Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:55:11.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN LOW BIRTH WEIGHT IN SPAIN: BIOLOGICAL, DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC VARIABLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2014

VICENTE FUSTER ,
PILAR ZULUAGA ,
S. E. COLANTONIO  and
J. ROMÁN-BUSTO
VICENTE FUSTER*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
PILAR ZULUAGA
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and I.O., Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
S. E. COLANTONIO
Affiliation:
Anthropology Unit, Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Argentina
J. ROMÁN-BUSTO
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The geographic and demographic dimensions of Spain, in terms of surface and number of inhabitants, and its heterogeneous socioeconomic development offer an adequate opportunity to study the provincial differences in birth weight from 1996 to 2010, focusing on possible factors determining the relative frequency of low birth weight. The study analysed geographic differences with regard to biological, demographic and socioeconomic factors that interfere with the female reproductive pattern. The variables considered here were: birth order, proportion of premature deliveries, mother's age, multiparity, mother's country of origin and professional qualifications. Two periods (1996–2000 and 2006–2010) were compared by means of principal components analysis. An increase in the relative frequency of deliveries weighing less than 2500 g occurred in most of the 52 geographic units studied, differences being significant in 42. Only in five cases was there a non-significant reduction in the proportion of low weight births. The first component after principal component analysis indicated that low birth weight was positively related to maternal age and to multiple deliveries, and negatively to the mother's low professional qualification. The second component related positively to the incidence of premature deliveries and to non-Spanish status and negatively in the case of primiparous mothers. The progressive increase in low birth weight incidence observed in Spain from 1996 onwards has occurred with considerable variation in each province. In part, this diversity can be attributed to the unequal reproductive patterns of immigrant mothers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 90 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo-García, D., Soobader, M. J. & Berkman, L. F. (2007) Low birthweight among US Hispanic/Latino subgroups: the effect of maternal foreign-born status and education. Social Science & Medicine 65, 2503–2516.Google Scholar
Astolfi, P. & Zonta, L. A. (1999) Risks of preterm delivery and association with maternal age, birth order and fetal gender. Human Reproduction 14, 2891–2894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernis, C. (2006) Aspects biosociaux de l'immigration en Espagne: facteurs de variabilité du poids à la naissance. Antropo 11, 29–140.Google Scholar
Cano-Serral, G., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borell, C., Pérez, M. M. & Salvador, J. (2006) Socio-economic inequalities in the provision and uptake of prenatal care. Gaceta Sanitaria 20, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro-Martín, T. & Rosero-Bixby, L. (2011) Maternidades y fronteras. La fecundidad de las mujeres inmigrantes en España. Monográfico 1: La inmigración en España: perspectivas innovadoras. Revista Internacional de Sociología Monograph 1, 105–137.Google Scholar
Chiavarini, M., Bartolucci, F., Gili, A., Pieroni, L. & Minelli, L. (2012) Effects of individual and social factors on preterm birth and low birth weight: empirical evidence from regional data in Italy. International Journal of Public Health 57, 261–268.Google Scholar
English, P. B., Kharrazi, M., Davies, S., Scalf, R., Waller, L. & Neutra, R. (2003) Changes in the spatial pattern of low birth weight in southern California county: the role of individual and neighborhood level factors. Social Science & Medicine 56, 2073–2088.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, A. M. & Galea, S. (2010) Community context, acculturation and low-birth-weight risk among Arab Americans: evidence from the Arab-American birth-outcomes study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 64, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferraz, E. M., Gray, R. H. & Cunha, T. M. (1990) Determinants of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation in north-east Brazil. International Journal of Epidemiology 19, 101–108.Google Scholar
Fujii, M, Matsuoka, R., Bergel, E., van der Poel, S. & Okai, T. (2010) Perinatal risk in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 94, 2113–2117.Google Scholar
Fuster, V., Zuluaga, P, Colantonio, S. & de Blas, C. (2008) Factors associated with recent increase of multiple births in Spain. Twin Research and Human Genetics 11, 70–76.Google Scholar
Fuster, V., Zuluaga, P., Colantonio, S. & Román-Busto, J. (2010) Temporal and territorial analysis of multiple deliveries in Spain (1900–2006). Twin Research and Human Genetics 13, 207–216.Google Scholar
Fuster, V., Zuluaga, P., Colantonio, S. E. & Román-Busto, J. (2013) Factors determining the variation in birth weight in Spain (1980–2010). Annals of Human Biology 40, 266–275.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A. J., Zimbeck, M., Zeitlin, J. & The ROAM Collaboration (2009) Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 69, 934–946Google Scholar
García-Subirats, I., Pérez, G., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Ruiz Muñoz, D. & Salvador, J. (2012) Neighborhood inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes in an urban setting in Spain: a multilevel approach. Journal of Urban Health 89, 447–463.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. C., Fisher, E. S., Little, G. A., Stukel, T. A. & Chang, C. (2001) Are neonatal intensive care resources located according to need? Regional variation in neonatologists beds, and low birth weight newborns. Pediatrics 108, 426–431.Google Scholar
Joseph, K. S., Kramer, M. S., Marcoux, L. S., Ohlsson, A., Wen, S. W., Allen, A. C. & Platt, R. (1998) Determinants of secular trends in preterm births in Canada. New England Journal of Medicine 339, 1434–1439.Google Scholar
Kirchengast, S. & Hartmann, B. (2003a) Advanced maternal age is not only associated with newborn somatometrics but also with mode of delivery. Annals of Human Biology 30, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kirchengast, S. & Hartmann, B. (2003b) Impact of maternal age and maternal somatic characteristics on newborn size. American Journal of Human Biology 15, 220–228.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S. (2003) The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. Journal of Nutrition 133, 1592–1596S.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S., Morin, I., Yang, H., Platt, R. W., Usher, R., McNamara, H.et al. (2002) Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. Journal of Pediatrics 141, 538–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, M. S., Séguin, L., Lydon, J. & Goulet, L. (2000) Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome. Why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology 14, 194–210.Google Scholar
Lim, J. W. (2011) The changing trends in live birth statistics in Korea, 1970 to 2010. Korean Journal of Pediatrics 54, 429–435.Google Scholar
Luque, M. A., Bueno, A. & de Mateo, S. (2011) Differences in the reproductive pattern of low birthweight by maternal country of origin in Spain, 1996–2006. European Journal of Public Health 31, 104–108.Google Scholar
Machado, C. J. (2005) Impact of maternal age on birth outcomes: a population-based study of primiparous Brazilian women in the City of Sao Paulo. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 523–535.Google Scholar
Mariotoni, G. G. B. & Barros Filho, A. A. (2000) Birth weight and maternal characteristics at the Maternity of Campinas along 25 years. Journal of Pediatrics 76, 55–64.Google Scholar
Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J. K. & Sutton, P. D. (2010) Are preterm births on the decline in the United States? Recent data from the National Vital Statistics System. NCHS Data Brief, 39. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
Moshin, M., Wong, F., Bauman, A. & Bai, J. (2003) Maternal and neonatal factors influencing premature birth and low birth weight in Australia. Journal of Biosocial Science 35, 161–174.Google Scholar
Reeske, A., Kutschmann, M., Razum, O. & Spallek, J. (2011) Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal data base, 2004–2007. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 11, 63–72.Google Scholar
Russell, R. B., Green, N. S., Steiner, C. A., Meikle, S., Howse, J. L., Poschman, K.et al. (2007) Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics 120, e1 doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simo, C. & Méndez, S. (2013) Testing the effect of the epidemiologic paradox: birth weight of newborns of immigrant and non-immigrant mothers in the region of Valencia, Spain. Journal of Biosocial Science doi:10.1017/S0021932013000539Google Scholar
Sparks, P. J. (2009) One size does not fit all: an examination of low birthweight disparities among diverse set of racial/ethnic groups. Maternal and Child Health Journal 13, 769–779.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. A., Goodman, D. C., Chang, C. H. & Stukel, T. A. (2005) Regional variation in rates of low birth weight. Pediatrics 115, 114–1121.Google Scholar
Torres-Arreola, L. P., Constantino-Casas, P., Flores-Hernández, S., Villa-Barragán, J. P. & Rendón-Macías, E. (2005) Socioeconomic factors and low birth weight in Mexico. BMC Public Health 5, 20 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-20Google Scholar
Tsimbos, C. & Verropoulou, V. (2011) Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of low birth weight and preterm births among natives and immigrants in Greece: an analysis using nationwide vital registration micro-data. Journal of Biosocial Science 43, 271–283.Google Scholar
Urquia, M. L., Glazier, R. H., Blondel, B., Zeitlin, J., Gissler, M., Macfarlane, A.et al. (2010) International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 64, 243–251.Google Scholar
Verropoulou, G. & Basten, S. (2013) Very low, low and heavy weight births in Hong Kong SAR: how important is socioeconomic and migrant status? Journal of Biosocial Science doi:10.1017/S0021932013000321Google Scholar
Verropoulou, G. & Tsimbos, C. (2013) Modelling the effects of maternal socio-demographic characteristics on the preterm and term birth weight distributions in Greece using quantile regression. Journal of Biosocial Science 45, 375–390.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, T., Blanc, A., Zupan, J. & Ahman, A. (2004) Low birth weight: Country, regional and global estimates. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), New York, and WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. K. (2002) Thermal environment and human birth weight. Journal of Theoretical Biology 214, 413–425.Google Scholar
Wen, S. W., Kramer, M. S. & Usher, R.H. (1995) Comparison of birth weight distributions between Chinese and Caucasian infants. American Journal of Epidemiology 141, 1177–1187.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. (2001) On the importance – and the unimportance – of birthweight. International Journal of Epidemiology 30, 1233–1241.Google Scholar