Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T00:32:06.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes of women of reproductive age to in vitro fertilization and embryo research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Elizabeth M. Alder ,
David T. Baird ,
Martin M. Lees ,
Dennis W. Lincoln ,
Nancy B. Loudon  and
Allan A. Templeton
Elizabeth M. Alder
Affiliation:
MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, Edinburgh
David T. Baird
Affiliation:
University Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Edinburgh
Martin M. Lees
Affiliation:
Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh
Dennis W. Lincoln
Affiliation:
MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, Edinburgh
Nancy B. Loudon
Affiliation:
Family Planning Centre, Dean Terrace, Edinburgh
Allan A. Templeton
Affiliation:
University Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The attitudes of women of reproductive age to IVF therapy and human embryo research were investigated. A questionnaire was given to 1920 consecutive women attending clinics for family planning (1050), ante-natal care (705) and infertility (165). This paper reports the analysis of 1701 returned questionnaires, all from women of reproductive age. The great majority (94%) were in favour of IVF treatment. Sixty-seven percent approved of research on human embryos up to 14 days to improve IVF treatment, and a further 10% supported research on embryos designed to avoid birth defects. The majority (79%) thought women should be allowed to donate ova for research. The social characteristics of the infertility group were similar to those of the ante-natal group except for lower parity. In the family planning and ante-natal groups attitudes were not related to age, social class or parity, but were influenced by religious beliefs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 155 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, E. & Templeton, A.A. (1985) Patient reaction to IVF treatment, Lancet, i, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkerhoff, M.B. & Mackie, M. (1985) Religion and gender: a comparison of Canadian and American student attitudes. J. Marriage & Fam. 47, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, J.J. (1984) Attitude to abortion, attitude to life and conservation in Australia. Sociol. social Res. 68, 236.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1980) Classification of Occupations. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. & Rosenthal, R. (1976) The volunteer subject revisited. Aust. J. Psychol. 28, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A.A., Glasier, A., Angell, R.R. & Aitken, R.J. (1984) What potential ovum donors think. Lancet, 1, 1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeton, A.A. & Penney, G.C. (1982) The incidence, characteristics and prognosis of patients whose infertility is unexplained. Fert. Steril. 37, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnock, M. (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Woman (1984, 1985) The debate no woman can ignore. Woman, 22 09, 1984. 12 01 1985.Google Scholar