Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:19:14.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth Spacing in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Zeba Sathar
Zeba Sathar
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Life table analysis is applied to data from the Pakistan Fertility Survey (1975) to examine the effects on birth spacing of a number of socioeconomic variables. Women of more modern backgrounds seem to space their families more closely, but differ little in achieved family size from the more traditional groups. Important factors are age at marriage, age at first birth, province of residence, and whether the woman had ever used contraception. Multivariate analysis taking into account interaction between variables shows that education, urban-rural residence, and province exert independent effects, and so does the cohort of the mother. But the variable with the strongest effect on length of interval, other than that from marriage to first birth, is duration of breast-feeding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 175 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, I. (1984) Fertility levels and trends. In: Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Fertility Survey. Edited by Alam, I. & Dineson, B.. ISI, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Booth, H. & Shah, I. (1984) The data and their quality. In: Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Fertility Survey. Edited by Alam, I. & Dineson, B.. ISI, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Casterline, J. (1984) Fertility differentials. In: Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Fertility Survey. Edited by Alam, I. & Dineson, B.. ISI, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Nag, M. (1980) Fertility increasing effects of modernization. In: Proceedings of IUSSP Conference 1980.IUSSP,Liège.Google Scholar
Pakistan Population Planning Council (1976) Pakistan Fertility Survey: First Country Report. Islamabad.Google Scholar
Rindfuss, R. R., Bumpass, L., Palmore, J. A. & Dae, Woo Han (1982) The transformation of Korean child spacing practices. Popul. Stud. 36, 87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathar, Z. (1979) Rural–urban fertility differentials in Pakistan—1975. Pakistan Dev. Rev. 55, No. 3.Google Scholar
Sathar, Z. (1979) Rural–urban fertility differentials in Pakistan—1975. Pakistan Dev. Rev.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathar, Z. (1984) Intervening variables. In: Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Fertility Survey. Edited by Alam, I. & Dineson, B.. ISI, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Shah, N. & Shah, M. (1984) From non-use to use: prospects of contraceptive adoption in Pakistan. In: Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Fertility Survey. Edited by Alam, I. & Dineson, B.. ISI, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1980) Life Table Analysis. Technical Bulletin No. 6, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar