Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:17:53.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rural–urban differentials in marital fertility in four Muslim populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

S. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra

Summary

The analysis based on data collected as a part of the World Fertility Survey programme in four Muslim populations—Bangladesh, Java, Jordan and Pakistan—did not show a consistent pattern in rural–urban differentials in marital fertility. While no significant differential in current fertility by place of current residence is noticeable in Bangladesh and Pakistan, urban women in Jordan showed lower fertility than their rural counterparts. Cumulative fertility, when controlled for duration of marriage, was found to be higher in urban than in rural areas of Bangladesh and Pakistan, but no clear pattern emerged in Jordan. In Java, both current and cumulative fertility were higher in urban than in rural areas; urban women who had spent their childhood and were brought up in the urban environment showed, in most instances, higher fertility than the other residence groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzal, M. (1967) The fertility of East Pakistan married women. In: Studies in the Demography of Pakistan, pp. 5192. Edited by Robinson, W. C.. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Karachi.Google Scholar
Ahmad, S. (1980) Fertility Levels and Trends in Bangladesh: A Macro Level Analysis. MPhil thesis. Cairo Demographic Centre.Google Scholar
Ahmad, S. (1984) Fertility Differentials among Selected Muslim Populations: A Comparative Analysis. PhD thesis. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1982) Theory of Fertility Decline. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Cho, L.-J., Suharto, S., McNicoll, G. & Mamas, S.G.M. (1980) Population Growth of Indonesia: An Analysis of Fertility and Mortality Based on the 1971 Population Census. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Duza, M.B. (1967) Differential fertility in Pakistan. In: Studies in the Demography of Pakistan, pp. 93138. Edited by Robinson, W. C., Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Karachi.Google Scholar
Freedman, R., Coombs, L.C. & Chang, M.-C. (1972) Trends in family size preferences and practice of family planning: Taiwan, 1965–70. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1973) Interrelations between migration and fertility in Thailand. Demography, 10, 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatmadji, H. & Suradji, B. (1979) Fertility Differentials in Java (mimeo). University of Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
Jones, G.W., McDonald, P.F. & Yasin, M. (1976) Levels and Trends in Fertility and Child Mortality in Indonesia. Monograph Series No. 1, Indonesian Fertility and Mortality Survey, Jakarta.Google Scholar
Nag, M. (1980) How modernization can also increase fertility. Curr. Anthrop. 21, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omran, A.R. (1973) Egypt: Population, Problems and Prospects. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Rizk, H. (1977) Trends in fertility and family planning in Jordan. Stud. Fam. Plann. 8, 91.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. & Cleland, J. (1981) Socio-economic determinants of marital fertility in twenty countries: a multivariate analysis. In: Record of Proceedings, World Fertility Survey Conference, 1980, pp. 337434, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
United Nations (1973) The Determinants and Consequences of Population Trends, Vol. 1. Population Studies, No. 50, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN, New York.Google Scholar
University of Indonesia (1974) Indonesian Fertility and Mortality Survey, 1973: Preliminary Report, Java (mimeo). Jakarta.Google Scholar