Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:37:16.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women’s socioeconomic status and choice of birth control method: an investigation for the case of Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Deniz Karaoğlan Open the ORCID record for Deniz Karaoğlan [Opens in a new window]  and
Dürdane Şirin Saraçoğlu
Deniz Karaoğlan*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Dürdane Şirin Saraçoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated whether woman’s education, labour market status and the status within the household have any impact on their birth control behaviour in Turkey. Empirical analyses were implemented using the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey dataset, which includes information on women’s socioeconomic status and their current choice of contraceptives: whether they used any method, and if so, what method they used. Using a bivariate probit model with selection to control for any possible selection bias, the results suggest that whether a woman uses any birth control method, and whether the woman chooses modern methods over traditional methods, are primarily explained by education level and urban/rural residence, and that the determinants of contraceptive use vary across college-educated and non-college-educated women. The results also indicate that non-employed women are less likely to use any birth control method compared with women with regular, full-time jobs. However the effect was statistically insignificant.

Keywords

FertilityContraceptive choiceWomen’s socioeconomic status
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 137 - 156
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adda, J, Dustmann, C and Stevens, K (2017) The career costs of children. Journal of Political Economy 125, 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, M, Beegle, K and Nyamete, A (1996) The impact of women’s schooling on fertility and contraceptive use: a study of fourteen sub-Saharan African countries. World Bank Economic Review 10(1), 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Riyami, A, Afifi, M and Mabry, RM (2004) Women’s autonomy, education and employment in Oman and their influence on contraceptive use. Reproductive Health Matters 12(23), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alpu, Ö and Fidan, H (2006) On the use of contraceptive methods among married women in Turkey. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 11(3), 228–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altindag, O (2016) Son preference, fertility decline, and the non-missing girls of Turkey. Demography 53(2), 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amuedo-Dorantes, C and Kimmel, J (2005) The motherhood wage gap for women in the Unites States: the importance of college and fertility delay. Review of Economics of the Household 3, 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, GS and Lewis, HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2), 279–288.Google Scholar
Bentley, R and Kavanagh, AM (2008) Gender equity and women’s contraception use. Australian Journal of Social Issues 43(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berik, G and Bilginsoy, C (2000) Type of work matters: women’s labor force participation and the child sex ratio in Turkey. World Development 28(5), 861–878.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M, Cortes, P, Olivetti, C and Pan, J (2016) Social norms, labor market opportunities, and the marriage gap for skilled women. NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper No. 22015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt, N, Özkan, S, Onan, A, Korucuoğlu, Ü, Aygün, R and Himmetoğlu, Ö (2007) Distribution of contraceptive use in a Turkish population. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 131, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckles, K (2008) Understanding the returns to delayed childbearing for working women. American Economic Review 98, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, SEK, Polis, CB, Bankole, A and Croft, T (2019) Global contraceptive failure rates: who is most at risk? Studies in Family Planning 50(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratti, M (2015) Fertility postponement and labor market outcomes. IZA World of Labor 117, 1–10.Google Scholar
Cagatay, N and Berik, G (1991) Transition to export-led growth in Turkey: is there a feminization of employment? Capital and Class 43, 153–177.Google Scholar
Canning, D and Schultz, TP (2012) The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. The Lancet 380, 165–171.Google ScholarPubMed
Caucutt, E, Guner, N and Knowles, J (2002) Why do women wait? Matching, wage inequality, and the incentives for fertility delay. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 815–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacko, E (2001) Women’s use of contraception in rural India: a village-level study. Health & Place 7, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cindoglu, D, Sirkeci, I and Sirkeci, RF (2008) Determinants of choosing withdrawal over modern contraceptive methods in Turkey. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 13(4), 412–421.Google ScholarPubMed
Cleland, J, Bernstein, S, Ezeh, A, Faundes, A, Glasier, A and Innis, J (2006) Family planning: the unfinished agenda. The Lancet 368, 1810–1827.Google ScholarPubMed
Connelly, R, DeGraff, DS, Levison, D and McCall, BP (2006) Tackling the endogeneity of fertility in the study of women’s employment in developing countries: alternative estimation strategies using data from urban Brazil. Feminist Economics 12(4), 561–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayıoğlu, M and Kırdar, MG (2010) Determinants of and trends in labor force participation of women in Turkey. Welfare and Social Policy Analytical Work Program Working Paper No. 6. State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, O (2016) Nüfus Politikaları ve Çin, Fransa ve Türkiye Örneklerinin Değerlendirilmesi [Population Policies and Evaluation of China, France and Turkey Samples]. Social Sciences 11, 41–61.Google Scholar
Do, M and Kurimoto, N (2012) Women’s empowerment and choice of contraceptive methods in selected African countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterlin, RA (1975) An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning 6(3), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterlin, RA and Crimmins, EM (1985) The Fertility Revolution: A Supply–Demand Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Erfani, A and Yuksel-Kaptanoglu, I (2012) The use of withdrawal among birth limiters in Iran and Turkey. Studies in Family Planning 43(1), 21–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Ergöçmen, BA, Koc, I, Senlet, P, Yıgit, EK and Roman, E (2004) A closer look at traditional contraceptive use in Turkey. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 9(4), 221–244.Google Scholar
Fu, H, Darroch, JE, Haas, T and Ranjit, N (1999) Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 31(2), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gage, AJ (1995) Women’s socioeconomic position and contraceptive behavior in Togo. Studies in Family Planning 26(5), 264–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, HI and Toros, A (1994) The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples. Studies in Family Planning 25(2), 122–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govindasamy, P and Malhotra, A (1996) Women’s position and family planning in Egypt. Studies in Family Planning 27(6), 328–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Güneş, PM (2015) The role of maternal education in child health: evidence from a compulsory schooling law. Economics of Education Review 47, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, ND and Smith, N (2002) Children and career interruptions: the family gap in Denmark. Economica 69, 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Him, MS and Hoşgör, AG (2011) Reproductive practices: Kurdish women responding to patriarchy. Women’s Studies International Forum 34, 335–344.Google Scholar
HIPS (2014) 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Development and TÜBİTAK, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
Hogan, DP, Behanu, B and Hailemariam, A (1999) Household organization, women’s autonomy, and contraceptive behavior in southern Ethiopia. Studies in Family Planning 30(4), 203–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilkkaracan, I (2012) Why so few women in the labor market in Turkey? Feminist Economics 18(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isen, A and Stevenson, B (2010) Women’s education and family behavior: trends in marriage, divorce and fertility. CESIFO Working Paper No. 2940.Google Scholar
Kimura, M and Yasui, D (2007) Occupational choice, educational attainment, and fertility. Economics Letters 94, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koç, İ (2000) Determinants of contraceptive use and method choice in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science 32, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolaşin, GU, Paker-Uncu, ZH, Cansuz, Y and Kökkızıl, M (2015) Türkiye’de lise ve üniversite mezunu kadınların işgücüne katılım kararlarının incelenmesi [Analysis of labor market participation decisions of women with high school and college degrees in Turkey]. TUBITAK Project No. 113K365, Ankara.Google Scholar
Kulczycki, A (2004) The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband’s imposition or a woman’s choice? Social Science & Medicine 59, 1019–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulczycki, A (2008) Husband–wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey. International Family Planning Perspectives 34(3), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapham, RJ and Mauldin, WP (1984) Family planning program effort and birthrate decline in developing countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 10, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, M, Ventola, C, Bohet, A, Moreau C and Bajos N for the FECOND Group (2015) Men’s contraceptive practices in France: evidence of male involvement in family planning. Contraception 92, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, D, Inki, P and Gemzell-Danielsson, K (2010) Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 15, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, RT (1973) Education and the derived demand for children. Journal of Political Economy 81, 128–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, C, Trussell, J, Rodriguez, G, Bajos, N and Bouyer, J (2007) Contraceptive failure rates in France: results from a population-based survey. Human Reproduction 22(9), 2422–2427.Google ScholarPubMed
Moursund, A and Kravdal, Ø (2003) Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Population Studies 57(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oddens, BJ and Lehert, P (1997) Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany. Journal of Biosocial Science 29, 415–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD (2018) Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozdemir, A (2017) Doğum kontrol teşviklerinden en az üç çocuğa: tarihsel süreçte türkiye’de antinatalist ve pronatalist politikalarin seyri [From birth control incentives at least three children: the cycle of antinatalist and pronatalist policies in Turkey in the historical process]. International Journal of Political Studies 3, 65–75.Google Scholar
Ozler, Ş (2000) Export orientation and female share of employment: evidence from Turkey. World Development 28(7), 1239–1248.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, MR and Schultz, TP (1985) The demand and supply of births: fertility and its life cycle consequences. American Economic Review 75(5), 992–1015.Google Scholar
Sahin, HA and Sahin, HG (2003) Reasons for not using family planning methods in Turkey. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 8, 11–16.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D and Tambashe, BO (1994) The impact of women’s employment and education on contraceptive use and abortion in Kinshasa, Zaire. Studies in Family Planning 25(2), 96–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, RD (1994) Fertility–mortality variations across LDCs: women’s education, labor force participation, and contraceptive-use. Kyklos 47(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, R, Bartel, D and Rubardt, M (2012) Constructs of power and equity and their association with contraceptive use among men and women in rural Ethiopia and Kenya. Global Public Health 7(6), 618–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanfer, K, Cubbins, LA and Brewster, KL (1992) Determinants of contraceptive choice among single women in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 24(4), 155–161, 173Google ScholarPubMed
Turkish Statistical Institute (n.d.) TurkSTAT. URL: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (accessed January 4th 2018).Google Scholar
Willis, RJ (1973) A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy 81, 14–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (n.d.) World Development Indicators. URL: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.asp (accessed December 12th 2017).Google Scholar