Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:35:45.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological aspects of a high socio-economic group II. IQ Components and Social Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

John B. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge
C. G. Nicholas Mascie-Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge

Extract

Data are presented on the verbal and performance (non-verbal) IQs of a sample of university scientists, their surviving fathers and male sibs.

Although mean IQs differ between scientific disciplines the disciplines do not differentially attract scientists from particular socio-economic classes.

The verbal IQs of both the scientists and their fathers are positively correlated with socio-economic class but only in the fathers' sample is the performance IQ/class correlation significant. The variance of both verbal and performance IQs increases from Class I to Class IIIM. The overall estimate of heritability for the verbal IQ is higher than that for the performance IQ.

Verbal and performance IQs are related to the distance the scientists have moved on the socio-economic scale. The effects of social mobility on the genetic and environmental components of the verbal and performance IQ phenotypic variances are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burt, C. (1961) Intelligence and social mobility. Br. J. statist. Psychol. 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. (1966) The genetic determination of differences in intelligence. Br. J. Psychol. 57, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. & Howard, M. (1956) The multifactorial theory of inheritance and its application to intelligence. Br. J. statist. Psychol. 9, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, A.J. (1964) Differentiation of abilities, socio-economic status and the W.I.S.C. J. consult. Psychol. 28, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J.W.B. (1964) The Home and the School. MacGibbon & Kee, London.Google Scholar
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. & Jarvik, L.F. (1963) Genetics and intelligence: a review. Science, N.Y. 142, 1477.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.B. (1970) Biological aspects of a high socio-economic group. I. IQ, education and social mobility. J. biosoc. Sci. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.B. (1971) Genetika a sociálna mobilita. Psychólogià a patopsychólógia dietàtà. Ročnik, 6, 21.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.B. & Light, P. (1967) Intelligence among university scientists. Nature, Lond. 213, 441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J.B. & Young, M. (1965) Social mobility and fertility. In: Biological Aspects of Social Problems. Edited by Meade, J.E. and Parkes, A.S.. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jinks, J.L. & Fulker, D.W. (1970) Comparison of the biometrical, genetical, M.A.V.A. and classical approaches to the analysis of human behaviour. Psychol. Bull. 5, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Registrar General (1966) Classification of Occupations. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1971) Race, social class and IQ. Science, N.Y. 174, 1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shields, J. (1962) Monozygotic Twins. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thoday, J.M. & Gibson, J.B. (1970) Environmental and genetical contributions to class difference: a model experiment. Science, N. Y. 167, 990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, J.H. (1971) Achievement and social mobility: relationships among IQ score, education and occupation in two generations. Social Biol. 18, 252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1955) Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar