Article contents
“In Ten Years There Is an Increase of 450 Priests of Antichrist”: Quantification, Anti-Catholicism, and the Bulwark
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2017
Abstract
The Scottish Reformation Society's The Bulwark (1851–present) was the Victorian era's most influential anti-Catholic periodical, a reputation based on its self-proclaimed devotion to “facts.” Attempting to counter a unified Catholic Church in a period of pronounced intra-Protestant conflict, the Bulwark sought to root religious controversy in the increasingly popular phenomenon of statistical inquiry. The Bulwark’s obsession with collating and interpreting religion-based numbers was unique not for its existence, but for its sheer extent. It thus exemplifies how “official” statistical documents, methods, and conclusions were translated into the concerns of popular religious culture. In particular, the Bulwark’s ongoing surveys of Catholicism's “progress,” intended to frighten Protestants into action, weaponized statistical discourses that were used in more measured fashion elsewhere. To that end, the Bulwark argued that only Protestants had the right mindset to put religious statistics into a proper explanatory framework, whereas Catholics manipulated their own data for dishonest rhetorical purposes that the Bulwark disclaimed. The Bulwark’s statistical turn, which bypassed the sectarianism of its theological articles, positioned it as a voice uniting the interests of all Protestant readers against Parliament's dangerously tolerant brand of liberalism.
Keywords
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2017
References
1 “The Progress of Popery,” Publications of the Protestant Association 1 (1839): 3Google Scholar.
2 “Introduction,” Bulwark; or Reformation Journal 1, no. 1 (July 1851): 1–2 Google ScholarPubMed, at 1.
3 Glass, David V., Numbering the People: The Eighteenth-Century Population Controversy and the Development of Census and Vital Statistics in Britain (London, 1978), 24–25 Google Scholar; Hutchinson, Edward Prince, The Population Debate: The Development of Conflicting Theories up to 1900 (Boston, 1967), 365–66Google Scholar.
4 Bashford, Alison and Chaplin, Joyce E., The New Worlds of Thomas Robert Malthus: Rereading the Principle of Population (Princeton, 2016), 155–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Eyler, John M., Victorian Social Medicine: The Ideas and Methods of William Farrar (Baltimore, 1979), 18–19 Google Scholar, 199–200; Levitan, Kathrin, A Cultural History of the British Census: Envisioning The Multitude in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 2011), 5–6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Porter, Theodore, “Statistics and the Career of Public Reason: Engagement and Detachment in a Quantified World,” in Statistics and the Public Sphere: Numbers and the People in Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000, ed. Crook, Tom and O'Hara, Glen (New York, 2011), 32–50 Google Scholar, at 38.
6 Tom Crook, “Suspect Figures: Statistics and Public Trust in Victorian England,” in Crook and O'Hara, eds., Statistics, 165–84, at 173, 172.
7 Edward Higgs, “The State and Statistics in Victorian and Edwardian Britain: Promotion of the Public Sphere or Boundary Maintenance?,” in Crook and O'Hara, eds., Statistics, 67–83, at 72.
8 Jacob, William, “Observations and Suggestions Respecting the Collection, Concentration, and Diffusion of Statistical Knowledge Regarding the State of the United Kingdom,” Transactions of the Statistical Society of London 1, no. 1 (1837): 1–25 Google Scholar, at 1.
9 Prévost, Jean-Guy and Beaud, Jean-Pierre, Statistics, Public Debate and the State, 1800–1945: A Social, Political and Intellectual History of Numbers (London, 2012)Google Scholar, 23.
10 Schweber, Libby, Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830–1885 (Durham, 2006), 97–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cullen, Michael J., The Statistical Movement in Early Modern Britain: The Foundations of Empirical Social Research (New York, 1975), 82–83 Google Scholar. See also Alain Desrosières, The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, trans. Naish, Camille (Cambridge, MA, 1998), 173–75Google Scholar; and Poovey, Mary, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago, 1998), 304–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Daston, Lorraine, “Fear and Loathing of the Imagination in Science,” Daedalus 127, no. 1 (Winter 1998): 73–95 Google Scholar, at 91.
12 Asad, Talal, “Ethnographic Representation, Statistics, and Modern Power,” Social Research 61, no. 1 (Spring 1994): 55–88 Google Scholar, at 78; Kalpagam, U., Rule by Numbers: Governmentality in Colonial India (Lanham, 2014), 12–13 Google Scholar.
13 Sherman, Sandra, Imagining Poverty: Quantification and the Decline of Paternalism (Columbus, 2001)Google Scholar, 101; Kalpagam, Rule by Numbers, 140.
14 “The Bulwark, or Reformation Journal,” Brechin Advertiser and Angus and Mearns Intelligencer, 14 October 1851, 3; “The Bulwark, or Reformation Journal,” Home and Foreign Record of the Free Church of Scotland, n.s., 5 (September 1860): xxiv.
15 See, for example, Griffin, Susan M., Anti-Catholicism and Nineteenth-Century Fiction (Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar; Moran, Maureen, Catholic Sensationalism and Victorian Literature (Liverpool, 2007)Google Scholar; O'Malley, Patrick R., Catholicism, Sexual Deviance, and Victorian Gothic Culture (Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peschier, Diana, Nineteenth-Century Anti-Catholic Discourses: The Case of Charlotte Brontë (Houndmills, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wheeler, Michael, The Old Enemies: Catholic and Protestant in Nineteenth-Century English Culture (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar.
16 Unsigned review of Bulwark, Original Secession Magazine 6, no. 7 (March 1864): 421–22Google Scholar, at 421.
17 Goldman, Lawrence, “Statistics and the Science of Society in Early Victorian Britain: An Intellectual Context for the General Record Office,” Social History of Medicine 4, no. 3 (December 1991): 415–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 428.
18 Croly, George, Papal Rome. The Principles and Practises of Rome Alike Condemned by the Gospel. A Sermon (London, 1849)Google Scholar, 5; Zuinglius, , Who Will Win? A Story of the Crisis of Today (London, 1899), 153, 279–80Google Scholar; Unsigned review of “Secrets of the Convent and Confessional,” Bulwark, n.s., 2, no. 3 (September 1873): 57–60; Wright, Julia McNair, Secrets of the Convent and Confessional: An Exhibition of the Influence and Workings of Papacy upon Society and Republican Institutions (Cincinnati, 1876)Google Scholar, 165.
19 “About the Scottish Reformation Society,” Scottish Reformation Society, http://www.scottishreformationsociety.org/about-the-scottish-reformation-society/; Meldrum, Patricia, Conscience and Compromise: Forgotten Evangelicals of Nineteenth-Century Scotland (Carlisle, 2006)Google Scholar, 189.
20 Kehoe, S. Karly, Creating a Scottish Church: Catholicism, Gender, and Ethnicity in Nineteenth-Century Scotland (Manchester, 2010)Google Scholar, 1.
21 Paz, Denis G., Popular Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian England (Stanford, 1992)Google Scholar, 188.
22 Scott, Patrick, “Victorian Religious Periodicals: Fragments that Remain,” in The Materials, Sources and Methods of Ecclesiastical History, ed. Baker, Derek (Oxford, 1975), 325–40Google Scholar, at 327.
23 Wallis, Frank H., “Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian Britain: Theory and Discipline,” Journal of Religion and Society 7 (2005): 1–17 Google Scholar, at 6.
24 “Preface,” Bulwark 1 (1852): v–vi Google ScholarPubMed, at vi; Altick, Richard D., The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900 (Chicago, 1957)Google Scholar, 394; Houghton, Walter E., “Victorian Periodical Literature and the Articulate Classes,” Victorian Studies 22, no. 4 (Summer 1979): 389–412 Google Scholar, at 394.
25 Popery: Its Progress and Position in Great Britain, and the Relative Duty of Protestants; Being the Ninth Report of the Scottish Reformation Society (Edinburgh, 1860), 4–5 Google Scholar; “Scottish Reformation Society,” Caledonian Mercury (Edinburgh), 17 March 1865, 2.
26 The Christian Year Book, Containing a Summary of Christian Work, and the Results of Missionary Effort throughout the World (London, 1868)Google Scholar, 139.
27 Wylie, J. A., ed., Ter-Centary of the Scottish Reformation, as Commemorated at Edinburgh, August 1860 (Edinburgh, 1860)Google Scholar, 286.
28 “Islington Protestant Institute,” Bulwark 3, no. 33 (March 1854): 235–36Google Scholar, at 235.
29 Altholz, Josef L., “Anonymity and Editorial Responsibility in Religious Journalism,” Victorian Periodicals Review 24, no. 4 (Winter 1991): 180–86Google Scholar, at 181.
30 Wolffe, John, “A Comparative Historical Categorisation of Anti-Catholicism,” Journal of Religious History 9, no. 2 (June 2015): 182–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 192.
31 “Protestant Organization of Great Britain,” Bulwark 1, no. 9 (April 1852): 245–47Google Scholar, at 245.
32 Klancher, Jon P., The Making of English Reading Audiences, 1790–1832 (Madison, 1987)Google Scholar, 51.
33 “Popish Tactics in Parliament,” Bulwark 9, no. 109 (September 1859): 57–59 Google Scholar, at 58.
34 Wolffe, John, The Protestant Crusade in Great Britain, 1829–1860 (Oxford, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 249.
35 Drummond, Andrew L. and Bulloch, James, The Church in Victorian Scotland, 1843–1874 (Edinburgh, 1975), 323–29Google Scholar.
36 Finlayson, Sandy, Unity and Diversity: The Founders of the Free Church of Scotland (Fearn, 2010)Google Scholar, 103, 174.
37 Couper, W. J., “A Bibliography of Edinburgh Political Literature,” Scottish Notes and Queries, 2nd ser., 3 (June 1902): 182–84Google Scholar, at 182.
38 Finlayson, Unity and Diversity, 160.
39 Smith, Thomas, Memoirs of Rev. James Begg, D.D., 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1885–88)Google Scholar, vol. 2, http://www.nesherchristianresources.org/JBS/ebooks/begg_memoir/CS.html.
40 Begg, James, A Handbook of Popery, or Text-Book of Missions for the Conversion of Romanists: Being Papal Rome Tested by Scripture, History, and Its Recent Workings (Edinburgh, 1842)Google Scholar, 11, 298.
41 “The Reverend Charles Kingsley at Bury St. Edmunds,” Bulwark 10, no. 117 (March 1861): 231–33Google Scholar.
42 Wheeler, Old Enemies, 246.
43 “Notices of New Publications,” North Devon Journal (Barnstaple), 3 November 1853, 6.
44 “The Rev. Hugh Stowell,” Bulwark 2, no. 15 (September 1852): 63Google Scholar.
45 See, e.g., “Statistics,” Baptist Magazine for 1843, no. 35 (1843): 24–25 Google ScholarPubMed.
46 Mullens, Joseph, Revised Statistics of Missions in India and Ceylon. Compiled at the Request of the Calcutta Missionary Conference (London, 1853)Google Scholar, 6. But by contrast, Rowse, Tim and Shellam, Tiffany, “The Colonial Emergence of a Statistical Imaginary,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55, no. 4 (October 2013): 922–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 923, 944, and 952–53.
47 W. B. B., Statistics of Protestant Missionary Societies, 1861 (London, 1863)Google Scholar, 10, 69.
48 Ibid., 4.
49 “The May Meetings,” Children's Missionary Newspaper, June 1850, 54–55, at 55.
50 Snell, K. D. M. and Ell, Paul S., Rival Jerusalems: The Geography of Victorian Religion (Cambridge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 28.
51 Wolffe, John, The Religious Census of 1851 in Yorkshire (York, 2005), 7–8 Google Scholar; Geary, Keith, ed., The 1851 Census of Religious Worship: Church, Chapel and Meeting Place in Mid Nineteenth-Century Warwickshire (Stratford-upon-Avon, 2014), 3–6 Google Scholar; Pickering, W. S. F., “The 1851 Religious Census: A Useless Experiment?,” British Journal of Sociology 18 (1967): 382–407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 385–86.
52 Levitan, Cultural History, 86. On privacy, see ibid., 89, 91–94. Pickering, “The 1851 Religious Census,” 386. See also Thompson, David M., “The 1851 Religious Census: Problems and Possibilities,” Victorian Studies 11, no. 1 (September 1967): 87–97 Google Scholar, at 87–88, 95.
53 Cullen, Statistical Movement, 69; Pickering, “1851 Religious Census,” 394–95. See also Snell and Ell, Rival Jerusalems, 42–44.
54 [Horace Mann], Census of Great Britain, 1851. Religious Worship. England and Wales. Report and Tables (London, 1853), ci–cii Google Scholar.
55 Ibid., clxxviii.
56 Snell and Ell, Rival Jerusalems, 38, 174.
57 Mann, Census, 106–7.
58 Dobraszczyk, Paul, “‘Give in Your Account’: Using and Abusing Victorian Census Forms,” Journal of Victorian Culture 14, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 1–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 15–16.
59 Baker, R. G., The Spiritual Improvement of the Census. A Sermon, Preached in the Parish Church of All Saints, Fulham, 30th March, 1851 (London, 1851)Google Scholar, 9.
60 Ibid., 20.
61 Binnie, W., “The Numbering of the People. (A Homily for the Census Day),” Homiletic Quarterly 5 (1881): 27–28 Google Scholar, at 27.
62 Allen, George, The Numbering of the People. A Sermon Delivered in Connection with the Census of 1861, Preached in St. Thomas’ Church, Islington, on Sunday Evening, April 7 (London, n.d.), 22Google Scholar; Spurgeon, C. H., “The Last Census. A Sermon Delivered on Sunday Morning, April 14th, 1861,” Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit 7, nos. 381–82 (April 1862): 273–80Google Scholar, at 279. On Allen, see Dobraszczyk, “‘Give in Your Account,’” 15–16.
63 Levitan, Cultural History, 6.
64 “By Whom Will Heaven Be Tenanted?,” Christian Reformer, or, Unitarian Magazine and Review 7, no. 74 (February 1840): 97–101 Google Scholar, at 99.
65 Knight, Frances, The Nineteenth-Century Church and English Society (Cambridge, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 18.
66 Mann, Census, cxvi.
67 Bolton, Frederick Samuel, Christian Unity. A Sermon Preached in St. Mary's Church, Stafford, at the Visitation of the Ven. the Archdeacon of Stafford, May 22nd, 1855 (London, 1855)Google Scholar, 19.
68 Potter, Jonathan, Wetherell, Margaret, and Chitty, Andrew, “Quantification Rhetoric—Cancer on Television,” Discourse and Society 2, no. 3 (July 1991): 333–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 336.
69 Freedgood, Elaine, Victorian Writing about Risk: Imagining a Safe England in a Dangerous World (Cambridge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 27.
70 “Comparative Statistics of Irish and English Crime,” Dublin Review 6, no. 11 (January 1839): 269–77Google Scholar, at 276.
71 “The Religious Census of England,” Rambler, n.s., 1, no. 2 (February 1854): 183–90Google Scholar, at 186.
72 “Our Picture in the Census,” Rambler, n.s., 1, no. 3 (March 1854): 356–75Google Scholar, at 372.
73 See, for example, “Romish Statistics.—St. Winefrede's Well,” Protestant Magazine 15, n.s., no. 25 (January 1853)Google Scholar: 5.
74 “Statistics of Popery in Great Britain and the Colonies,” Fraser's Magazine 19, no. 111 (March 1839): 261–77Google Scholar, at 263.
75 “Irish Crime and London Morals,” Lamp 4, no. 3 (January 31, 1852): 29–31 Google Scholar, at 29.
76 Worsnop, Judith, “A Reevaluation of the Problem of ‘Surplus Women’ in Nineteenth-Century England,” Women's Studies International Forum 13, no. 1–2 (January 1990): 21–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 26.
77 “Popery in Clydesdale,” Bulwark 7, no. 76 (October 1857): 100Google Scholar.
78 “Notes of the Month,” Bulwark 8, no. 88 (October 1858): 104–8Google Scholar, at 106; “Popish Chaplains in the Army,” Bulwark 8, no. 88 (October 1858): 100–3Google Scholar.
79 “State of the Protestant Organization of Britain,” Bulwark 1, no. 6 (December 1851): 149–51Google Scholar, at 150.
80 “Scottish Reformation Society,” Bulwark 4, no. 44 (February 1855): 200–1Google Scholar.
81 “The Census of 1861,” Bulwark 11, no. 127 (January 1862): 193–94Google Scholar, at 193.
82 “The Special Mission—A Prospect,” British Protestant 10, no. 98 (February 1854): 17–20 Google Scholar, at 18.
83 Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland. Held at Edinburgh May, 1854 (Edinburgh, 1854)Google Scholar, 102.
84 “The State of the Struggle,” Bulwark 4, no. 37 (July 1854): 1–3 Google ScholarPubMed, at 2–3.
85 “The Protestant Alliance,” Bulwark 4, no. 39 (September 1854): 81–82 Google Scholar, at 81.
86 Steinmetz, Andrew, The Novitiate, or, a Year among the English Jesuits: A Personal Narrative; With an Essay on the Constitutions, the Confessional Morality, and History of the Jesuits (London, 1846)Google Scholar, 369.
87 Poovey, Mary, Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864 (Chicago, 1995)Google Scholar, 84.
88 Cubitt, Geoffrey, The Jesuit Myth: Conspiracy Theory and Politics in Nineteenth-Century France (Oxford, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 225; Moran, Catholic Sensationalism, 28–76. See also Peschier, Nineteenth-Century Anti-Catholic, 43–69; Wolffe, John, “The Jesuit as Villain in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction,” in The Church and Literature, ed. Clarke, Peter and Methuen, Charlotte (Suffolk, 2012), 308–20Google Scholar, at 320.
89 “The Jesuits in England,” Bulwark 9, no. 97 (July 1859): 27Google Scholar.
90 “Jesuit Statistics,” Pall Mall Budget 8 (12 July 1872): 24Google Scholar.
91 “The March to Rome,” Bulwark 5, no. 58 (April 1856): 255–59Google Scholar, at 257.
92 Verhoeven, Timothy, “‘A Perfect Jesuit in Petticoats’: The Curious Figure of the Female Jesuit,” Journal of Jesuit Studies 2, no. 4 (2015): 624–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 630; Wheeler, Old Enemies, 220–28.
93 Gavazzi, Anthony, The Orations of Father Gavazzi, Delivered in Belfast on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th November, 1852 (Belfast, 1852)Google Scholar, 20.
94 “The Importance of London as a Centre of Protestant Effort. Chapter 4:—The Influence of Rome in London,” Bulwark 21, no. 243 (September 1871): 57–60 Google Scholar, at 60.
95 “Dr. Warneck on Romish Missions,” Church Missionary Intelligencer and Record, n.s., 10 (July 1885): 516–21Google Scholar, at 518.
96 Poovey, History, 313.
97 “The Speech of Bishop Goss,” Bulwark 14, no. 164 (February 1865): 209Google Scholar.
98 “Monasteries under the Microscope,” Punch, or the London Charivari 26, no. 661 (1854): 105Google Scholar.
99 “Popery Turning the Cardinal to Account, and Attempting to Acquire Paramount Influence in London,” Bulwark 1, no. 1 (July 1851): 17–20 Google Scholar, at 17.
100 “Popish Directories for 1854,” Bulwark 3, no. 33 (March 1854): 225–27Google Scholar, at 225.
101 “Protestant Statistics—Edinburgh,” 235.
102 Prévost and Beaud, Statistics, 48.
103 “Popery Seizing London,” Bulwark 9, no. 98 (August 1859): 52–54 Google Scholar, at 52.
104 “Power and Growth of Popery,” Bulwark 9, no. 98 (August 1859): 42–44 Google Scholar.
105 “The Bartholomew Massacre,” Bulwark 1, no. 2 (August 1851): 35–39 Google Scholar, at 38.
106 “Romish Statistics for Scotland,” Bulwark 5, no. 57 (March 1856): 236Google Scholar.
107 Desrosières, Politics of Large Numbers, 174.
108 “Conversions from the Church of Rome,” Bulwark 1, no. 3 (September 1851): 59–61 Google Scholar, at 59.
109 “New Papists,” Bulwark 1, no. 3 (September 1851): 74; “More Nuns at Glasgow,” Bulwark 1, no. 3 (September 1851): 76.
110 “Conversions from Popery in Ireland,” Bulwark 1, no. 5 (November 1851): 123–24Google Scholar, at 123.
111 “Popish Inroad on Leeds,” Bulwark 1, no. 6 (December 1851): 153Google Scholar.
112 “Notes of the Month,” Bulwark 3, no. 29 (November 1853): 113–15Google Scholar, at 114.
113 “Extensive Conversion from Rome,” Bulwark 8, no. 93 (March 1859): 233–35Google Scholar, at 235.
114 “Notes of the Month,” Bulwark 3, no. 33 (March 1854): 249–50Google Scholar, at 249.
115 “The Protestant Electoral Union of Scotland,” Bulwark 14, no. 167 (May 1865): 301–4Google Scholar, at 303.
116 Higgs, Edward, The Information State in England (Houndmills, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 87; idem Life, Death, and Statistics: Civil Registration, Censuses, and the Work of the General Register Office, 1836–1952 (Hatfield, 2004), 59–60 Google Scholar.
117 “The Theory of the Maynooth Endowment,” Bulwark 3, no. 33 (March 1854): 237Google Scholar.
118 “Maynooth, or Popery Throwing off the Mask,” Bulwark 5, no. 50 (August 1855): 32–33 Google ScholarPubMed, at 33.
119 “Protestant Electoral Associations,” Bulwark 3, no. 35 (May 1854): 283–85Google Scholar, at 285.
120 “The Anti-Maynooth Agitation,” Bulwark 1, no. 9 (March 1852): 219Google ScholarPubMed.
121 Machin, G. I. T., Politics and the Churches in Great Britain, 1832 to 1868 (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar, 218.
122 “The Progress of Popery. A Solemn Warning in 1830,” Bulwark 3, no. 26 (August 1853): 29Google Scholar.
123 “Opening of Parliament—Prospects of Protestantism,” Bulwark 1, no. 9 (March 1852): 227–29Google Scholar, at 229.
124 “Popery Effectually Dealt With,” Bulwark 3, no. 36 (June 1854): 324–25Google Scholar, at 325.
125 Gigerenzer, Gerd et al. ., The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 40; Desrosières, Politics of Large Numbers, 7–8.
126 Porter, Theodore, The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton, 1986)Google Scholar, 51.
127 Scott, Thomas, ed., The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, According to the Authorised Version, from the 5th London ed. (Boston, 1824)Google Scholar, 6:749.
128 “The Progress of Popery,” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 44, no. 276 (October 1838): 494–507 Google Scholar, at 498.
129 Cobbin, Ingram, The Book of Popery. A Manual for Protestants; Descriptive of the Origin, Progress, Doctrines, Rites, and Ceremonies of the Catholic Church (London, 1840)Google Scholar, 121; Woodcock, Henry, Popery Unmasked; Being Thirty Conversations between Mr. Daylight and Mr. Twilight, in which the Peculiar Doctrines, Morals, Government, and Usages of the Romish Church are Truthfully Stated from Her Own Authorised Works, and Impartially Tried by God's Word, the Only Unerring Rule of Doctrine and Duty (London, [1862]), 327–28Google Scholar.
130 “Popery the Grand Curse of Christendom,” Bulwark 4, no. 46 (April 1855): 263–64Google Scholar, at 263.
131 “The Butcheries of Rome,” Bulwark 3, no. 27 (December 1853): 63Google Scholar.
132 “Popish Reformation,” Bulwark 1, no. 6 (December 1851):151–52Google Scholar, at 152.
133 Hacking, Ian, The Taming of Chance (Cambridge, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 120; Goldman, Lawrence, “Victorian Social Science: From Singular to Plural,” in The Organisation of Knowledge in Victorian Britain, ed. Daunton, Martin (Oxford, 2005), 87–114 Google Scholar. See, for example, ibid., 97–100.
134 Sargant, William Lucas, Essays of a Birmingham Manufacturer (London, 1870)Google Scholar, 2:60.
135 Wylie, J. A., Rome and Civil Liberty: Or, the Papal Aggression in its Relation to the Sovereignty of the Queen and the Independence of the Nation (London, 1866)Google Scholar, 225.
136 “The Sources of Britain's Greatness,” Bulwark 9, no. 102 (December 1859): 145–48Google Scholar, at 148.
137 Wallis, “Anti-Catholicism,” 6.
138 “The Priest and the Rail,” Bulwark 10, no. 120 (June 1861): 327Google Scholar; “Popery and ‘Mud-Cabins’ in Ireland,” Bulwark 10, no. 120 (June 1861): 327–28Google Scholar. The first article was a reprint from the Gospel Magazine.
139 “Popish Paupers in the Workhouses of England,” Bulwark 10, no. 120 (June 1861): 314–18Google Scholar.
140 “Popery and Savings Banks,” Bulwark 11, no. 121 (July 1861): 20Google Scholar.
141 “Popery a Parent of Crime,” Bulwark 3, no. 32 (February 1854): 199–200 Google Scholar, at 199.
142 Ibid., 200.
143 “Popery in Irish Prisons,” Bulwark 9, no. 105 (March 1860): 229–31Google Scholar, at 230, 231.
144 “A Proposed Popish Establishment in Jails,” Bulwark 20, no. 231 (September 1870): 57–62 Google Scholar, at 61.
145 “Brigandage and Romanism in Italy,” Bulwark 15, no. 176 (February 1866): 220Google Scholar.
146 O'Malley, Catholicism, Sexual Deviance, 50; Griffin, Anti-Catholicism, 153–78. See also Peschier, Nineteenth-Century Anti-Catholic, 25–42.
147 Boyd, Kenneth M., Scottish Church Attitudes to Sex, Marriage and the Family, 1850–1914 (Edinburgh, 1980)Google Scholar, 30.
148 Ibid., 31.
149 Lumley, W. G., “Observations upon the Statistics of Illegitimacy,” Journal of the Statistical Society 25, no. 2 (June 1862): 219–74Google Scholar, at 270.
150 “Houses for the Working Classes,” Home and Foreign Record of the Free Church of Scotland, n.s., 3, no. 11 (June 1859): 251–53Google Scholar; Boyd, Scottish Church Attitudes, 29–41.
151 Verhoeven, Timothy, Transatlantic Anti-Catholicism: France and the United States in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 2010), 84, 88, 90–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
152 “The Moral Results of the Romish System,” Bulwark 4, no. 90 (October 1854): 85–89 Google Scholar, at 87–88.
153 Zuinglius, Who Will Win?, 280.
- 1
- Cited by