Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:19:50.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical population structure of two Tasmanian communities using surname analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

M. Kosten ,
J. Williams  and
R. J. Mitchell
M. Kosten
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
R. J. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper reports the first data on historical population structure in white Australians. Vital records and census data from two Tasmanian registration districts, Oatlands and Bothwell, were examined using surname analysis to investigate population structure in the nineteenth century. Both were colonising populations and therefore initially had massive immigration and a very high sex ratio. Inbreeding, as measured by marital isonymy, was relatively high in Oatlands, especially in the context of its short history. Although genetic continuity, measured by surname constancy, was relatively low, a small but distinct core was detectable. Bothwell, the smaller community, exhibited very little inbreeding and, concomitantly, low surname constancy. The coefficient of relationship by isonymy between Oatlands and Bothwell was extremely low. These findings are discussed in the context of the known socio-political history of this region of Tasmania.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 367 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Census of Tasmania (1838, 1841, 1847, 1857, 1861, 1870, 1881, 1891, 1901) Tasmanian Government Statistician, Hobart.Google Scholar
Crow, J.F. & Mange, A.P. (1965) Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. Eugen. Q. 12, 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, T. (1973) Historical population structure in Northumberland. In: Genetic Variation in Britain, p. 67. Edited by Roberts, D.F. and Sunderland, E.Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Dobson, T. & Roberts, D.F. (1971) Historical population movement and gene flow in Northumberland parishes. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosten, M. (1981) The Population Structure of Two Colonial Tasmanian Districts. Honours thesis, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Küchemann, C.F., Lasker, G.W. & Smith, D.I. (1979) Historical changes in the coefficient of relationship by isonymy among the populations of the Otmoor villages. Hum. Biol. 51, 63.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G.W. (1977) A coefficient of relationship by isonymy: a method for estimating the genetic relationship between populations. Hum. Biol. 49, 489.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G.W. (1978) Increments through migration to the coefficient of relationship between communities estimated by isonymy. Hum. Biol. 50, 235.Google Scholar
Lasker, G.W. (1980) Surnames in the study of human biology. Am. Anthrop. 82, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raspe, P.D. & Lasker, G.W. (1980) The structure of the human population of the Isles of Scilly: inferences from surnames and birthplaces listed in census and marriage records. Ann. hum. Biol. 7, 401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawling, C.P. (1973) A study of isonymy. In: Genetic Variation in Britain, p. 83. Edited by Roberts, D.F. and Sunderland, E.. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. (1969) ‘Men of substance and deservedly good repute’: the Tasmanian gentry 1856–1875. Aust. J. Polit. Hist. 25, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.F. (1981) Inbreeding and ecological change: an isonymic analysis of secular trends in a Tyneside parish over three centuries. Social Biol. 27, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.F. & Rawling, C.P. (1974) Secular trends in genetic structure: an isonymic analysis of Northumberland parish records. Ann. hum. Biol. 1, 393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skolnick, M.H. (1974) The construction and analysis of genealogies from parish registers with a case study of Parma Valley, Italy. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Steel, D.J. (1968) National Index of Parish Registers, 1. Society of Genealogists, London.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A.C. (1971) The genetical structure of an historical population: a study of marriage and fertility in Old Deerfield, Massachusetts. Research Reports in Anthropology, No. 7, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A.C. (1975) Isonymy: estimating inbreeding from social data. Bull. Eugen. Soc. 7, 67.Google Scholar
Von Stieglitz, K.R. (1958) A History of Bothwell and its Early Settlers at the Clyde in Van Dieman's Land. Telegraph Printery, Hobart.Google Scholar
Von Stieglitz, K.R. (1963) A History of Oatlands and Jericho. Telegraph Printery, Hobart.Google Scholar