Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:23:37.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex preference and third birth intervals in a traditional Indian society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Dilip C. Nath  and
Kenneth C. Land
Dilip C. Nath
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Kenneth C. Land
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The traditional preference for sons may be the main hindrance to India's current population policy of two children per family. In this study, the effects of various sociodemographic covariates, particularly sex preference, on the length of the third birth interval are examined for the scheduled caste population in Assam, India. Life table and hazards regression techniques are applied to retrospective sample data. The analysis shows that couples having two surviving sons are less likely to have a third child than those without a surviving son and those with only one surviving son. Age at first marriage, length of preceding birth intervals, age of mother, and household income have strong effects on the length of the third birth interval.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 377 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beenstock, M. & Sturdy, P. (1990) The determinants of infant mortality in regional India. World Dev. 18, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, D. E. & Reddhy, P. H. (1986) Age patterns of women at marriage, cohabitation, and first birth in India. Demography, 23, 509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, S. (1987) The effect of lactation on ovulation and fertility. Clinics in Perinatol. 14, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhry, M. K. (1989) Fertility behaviour in India, 1961–86: the stalled decline in the crude birth rate. In: Population Transition in India—I. Edited by Singh, S. N., Premi, M. K., Bose, A. & Bhatia, P. S.BR Publishing Corporation, Delhi.Google Scholar
Chen, P. C. (1984) Birth planning and fertility transition. Ann. Am. Acad. polit. social Sci. 476, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression model and life table (with discussion). J. roy. statist. Soc. 34B, 187.Google Scholar
Doyle, P., Morley, D., Woodland, M. & Cole, J. (1978) Birth intervals, survival and growth in a Nigerian village. J. biosoc. Sci. 10, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, S. C. (1954) Indian Village. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Dyson, T. & Somawat, G. (1983) An assessment of fertility in India. In: Dynamics of Population and Family Welfare, pp. 138–164. Edited by Srinivasan, K. & Mukerjee, S.Himalaya Publishing, Bombay.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1970) World Revolution and Family Pattern. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Government of india (1980) Report of the Planning Commission — 1980. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Habicht, J-P., Davanzo, J., Butz, P. & Meyers, L. (1985) The contraceptive role of breastfeeding. Popul. Stud. 39, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. & Walker, J. R. (1990) The third birth in Sweden. J. Popul. Econ. 3, 235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoem, B. & Hoem, J. M. (1989) The impact of woman's employment on second and third births in modern Sweden. Popul. Stud. 43, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J. & Prentice, R. (1980) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kapadia, K. M. (1966) Marriage and Family in India. Oxford University Press, Bombay.Google Scholar
Khan, M. E. (1990) Breast-feeding and weaning practices in India. Asia-Pacific Popul. J. 5, 71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishanan, P. (1975) Mortality decline in India, 1951—1961: development versus public health program hypothesis. Social Sci. Med. 9, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, U. (1990) An assessment of the one-child policy in China from 1980–1985. Eur. J. Popul. 6, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leridon, H. (1980) Birth Intervals: New Empirical Data. Population Studies Translation Series No. 4. United Nations. New York.Google Scholar
Mukerjee, R. (1976) Family and Planning in India. Orient Longman, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Namboodiri, K. & Suchindran, C. M. (1987) Life Table Techniques and their Applications. Academic Press, Orlando, USAGoogle Scholar
Nath, D. C., Land, K. C. & Singh, K. K. (1994) The role of breast-feeding beyond postpartum amenorrhoea on the return of fertility in India: a life table and hazards model analyses. J. biosoc. Sci. 26, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, D. C., Singh, K. K., Land, K. C. & Talukdar, P. K. (1993a) Breast feeding and postpartum amenorrhea in a traditional society: a hazards model analysis. Social Biol. 40, 74.Google Scholar
Nath, D. C., Singh, K. K., Land, K. C. & Talukdar, P. K. (1993b) Age of marriage and length of the first birth interval in a traditional society: a life table and hazards model analysis. Hum. Biol. 65, 783.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, M. V. (1968) Manusmriti: The Ideal Democratic Republic of Manu. Matilal Banarisidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H. & Bhat, P. N. M. (1984) New evidence on fertility and mortality trends in India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 10, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, K. S., Mohapatra, P. S. & Bhatia, P. S. (1970) Mortality in India in Relation to Prospects of Fertility Decline. CFPI Technical Report No. 10. Central Family Planning Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Rindfuss, R. R., Palmore, J. A. & Bumpass, L. L. (1982) Selectivity and the analysis of birth interval data. Asian and Pacific Census Forum 8, 5.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. & Hobcraft, J. N. (1980) Illustrative Analysis: Life Table Analysis of Birth Intervals in Colombia. World Fertility Survey Scientific Report No. 16. Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. (1992) Heterogeneity and selection in multistate population analysis. Demography, 29, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, T. J. (1971) Culture and human fertility in India. In: Population Studies: Selected Essays and Research. Edited by Kammeyer, K. C. W.Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
Santow, G. (1978) A Simulation Approach to the Study of Human Fertility. Netherlands Interuniversity Demographic Institute and the Population and Family Study Centre 5. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. N. & Singh, K. K. (1989) Life table analysis on censored data of post-partum amenorrhoea period. Demography India, 18, 27.Google Scholar
Singh, K. K., Suchindran, C. M., Singh, V. & Ramkumar, R. (1993a) Analysis of birth intervals in India's Uttar Pradesh and Kerala states. J. biosoc. Sci. 25, 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, K. K., Suchindran, C. M., Singh, V. & Ramkumar, R. (1993b) Age at return marriage and timing of first birth in India's Uttar Pradesh and Kerala. Social Biol. 39, 291.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. & Ramaswami, E. A. (1977) Culture and Human Fertility in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Trussell, J. & Hammerslough, C. (1983) A hazards-model analysis of the covariates of infant and child mortality in Sri Lanka. Demography, 20, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaupel, J. W. & Yashin, A. I. (1985) Heterogeneity ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am. Statist. 39, 176.Google ScholarPubMed
Wineberg, H. (1987) Recent trends in the timing of the second and third birth among black American women. Sociol. social Res. 71, 298.Google Scholar
Wright, R. E., Ermisch, J. F., Hinde, P. R. A. & Joshi, H. E. (1988) The third birth in Great Britain. J. biosoc. Sci. 20, 489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed