Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:22:27.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social class and diachronic trends in physique in young university women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

D. F. Roberts  and
T. C. Dann
D. F. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
T. C. Dann
Affiliation:
Medical Centre, University of Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a large sample of female students admitted to the University of Warwick in the period 1971–86, physique as measured by height, weight and ponderal index was examined in relation to family variables and socioeconomic class. Stature and weight both show a secular tendency to increase, and there is no indication of any slowing of rate. The different social classes do not participate equally in these trends, in a way that is difficult to reconcile with the attribution of the diachronic changes to simple improvement in environmental conditions. Maternal competence is suggested as a possible factor in the pattern of class difference.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 269 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chief Medical Officer of the Ministry of Education (1962) Report on the Health of the School Child. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Chinn, S., Rona, R. J. & Price, C. E. (1989) The secular trend in height in primary school children in England and Scotland 1972–9 and 1979–86. Ann, hum. Biol. 16, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, T. C. & Roberts, D. F. (1976) Physique and socioeconomic variables in university girls. J.biosoc. Sci. 8, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogelman, K. R. (1983) Growing up in Britain: Papers from the National Child Development Study. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1971) Factors influencing the height of seven-year-old children. Hum. Biol. 43, 92.Google ScholarPubMed
Henneberg, M. & Van Den Berg, E. L. (1990) Test of socioeconomic causation of secular trend. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 83, 459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hueneman., R. L. (1969) Factors associated with teenage obesitv. In: Obesity, pp. 55–68. Edited by Wilson, N. L., Davis, , Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lasker, G. W. & Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (1989)Effects of social class differences and social mobility on growth in height, weight and body mass index in a British cohort. Ann. hum. Biol. 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, G. W. & Hauspie, R. C. (1989) Heights and weights of Swedish school children born in 1955 and 1967. Ann. hum. Biol. 16, 397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D. F. & Dann, T. C. (1985) Physique and family variables in university girls in Britain. Social Biol. 32, 45.Google ScholarPubMed
Silverstone, J. T., Gordon, R. & Stinkard, A. J. (1969) Social factors in obesity in London. Practitioner, 202, 682.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M., Chinn, S. & Rona, R. J. (1980) Social factors and height gain of primary school children in England and Scotland. Ann. hum. Biol. 7, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinson, S. (1985) Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development. Yearbk phys. Anthrop. 28, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, T. R. & Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (1991) Biosocial correlates of stature in a 16-year-old British cohort. J. biosoc. Sci. 23, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, P. V. (1985) The negative secular trend. J. hum. Evol. 14, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wieringen, J. C. (1986) Secular growth. In: Human Growth, pp. 307–331. Edited by Falkner, I. & Tanner, J. M.. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, G. C. (1971) The association of social class and sibling number with skinfold thickness in London school boys. Hum. Biol. 43, 414.Google Scholar