Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:43:09.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Twyne: a Tudor Humanist and the Problem of Legend

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Arthur B. Ferguson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Twyne deserves to be better known. Any man raised as he was in a society still not accustomed to drawing a clear line between history and myth, yet who struggled as valiantly as he did to make the nation's distant past comprehensible to men of reason, merits more than a second glance – if only because his failure to free himself completely from the myths and legends against which he was contesting tells as much about the limitations of humanist scholarship as his partial success tells about its potentialities. As it is, no one but the rare scholar interested in Geoffrey of Monmouth's reputation or the fortunes of the Brutus legend in Renaissance thought is likely ever to have heard of him. His one known work, the engagingly levelheaded (and at times engagingly wrongheaded) dialogue, De rebus Albionicis, Britannicis atque Anglicis, remained in the limbo of forgotten books until Sir Thomas Kendrick restored it to its proper place as one of the most resourceful critiques of the British History to appear in the century.

It is less, however, for his substantive contribution to the controversy over the Trojan origin of the British people that Twyne rates additional attention than for his approach to the problems involved in it – a fact which helps account for the neglect he has suffered. An original rather than a profound mind, not quite in the first rank of scholars despite his considerable classical learning, he nevertheless makes possible the examination, in a rarely revealing example, of the sense of temporal perspective then emerging in Renaissance England.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , November 1969 , pp. 24 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Twyne, John, De rebus Albionicis, Britannicis atque Anglicis, Commentariorum libri duo (London, 1590)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 24407. It was written for his son Thomas and published by him. It was probably written, however, sometime before 1550. It purports to be a dialogue that took place much earlier still, certainly well before the dissolution of the monasteries and, since it refers to a recent trip made by Juan Luis Vives to England, probably in the late 1520s.

2. SirKendrick, Thomas D., British Antiquity (Cambridge, 1950), esp. pp. 105–08Google Scholar. For biographical detail see D.N.B. Twyne was for twenty years headmaster of King's School, Canterbury, and a man of some prominence in the city, for brief periods mayor and also Member of Parliament.

3. Ferguson, A. B., “Circumstances and the Sense of History in Tudor England: the Coming of the Historical Revolution,” Medieval and Renaissance Studies, ed. Headley, John M. [Proceedings of Southeastern Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, No. 3] (Chapel Hill, 1968), pp. 170–205Google Scholar.

4. Ferguson, A. B., The Articulate Citizen and the English Renaissance (Durham, N.C., 1965), chs. viii-xGoogle Scholar.

5. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 6–7Google Scholar.

6. Ibid., p. 131.

7. The discourse is supposed to have taken place at the summer residence of John Foche, last Abbot of St. Augustine's at Sturry, near Canterbury. The others present were Wotten, then a youth and afterwards dean of Canterbury, Dygon, then a monk of St. Augustine's and later prior, and lastly Twyne himself, then certainly young. Foche does most of the talking, being the senior scholar present; the others serve largely to set up speeches for him. On the treatment of Polydore Vergil, see Kendrick, British Antiquity; also Hay, Denys, Polydore Vergil: Renaissance Historian and Man of Letters (Oxford, 1952)Google Scholar.

8. See Young, A. M., Troy and Her Legend (Pittsburgh, 1948)Google Scholar; Heninger, S. K., “The Tudor Myth of Troy-novant,” South Atlantic Quarterly, LXI (1962), 378–87Google Scholar.

9. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, p. 67Google Scholar.

10. Seznec, J., La survivance des dieux antiques (London, 1940)Google Scholar.

11. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, p. 13Google Scholar.

12. Ibid., pp. 13-14; cf. Geoffrey of Monmouth, History of the Kings of Britain, tr. Evans, Sebastian (London, 1912)Google Scholar, Bk. IV, ch. i. See also Levy, J. H., Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, 1967), p. 146Google Scholar.

13. E.g., Llwyd, Humphrey, The Breviary of Britain, tr. Twyne, Thomas (London, 1573)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 16636, fols. 1-4; SirPrice, John, Historiae Brytannicae defensio (London, 1573)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 20309, p. 3. On these and other defenders of the British History, see also Kendrick, , British Antiquity, pp. 88 ffGoogle Scholar.

14. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 15, 18-19, 22, 27, 32–33Google Scholar.

15. Ibid., pp. 32-33.

16. Ibid., pp. 38-39; cf. p. 20.

17. Ibid., pp. 13-14, 66-68. Both Polydore and John Rastell had also recognized this. Levy, , Tudor Historical Thought, pp. 58–73Google Scholar. But note the sensible counterargument advanced by Price to the effect that the Romans were not in a position to know much about British origins. Price, , Defensio, p. 4Google Scholar.

18. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 65–67Google Scholar.

19. Ibid., p. 92. “Sed vetus error occupauit animos multorum, ac fascinauit specie antiquitatis quadam suae, atque ita fascinauit, vt quod verum est deinceps certe nolint cernere.”

20. Leland, John, Assertio inclytissimi Arturii regis Britanniae (1544), tr. Robinson, Richard (London, 1582)Google Scholar, esp. chs. x-xii, xv, in Middleton, Christopher, The Famous Historie of Chinon of England, ed. Mead, W. E. [E.E.T.S., original series, No. 165] (London, 1925)Google Scholar. Leland, however, was more willing than Twyne to accept legends even when he recognized them as such.

21. Kendrick, , British Antiquity, p. 105Google Scholar.

22. SirElyot, Thomas, Bibliotheca Eliotae: Eliotis Librarie (London, 1545)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 7660. Elyot expressed much the same skepticism as did Twyne about the notion that “Britain” was derived from “Brutus.” The suggestion that Elyot may have been the author of the De rebus Albionicis will not, I think, survive a careful reading of that document. See Hogrefe, Pearl, The Life and Times of Sir Thomas Elyot (Ames, 1967), pp. 104–05Google Scholar.

23. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, p. 118Google Scholar.

24. Ibid., p. 15.

25. Ibid., p. 16.

26. For primitivistic and antiprimitivistic references in classical writings, see Lovejoy, A. O. and Boas, George, Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity (Baltimore, 1935)Google Scholar.

27. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 7-9, 15-31, 98–107Google Scholar.

28. Lambarde, William, A Perambulation of Kent (London, 1826), p. 11Google Scholar. Lambarde, writing in the early 1570s, must have read Twyne's manuscript or perhaps heard him speak. Alexander Neville, writing about the same time and also of Lambarde's circle, refers to the idea but says merely that it was held a nonnullis, Neville, Alexander, in Norwicus, De furoribus Norfolciensium Ketto duce (London, 1575), S.T.C. 18478, p. 13Google Scholar.

29. Norden, John, Speculum Britanniae (London, 1593), S.T.C. 18635, p. 2Google Scholar Twyne does not mention Volscus, however.

30. Verstegen, Richard [pseudonym for Rowland, R.], A Restitution of Decayed Intelligence in Antiquities concerning … the English Nation (London, 1605), S.T.C. 21361, ch. ivGoogle Scholar. See also Spenser, Edmund, The Faerie Queen, II.x.5Google Scholar.

31. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 17–31Google Scholar.

32. Ibid., pp. 24-25; for his full discussion of this evidence, see pp. 24-31. On the subject of changes in the Kentish coastline in ancient times, see Holmes, T. Rice, Ancient Britain and the Invasions of Julius Caesar (London, 1936), pp. 518–51Google Scholar.

33. Twyne, De rebus Albionicis, “quondam altum pelagus, et mare veliuolum?”

34. Ibid., pp. 96-103.

35. Ibid., pp. 105-07.

36. Ibid., p. 103. “Quod mihi non leue argumentum aduersum eos qui isthmum olim fuisse inter Britanniam Galliamque, vel negauerint, vel dubitauerint, saepenumero videri solet cogitanti qua via ac ratione alias 11 If primum in Albionem venerint.”

37. Ibid., p. 15.

38. Ibid., pp. 56-59.

39. Ibid., p. 48. It is interesting that Twyne did not take notice of the story published by his contemporary, John Bale, to the effect that one Samothes, son of Japhet, was the first postdiluvian king of Britain and that Albion, a collateral descendant, came later. See Bale, John, Illustrium majoris Britanniae Scriptorum Summarium (Ipswich [actually Wesel?], 1548)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 1295.

40. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 16-17, 58-59, 96–98Google Scholar.

41. Ibid., p. 97. “Tum Vochius, ridenda haec potius mehercule, inquit, quam refellenda … iudicauerim…. Deus bone, quae vnquam narratio audita est quae risu acciperatur dignior, ab ijs praesertim qui in veterum historicorum monumentis desudarunt?”

42. Piggott, Stuart, “Antiquarian Thought in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” in English Historical Scholarship in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. Fox, Levi (Oxford, 1956), pp. 93–114Google Scholar.

43. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 59–60Google Scholar. “Quorum non pauca vestigia, nimirum aggeres, castella, caucas subterraneas, trophaea saxea, gygantum choraeas, sepulchra, non solum maiorum nostrorum aetas, verum etiam nostra contemplata est,” See also p. 75 for grave findings. It is interesting to notice that Leland also accepted giants on authority but would not admit the stories of gigantic grave remains. Leland, , Assertio, p. 30Google Scholar. Twyne, however, cites relatively “recent” and specific cases. He does not mention the case mentioned in Elyo, Bibliotheca, s.v. “Gigas.”

44. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 61–62Google Scholar.

45. See above, n. 26.

46. For a development of this point, see A. B. Ferguson, “‘By Little and Little’: the Early Humanists on the Development of Man,” to be published in a volume in honor of Wallace K. Ferguson. See also Kendrick, , British Antiquity, p. 121Google Scholar.

47. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 63–64Google Scholar. “dum adhuc in cauernis et foueis habitatum esset … nee rudis populus condendarum aedium, multo minus civitatum, scientiam calleret. Quo sane tempore … quae alimenta ipsa terra primum sponte sua, postea vero incondita quadam adiuta agricultura producebat, parce ad arcendam famen ac sitim, non ad excitandam gulam liberalius sumebantur. Vestitus erat, non quern ingenium ad fastum, sed necessitas ad tegumentum excogitauerat, nempe ex pilis et corijs animalium, quae nonunquam confecta venatione, carnes praebebant in dapes lautiores: verum eo rarius, quo minus in actum adhuc venissent homines, nec ferarum, volucrum et piscium capiendorum artificium cognoscerent. Haec vita primorum parentum fuit, hae antiquae gentis Albionicae.”

48. White, John, The True Pictures and Fashions of the People in that Parte of America now called Virginia, in Hariot, Thomas, A briefe and true report of the new found land of Virginia (Frankfort, 1590)Google Scholar, S.T.C. 12786. White depicts not only the aborigines he saw on the 1585 expedition to the West but the “Picts” of early British history, whom he reconstructed more or less by analogy. See also Kendrick, British Antiquity, plates XII-XV. A more explicit parallel between the Indians and the Britons was made by Speed, John, The History of Great Britaine (London, 1611), pp. 179–82Google Scholar.

49. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 58–60Google Scholar.

50. Ibid., p. 64. He speaks of the early Albionic society, “Nondum aliarum nationum inquinamentis turpificatae ab initio consuetudines: a quibus quanto hodie longius decessum est, tanto corruptius viuitur.”

51. Ibid., pp. 64-65. He cites Diodorus, Herodianus, and Dio.

52. Ibid., pp. 167, 132-33. See also Cary, M. and Warmington, E. H., The Ancient Explorers (London, 1929), pp. 31–33Google Scholar; Holmes, , Ancient Britain, pp. 511–14Google Scholar.

53. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 41–43Google Scholar.

54. Ibid., pp. 58, 144.

55. Ibid., p. 44.

56. Ibid., p. 81.

57. Ibid., p. 59.

58. Ibid., pp. 56-58. Twyne makes the kind of use of the ancient theory of the effect of climate on the temperament and character of peoples which begins to move from the typical medieval use to something more nearly like Jean Bodin's.

59. Ibid., p. 91.

60. Ibid., pp. 80-83, 91.

61. Ibid., pp. 108-10.

62. Ibid., p. 16.

63. Ibid., p. 9.

64. Ibid., p. 10.

65. Ibid., p. 80.

66. Ibid., pp. 77-78.

67. Ibid., pp. 82-86.

68. Ibid., pp. 90-91.

69. Ibid., pp. 88-89.

70. Ibid., pp. 82, 144.

71. Ibid., pp. 142-44. On the Druids see Kendrick, Thomas D., The Druids, a Study in Keltic Prehistory (New York, 1927)Google Scholar. Some interest in the subject was shown in Leland, John, Commentarii de Scriptoribus Britannicis (Oxford, 1709)Google Scholar. But Twyne's interest in the nature and influence of Druidism is not met with again until the works of Price and Llwyd. See above, n. 13.

72. Twyne, , De rebus Albionicis, pp. 87–88Google Scholar.

73. Ibid., pp. 143-44.

74. Ibid., p. 119; see also preceding pages.

75. Ibid., pp. 150-52.

76. Ibid., pp. 152-53. “Ex his togati bellicique Romanorum mores, ex his ardens propagandae gloriae studium, ex his denique conseruandi in officio animos, mira victorum solertia elucere potent.” He believed, however, that the Romans had occupied the entire island.

77. Ibid., pp. 122-25.

78. Ibid., pp. 122-23.

79. Ibid., p. 161.

80. Ibid., p. 45. He also had it on good authority that Hercules among others, before the fall of Troy, had come to Britain, made war on the inhabitants, and was chased out by them.

81. Ibid., p. 91.

82. Ibid., p. 84.

83. Ibid., p. 125.

84. Ibid., pp. 129-31.