Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:03:03.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONSANGUINITY AND HOMOZYGOSITY AMONG TUNISIAN PATIENTS WITH AN AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE DISORDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

WIDED KELMEMI ,
IMENE CHELLY ,
MAHER KHARRAT  and
HABIBA CHAABOUNI-BOUHAMED
WIDED KELMEMI
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
IMENE CHELLY
Affiliation:
Pediatric Department, Regional Hospital of Bizerte, Bizerte, Tunisia
MAHER KHARRAT
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
HABIBA CHAABOUNI-BOUHAMED*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia Department of Congenital and Hereditary Disorders, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Consanguineous unions are a deeply rooted social practice among traditional societies. Despite their presumed social advantages, they can result in several health conditions. The aim of this study was: i) to compare consanguinity levels between Tunisian patients affected with autosomal recessive disorders (ARDs) and those with a chromosomal abnormality; and ii) to gain more insight into the mutational status of patients affected with ARDs. Data were collected from 290 files of patients affected by one of five ARDs confirmed by molecular analysis and 248 files of patients with confirmed Down syndrome. Information on the disease, mutation defining the disease, parents' relatedness and geographical origin was gathered. Consanguinity was found among 58% of the ARD patients and among 22% of Down syndrome patients, and a homozygous status was found in 90% of the patients born to related parents and in 70% of patients born to unrelated parents. Also, children from unrelated parents from the same geographical background were found to be more frequently affected by homozygous mutations than those from unrelated parents from different geographical backgrounds. The present study shows how marriage practices affect patterns of genetic variations and how they can lead to homogenization in the genetic pool.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 718 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben Arab, S., Masmoudi, S., Beltaief, N., Hachicha, S. & Ayadi, H. (2004) Consanguinity and endogamy in northern Tunisia and its impact on non-syndromic deafness. Genetic Epidemiology 1, 74–79.Google Scholar
Ben Halim, N., Ben Alaya Bouafif, N., Romdhane, L., Kefi Ben Atig, R., Chouchane, I., Bouyacoub, Y., Arfa, I. et al. (2013) Consanguinity, endogamy, and genetic disorders in Tunisia. Journal of Community Genetics 4, 273–284.Google Scholar
Bener, A. & Alali, K. A. (2006) Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: the Qatari population. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 239–246.Google Scholar
Bener, A., Hussain, R. & Teebi, A. S. (2007) Consanguineous marriages and their effects on common adult diseases: studies from an endogamous population. Medical Principles and Practice 4, 262–267.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2005) Endogamy consanguinity and community disease profiles. Community Genetics 81, 17–20.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2009) Commentary: the background and outcomes of the first-cousin marriage controversy in Great Britain. International Journal of Epidemiology 38, 1453–1458.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2011) The Global Prevalence of Consanguinity. URL: http//www.consang.net (accessed 10–12th June 2011).Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. & Hamamy, H. (2010) Endogamy and consanguineous marriage in Arab populations. In Teebi, A. S. (ed.) Genetic Disorders among Arab Populations, 2nd edition. Springer, pp. 93.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. & Black, M. (2010) Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107 (supplement 1), 1779–1786.Google Scholar
Chaabouni-Bouhamed, H. (2008) Tunisia: communities and community genetics. Community Genetics 116, 313–323.Google Scholar
Chéhab, G., Chokor, I., Fakhouri, H., Hage, G., Saliba, Z. & El-Rassi, I. (2007) Congenital heart disease, maternal age and parental consanguinity in children with Down's syndrome. Le Journal Médical Libanais 3, 133–137.Google Scholar
De Braekeleer, M., Landry, T. & Chalotte, A. (1994) Consanguinity and kinship in Down syndrome in Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean (Québec). Annales de Génétique 37(2), 86–88.Google Scholar
Jaouad, I. C., Elalaoui, S. C., Sbiti, A., Elkerh, F., Belmahi, L. & Sefiani, A. (2009) Consanguineous marriages in Morocco and the consequence for the incidence of autosomal recessive disorders. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(5), 575–581.Google Scholar
Maximilian, C., Pop, T., Duca, D., Simionescu, L., Danielescu, M. & Ioan, D. (1981) Familial Down's syndrome. Endocrinologie 1, 65–68.Google Scholar
Mokhtar, M. M., Kotb, S. M. & Ismail, S. R. (1998) Autosomal recessive disorders among patients attending the genetics clinic in Alexandria. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 4, 470–497.Google Scholar
Pemberton, T. J., Absher, D., Feldman, M. W., Myers, R. M., Rosenberg, N. A. & Li, J. Z. (2009) Genomic patterns of homozygosity in worldwide human populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 91, 275–292.Google Scholar
Petukhova, L., Shimomura, Y., Wajid, M., Gorroochurn, P., Hodge, S. E. & Christiano, A. M. (2009) The effect of inbreeding on the distribution of compound heterozygotes: a lesson from lipase H mutations in autosomal recessive woolly hair/hypotrichosis. Human Heredity 68, 117–130.Google Scholar
Riou, S., El Younsi, C. & Chaabouni, H. (1989) Consanguinity in the population of northern Tunisia (French). Tunisie Médicale 67, 167–172.Google Scholar
Romdhane, L. & Abdelhak, S. (2011) Genetic diseases in the Tunisian population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155, 238–267.Google Scholar
Rudan, I., Campbell, H. et al. (2006) Contribution of consanguinity to polygenic and multifactorial diseases. Nature Genetics 11, 1224–1222.Google Scholar
Tadmouri, G. O., Nair, P., Obeid, T., Al Ali, M. T., Al Khaja, N. & Hamamy, H. A. (2009) Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health 6, 17.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330–338.Google Scholar