Article contents
Authority and Rebellion in Victorian Autobiography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2014
Extract
It has been a literary (if not strictly historical) commonplace that the later nineteenth century was a time of pervasive rebellion of sons against fathers. For example, Butler's The Way of All Flesh and Gosse's Father and Son are texts often cited as indicative of a broader social phenomenon. “As Irish life runs to secret societies,” observed V. S. Pritchett, “so English life seems to run naturally to parricide movements. We are a nation of father haters.” Yet father-hating did not become conspicuous until the Victorian period, when, in contrast to the reputed submissiveness of the eighteenth-century son, a “growing self-consciousness by the son of his role as liberator” surfaced in fictional and biographical writing. Whether such a rebellion actually took place on any large scale is impossible to determine. Few men record such things, and when they do their real feelings tend to remain concealed or not fully understood. The premise of this study, based on selected examples of autobiography, is that the peculiar desperation of many Victorians to buttress eroding forms of traditional patriarchal authority had its first and perhaps most crucial effects within the family itself, intensifying ordinary generational conflict and its usual quota of rebellion, guilt, and neurosis. Amidst the conventional catalogues of accomplishment, there is a striking pattern of childhood experience within the family that incubated some version of future rebellion and profoundly affected the writers' emotional lives.
Open warfare between generations is uncommon; most often rebellion instead employs a disguised language and context for its articulation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1978
References
1. The Living Novel and Later Appreciations (New York, 1967), p. 141Google Scholar.
2. Wolf, Howard R., “British Fathers and Sons, 1773-1913: from Filial Submissiveness to Creativity,” Psychoanalytic Review, 52, No. 2 (Summer 1965), 53Google Scholar. A recent discussion is Mazlish's, BruceJames and John Stuart Mill: Father and Son in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 1975)Google Scholar. For submissiveness as a literary motif see Tompkins, J. M. S., The Popular Novel in England, 1770-1800 (London, 1932)Google Scholar and Avery, G., Nineteenth Century Children: Heroes and Heroines in English Children's Stories 1780-1900 (London, 1965)Google Scholar.
3. For the eighteenth-century context of revolt, see Weinstein, Fred and Platt, Gerald M., The Wish to be Free: Society, Psyche and Value Change (Berkeley, 1969)Google Scholar.
4. These quotations are found in Houghton, Walter, The Victorian Frame of Mind (New Haven, 1957), pp. 343–45Google Scholar.
5. Orwell, George, “Charles Dickens,” A Collection of Essays (New York, 1954), p. 95Google Scholar.
6. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, ed. Barlow, Nora (London, 1958), p. 39Google Scholar.
7. Praeterita, The Works of John Ruskin, eds. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander (London, 1908), XXXV, 46Google Scholar.
8. Father and Son (3rd. ed., New York, 1908), p. 35Google Scholar.
9. See Reader, W. J., Professional Men: the Rise of the Professional Classes in Nineteenth-Century England (London, 1966)Google Scholar and Musgrove, F., “Middle-Class Education and Employment in the Nineteenth Century,” Economic History Review, 2nd Ser., XII (1959–1960), 99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. Wakefield, Edward Gibbon, England and America (London, 1833), pp. 94–95Google Scholar, quoted in Neale, R. S., “Class and Class-Consciousness in Early Nineteenth-Century England: Three Classes of Five?,” Victorian Studies (hereafter, V.S.), XII, (Sept., 1968), 15Google Scholar.
11. Neale, R. S., “Class and Class Consciousness,” V.S., XII, 14Google Scholar. This is not to suggest that professional men, always highly conscious of the genteel status they could claim by virtue of education and personal associations, would have dreamed of classifying themselves with mere middle-class people in trade. Their sturdy political liberalism was nearly always laced by an unabashed social snobbery that is now more fashionably concealed. Nevertheless, their economic position in the first half of the nineteenth century did significantly lack the financial comforts and enhanced social status that now characterize upper-middle-class professionals (if not the presently emerging intellectual proletariat).
12. Father and Son, pp. 216-17.
13. Works, XXXV, 185Google Scholar.
14. Quoted in Dunn, Waldo H., James Anthony Froude (Oxford, 1961), I, 28Google Scholar.
15. The Way of All Flesh (New York, 1965), pp. 59, 69Google Scholar.
16. Autobiography, The Works of Herbert Spencer, Vol. XX (reprt. 1904 ed.; Osnabruck, , 1966), 54–60Google Scholar.
17. Quoted in Mazlish, , James and John Stuart Mill, p. 153Google Scholar.
18. Trollope, Anthony, An Autobiography (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1947), pp. 19, 27–28Google Scholar.
19. Cominos, Peter T., “Late-Victorian Sexual Respectability and the Social System,” International Review of Social History, VIII (1963), Part 2, 245Google Scholar.
20. Spencer, , Works, XX, 162Google Scholar, 43. It is possible, of course, that the role of the mother was far more crucial, particularly in the pre-Oedipal years, than the son either consciously remembered or wished to admit. Certainly Spencer's contempt for his mother's passive submission to authority, and his emphatic denials of resemblance between them, suggest an underlying identification of some kind. Their physical resemblance is striking; so was Spencer's assumption, through his prostrating nervous illness, of a passive “feminine” role.
21. Darwin to his son, William Erasmus Darwin, 26 April 1858, quoted in Colp, Ralph, To Be an Invalid: the Illness of Charles Darwin (Chicago and London, 1977), p. 53Google Scholar: Darwin, , Autobiography, p. 28Google Scholar.
22. Autobiography of John Stuart Mill (New York, 1964), p. 151Google Scholar.
23. Carlyle, , Reminiscences, ed. Froude, J. A. (New York, 1881), pp. 47Google Scholar, 7, 15, 13.
24. Quoted in Stock, Irvin, William Hale White (Mark Rutherford) (New York, 1956), p. 35Google Scholar.
25. The Way of All Flesh, p. 126.
26. Quoted in Dunn, , Froude, I, 18, 34, 43Google Scholar.
27. Autobiography, p. 27; Sadleir, Michael, Anthony Trollope: a Commentary (Boston, 1927), p. 57Google Scholar.
28. Mill, , Autobiography, pp. 151Google Scholar, 46.
29. Totem and Taboo (New York, 1938), p. 846Google Scholar.
30. Mill, , Autobiography, p. 56Google Scholar.
31. Carlyle, , Reminiscences, p. 17Google Scholar.
32. Froude, J. A., “The Spirit's Trials,” in Shadows of the Clouds (London, 1847), p. 25Google Scholar.
33. Trollope, , Autobiography, p. 27Google Scholar.
34. Spencer, , Works, XX, 55, 82Google Scholar.
35. Mill, , Autobiography, p. 45Google Scholar.
36. Carlyle, , Reminiscences, p. 11Google Scholar.
37. Darwin, , Autobiography, p. 40Google Scholar.
38. The fear of marriage was perceptively described by Edward Gibbon Wakefield: “… a great proportion of young men in the uneasy class dread marriage, unless there be a fortune in the case, as the surest means of increasing their embarrassment. This is one of the most important features in the social state of England.” Quoted in Neale, R. S., “Class and Class-Consciousness,” V.S., XII, 15Google Scholar.
39. Froude, , “Spirit's Trials,” pp. 32–33Google Scholar, 20.
40. Quoted in Henderson, Philip, Samuel Butler: the Incarnate Bachelor (London, 1953), p. 152Google Scholar.
41. Butler, , The Way of All Flesh, pp. 128Google Scholar, 122.
42. Carlyle, , Reminiscences, p. 45Google Scholar.
43. Froude, , “Spirit's Trials,” p. 25Google Scholar.
44. Quoted in Dunn, , Froude, I, 42Google Scholar.
45. Butler, , The Way of All Flesh, p. 145Google Scholar.
46. Quoted in Houghton, , The Victorian Frame of Mind, pp. 234–35Google Scholar.
47. Keary, Annie, The Rival Kings (1857)Google Scholar, quoted in Wolff, Robert Lee, “Some Erring Children in Children's Literature: the World of Victorian Religious Strife in Miniature,” in The Worlds of Victorian Fiction, ed. Buckley, Jerome H. (Cambridge, Mass., 1975), p. 314Google Scholar.
48. Cominos, , “Late Victorian Sexual Respectability and the Social System,” I.R.S.H., VIII (1963), 216Google Scholar.
49. Houghton, , The Victorian Frame of Mind, p. 235Google Scholar.
50. Quoted in Newsome, David, Godliness and Good Learning: Four Studies on a Victorian Ideal (London, 1961), p. 49Google Scholar. The passage criticizes Thomas Arnold.
51. Father and Son, p. 73. The degree of guilt that such spiritual inspection could generate is revealed in the well-known episode of the Christmas pudding. Gosse, in direct disobedience of his father's strictures against “Popish” rites, had eaten a small slice of plum pudding. Yet his conviction of sin proved overwhelming: “At length I could bear my spiritual anguish no longer, and bursting into the study I called out: ‘Oh! Papa, Papa, I have eaten of flesh offered to idols!’” (p. 127).
52. Undoubtedly many parents were rather more practical than truly pious in their choice of a clerical occupation for their sons. In the first half of the century church livings and teaching opportunities for men who had taken orders far outnumbered other professional vacancies, and though places were still distributed largely on the basis of patronage, many professional fathers had family clerical connections which might be exploited. Furthermore, aspiring sons of families without specific influence could still enter the fierce college competitions for the fellowships and awards that would open the doors to preferment.
53. Quoted in Newsome, Godliness and Good Learning, p. 53.
54. Butler, , The Way of All Flesh, p. 87Google Scholar.
55. Sherwood, Mary Martha, The Fairchild Family, ed. Palgrave, Mary E. (London, 1931), p. 35Google Scholar.
56. Robertson, Priscilla, “Home as Nest: Middle Class Childhood in Nineteenth-Century Europe,” in The History of Childhood, ed. de Mause, Lloyd (New York, 1974). pp. 415–16Google Scholar.
57. Froude, , “Spirit's Trials,” p. 36Google Scholar.
58. Quoted in Dunn, , Froude, I, 17–18Google Scholar.
59. Trollope, , Autobiography, p. 15Google Scholar.
60. Works, XXXV, 21Google Scholar.
61. The Way of All Flesh, p. 23.
62. Neale, R. S., “Class and Class-Consciousness,” V.S., XII, 14Google Scholar.
63. Father and Son, pp. 38-39, 219.
64. Butler, , The Way of All Flesh, pp. 128–29Google Scholar.
65. Works, XXXV, 46Google Scholar.
66. This idea was first suggested to me by Christopher Lasch.
67. Quoted in Dunn, , Froude, I, 95Google Scholar. Neale remarks upon “the role of the colonies in drawing off some of the pressure from the petit bourgeois, the professionals, and impecunious younger sons” competing for economic and social position. (“Class and Class-Consciousness,” V.S., XII, 24Google Scholar).
68. Spencer, , Works, XX, 76Google Scholar; Ruskin, , Works, XXV, 78Google Scholar.
69. White, William Hale, The Autobiography of Mark Rutherford (2nd ed.; New York, n.d.), pp. 18–19Google Scholar.
70. Ibid. p. 84.
71. Mill, , Autobiography, p. 107Google Scholar.
72. Darwin, , Autobiography, pp. 85–86Google Scholar; Darwin, Transmutation Notebooks, Part IV, quoted in Colp, , To Be an Invalid, p. 26Google Scholar; Darwin to Hooker, 11 Jan. 1844, quoted in ibid., p. 29.
73. Jones, Ernest, Free Associations: Memoirs of a Psychoanalyst (New York, 1959), p. 204Google Scholar.
74. From The Fairchild Family, quoted in Avery, G., Nineteenth Century Children (London, 1965), p. 86Google Scholar.
75. Works, XXXV, 44-45, 424Google Scholar, 83.
76. Quoted in Evans, Joan, John Ruskin (London, 1954), p. 132Google Scholar.
77. Darwin to Fox, 7 July 1840, quoted in Colp, , To Be An Invalid, p. 22Google Scholar.
78. Mill, , Autobiography, pp. 134–35Google Scholar.
79. Spencer, , Works, XX, 150Google Scholar.
80. The American physician George M. Beard pioneered the subject of neurasthenia in the 1870s and 1880s and popularized it as a disease category. His best known discussion is American Nervousness: Its Causes and Consequences (1869). There has been no comprehensive historical study. Partial surveys include the “Symposium on Neurasthenia” in Medical Review of Reviews, 36 (1930), 108–47Google Scholar; Rosenberg, Charles, “The Place of George M. Beard in Nineteenth Century Psychiatry,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 36 (1962), 245–59Google Scholar; Hale, Nathan G. Jr., Freud in America, I (New York, 1971)Google Scholar; and Weiner, Philip P., “G. M. Beard and Freud on ‘American Nervousness,’” Journal of the History of Ideas, 17 (1956)Google Scholar.
81. Much ink has been spilled in an effort to discover the causes of Darwin's symptoms. The best review of the case is Colp's To Be an Invalid.
82. See The Collected Letters of Thomas and Jane Welsh Carlyle, eds. Sanders, Charles Richard and Fielding, Kenneth J., 4 vols. (Durham, N. C., 1970)Google Scholar; and Symons, , Thomas Carlyle: The Life and Ideas of a Prophet (1952)Google Scholar.
83. Autobiography, p. 109.
84. Quoted in Wilenski, R. H., John Ruskin: an Introduction to Further Study of His Life and Work (New York, 1933), p. 124Google Scholar.
85. White, Hale, Autobiography of Mark Rutherford, pp. 36–38Google Scholar.
86. Spencer, , Works, XX, 474-75, 495Google Scholar.
87. Ibid., 79.
88. “The Filiation of Ideas,” (1899), quoted in Duncan, David, The Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer (London, 1908), II, 309Google Scholar.
89. Works, XX, 486Google Scholar.
90. Elliot, Hugh, Herbert Spencer (New York, 1917), pp. 57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91. Works, XX, 479Google Scholar.
92. Quoted in Duncan, , The Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer, II, 256Google Scholar.
93. Works, XX, 404Google Scholar.
94. Dora (New York, 1963), p. 59Google Scholar; this is an additional note of 1923.
95. The designation of “neurasthenia” for these symptoms did not become accepted until the 1870s and 1880s. Beard's ingenious nosology proved far too encompassing to admit of precise diagnosis or treatment, and within several decades neurasthenia had become recognized as the “garbage can” of medicine.
96. “‘Civilized’ Sexual Morality and Modern Nervousness,” (1908), Collected Papers, 2, 86–87Google Scholar. See also “On the Grounds for Detaching a Particular Syndrome from Neurasthenia under the Description ‘Anxiety Neurosis,”“ (1895), Collected Papers, 1Google Scholar.
97. In these early papers Freud insisted that the anxiety neurosis was an actual neurosis derived from immediate sexual frustration, and not a psychoneurosis originating in repression of ideas, and thus remediable by analysis. Freud, who suffered from neurasthenia during his long engagement and first years of marriage, was long unwilling to relinquish this early view; it was not until 1933, in the New Introductory Lectures, that he acknowledged neurotic anxiety might also result from repression (itself arising from early traumatic experience), and thus be essentially psychogenic.
98. Civilization and its Discontents (New York, 1962), p. 86Google Scholar.
99. The Way of All Flesh, p. 101.
100. Father and Son, p. 349.
101. Cockshut, A. O. J., Anthony Trollope: a Critical Study (London, 1955), pp. 52–53Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by