Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:02:26.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coital rates and dizygotic twinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

William H. James
Affiliation:
Galton Laboratory, University CollegeLondon

Extract

There is some evidence, mostly of an epidemiological nature, that coital rates may be positively associated with dizygotic twinning. It is suggested that this link is causal, in which case an explanation becomes available for some curious—and hitherto unexplained—features of dizygotic twinning rates by maternal age and legitimacy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1972, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, G. & Schachter, J. (1970) Do conception delays explain some changes in twinning rates? Acta Genet. med. Gemell. 19, 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M.G. (1959) The effect of parental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Ann. hum. Genet. 23, 454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M.G. (1970) Biology of Twinning in Man.Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A.W. & Fellman, J. (1967) Twinning in relation to the marital status of the mother. Acta Genet. 17, 385.Google Scholar
Gemzell, C. & Roos, P. (1966) Pregnancies following treatment with human gonadotrophins, with special reference to the problem of multiple births. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 94, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Register Office (1944) Registrar General's Annual Statistical Review for 1938, part 2, pp. 119, 120, 135. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1970) Registrar General's Annual Statistical Review for 1966, part 3, pp. 39, 40. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Grebenik, E. (1957) The fertility of women with premarital conceptions in Great Britain. Bull. Inst. int. Statist. 36 (2), 122.Google Scholar
James, W.H. (1970) The incidence of spontaneous abortion. Popul. Stud. 24, 241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeanneret, O. & Macmahon, B. (1962) Secular changes in rates of multiple births in the US. Am. J. hum. Genet. 14, 410.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. & Gebhard, P.H. (1953) Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Macdonald, E.K. (1956) Follow-up of illegitimate children. Med. Offr, 96, 361.Google Scholar
Nylander, P.P.S. (1970) The inheritance of dizygotic twinning. Acta. Genet. med. Gemell. 19, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, G.N. (1969) Multiple births in Australia, 1944–63. J. biosoc. Sci. 1, 389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renkonen, K.O. (1966) The mothers of twins and their fertility. Annls Med. exp. Biol. Fenn. 44, 322.Google ScholarPubMed
Selvin, S. (1971) The number of pregnancies prior to the birth of twins. Ann. hum. Genet. 34, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, P. (1952) Recent statistics of multiple births in England and Wales. Acta Genet. med. Gemell. 1, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, B. (1956) Social study of illegitimate maternity. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 10, 75.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. & Illsley, R. (1969) Family growth in Aberdeen. J. biosoc. Sci. 1, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyshak, G. & White, C. (1969) Fertility of twins and parents of twins. Hum. Biol. 41, 66.Google ScholarPubMed