Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:19:04.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demographic and contraceptive innovators: a study of transitional African society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

J. C Caldwell  and
Pat Caldwell
J. C Caldwell
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Pat Caldwell
Affiliation:
University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Data are employed from six surveys carried out in Ibadan City, Nigeria, during two survey programmes: the Nigerian segment of the Changing African Family Project in 1973, and the Nigerian Family Study in 1974–5. A distinction is made between contraceptive innovators, those who use any means to control fertility except the traditional Yoruba sexual abstinence, and demographic innovators, those who succeed in limiting their family size. It is shown that contraceptive innovation is now proceeding rapidly but has little connection with demographic innovation. Contraceptive innovation is a response to social change which has increased the likelihood of premarital and extramarital sexual relations and the desire to shorten the period of postnatal sexual abstinence while not increasing the interval between births. Such innovation has proceeded more rapidly because of the increased availability of contraceptives since about 1960 and because of the types of contraceptives which have been developed since then. Demographic innovation is on the increase but its incidence is still minute. Fertility restriction within marriages seems to take place only after profound changes have occurred in the economic relationships within both the extended and nuclear families which for the first time make the small family the economically rational choice. Such change probably depends more on the import of cultural patterns than on necessary cultural adjustments to imported economic change, but a strengthening of the conjugal bond is involved and this may be hastened by contraceptive innovation. Little innovational trauma or even awareness of profound change was detected, largely because the profound, and even disruptive, innovations are preceding social ones, but partly too because peer group behaviour changes at much the same time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 347 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, J.A. (1954) Prosperity and Parenthood: A Study of Family Planning among the Victorian Middle Classes. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Barnett, H.G. (1953) Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1968) Population Growth and Family Change in Africa: The New Urban Elite in Ghana. Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1974) The study of fertility and fertility change in tropical Africa. Occasional Papers 7, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1975) Fertility control. In: Population Growth and Socioeconomic Change in West Africa. Edited by Caldwell, J.C.. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1976a) Fertility and the household economy in Nigeria. J. comp. fam. Stud. 7, 1.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1976b) Towards a restatement of demographic transition theory: an investigation of conditions before and at the onset of fertility decline employing primarily African experience and data. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. & Caldwell, P. (1977) The role of marital sexual abstinence in determining fertility: a study of the Yoruba in Nigeria. Popul. Stud. 31, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, J.C. & Igun, A. (1970) The spread of anti-natal knowledge and practice in Nigeria. Popul. Stud. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, J.C., Choldin, H.M., Noé, L.F., Sills, D.L. & Stephan, F.F. (1970) A Manual for Studies of Fertility and Family Planning: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice. The population Council, New York.Google Scholar
Changing African Family Project (1975) Nigerian Segment, Project 2, The Value of Children. Information Sheets on Individual Centres. Demography Department, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Coale, A.J. & Demeny, P. (1966) ‘North’’Tables. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think. Heath, Boston.Google Scholar
Freedman, R. (1975) The Sociology of Human Fertility: An Annotated Bibliography. Irvington, New York.Google Scholar
Keyfitz, N. & Flieger, W. (1968) World Population: An Analysis of Vital Data. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. & Page, H.J. (1976) Relating Individual Fertility to Other Variables: Common Problems and Pitfalls. Seminar on Marriage, Parenthood and Fertility in West Africa. International Sociological Association: Committee on Family Research, Lomé, 3–901 1976.Google Scholar
Lionberger, H.F. (1960) Adoption of New Ideas and Practices: A summary of the Research Dealing with the Acceptance of Technological Change in Agriculture, with Implications for Action in Facilitating such Change. National Project in Agricultural Communications, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Notestein, F. (1945) Population: the long view. In: Food for the World. Edited by Schultz, T.W.. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Notestein, F. (1953) Economic problems of population change. In: 8th International Conference of Agricultural Economists. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Okedui, F.O., Caldwell, J.C., Caldwell, P. & Ware, H. (1976) The Changing African Family Project: a report with special reference to the Nigerian Segment. Stud. Fam. Plann. 7, 5.Google Scholar
Sauvy, A. (1966) General Theory of Population. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
United Nations (1965) Population Bulletin of the United Nations, No. 7–1963, with Special Reference to Conditions and Trends of Fertility in the World. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (1970) Variables and Questionnaire for Comparative Fertility Studies, prepared by the Committee on Comparative Studies of Fertility and Family Planning of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Population Studies No. 45, UN, New York.Google Scholar
World Fertility Survey (1975) Basic Documentation, 1, Core Questionnaires. WFS, London.Google Scholar