Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:13:56.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IQ AND THE VALUES OF NATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

SATOSHI KANAZAWA
SATOSHI KANAZAWA
Affiliation:
Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Psychology, University College London and Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The origin of values and preferences is an unresolved theoretical question in behavioural and social sciences. The Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis, derived from the Savanna Principle and a theory of the evolution of general intelligence, suggests that more intelligent individuals may be more likely to acquire and espouse evolutionarily novel values and preferences (such as liberalism and atheism and, for men, sexual exclusivity) than less intelligent individuals, but that general intelligence may have no effect on the acquisition and espousal of evolutionarily familiar values. Macro-level analyses show that nations with higher average intelligence are more liberal (have greater highest marginal individual tax rate and, as a result, lower income inequality), less religious (a smaller proportion of the population believes in God or considers themselves religious) and more monogamous. The average intelligence of a population appears to be the strongest predictor of its level of liberalism, atheism and monogamy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , July 2009 , pp. 537 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin 121, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., Noonan, K. M. & Sherman, P. W. (1979) Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans. In Chagnon, N. A. & Irons, W. (eds), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, pp. 402–435.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L. & Hibbing, J. R. (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review 99, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, J. & Gallup, G. G. Jr (2007) Paleoclimatic variation and brain expansion during human evolution. Human Nature 18, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, S. (2002) In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1996) Accounting for Tastes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ner, Ner. & Putterman, L. (2000) On some implications of evolutionary psychology for the study of preferences and institutions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 43, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, C. (1999) Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, J., T., J., McGue, M., Lykken, D. & Tellegen, A. (1999) Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Genetic and environmental influences and personality correlates. Twin Research 2, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, P. (2001) Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. Basic, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, D. E. (1991) Human Universals. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Burnham, T. C. & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Analyse & Kritik 27, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2006) Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology 10, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D. & MacDonald, K. (2005) The evolution of domain-general mechanisms in intelligence and learning. Journal of General Psychology 132, 5–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1999) What is Evolutionary Psychology?www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/254/WEP254.PDF.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2002) Unraveling the enigma of human intelligence: Evolutionary psychology and the multimodular mind. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds) The Evolution of Intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 145–198.Google Scholar
Crawford, C. B. (1993) The future of sociobiology: Counting babies or proximate mechanisms? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Waal, F. B. M. (1989) Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution 18, 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1992) Appeasement, celebration, and food sharing in the two Pan species. In Nishida, T., McGrew, W. C. & Marler, P. (eds) Topics in Primatology: Human Origins. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M., Luttrell, L. M. & Canfield, M. E. (1993) Preliminary data on voluntary food sharing in brown capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 29,73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deary, I. J., Batty, G. D. & Gale, C. R. (2008a) Bright children become enlightened adults. Psychological Science 19, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deary, I. J., Batty, G. D. & Gale, C. R. (2008b) Childhood intelligence predicts voter turnout, voting preferences, and political involvement in adulthood: The 1970 British Cohort Study. Intelligence 36, 548–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J. & Fox, H. C. (2004) The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: Following up the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, 130–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaves, L. J. & Eysenck, H. J. (1974) Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature 249, 288–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L. (1998) NeoDarwinian theories of violent criminality and antisocial behavior: Photographic evidence from nonhuman animals and a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior 3, 61–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1987) Toward a theory of value in social exchange. In Cook, K. S. (ed) Social Exchange Theory. Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 11–46.Google Scholar
Fryer, R. G. Jr & Levitt, S. D. (2004) The causes and consequences of distinctly black names. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 767–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, C. R., Deary, I. J., Schoon, I. & Batty, G. D. (2007) IQ in childhood and vegetarianism in adulthood: 1970 British Cohort Study. British Medical Journal 334, 245–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilles, G. E., Stough, C. & Loukomitis, S. (2004) Openness, intelligence, and self-report intelligence. Intelligence 32, 133–143.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997) Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence 24, 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. & Deary, I. J. (2004) Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, S. E. (1993) Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. H. & Hammerstein, P. (2006) Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology 69, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) Genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. H. & Bennett, P. M. (1985) Sexual dimorphism and reproductive strategies. In Ghesquiere, J., Martin, R. D. & Newcombe, F. (eds) Human Sexual Dimorphism. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hechter, M., Nadel, L. & Michod, R. E. (eds) (1993) The Origin of Values. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Hechter, M., Ranger-Moore, J., Jasso, G. & Horne, C. (1999) Do values matter? An analysis of advanced directives for medical treatment. European Sociological Review 15, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Holland, D. C., Dollinger, S. J., Holland, C. J. & MacDonald, D. A. (1995) The relationship between psychometric intelligence and the Five-Factor Model of personality in a rehabilitation sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology 51, 79–88.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, C. (2004) Values and evolutionary psychology. Sociological Theory 22, 477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., Basañez, M. & Moreno, A. (1998) Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998) The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Praeger, Westport.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129, 339–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2001a) De gustibus est disputandum. Social Forces 79, 1131–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2001b) Why father absence might precipitate early menarche: The role of polygyny. Evolution and Human Behavior 22, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2002) Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior 23, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2004a) The Savanna Principle. Managerial and Decision Economics 25, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2004b) General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation. Psychological Review 111, 512–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2005) An empirical test of a possible solution to “the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology”. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 3, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2006a) Why the less intelligent may enjoy television more than the more intelligent. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 4, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2006b) Mind the gap … in intelligence: Reexamining the relationship between inequality and health. British Journal of Health Psychology 11, 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2008a) Temperature and evolutionary novelty as forces behind the evolution of general intelligence. Intelligence 36, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2008b) Why Liberals and Atheists are More Intelligent. Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2008c) IQ and the health of states. Biodemography and Social Biology 54, 200–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2009a) Evolutionary psychology and crime. In Walsh, A. & Beaver, K. M. (eds) Biosocial Criminology: New Directions in Theory and Research. Routledge, New York, pp. 90–110.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2009b) Evolutionary psychological foundations of civil wars. Journal Politics 71, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. & Kovar, J. L. (2004) Why beautiful people are more intelligent. Intelligence 32, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. & Novak, D. L. (2005) Human sexual dimorphism in size may be triggered by environmental cues. Journal of Biosocial Science 37, 657–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. & Still, M. C. (1999) Why monogamy? Social Forces 78, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. & Still, M. C. (2000) Why men commit crimes (and why they desist) Sociological Theory 18, 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2005) Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Koenig, L. B., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F. & Bouchard, T. J. Jr (2005) Genetic and environmental influences on religiousness: Findings for retrospective and current religiousness ratings. Journal of Personality 73, 471–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenski, G. E. (1966) Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Leutenegger, W. & Kelly, J. T. (1977) Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Primates 18, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, D. (ed.) (1991–1995) Encyclopedia of World Cultures. (10 volumes)G.K. Hall, Boston.Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D. & Dubner, S. J. (2005) Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. & Bell, E. O. (1992) Children's first names: An empirical study of social taste. American Journal of Sociology 98, 511–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R. (2007) A study of the IQ in Bangladesh. Mankind Quarterly 48, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R., Harvey, J. & Nyborg, H. (2009) Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations. Intelligence 37, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2002) IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Praeger, Westport.Google Scholar
Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2006) IQ and Global Inequality. Washington Summit Books, Augusta.Google Scholar
McRae, R. R. (1994) Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. European Journal of Personality 8, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. (1998) What it Means to be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation. Broadway, New York.Google Scholar
Neisser, U, Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. Jr, Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J. et al. . (1996) Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist 51, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickford, M. (1986) On the origins of body size dimorphism in primates. In Pickford, M. & Chiarelli, B. (eds) Sexual Dimorphism in Living and Fossil Primates. Il Sedicesimo, Florence, pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
Rindermann, H. (2007) The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: The homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality 21, 667–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. & Becker, G. S. (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67, 76–90.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1990) Adaptiveness and adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology 11, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templer, D. I. & Arikawa, H. (2006) Temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ: An international perspective. Intelligence 34, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1989) Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: Theoretical considerations. Ethology and Sociobiology 10, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1990) The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology 11, 375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, T. (2003) Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Whitmeyer, J. M. (1997) Endogamy as a basis for ethnic behavior. Sociological Theory 15, 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1987) Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preferences formation. American Political Science Review 81, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985) Crime and Human Nature: The Definitive Study of the Causes of Crime. Touchstone, New York.Google Scholar