Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:05:04.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MATE CHOICE IN OLIVENZA: INFLUENCE OF BORDER CHANGE ON SPANISH–PORTUGUESE LINEAGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

JORGE ROMÁN-BUSTO
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
VICENTE FUSTER
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
SONIA COLANTONIO
Affiliation:
Anthropology Unit, Faculty of Mathematical Physical and Natural Sciences, National University of Córdoba and CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina
PILAR ZULUAGA
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and I.O., Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
MARÍA JOSÉ BLANCO
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, University of Salamanca, Spain
MARIA JOAO GUARDADO-MOREIRA
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences and Education, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Portugal

Summary

The mating pattern in a population determines the next generation gene pool and therefore its genetic structure. Besides socio-cultural and geographic factors, political barriers may influence the formation of couples. The present paper studies how the change of national border affected the mating pattern of Olivenza in Badajoz Province (Spain), which experienced a change of domain from Portugal to Spain in 1801. For the period analysed (1750–1850), 954 Catholic marriage records were transcribed. Data were sorted by decades in order to make a temporal study possible and analysed by means of diversity and repeated-pairs of surnames. Following the change of border the mating pattern modified. Coinciding with a larger number of mixed marriages with Spaniards, there was a progressive rise in the diversity of surnames. From 1811 to 1820 the analysis of repeated-pairs of surnames indicates the existence of preferential matings within Spanish and Portuguese lineages. After 1821 the above pattern became less clear due to the disappearance of the Spanish–Portuguese restrictions on choice of mate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abade, A. (1992) A populaçao inexistente. Estrutura Demográfica e Genética da Populaçao da Lombada Bragança. Thesis, Fac. Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
Biondi, G., Raspe, P., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. & Lasker, G. W. (1996) Repetition of the same pair of surnames in marriages in Albanian Italians, Greek Italians, and the Italian population of Campobasso Province. Human Biology 68, 573583.Google ScholarPubMed
Biondi, G., Vienna, A., Peña Garcìa, J. A. & Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (2005) Isonymy and the structure of the Provençal-Italian ethnic minority. Journal of Biosocial Science 37, 163174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boattini, A., Calboli, F. C. F., Blanco Villegas, M. J., Gueresi, P., Franceschi, M. G., Paoli, G., Cavicchi, S. & Pettener, D. (2006) Migration matrices and surnames in populations with different isolation patterns: Val di Lima (Italian Apennines), Val di Sole (Italian Alps), and La Cabrera (Spain). American Journal of Human Biology 18, 676690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldsen, J. & Lasker, G. W. (1996) Relationship of people across an international border based on an isonymy analysis across the German–Danish frontier. Journal of Biosocial Science 28, 177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caravello, G. & Tasso, M. (1999) An analysis of the spatial distribution of surnames in the Lecco area (Lombardy, Italy). American Journal of Human Biology 11, 305315.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, R. (1985) A note on the calculation of random RP and its sampling variance. Human Biology 57, 713717.Google ScholarPubMed
Eizaguirre, M. (1994) Down to the river. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, UK.Google Scholar
Esparza, M., Garcìa-Moro, C. & Hernández, M. (2006) Inbreeding from isonymy and repeated pairs of surnames in the Ebro Delta region (Tarragona, Spain). American Journal of Human Biology 18, 849852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faure, R., Ribes, M. A. & Garcia, A. (2001) Diccionario de apellidos españoles. Espasa Calpe, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Fuster, V., Román, J., Guardado, M. J., Zuluaga, P., Blanco, M. J. & Colantonio, S. (2007) Influence of Spanish–Portuguese border changes in 1801 on the mating pattern of Olivenza. In Bodzsár, E. B. & Zsákai, A. (eds) New Perspectives and Problems in Anthropology. Cambridge Scholars Pub., Newcastle, UK, pp. 101108.Google Scholar
González-Martìn, A. & Toja, D. I. (2002) Inbreeding, isonymy, and kin-structured migration in the Principality of Andorra. Human Biology 74, 587600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koertvelyessy, T., Crawford, M. H., Huntsman, R. G., Collins, M., Keeping, D. & Uttley, M. (1988) Repetition of the same pairs of names in marriages in Fogo Island, Newfoundland, and genetic variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 77, 253260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koertvelyessy, T., Crawford, M. H., Pap, M. & Szilagyi, K. (1990) Surname repetition and isonymy in Northeastern Hungarian marriages. Human Biology 62, 515524.Google ScholarPubMed
Koertvelyessy, T., Crawford, M. H., Pap, M. & Szilagyi, K. (1992) The influence of religious affiliation on surname repetition in marriages in Tiszaszalka, Hungary. Journal of Biosocial Science 24, 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G. W. (1988) Repeated surnames in those marrying into British one-surname ‘lineages’: an approach to the evaluation of population structure through analysis of surnames in marriages. Human Biology 60, 19.Google Scholar
Lasker, G. W. & Kaplan, B. A. (1985) Surnames and genetic structure: repetition of the same pairs of names in married couples, a measure of subdivision of the population. Human Biology 57, 431440.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G. W., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. & Coleman, D. A. (1986) Repeating pairs of surnames in marriages in Reading (England) and their significance for population structure. Human Biology 58, 421425.Google ScholarPubMed
Macbeth, M., Salvat, M., Vigo, V. & Bertranpetit, J. (1996) Cerdanya: mountain valley, genetic highway. Annals of Human Biology 23, 4162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manfredini, M. (2003) The use of parish marriage registers in biodemographic studies: two case studies from 19th-Century Italy. Human Biology 75, 255265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manni, F., Guérard, E. & Heyer, E. (2004) Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm. Human Biology 76, 173190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadal, J. (1976) La población española (siglos XVI a XX). Ed. Seix y Barral, I.G.. Hnos S.A. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pallarés, J. M. (1990) Biologìa de la población de Llivia: Evolución y estructura. PhD Thesis, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Pettener, D., Pastor, V. & Tarazona-Santos, E. (1998) Surnames and genetic structure of a high-altitude Quechua community from the Ichu River Valley, Peruvian Central Andes, 1825–1914. Human Biology 70, 865887.Google ScholarPubMed
Relethford, J. H. (1992) Analysis of marital structure in Massachusetts using repeating pairs of surnames. Human Biology 64, 2533.Google ScholarPubMed
Ridley, M. (1996) Evolution. 2nd edition. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Riegler, A., Marrón, F., Pattaro, C., Guerreéis, P. & Pramstaller, P. P. (2007) Isolation and marriage patterns in four Tyrolean villages (Italy) during the nineteenth century. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 781791.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Larralde, A. & Barrai, I. (1998) Estudio genético demográfico del estado Zulia, Venezuela, a través de isonimia. Acta cientìfica Venezolana 49, 134143.Google Scholar
Román, J., Guardado-Moreira, M. J., Zuluaga, P., Blanco Villegas, M. J., Colantonio, S. & Fuster, V. (2007) Estudios de isonimia en Portugal: consideraciones metodológicas. Antropo 14, 4759. URL: http://www.didac.ehu.es/antropo.Google Scholar
Sanna, E., Jovine, M. C., Melis, M. & Floris, G. (2006) Lasker's coefficient of isonymy between and within 16 Sardinian villages in the periods 1825–1849, 1975–1899, and 1925–1949. American Journal of Human Biology 18, 621629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scapoli, C., Mamolini, E., Carrieri, A., Rodriguez-Larralde, A. & Barrai, I. (2007) Surnames in Western Europe: a comparison of the subcontinental populations through isonymy. Theoretical Population Biology 71, 3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Smith, M. & Bittles, A. H. (2002) Genetic structure of the Ards Peninsula, Northern Ireland: evidence from civil registers of marriage 1840–1911. Human Biology 74, 507524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. T., Smith, B. L. & Williams, W. R. (1984) Changing isonymy relationship in Fylingdales parish, North Yorkshire, 1841–1881. Annals of Human Biology 11, 449457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tagarelli, G., Fiorini, S., Piro, A., Luiselli, D., Tagarelli, A. & Pettener, D. (2007) Ethnicity and biodemographic structure in the Arbëresche of the province of Cosenza, Southern Italy, in the XIX Century. Collegium Antropologicum 31, 331338.Google ScholarPubMed
Vernay, M. (2000) Trends in inbreeding, isonymy, and repeated pairs of surnames in the Valserine Valley, French Jura, 1763–1972. Human Biology 72, 675692.Google ScholarPubMed
Vienna, A. & Biondi, G. (2001) Culture and biology: surnames in evaluating genetic relationship among the ethnic minorities of Southern Italy and Sicily. Collegium Antropologicum 25, 189193.Google ScholarPubMed
Wahlund, S. (1928) Zusammensetzung von populationen und korrelationsersheinungen vom standpunkt den vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas 11, 65106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar