Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:36:34.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECT OF CONSANGUINITY ON CONGENITAL DISABILITIES IN THE KUWAITI POPULATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2010

YAGOUB Y. AL-KANDARI  and
DOUGLAS E. CREWS
YAGOUB Y. AL-KANDARI
Affiliation:
Medical Anthropology, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kuwait University, Kuwait
DOUGLAS E. CREWS
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Consanguinity has been shown to increase homozygosity and to reduce genetic variation in a group, which may protect against the expression of recessive genes that can lead to genetic disorders. Consanguineous marriages are practised widely in Kuwait. The major aim of this study is to delineate the association of consanguineous marriages with congenital disabilities in different Kuwaiti population subcultures. A total of 9104 married Kuwaiti females aged 15–79 years from different backgrounds were selected at ten primary health care centres from six governorates in Kuwait. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analysed with chi-squared tests. The data indicate significant differences in the occurrence of genetic diseases in consanguineous couples' offspring (4.88%) compared with those of non-consanguineous couples (4.13%) (p<0.002). The results also show significant differences in frequencies of genetic/environmental diseases in consanguineous couples' offspring (8.59%) compared with those of non-consanguineous couples (8.23%) (p<0.005). No significant differences between the two groups regarding environmental diseases were observed. A higher frequency of genetic diseases was found in first- (6.97%; p<0.001), second- (6.78%; p<0.001) and third-cousin (6.46%; p<0.022) couples' offspring compared with those of non-consanguineous couples. The frequency of congenital disabilities in the offspring of couples from consanguineous marriages (2.9%) is higher than that in the offspring of non-consanguineous marriages (2.3%). But this difference is not significant at the 0.05 level. First-cousin marriages have the highest frequency (3.5%) of congenital disabilities compared with other kinds of marriages (2.1–2.3%). Differences across groups are significant (p<0.036). Significant differences are found for first-cousin couples in both physical (2.37; p<0.042) and mental (0.74; p<0.037) disabilities compared with non-consanguineous couples. No significant differences were observed in deafness and blindness disabilities. The data show no significant differences between second- and third-cousin and non-consanguineous couples in physical, mental or deafness and blindness disabilities. There are no significant differences in the percentages of offspring with congenital disabilities in consanguineous and non-consanguineous marriages across sub-population groups for the total of four types of congenital disability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 65 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulrazzaq, Y. M., Bener, A., Al-Gazali, L. I., Al-Khayat, A. I., Micallef, R. & Gaber, T. (1997) A study of possible deleterious effect of consanguinity. Clinical Genetics 51, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akrami, S. M., Montazeri, V. l., Shomali, S. R., Heshmat, R. & Larijani, B. (2009) Is there a significant trend in prevalence of consanguineous marriage in Tehran? Journal of Genetic Counseling 18(1), 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Abdulkareem, A. A. & Ballal, S. G. (1997) Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. Journal of Community Health 23(1), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Abdulkareem, Y. M., Bener, A. & Ballal, S. G. (1998) Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effect on the offspring. Journal of Community Health 23(1), 57–83.Google Scholar
al-Awadi, F. & Amin, E. K. (1992) Factors affecting birth weight in Kuwait. Part II: Pregnancy characteristics and health factors. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 67(1–2), 53–74.Google Scholar
Al-Awadi, S. A., Moussa, M. A., Naguib, K. K., Farag, T. I., Teebi, A. S., el-Khalifa, M. & el-Dossary, L. (1985) Consanguinity among the Kuwaiti population. Clinical Genetics 27(5), 483–486.Google Scholar
Al-Awadi, S. A., Naguib, K. K., Moussa, M. A., Farag, T. I., Teebi, A. S. & el-Khalifa, M. Y. (1986) The effect of consanguineous marriages on reproductive wastage. Clinical Genetics 29(5), 384–388.Google Scholar
Alfi, O. S., Chang, R. & Azen, S. P. (1980) Evidence for genetic control of nondisjunction in man. American Journal of Human Genetics 32(4), 477–483.Google ScholarPubMed
al-Fuzae, L., Aboolbacker, K. C. & al-Saleh, Q. (1998) β-Thalassaemia major in Kuwait. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 44(5), 311–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Herz, W. (2008) Primary immunodeficiency disorders in Kuwait: first report from Kuwait National Primary Immunodeficiency Registry (2004–2006). Journal of Clinical Immunology 28(2), 186–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Kandari, Y. (2006) Consanguinity in Kuwait and its relations to some sociocultural determinants (in Arabic). Annals of Arts and Social Sciences No. 252(26). Academic Publication Council, Kuwait University.Google Scholar
Al-Kandari, Y. (2007) The health consequences of consanguineous marriage in Kuwait. Anthropology of the Middle East 2(2), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Merjan, J. I., Pandova, M. G., Al-Ghanim, M., Al-Wayel, A. & Al-Mutairi, S. (2005) Registered blindness and low vision in Kuwait. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 12(4), 251–257.Google Scholar
Al-Salem, M. & Rawashdeh, N. (1993) Consanguinity in north Jordan: prevalence and pattern. Journal of Biosocial Science 25(4), 553–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Thakeb, F. (1982). Family-kinship tie in the contemporary Kuwaiti society. Annals of Arts No. 10(3). Academic Publication Council, Kuwait University [in Arabic].Google Scholar
Barakat, H. (2008) The Contemporary Arabic Society: Experimental Social Research. The Arabian United Studies Center, Beirut[in Arabic].Google Scholar
Barbour, B. & Salameh, P. (2009) Consanguinity in Lebanon: prevalence, distribution and determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(4), 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow-Stewart, K. & Saleh, M. (2007) When parents are relatives – consanguinity. Centre for Genetics Education. URL: http://www.genetics.edu.au.Google Scholar
Bener, A. & Hussain, R. (2006) Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20(5), 372–378.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2002) Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics. Journal of Genetics 81, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demirel, S., Kaplanoğlu, N., Acar, A., Bodur, S. & Paydak, F. (1997) The frequency of consanguinity in Konya, Turkey, and its medical effects. Genetic Counseling 8(4), 295–301.Google ScholarPubMed
Denic, S. & Nicholls, M. G. (2007) Genetic benefits of consanguinity through selection of genotypes protective against malaria. Human Biology 2(79), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbase, P. E., al-Sharhan, M., al-Othman, S., al-Mutawa, M. & Grudzinskas, J. G. (1996) Outcome of assisted reproduction technology in infertile couples of consanguineous marriage. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 13(4), 279–281.Google Scholar
El Mouzan, M. I., Al Salloum, A. A., Al Herbish, A. S., Qurachi, M. M. & Al Omar, A. A. (2008) Consanguinity and major genetic disorders in Saudi children: a community-based cross-sectional study. Annals of Saudi Medicine 28(3), 169–173.Google Scholar
el-Hazmi, M. A., al-Swailem, A. R., Warsy, A. S., al-Swailem, A. M., Sulaimani, R. & al-Meshari, A. A. (1995) Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. Journal of Medical Genetics 32(8), 623–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Najjar, M. (1996) Consanguinity in Kuwait. Collegium Anthropologicum 20, 275–282.Google Scholar
Hafez, M., El-Tahan, H., Awadalla, M., El-Khayat, H., Abdel-Gafar, A. & Ghoneim, M. (1983) Consanguineous matings in the Egyptian population. Journal of Medical Genetics 20(1), 58–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamamy, H. & Al-Hakkak, Z. (1989) Consanguinity and reproductive health in Iraq. Human Heredity 39, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamamy, H., Jamhawi, L., Al-Darawsheh, J. & Ajlouni, K. (2005) Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: why is the rate changing with time? A review of three generations. Clinical Genetics 67(6), 511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamamy, H. A., Masri, A. T., Al-Hadidy, A. M. & Ajlouni, K. M. (2007) Consanguinity and genetic disorders. Profile from Jordan. Saudi Medical Journal 28(7), 1015–1017.Google ScholarPubMed
Jain, V. K., Nalini, P., Chandra, R. & Srinivasan, S. (1993) Congenital malformations, reproductive wastage and consanguineous mating. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 33(1), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaouad, I. C., Elalaoui, S. C., Sbiti, A., Elkerh, F., Belmahi, L. & Sefiani, A. (2009) Consanguineous marriages in Morocco and the consequence for the incidence of autosomal recessive disorders. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(5), 575–581.Google Scholar
Kanaan, Z. M., Mahfouz, R. & Tamim, H. (2008) The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in an underserved area in Lebanon and its association with congenital anomalies. Genetic Testing 12(3), 367–372.Google Scholar
Khabori, M. A. & Patton, M. A. (2008) Consanguinity and deafness in Omani children. International Journal of Audiology 47(1), 30–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khlat, M. & Halabi, S. (1986) Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Beirut. Journal of Biosocial Science 18, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madi, S. A., Al-Naggar, R. L., Al-Awadi, S. A. & Bastaki, L. A. (2005) Profile of major congenital malformations in neonates in Al-Jahra region of Kuwait. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 11(4), 700–706.Google ScholarPubMed
Mohanty, D., Das, K. C., al-Hussain, H., Naglen, P., Eklof, B., Marouf, R., Khamis, A. & al-Majdi, (1996) Thrombophilia in ethnic Arabs in Kuwait. Annals of Hematology 73(6), 283–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasir, J. A., Chanmugham, P., Tahir, F., Ahmed, A. & Shinwari, F. (2004) Investigation of the probable causes of specific childhood disabilities in eastern Afghanistan. Central European Journal of Public Health 12(1), 53–57.Google Scholar
Radovanovic, Z., Shah, N. & Behbehani, J. (1999) Prevalence and social correlates to consanguinity in Kuwait. Annals of Saudi Medicine 19(3), 206–210.Google Scholar
Saleh, E. A., Mahfouz, A. A., Tayel, K. Y., Naguib, M. K. & Bin-al-Shaikh, N. M. (2000) Hypertension and its determinants among primary-school children in Kuwait: an epidemiological study. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 6(2–3), 333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanghvi, L. D. (1966) Inbreeding in India. Eugenics Quarterly 13, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teebi, A. S., Al-Awadi, S. A., Farag, T. I., Naguib, K. K. & el-Khalifa, M. Y. (1987) Phenylketonuria in Kuwait and Arab countries. European Journal of Pediatrics 146(1), 59–60.Google Scholar
White, A. G., Raju, K. T. & Abouna, G. M. (1988) A six year experience with recurrent infection and immunodeficiency in children in Kuwait. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Immunology 26(2), 97–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Zlotogora, J. (1997) Genetic disorders among Palestinian Arabs: 1. Effects of consanguinity. American Journal of Medical Genetics 68(4), 472–475.Google Scholar