historical Journal 47, no. 3 (2004): 722–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ Torfing, Jacob, “Democratic Network Governance,” in Democratic Network Governance in Europe, ed. Marcussen, Martin and Torfing, Jacob (Basingstoke, 2007), 5.Google Scholar

²⁵ Stacey, British Ombudsman, 4–5.

²⁶ See Lichfield, Nathaniel and Darin-Drabkin, Haim, Land Policy in Planning (London, 1980), 142–43.Google Scholar

²⁷ Cullingworth, J. B., Environmental Planning, 1939–1969, vol. 4, Land Value, Compensation and Betterment (London, 1980), 3–13, 85–138.Google Scholar

²⁸ Griffith, J. A. G., “The Crichel Down Affair,” Modern Law Review 18, no. 6 (1955): 557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Davis, John, “Macmillan’s Martyr: The Pilgrim Case, the ‘Land Grab’ and the Tory Housing Drive, 1951–59,” Planning Perspectives 23, no. 2 (2008): 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁰ Gregory and Giddings, Ombudsman, 35.

³¹ Booth, Philip, Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control (London, 2003), 116–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a contemporary account, see Brown, R. D., The Battle of Crichel Down (London, 1955).Google Scholar

³² Report of the Committee on Administrative Tribunals and Enquiries, Cmnd. 218 (1957), 2–3, 91–92, 98.

³³ Cheng, H. Y., “The Emergence and Spread of the Ombudsman Institution,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 377, no. 1 (1968): 21.Google Scholar

³⁴ Johnson, Cassandra, 63.

³⁵ “A British Ombudsman?” Economist, 4 July 1959, 4.

³⁶ Hurwitz, Stefan, “The Danish Ombudsman and His Office,” Listener 63, no. 1624 (1960): 836.Google Scholar

³⁷ Gellhorn, Walter, Ombudsmen and Others: Citizens’ Protectors in Nine Countries (Cambridge, MA, 1966), 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Hurwitz, Stefan, “The Danish Parliamentary Commissioner for Civil and Military Government Administration,” Public Law 3, no. 3 (1958): 238.Google Scholar

³⁹ Sargant to Shawcross, 13 April 1960, Hull University Library (HUL), “Justice” Papers (DJU) 1/2.

⁴⁰ Hurwitz, Stefan, The Ombudsman (Copenhagen, 1968), 5–6.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Parliamentary Ombudsman’s Office, The Parliamentary Ombudsman in Finland: Position and Functions (Helsinki, 1976), 5–8.Google Scholar

⁴² Means, I. M., “The Norwegian Ombudsman,” Western Political Quarterly 11, no. 4 (1968): 626–27.Google Scholar

⁴³ For these influences, See Rodgers, Daniel, Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA, 1998), 55–56, 61.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ A copy is preserved in the Hurwitz memorandum to the UN seminar on “Judicial and other remedies against the illegal exercise or abuse of administrative authority,” 4–15 May 1959, The National Archives (TNA), Records of the Treasury Solicitor (TS) 558/605.

⁴⁵ For Robson’s own view of this office, see Robson, John Lochiel, New Zealand: The Development of its Laws and Institutions, 2nd ed. (London, 1967), 144, 151–52Google Scholar, and Sacred Cows and Rogue Elephants: Policy Development in the New Zealand Justice Department (Wellington, 1987), 226–28.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Robertson, John, “The Danish Ombudsman: New Zealand’s Precedent,” in The Danish Ombudsman, ed. Gammeltoft-Hansen, Hans and Axmark, Flemming (Copenhagen, 1995), 35.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Hill, Larry, The Model Ombudsman: Institutionalizing New Zealand’s Democratic Experiment (Princeton, NJ, 1976), 70.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Oxley to Dobson, 30 August 1962, Dobson to Kent, 13 September 1962, TNA, Records of the Lord Chancellor’s Office (LCO) 2/8442.

⁴⁹ “New Move over Ombudsman in Britain,” The Times, 7 September 1965, 7; “Visit to Study Ombudsman,” The Times, 20 September 1966, 6.

⁵⁰ See Justice, , British Section of the International Commission of Jurists, Annual Report, June 1958 (London, 1958), 1–2.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Jean-Flavian Lalive to Sargant, 29 October 1958; program of the International Commission of Jurists Conference on the Rule of Law, New Delhi, 5–10 January 1959, HUL DJU 10/4.

⁵² Sargant to Shawcross, 13 November 1959, HUL DJU 1/2.

⁵³ For a survey of these men’s prior views, See Wong, Andrew, “Birth of an Ombudsman,” United College Journal of Hong Kong 11, no. 3 (1973): 133–36.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Society, Justice, The Citizen and the Administration: The Redress of Grievances (London, 1961), 29, 34–35.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Chapman, Brian, “The Ombudsman,” Public Administration 38, no. 4 (1960): 306CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Our ‘Ombudsman’ Safeguards,” The Times, 14 March 1961, 6.

⁵⁶ See Donald Johnson, “Do We Need a ‘Grievance Man’?” Sunday Express, 31 May 1959, 8; “Is a Guardian of the Public Necessary?” Evening Standard, 23 May 1959, 5. For Johnson’s correspondents’ multifarious complaints, see the Johnson memorandum “Cases on my files which would merit consideration by an ‘Ombudsman’” (October–November 1959?), Johnson Papers 6/18.

⁵⁷ Utley, Thomas, Occasion for Ombudsman (London, 1961), 139–40, 144.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Conservative Political Centre, Law, Liberty and Licence (London, 1964), 7–9Google Scholar; on this pamphlet, See Ellis, Catherine, “No Hammock for the Idle: The Conservative Party, ‘Youth’ and the Welfare State in the 1960s,” Twentieth Century British History 16, no. 4 (2005): 455–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁹ “Saint George Is a Woman,” Daily Sketch, 8 February 1960, 8.

⁶⁰ Birnberg, Haldane Society, to Williams, 12 May 1960, LSE Archives, Fabian Society Papers E/132/10, and Notice of Young Fabians’ meeting with Blom-Cooper, 20 July 1964, Fabian Society Papers H43/3.

⁶¹ Kynaston, David, Family Britain, 1951–1957 (London, 2009), 229–43.Google Scholar

⁶² Shanks, Michael, The Stagnant Society: A Warning (Harmondsworth, 1961), 174.Google Scholar

⁶³ Shonfield, Andrew, Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power (London, 1965), 427.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Weiler, Peter, “Labour and the Land: From Municipalization to the Land Commission, 1951–71,” Twentieth Century British History 19, no. 3 (2008): 321–22.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ See her (relatively sympathetic) approach detailed in Campbell, John, Margaret Thatcher, vol. 1, The Grocer’s Daughter (London, 2000), 141–45.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Central Health Services Council memorandum “Analysis of Letters of Complaint Sent to the Department,” November 1951, Ministry of Health memorandum “Handling of Complaints,” 19 May 1953, Hewitt to Hodgson, 18 August 1960, TNA, Ministry of Health (MH) 58/915.

⁶⁷ Kynaston, Family Britain, 331.

⁶⁸ Labour Party Research Department memorandum “Parliamentary Commissioner: Evidence of need,” May 1964, John Rylands Archive and Study Centre, Manchester, Labour Party Archives (hereafter LPA).

⁶⁹ Ennals memorandum to Parliamentary Civil Rights Group titled “Outline paper on Ombudsman,” 25 January 1965, LSE Archives, Peter Shore Papers 6/26.

⁷⁰ See, e.g., the attorney general’s written answers, 25 November 1961, “Parliamentary Commissioner,” PD, vol. 649, col. 167.

⁷¹ Butler, Kilmuir, and Maclay memorandum to Home Affairs Committee titled “Justice Report on the Citizen and the Administration: The Redress of Grievances,” 28 November 1961, TNA, Cabinet Papers (CAB) 134/1988; minutes of the Home Affairs Committee, 8 December 1961, TNA, CAB 134/1984.

⁷² Ad hoc official committee on The Citizen and Administration, “The Report to Ministers,” 1 August 1962, TNA, CAB 130/181.

⁷³ Brooke memorandum to Home Affairs Committee, enclosing Kent report on Stockholm conference, 10 August 1962, TNA, CAB 134/1992.

⁷⁴ Briefing for Sir Harold Kent, parliamentary questions, 16 July 1962, TNA, TS 558/599.

⁷⁵ Kent to Dobson, 28 June 1962, and treasury solicitor’s memorandum “The Whyatt Report,” 15 February 1962, TNA, TS 558/599.

⁷⁶ Attorney general’s oral answers, 8 November 1962, “Public Grievances,” PD, vol. 666, cols. 1124–26.

⁷⁷ Colley, Linda, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, CT, 1992), esp. 30–42, 368–69Google Scholar; Langford, Paul, Englishness Identified: Manners and Character, 1650–1850 (Oxford, 2000), 208, 220, 298–99Google Scholar; Porter, Bernard, “‘Bureau and Barrack’: Early Victorian Attitudes towards the Continent,” Victorian Studies 27, no. 4 (1984): 407–33.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ For a discussion of these nascent theories, See Hunt, Alan, “Dichotomy and Contradiction in the Sociology of Law,” British Journal of Law and Society 8, no. 1 (1981): 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁹ An idea delineated, in the English context, by Colls, Robert, Identity of England (Oxford, 2002), 54–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mandler, Peter, The English National Character: The History of an Idea from Edmund Burke to Tony Blair (New Haven, CT, 2006), 122–23, 210–11Google Scholar; Paxman, Jeremy, The English (London, 1998), 134–40Google Scholar. The concept was satirized by Priestley, J. B. in his The English (London, 1973), 13–14.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ “Ombudsman Campaign to be Pressed,” The Times, 12 November 1962, 7.

⁸¹ Douglas-Home to Hobson, 7 February 1964, Hobson to Douglas-Home, 11 February 1964, Maudling to Douglas-Home, 13 February 1964, Brooke to Douglas-Home, 17 February 1964, TNA, Prime Minister’s Office (PREM) 11/4853.

⁸² Fielding, Steven, “The British Labour Party and ‘Participation’ in the 1960s,” in Transitions in Social Democracy: Culture and Ideological Problems of the Golden Age, ed. Callaghan, John and Favretto, Ilaria (Manchester, 2006), esp. 139–43.Google Scholar

⁸³ See the comments in Harvester Archives of the British Labour Party, Part One (Brighton, 1978)Google Scholar, card 783, minutes of the National Executive Committee (NEC), 11 May, and of the Home Policy Sub-committee, 8 June 1964.

⁸⁴ Houghton memorandum “Parliamentary Commissioner or Ombudsman,” May 1964, LPA NEC Sub-committee Papers.

⁸⁵ “Speech at Stowmarket, Suffolk, Friday, 3 July 1964,” Bodleian Library, Harold Wilson Papers, MS Wilson c.893; “Wilson’s Aim to ‘Humanise’ Whitehall,” Daily Telegraph, 4 July 1964, 3.

⁸⁶ Stewart, Michael, “The Ombudsman,” New Statesman, 25 September 1964, 430.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Dale, Iain, Labour Party General Election Manifestos, 1900–1997 (London, 2000), 124.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Minutes of the Home Affairs Committee, 27 November 1964, TNA, CAB 134/1996.

⁸⁹ Minutes of the Official Committee on the Ombudsman, 1 January 1965, TNA, CAB 130/219; “The Parliamentary Commissioner, note by officials,” January 1965, TNA, TS 558/559.

⁹⁰ Minutes of the Ministerial Committee on the Ombudsman, 20 January 1965, TNA, CAB 130/216; McIndoe to Wilson, 5 April 1965, TNA, PREM 13/1557.

⁹¹ Houghton memorandum to Cabinet, “The Parliamentary Commissioner,” 25 March 1965, TNA, CAB 129/120; minutes of the Cabinet, 6 April 1965, TNA, CAB 128/39.

⁹² The Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Cmnd. 2767 (1965), 3, 6–7.

⁹³ Stacey, Frank, Ombudsmen Compared (Oxford, 1978), 127–28.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Crossman speech on Second Reading, 18 October 1966, PD, vol. 734, cols. 48–51.

⁹⁵ Armstrong, Robert, “Compton, Sir Edmund Gerald (1906–1994),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar, http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/54820.

⁹⁶ Williams, Marcia, Inside Number Ten (London, 1972), 110.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Helsby to Wilson, 27 January 1966, TNA, PREM 5/495.

⁹⁸ Compton memorandum to Machinery of Government Steering Group, “A Parliamentary Commissioner,” 15 June 1964, TNA, Records of the Civil Service Department (BA) 17/28.

⁹⁹ Utley, Thomas, “Where Is the Ombudsman?” Spectator, 12 February 1965, 194–95.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Hogg speech on Third Reading, 24 January 1967, PD, vol. 739, col. 1452.

¹⁰¹ See Abse’s comments of 18 October 1966 in PD, vol. 734, cols. 60–61.

¹⁰² Baldwin to Lam, “Parliamentary Commissioner Bill,” 19 January 1966, TNA, Records of the Board of Trade (BT) 296/188.

¹⁰³ Mold, Alex, “Patient Groups and the Construction of the Patient-Consumer in Britain: An Historical Overview,” Journal of Social Policy 39, no. 4 (2010): 510–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Trend to Fraser, 25 January 1962, Fraser to Trend, “‘Justice’ Report,” 26 March 1962, TNA, MH 58/915.

¹⁰⁵ Emery memorandum “Complaints by Patients,” 15 February 1962, TNA, MH 58/915.

¹⁰⁶ Mold, “Patient-Consumer,” 7–8.

¹⁰⁷ Ministry of Health memorandum for Fraser, “Ombudsman,” 27 May 1960, TNA, MH 58/915.

¹⁰⁸ Fraser memorandum “Justice Report on the Citizen and Administration,” 30 March 1962, TNA, CAB 130/182.

¹⁰⁹ Fraser memorandum on meeting with Whyatt, 2 June 1960, TNA, MH 58/915.

¹¹⁰ Rowat, D. C., ed., The Ombudsman: Citizen’s Defender (London, 1965), 336–37Google Scholar; Means, “Norwegian Ombudsman,” 634, table 1.

¹¹¹ Birkinshaw, Patrick, Grievances, Remedies and the State (London, 1985), 131.Google Scholar

¹¹² Winstanley, Michael, “Britain’s ‘Ombudsman’—His Role in the Process of Parliamentary Scrutiny,” in The Growth of Parliamentary Scrutiny by Committee, ed. Morris, Alfred (Oxford, 1970), 80.Google Scholar

¹¹³ See also, e.g., Hill, Michael, The State, Administration and the Individual (London, 1976), 153.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Marshall, Geoffrey, “The British Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 377, no. 1 (1968): 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹⁵ Justice, , Our Fettered Ombudsman (London, 1977), 3–7, 17, 23–25, 27–29.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Gwyn, W. B., “The British PCA: ‘Ombudsman or Ombudsmouse’?” Journal of Politics 35, no. 1 (1973): 46–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also “Ombudsman—or Ombudsmouse?” The Times, 10 November 1967, 9.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ “The Vanishing Ombudsman,” Sunday Times, 12 February 1967, 12; “Stop It: The Lords Should Throw Out the Ombudsman Bill,” Economist, 28 January 1967, 303.

¹¹⁸ Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, Annual Report for 2008–09: Every Complaint Matters (London, 2009), figs. 2, 9.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ New Zealand Commissioner for Administration, 2008/2009 Report of the Ombudsman (Wellington, 2009), 15Google Scholar; Danish Office of the Ombudsman, Annual Report for 2008 (Copenhagen, 2009), 22.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Gwyn, W. B., “The Ombudsman in Britain: A Qualified Success in Government Reform,” Public Administration 60, no. 2 (1982): 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹²¹ Kirkham, Withstanding the Test of Time, 7–9.

¹²² “The Thinking Man’s Esther Rantzen,” New Society (1 January 1981): 11; “Whose Side Is the Ombudsman Really On?” New Society (13 January 1983): 55–56.

¹²³ Minutes of the Secretary of State’s meeting with the British Medical Association, 15 June 1971, Cashman to Allison, “Health Commissioner,” 28 April 1971, TNA, MH 153/580.

¹²⁴ Warner to Pease, “Health Commissioner,” 1 February 1971; Joseph statement, 22 February 1972, TNA, MH 153/580.

¹²⁵ Giddings, Philip, “Great Britain,” in Protecting Patients’ Rights? A Comparative Study of the Ombudsman in Healthcare, ed. Mackenney, Stephen and Fallberg, Lars (Abingdon, 2003), 116.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Giddings, Philip, “The Health Service Ombudsman after Twenty-Five Years,” Public Law 34, no. 3 (1999): 201.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ National Consumer Council, A to Z of Ombudsmen (London, 1997), iv–v.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Annual Report for 1997/1998 (London, 1998), 19.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, Trusting in the Pensions Promise (London, 2006)Google Scholar; Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, Equitable Life: A Decade of Regulatory Failure (London, 2008).Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Elliott, Mark, “Asymmetric Devolution and Ombudsman Reform in England,” Public Law 84, no. 1 (2006): 84–105Google Scholar; Seneviratne, Mary, “A New Ombudsman for Wales,” Public Law 84, no. 1 (2006): 6–14.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Rosanvallon, Counter-democracy, 71–75.

¹³² Schrafstetter, Susanna, “‘Gentlemen, the Cheese Is All Gone!’ British POWs, the ‘Great Escape’ and the Anglo-German Agreement for Compensation to Victims of Nazism,” Contemporary European History 17, no. 1 (2008): 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³³ Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Fifth Report for 1974–75 (London, 1975), 26, 28Google Scholar; Gregory, Roy, “Court Line, Mr. Benn and the Ombudsman,” Parliamentary Affairs 30, no. 3 (1977): 269–92.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Jamieson, Roberta, “The Ombudsman: Learning from Other Cultures,” Ottawa Law Review 25, no. 3 (1993): 624–39Google Scholar; Kracke, Edward Jr., “Early Visions of Justice for the Humble in East and West,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 96, no. 4 (1976): 492–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³⁵ Lajoie, Andrée, Melançon, Hughes, Rocher, Guy, and Janda, Richard, “Quebec’s Conception of Aboriginal Rights,” in Aboriginal Rights and Self-Government: The Canadian and Mexican Experience in North American Perspective, ed. Cook, Curtis and Lindau, Juan (Montreal, 2000), 178Google Scholar; Russell, Dan, A People’s Dream: Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada (Vancouver, 2000), 214Google Scholar; Rowat, D. C., “The American Distortion of the Ombudsman Concept and its Influence on Canada,” Canadian Journal of Public Administration 50, no. 1 (2007): 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³⁶ Ombudsman, European, Annual Report, 2007 (Luxembourg, 2008), 16.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Christensen, Jørgen Grønnegaard, “Bureaucratic Autonomy as a Political Asset,” in Politics, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, ed. Peters, B. G. and Pierre, Jon (London, 2001), 122, 131.Google Scholar

¹³⁸ See, respectively, Wickham-Jones, Mark, “Missed Opportunities: British Social Democracy and the Rehn Model, 1951–1964,” in Gösta Rehn, The Swedish Model and Labour Market Policies: International and National Perspectives, ed. Milner, Henry and Wadensjö, Eskil (Aldershot, 2001), 277–97Google Scholar; Pemberton, Hugh, Policy Learning and British Governance in the 1960s (Basingstoke, 2004), 122–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O’Hara, Glen, “‘Applied Socialism of a Fairly Moderate Kind’: Scandinavia, British Policymakers and the Post-war Housing Market,” Scandinavian Journal of History 33, no. 1 (2008): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “The Intellectuals’ Ideal: British Views of Scandinavia in the 1950s and 1960s,” in Intellectuals and the Public Sphere: Britain and Scandinavia since the Second World War, ed. Myhre, Jan Eivind (Oslo, 2008), 91–122.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ A rather different conceptualization of this idea might be found in Tomlinson, Jim, “The Iron Quadrilateral: Political Obstacles to Economic Reform under the Attlee Government,” Journal of British Studies 34, no. 1 (1995): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Tomlinson, Jim, “A Failed Experiment? Public Ownership and the Narratives of Post-war Britain,” Labour History Review 73, no. 2 (2008): 235–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴¹ Hilson, Mary, The Nordic Model: Scandinavia since 1945 (London, 2008), 114.Google Scholar

¹⁴² Harris, Jose, “Civil Society in British History: Paradigm or Peculiarity?” in Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions, ed. Harris, J. (Oxford, 2004), 4.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ Dolowitz, David and Marsh, David, “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making,” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13, no. 1 (2000): 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴⁴ For the contrary view, see DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (1983): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar