Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:31:54.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of contraceptive use in Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

J. M. Tuladhar
J. M. Tuladhar
Affiliation:
Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study, based on the Nepal Contraceptive Prevalence Survey carried out in 1981, is the first of its kind. Analysis using a logit-linear model showed that the prevalence of current contraception was directly related to number and sex of living children, and the age of the woman. The prevalence rates are higher among women who did not want more children and women who had discussed family size with their husbands. The prevalence varies according to women's education and work-status. Urban women have a higher prevalence than rural women. Women who have access to the family planning service within a short distance have higher prevalence than those who do not.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 185 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frenzen, P.D. & Hogan, D.P. (1982) The impact of class, education, and health care on infant mortality in a developing society: the case of rural Thailand. Demography, 18, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, R. & Green, M. (1980) GLIM—a Primer. Department of Mathematics, Polytechnic of North London.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A. (1971) The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13, 33.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A. (1972) A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables. Am. sociol. Rev. 37, 28.Google Scholar
Hogan, D.P. & Frenzen, P.D. (1981) Antecedent to contraceptive innovation: evidence from rural northern Thailand. Demography, 18, 597.Google Scholar
Little, R. (1978) Generalized Linear Models for Cross-classified Data from the WFS. Technical Bulletins no. 5/Tech. 834. International Statistical Institute/World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (1977) Nepal Fertility Survey, 1976: First Report. Nepal FP/MCH Project, World Fertility Survey/Nepal Project, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Morris, L., Lewis, G., Powell, D.L., Anderson, J., Way, A., Cushing, J. & Lawless, G. (1981) Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys: a New Source of Family Planning Data. Population Reports, series M no. 5, M163–193. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Nepal FP/MCH Project (1983) Nepal Contraceptive Prevalence Survey Report, 1981. Westinghouse Health Systems, USA.Google Scholar
Pullum, T. (1980) Separating age, period, and cohort effects in white US fertility, 1920–70, Social Sci. Res. 9, 225.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. (1978) Family planning availability and contraceptive practice. Int. Fam. Plann. Perspect. Dig. 4, 100.Google Scholar
Tsui, A.O., Hogan, D.P. & Teachman, J.D. (1981) Community availability of contraceptives and family limitation. Demography, 18, 615.Google Scholar
Westoff, C. (1978) The unmet need for birth control in five Asian countries. Int. Fam. Plann. Perspect. Dig. 4, 9.Google Scholar