Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:38:27.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some comments on the demographic and social effects of the 1967 Abortion Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Richard Leete
Richard Leete
Affiliation:
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Estimates of the incidence of illegally induced abortions are critically reviewed and on the basis of a revised estimate it is tentatively suggested that there were 50,000 (legal plus illegal) abortions induced annually between 1964 and 1966. A substantial reduction in the extent of illegal abortions is an important consequence of the 1967 Abortion Act. But induced abortion is seen as a contributory factor only in the decline of legitimate fertility which has been greater at all ages and all parities than the increment of abortions to married women. A particularly marked reduction in legitimate births occurred between 1972 and 1975 whereas the number of induced abortions performed on married women declined slightly. However, the reversal of the secular trend of increasing illegitimacy is evidence of the demographic impact of the Act. Regional rates of abortion are found to be unassociated with the decline in high parity births but nagatively associated with illegitimacy ratios. At the regional level differences in the proportion of abortions performed under the NHS remain. At the national level a lower proportion of early terminations occur in the public sector than in the private sector, and women in the least skilled occupational groups have their abortions latest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 1976 , pp. 229 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © 1976, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bone, M. (1973) Family Planning Services in England and Wales. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. & Waite, M. (1972) General practitioners and abortion. J. R. Coll. gen. Pract. 22, Suppl. No. 1.Google Scholar
Chief Medical Officer, Dhss (1973) Annual Report: On the State of the Public Health 1972. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Daling, J. & Emanuel, I. (1975) Induced abortion and subsequent outcome of pregnancy. Lancet, ii, 170.Google Scholar
Diggory, P. (1969) Some experiences of therapeutic abortion. Lancet, i, 873.Google Scholar
Diggory, P., Peel, J. & Potts, M. (1970) Preliminary assessment of the 1967 Abortion Act in practice. Lancet, i, 287.Google Scholar
Glass, D.V. (1968) Fertility trends in Europe since the Second World War. Popul. Stud. 22, 103.Google Scholar
Glass, D.V. (1970) Components of natural increase in England and Wales. Popul. Stud. Suppl.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C.B. (1964) The frequency of illegal abortion. Eugen. Rev. 55, 197.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C.B. (1969) Estimation of illegal abortions. J. biosoc. Sci. 1, 235.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C.B. (1973) On the incidence of illegal abortion. Popul. Stud. 27, 207.Google Scholar
James, W. (1971) The incidence of illegal abortion. Popul. Stud. 25, 327.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. (1969) The incidence of unnatural deaths which have been presumed to be natural in Coroners’ authopsies. Medicine Sci. Law. 9, 105.Google Scholar
Lane, J. (1974) Report of the Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act, Vol. I, II. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Potter, R. (1972) Additional births averted when abortion is added to contraception. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Registrar General (1969–1973) Statistical Reviews Part II, Tables. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1968–1973) Supplements on Abortion. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. (1966) A gynaecologist’s view. In: Abortion in Britain. Family Planning Association, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Bongaarts, J. (1975) Fertility rates and abortion rates; simulation of family limitation. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tietze, C. & Murstein, M.C. (1975) Induced abortion: 1975 factbook. Rep. Popul. Fam. Plann. 14, 1.Google Scholar
Westoff, C.F. & Jones, E.F. (1972) Attitudes toward abortion in the United States in 1970 and the trend since 1965. In: Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth, p. 569. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar