Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:06:16.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of British Nuclear Culture, 1895–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Kirk Willis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The images are familiar and ineradicable: cities scorched by blasts of tremendous heat, with thousands of civilians vaporized, thousands of others burned and disfigured, landscapes rendered desolate and uninhabitable by radiation; submarines, automobiles, luxury liners, and airplanes powered by clumps of uranium the size of a human fist; homes heated and cooled by limitless supplies of cheap energy drawn from secure reactors; land-based particle beam weapons capable of destroying airborne missiles and thus of providing a protective shield for civilian populations; eccentric physicists with thick central European accents, unkempt hair, ill-fitting clothes, and a crazed gleam of unearthly mischief in their eyes; politicians, civil servants, joint chiefs blinkered by hatred and ambition, ignorant of even the first principles of science and technology, careless of civilians, reckless in brinksmanship, and arrogant in assessments of military capability.

Such images, indeed, are part of the consciousness of all citizens of the atomic age: we who have stared at the newsreels of Nagasaki and Chernobyl, sat riveted with John Hersey's unforgettable Hiroshima, laughed over the absurdities of Dr. Strangelove (1964), winced at the smiling publicity of atomic energy authorities or the local power company's plans for a new reactor, trembled at the apprarently inexorable proliferation of nuclear technologies into the Third and Fourth Worlds, or grown angry at the exaggerations—both budgetary and practical—of yet the latest “generation” of weapons systems. And yet the images of obliterated cities, atomic-powered ships, and particle beam weapons—images which have come to define so much of the anxiety as well as opportunity of the postwar world—all existed in the popular consciousness in Britain and America long before August 1945, before, indeed, December 1941 or even September 1939.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 59 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hersey, John, Hiroshima (New York, 1946)Google Scholar.

2 Boyer, Paul, By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Franklin, H. Bruce, War Stars: The Superweapon and the American Imagination (New York, 1989)Google Scholar; Goin, Peter, Nuclear Landscapes (Baltimore, 1991)Google Scholar; Weart, Spencer, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Cambridge, Mass., 1988)Google Scholar; Whitfleld, Stephen J., The Culture of the Cold War (Baltimore, 1991)Google Scholar.

3 This literature daily grows more extensive. Among the most useful studies are Botti, Timothy J., The Long Wait: Forging of the Anglo-American Nuclear Alliance, 1945–1952 (New York, 1987)Google Scholar; Clark, Ian and Wheeler, Nicholas J., The British Origins of Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1955 (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Gowing, Margaret, Britain and Atomic Energy, 1939–1945 (London, 1964)Google Scholar, and Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 2 vols. (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Groom, A. J. R., British Thinking about Nuclear Weapons (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Navias, Martin S., Nuclear Weapons and British Strategic Planning, 1955–1958 (Oxford, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pierre, Andrew J., Nuclear Politics: The British Experience with an Independent Strategic Force, 1939–1970 (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Ruston, Roger, A Say in the End of the World: Morals and British Nuclear Weapons Policy, 1941–1987 (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Szasz, Ferenc Morton, British Scientists and the Manhattan Project: The Los Alamos Years (New York, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Richard, Against the Bomb: The British Peace Movement, 1958–1965 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar.

4 Good introductions to the evolution of atomic and nuclear physics can be found in Keller, Alex, The Infancy of Atomic Physics: Hercules in His Cradle (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar; and Pais, Abraham, Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World (New York, 1986)Google Scholar.

5 Russell, Bertrand, The ABC of Atoms (London, 1923)Google Scholar, and The ABC of Relativity (London, 1925)Google Scholar; Andrade, E. N. da C., The Atom (London, 1927)Google Scholar; Sullivan, J. W. N., Atoms and Electrons (London, 1923)Google Scholar; Lodge, Oliver, Atoms and Rays (London, 1924)Google Scholar; and Conn, G. K. T., The Nature of the Atom (London, 1939)Google Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Kropotkin, Peter, “Recent Science: Röntgen Rays,” Nineteenth Century 39 (March 1896): 416–25Google Scholar; Clerke, Agnes Mary, “The Photography of the Invisible,” Quarterly Review 183 (April 1896): 496–507Google Scholar; Walsh, David, The Rontgen Rays in Medical Work (London, 1897)Google Scholar; Thompson, Silvanus P., Light Visible and Invisible (London, 1897)Google Scholar; Awdry, W., Early Chapters in Science (London, 1899)Google Scholar; Ramsay, William, “The Becquerel Rays,” Contemporary Review 81 (May 1902): 730–40Google Scholar; Kropotkin, Peter, “Recent Science: Unsuspected Radiation,” Nineteenth Century 48 (December 1900): 919–33Google Scholar.

7 Badash, Lawrence, Radioactivity in America: Growth and Decay of a Science (Baltimore, 1979), pp. 9, 11Google Scholar.

8 Illustrated in Hampson, William, Radium Explained (London, 1905), p. 1Google Scholar.

9 Badash, , Radioactivity, pp. 24–25Google Scholar.

10 Soddy, Frederick, “Some Recent Advances in Radioactivity: An Account of the Researches of Professor Rutherford and His Co-workers at McGill University,” Contemporary Review 83 (May 1903): 708–20Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., pp. 718, 720.

12 Ibid., p. 720.

13 Ibid.

14 [Soddy, Frederick], “The Disintegration Theory of Radioactivity,” TLS (June 26, 1903), p. 201Google Scholar.

15 [Soddy, Frederick], “Possible Future Applications of Radium,” TLS (July 17, 1903), p. 226Google Scholar.

16 Ibid.

17 Soddy, Frederick, Radio-Activity: An Elementary Treatise (London, 1904), p. 34Google Scholar.

18 Quoted in Weart (n. 2 above), p. 6.

19 Soddy, Frederick, The Interpretation of Radium (London, 1908), p. 244Google Scholar.

20 In his lectures to the Royal Engineers, Soddy had remarked, “It is possible that all heavy matter possesses latent and bound up with structure of the atom, a similar quantity of energy to that possessed by radium. If it could be tapped and controlled what an agent it would be in shaping the world's destiny! The man who put his hand on the lever by which a parsimonious nature regulates so jealously the output of this store of energy, would possess a weapon by which he could destroy the earth if he chose.” Quoted in Howorth, Muriel, Pioneer Research on the Atom: The Life Story of Frederick Soddy (London, 1958), p. 123Google Scholar.

21 Rutherford, Ernest, Radio-Activity (Cambridge, 1904), p. 337Google Scholar.

22 Strutt, R. J., The Becquerel Rays and the Properties of Radium (London, 1904), pp. 138–39Google Scholar.

23 Lodge, Oliver, “Modern Views on Matter,” reprinted in the Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution (Washington, D.C., 1904), p. 226Google Scholar, and “Radium and Its Lessons,” Nineteenth Century 54 (July 1903): 85Google Scholar.

24 Whetham, W. C. D., “Matter and Electricity,” Quarterly Review 183 (April 1904): 126Google Scholar. Whetham repeated the speculation in his enormously popular textbook, The Recent Development of Physical Science (London, 1904)Google Scholar, where he dismissed it as “only a nightmare dream of the scientific imagination” (p. 245). Whetham, himself an important scientist and colleague of Rutherford's at Trinity College, asked and received Rutherford's permission to include the potentially alarmist passage. What Rutherford had in fact said was, if anything, even more frightening: “Some fool in a laboratory might blow up the universe unawares” by setting off an uncontrolled “wave of atomic disintegration through matter.” Quoted in Eve, A. S., Rutherford (Cambridge, 1939), p. 102Google Scholar.

25 Zimmern, Antonia, “The New Discoveries in Electricity,” Nineteenth Century 55 (January 1904): 89Google Scholar; “The Revelations of Radium,” Edinburgh Review 198 (October 1903): 398Google Scholar.

26 An excellent account of this research can be found in Keller (n. 4 above), pp.98–146.

27 Wickham, Louis and Degrais, Paul, Radium Therapy, trans. Dove, S. Ernest (London, 1910)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Radium as Employed in the Treatment of Cancer, trans. Bateman, and Bateman, A.C. (London, 1911)Google Scholar, and “Radium: Its Use in Cancer and Other Diseases,” Contemporary Review 98 (August 1910): 174–88Google Scholar; Speed, J. G., “The Brain, X-Rays, and the Cinematograph,” Westminster Review 175 (March 1911): 269–73Google Scholar; Kaye, G. W. C., X-Rays: An Introduction to the Study of Röntgen Rays: Their Properties and Behaviour (London, 1914)Google Scholar. See also Walsh, David, The Röntgen Rays in Medical Work, 4th ed. (London, 1907)Google Scholar; and Fournier, E. E., The Wonders of Physical Science (London, 1910), pp, 178–90Google Scholar.

28 Rutherford, Ernest, Radioactive Transformations, 2d ed. (New Haven, Conn., 1908)Google Scholar; Makower, Walter, The Radioactive Substances (London, 1908)Google Scholar; Whetham, W. C. D., “The Individual Atom,” Quarterly Review 219 (July 1913): 104–24Google Scholar.

29 Cox, John, Beyond the Atom (Cambridge, 1913)Google Scholar; Soddy, Frederick, Matter and Energy (London, 1912)Google Scholar; Schuster, Arthur, The Progress of Physics, 1875–1908 (Cambridge, 1911)Google Scholar.

30 Cox, pp. 145–46.

31 Cromie, Robert, The Crack of Doom (London, 1895), p. 18Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., pp. 106, 108–9.

33 France, Anatole, Penguin Island, trans. Evans, A.W. (London, 1909), p. 340Google Scholar.

34 Griffith, George, The Lord of Labour (London, 1911)Google Scholar.

35 “I've suddenly broken out into one of the good old scientific romances again,” Wells informed his old friend, A. T. Simmons, “and I want to know quite the latest about the atomic theory and sources of energy. I've read and mastered Soddy's very good little book and I want more. My idea is taken from Soddy. Men are supposed to find out how to set up atomic degeneration in the heavy elements just as they found out long ago how to set up burning in coal. Hence limitless energy.” Quoted in West, Geoffrey, H. G. Wells: A Sketch for a Portrait (London, 1930), p. 199Google Scholar; see Wells, H. G., The World Set Free (New York, 1914)Google Scholar.

36 See, e.g., reviews in TLS (May 14, 1914), p. 238; Nation 15 (May 9, 1914): 218Google Scholar; Saturday Review (May 9, 1914), pp. 605–6Google Scholar.

37 Wells, , The World Set Free, p. 1Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., p. 40. Wells missed his prediction of the discovery of artificial radioactivity by but one year; 1934 would see the Joliot-Curies' discovery.

39 Ibid., pp. 55, 79.

40 Ibid., p. 113.

41 Ibid., p. 221.

42 Ibid., p. 137.

43 The best studies of this literature are Ceadel, Martin, “Popular Fiction and the Next War, 1918–1939,” in Class, Culture and Social Change, ed. Gloversmith, Frank (Sussex, 1980), pp. 161–84Google Scholar; and Clarke, I. F., Voices Prophesying War, 1763–1984 (London, 1966)Google Scholar.

44 Pais, Abraham, “Subtle is the Lord …”: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford, 1982), p. 305Google Scholar.

45 The Times (November 7, 1919), p. 12Google Scholar. The findings of the expedition were announced at a joint meeting of the Royal Society and the Royal Astronomical Society on November 6.

46 Einstein, Albert, Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, trans. Lawson, Robert W. (London, 1920)Google Scholar; Eddington, Arthur, Space, Time, and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory (Cambridge, 1920)Google Scholar; Bertrand Russell, The ABC of Relativity (n. 5 above); Jeans, James, The Mysterious Universe (Cambridge, 1930)Google Scholar; Sullivan, J. W. N., Three Men Discuss Relativity (London, 1926)Google Scholar.

47 Quoted in Pais, , “Subtle is the Lord …,“ p. 309Google Scholar.

48 Excellent accounts of this work can be found in Keller (n. 4 above); and Pais, Inward Bound (n. 4 above).

49 Soddy, Frederick, The Interpretation of Radium, 4th ed. (London, 1922)Google Scholar; Andrade, E. N. da C., The Structure of the Atom (London, 1923)Google Scholar, and The Atom (n. 5 above); Campbell, N. R., The Structure of the Atom (Cambridge, 1923)Google Scholar; Sullivan, Atoms and Electrons (n. 5 above); Lodge, Atoms and Rays (a. 5 above); Cranston, J. A., The Structure of Matter (London, 1925)Google Scholar; Thomson, George, The Atom (London, 1930)Google Scholar.

50 Discovery: A Monthly Popular Journal of Knowledge was founded in January 1920 with the distinguished Oxford chemist A. S. Russell as its first editor.

51 Crowther's, J. G. collections include Science for You (London, 1929)Google Scholar, Short Stories in Science (London, 1929)Google Scholar, and Osiris and the Atom (London, 1932)Google Scholar.

52 Andrade, , The Structure of the Atom, p. 15Google Scholar.

53 Lodge, , Atoms and Rays, p. 197Google Scholar.

54 Cranston, p. 183.

55 Russell, Bertrand, The ABC of Atoms (n. 5 above), p. 15Google Scholar.

56 Ibid., p. 11.

57 Lodge, , Atoms and Rays, p. 201Google Scholar.

58 Connington, J. J., Nordenholt's Million (London, 1923), pp. 237, 263Google Scholar. “Connington” was the pseudonym of A. W. Stewart, professor of chemistry at Belfast.

59 Ibid., pp. 273–75, 283.

60 Nordenholt's Million was reissued as a Penguin paperback in 1946.

61 Stapledon, Olaf, Last and First Men (1930)Google Scholar; reprint, Los Angeles, 1988), pp. 96, 169.

62 Ibid., p. 28.

63 Nichols, Robert and Browne, Maurice, Wings over Europe (New York, 1928), pp. 10, 28, 41, 49Google Scholar.

64 Ibid., pp. 51–52.

65 Ibid., p. 97.

66 Browne, Maurice, Too Late to Lament (Bloomington, Ind., 1966), p. 299Google Scholar.

67 Quoted in McKay, Alwyn, The Making of the Atomic Age (Oxford, 1984), p. 17Google Scholar.

68 Jeans, James, The Mysterious Universe, 2d ed. (Cambridge, 1932)Google Scholar; Andrade, E. N. da C., The Atom, 2d ed. (London, 1936)Google Scholar; Soddy, Frederick, The Interpretation of the Atom (London, 1932)Google Scholar; Darwin, G. C., The New Conceptions of Matter (London, 1931)Google Scholar; Conn (n. 5 above).

69 See, e.g., Crowther, J. G., “New Particles,” Nineteenth Century 115 (February 1934): 208–19Google Scholar, “The Neutron,” Nineteenth Century 111 (May 1932): 590–602Google Scholar, and “Breaking Up the Atom,” Nineteenth Century 112 (July 1932): 81–94Google Scholar; Sullivan, J. W. N., “Secrets of the Atom,” Fortnightly Review 146 (June 1936): 713–20Google Scholar.

70 Rutherford, Ernest, The Newer Alchemy (Cambridge, 1937)Google Scholar; Aston, F. W., “Forty Years of Atomic Theory,” in Background to Modern Science, ed. Needham, Joseph and Pagel, Walter (Cambridge, 1938), pp. 93–114Google Scholar; Feather, Norman, “1932—and After: The New Physics of the Nucleus,” Science Progress 29 (October 1934): 193–209Google Scholar.

71 Rutherford, Ernest, “Atomic Transmutation,” Nature 132 (September 16, 1933): 432–33Google Scholar.

72 Rutherford, Ernest, Newer Alchemy, p. 65Google Scholar.

73 Eddington, Arthur, New Pathways in Science (Cambridge, 1935), p. 163Google Scholar.

74 Soddy, The Interpretation of Radium (n. 19 above). Nor did Soddy's selfprofessed atomic disciple, H. G. Wells, ever return to the theme of nuclear energy or atomic warfare in any of his dozens of books or scores of articles written after 1914, not even in The Shape of Things to Come (London, 1933)Google Scholar—a widely read novel turned into a popular film three years later.

75 Eddington, , New Pathways, p. 163Google Scholar.

76 Aston, p. 114.

77 McDougall, William, World Chaos: The Responsibility of Science (London, 1931), p. 45Google Scholar.

78 Haldane, J. B. S., Callinicus: A Defence of Chemical Warfare (London, 1925), p. 15Google Scholar.

79 Badash, Lawrence, Nuclear Fission: Reaction to the Discovery in 1939 (San Diego, Calif., 1985)Google Scholar; Bartlett, Martha A., The Way to Ground Zero: The Atomic Bomb in American Science Fiction (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; Weart (n. 2 above), pp. 55–101.

80 Lawrence quoted in Kevles, Daniel J., “Begetting Big Science,” New York Review of Books (October 25, 1990), p. 8Google Scholar; Millikan, quoted in Weart, p. 33.

81 Crowther, , “Breaking Up the Atom” (n. 69 above), p. 81Google Scholar; Kaempffert, quoted in Weart, pp. 11–12.

82 Furnas, C. C., The Next Hundred Years (New York, 1936), p. 188Google Scholar; Harrison, George Russell, “When Physics Goes Farming,” in his Atoms in Action (London, 1939)Google Scholar; Rusk, Rogers, “Hunting for Big Game among the Atoms,” in his Atoms, Men, and the Stars (London, 1937)Google Scholar.

83 Haldane, J. B. S., Daedalus, or Science and the Future (London, 1923), pp. 24–25Google Scholar, Russell, Bertrand, Icarus, or the Future of Science (London, 1924)Google Scholar.

84 Chase, Carl Trueblood, Frontiers of Science (London, 1937)Google Scholar.

85 The star of Murder in the Air? Who else but Ronald Reagan.

86 Stableford, Brian, Scientific Romance in Britain, 1890–1950 (New York, 1985), pp. 151, 371Google Scholar. There is a comparable American study in Bartlett.

87 Nicolson, Harold, Public Faces (London, 1932), p. 157Google Scholar.

88 Ibid., pp. 303, 325.

89 Mitchell, J. Leslie [Lewis Grassic Gibbon], Gay Hunter (London, 1934), p. 86Google Scholar.

90 Priestley, J. B., The Doomsday Men (New York, 1938), p. 255Google Scholar.

91 Snow, C. P., “A New Means of Destruction?” Discovery, n.s., 2 (September 1939): 443Google Scholar.

92 Ibid., p. 444.

93 Mayer, Douglas W. F., “Energy from Matter,” Discovery, n.s., 2 (September 1939): 459–60Google Scholar.

94 McKay (n. 67 above), p. 35; Badash, , Nuclear Fission (n. 79 above), pp. 1–41Google Scholar.

95 The best study of that “official” activity is Gowing, Britain and Atomic Energy (n. 3 above). Also well worth examining is Rhodes, Richard, The Making of the Atomic Bomb (Harmondsworth, 1988)Google Scholar.

96 There is, alas, no study of science funding in Britain. Some indication of American practices can be found in Heilbron, J. L. and Seidel, Rovert W., Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Berkeley, 1989)Google Scholar; Kargon, Robert H., The Rise of Robert Millikan (Ithaca, N.Y., 1982)Google Scholar; Kevles, Daniel J., The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (New York, 1978)Google Scholar.