Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:08:48.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility control and the voluntarily childless: an exploratory study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Elaine Carlisle
Elaine Carlisle
Affiliation:
Department of Social Studies, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Irland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The widespread availability of effective means of fertility control in many developed countries has made voluntary childlessness a viable alternative to parenthood. Little attention however has been given to the family planning requirements of those who take this minority decision. Data from Scotland suggest that the voluntarily childless have contrasting needs and that usage of and perspectives on contraceptive techniques, sterilization, and abortion depend primarily upon the extent and basis of individual commitment. It is important that those involved in providing family planning services should be aware of the variations in the childless condition and how these might influence individual behaviour in relation to fertility control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 203 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © 1982, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, I. (1981) Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion Services. Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1979) Is zero preferred? American attitudes towards childlessness in the 1970s. J. Marr. & Fam. 41, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, M. (1973) Family Planning Services in England and Wales. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Bumpass, L.L. (1973) Is low fertility here to stay? Fam. Plann. Perspect. 5, 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. (1978) Talking about children: an examination of accounts about reproduction and family life. J. biosoc. Sci. 10, 367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, E. (1971) The Baby Trap. Hanau, London.Google Scholar
Peck, E. & Senderowitz, J. (1974) Pronatalism: The Myth of Mom and Apple Pie. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
Peel, J. & Carr, G. (1975) Contraception and Family Design. A Study of Birth Planning in Contemporary Society. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Pohlman, E. (1970) Childlessness: intentional and unintentional. J. nerv. ment. Dis. 151, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radl, S. (1973) Mother's Day is Over. Charterhouse, New York.Google Scholar
Rainwater, L. (1960) And the Poor Get Children: Sex, Contraception and Family Planning in the Working Class. Quadrangle, Chicago.Google Scholar
Veevers, J. (1972) Factors in the incidence of childlessness in Canada: an analysis of census data. Soc. Biol. 19, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, J. (1973) Voluntary childlessness: a neglected area of family study. Fam. Coordinator, 22, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, J. (1979) Voluntary childlessness: a review of issues and evidence. Marr. & Fam. Rev. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, J. (1980) Childless by Choice. Butterworths, Toronto.Google Scholar