Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:07:01.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of impairment and disability related to social handicap in young people with cerebral palsy and spina bifida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Michael Hirst
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington, York

Summary

This paper explores the inter-relationships between impairment and disability in a sample of 119 teenagers in relation to their psychological adjustment and quality of social life. Poor psychological adjustment and extreme social isolation are associated not so much with individual functional limitations as with particular configurations of impairments and disabilities. It seems that social handicap is not a direct consequence of any impairment or disability but arises generally from severe functional loss and is shaped by dependency on others, restricted choices, physical barriers and adverse reactions of others.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. M. (1973) The Disabled Schoolchild: a Study of Integration in Primary Schools. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. M. & Clarke, L. (1982) Disability in Adolescence. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Brown, J. C. (1984) The Disability Income Scheme. Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Disability Alliance (1987) Poverty and Disability: Breaking the Link. Disability Alliance, London.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. A. (1986) Disabilities, benefits, and disability benefits. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 9, 3Google Scholar
Hirst, M. A. (1989) Representation of disablement. In: Quality of Life: Perspectives and Policies. Edited by Baldwin, S., Godfrey, C. & Propper, C.. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. A. & Cooke, K. (1988) Grading severity of childhood disablement: comparing survey measures with a paediatrician's assessment. Child: Care, Hlth Dev. 14, 111Google Scholar
Ho, Y-S. (1982) The planning process: structure of verbal descriptions. Environ. Plann. B, 9, 397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, D., Lawrence, C. & Tripp, J. (1986) Disabled young people: making choices for future living options. Social Services Res. 15, 1Google Scholar
Lindon, R. L. (1963) The Pultibec system for the medical assessment of handicapped children. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 5, 125Google Scholar
Macgill, S. (1985) Structural analysis of social data: a guide to Ho's Galois lattice approach and a partial respecification of Q-analysis. Environ. Plann. A. 17, 1089Google Scholar
Oliver, M. (1987) Re-defining disability: a challenge to research. Res. Policy Plann. 5, 9Google Scholar
Richardson, S. A., Koller, H., Katz, M. & McLaren, J. (1984) Patterns of disability in a mentally retarded population between ages 16 and 22 years. In: Perspectives and Progress in Mental Retardation, Vol. 2, Biomedical Aspects. Edited by Berg, J. M. & de Jong, J. M.. University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Wood, P. H. N. & Badley, E. M. (1980) People with Disabilities: Towards Acquiring Information which Reflects More Sensitively their Problems and Needs. World Rehabilitation Fund, New York.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1980) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar