Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:00:40.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of amniocentesis for genetic purposes on the pregnancy and its outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

E. V. Davison ,
A. S. McIntosh  and
D. F. Roberts
E. V. Davison
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
A. S. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Newcastle General Hospital
D. F. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An attempt was made to follow to completion the pregnancies of 2049 women who had amniocentesis for genetic purposes in a single hospital region in northern England. The object of the study was to establish the extent to which complications of pregnancy and fetal problems are attributable to the procedure. Follow-up was complete in 1750 women. Risks to the mother, other than minor abdominal discomfort following the amniocentesis, were minimal. The increase in complications to the pregnancy and delivery, the occurrence of congenital anomalies, spontaneous abortion, and perinatal death, that can be attributed to the procedure of anmiocentesis fall at the lower end of the range previously reported.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 295 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benacerraf, B. R. & Frigoletto, F. D. (1983) Amniocentesis under continued ultrasound guidance. Obstet. Gyncec. 62, 760.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowman, J. M. & Pollock, J. M. (1985) Transplacental fetal hemorrhage after amniocentesis. Obstet. Gynec. 66, 749.Google ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, D. P., Varner, M. W., Cruikshank, J. C, Grant, S. S. & Donnelly, E. (1983) Midtrimester amniocentesis: an analysis of 923 cases with neonatal follow up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 146, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galjaard, H. (1976) European experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital disease: a survey of 6121 cases. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 16, 453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golbus, M. S., Stephens, J. D., Cann, J. M., Mann, J. & Hensleigh, P. A. (1982) Rh isoimmunisation following genetic amniocentesis. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2, 149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grundell, B. F., Howard, J. & Lehbert, T. B. (1980) Follow up of 2000 second trimester amniocenteses. Obstet. Gynec. 56, 625.Google Scholar
Hess, L. W., Anderson, R. L. & Golbus, M. J. (1986) Significance of opaque discolored amniotic fluid at second trimester amniocentesis. Obstet. Gynec. 67, 44.Google ScholarPubMed
Hsu, L. Y. F., Kaffe, S., Yahr, F., Serotkin, A., Giordano, F., Goomilow, L., Hyon, J. K., David, K., Kerenyi, T. & Hirschhorn, K. (1978) Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. First 1000 successful cases. Am. J. med. Genet. 2, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Italian Collaborative Study (1982) Cytogenetic findings on 4952 prenatal diagnoses. Hum. Genet. 60, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, C. B. & Barter, R. H. (1967) Intra-uterine diagnosis and the management of genetic defects. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 99, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (1977) An assessment of the value of examination of the hip in the newborn. J. Bone Joint Surg. 59–B, 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Research Council (1978) An assessment of the hazards of amniocentesis. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 85, Suppl. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Menes, T. D., Miller, J. D. & Holly, L. E. (1930) Amniography: preliminary report. Am. J. Roentgenol. 24, 363.Google Scholar
Murken, J. D., Stengel-Rutkowski, B. & Schwinger, E. (Eds.) (1979) European Collaborative Study: Prenatal Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders. Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Murray, J. C., Karp, L. E. & Williamson, R. A. (1983) Rh isoimmunization related to amniocentesis. Am. J. med. Genet. 16, 527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institutes of Health and Child Development (1976) Midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis: safety and accuracy. J. Am. med. Ass. 236, 1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niermeyer, M. F., Sachs, E. S., Jahodova, M., Tichelaar-Klepper, C., Klejer, W. J. & Galjaard, H. (1976) Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorder. J. med. Genet. 13, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, J. & Bang, J. (1978) Outcome of pregnancy after amniocentesis for chromosomal analysis. Br med. J. 2, 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polani, P. E., Alberman, E., Alexander, B. J., Benson, P. F., Berry, A. C., Blunt, S., Daker, M. G., Fensom, A. H., Garrett, D. M., McGuire, V. M., Fraser-Roberts, J. A., Seller, M. J. & Singer, J. D. (1979) Sixteen years' experience of counselling, diagnosis, and prenatal detection in one genetic centre: progress, results and problems. J. med. Genet. 16, 166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sant-Cassia, L. J., MacPherson, M. B. A. & Tyack, A. J. (1984) Midtrimester amniocentesis, is it safe? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 91, 736.Google ScholarPubMed
Schlensker, K. H. (1984) Schwangerschaftsausgang nach Amniozentese zur prenatalen Diagnostik genetisch bedingter Defekte. Gerburtshilfe Frauenhielkd, 44, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, E., Dallaire, L., Miller, J. R., Siminovich, L., Hamerton, J. & McKeen, C. (1976) Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease in Canada: report of collaborative study. Can. Med. Ass. J. 155, 739.Google Scholar
Steele, M. W. & Bregg, W. R. (1966) Chromosome analysis of human amniotic fluid cells. Lancet, i, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verjaal, M., Leschot, N. J. & Treffers, P. E. (1981) Risk of amniocentesis and laboratory findings in a series of 1500 prenatal diagnoses. Prenatal Diagnosis, 1, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, N. J., Terzian, E., Vickers, P. R. & Weatherall, J. A. C. (1983) Congenital talipes and hip malformation in relation to amniocentesis. Lancet, ii, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar