Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:11:13.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sterilization in Canberra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

David Lucas
David Lucas
Affiliation:
Demography Department, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In contrast to the USA and the UK, vasectomy is less popular than tubal ligation in Australia, and this may reflect differences in husband-wife communication. Using data from the 1979 Canberra Population Survey, it seemed that although a majority of respondents would use sterilization, female sterilization would be preferred, largely because males were more resistant to the idea than females. Respondents born outside Australia, the UK, and Eire were more resistant to the idea of sterilization, but reported higher use of tubal ligation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 335 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bean, F., Clark, M., Swicegood, G. & Williams, D. (1983) Husband-wife communication, wife's employment, and the decision for male or female sterilization. J. Marr. & Fam. 45, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berent, J. (1982) Family Planning in Europe and USA in the 1970s. Comparative Studies, No. 20. World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. (1983) Fertility control. In: Population of Australia, Vol. 1, p. 230. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C., Young, C.M., Ware, H., Lavis, D.R. & Davis, A.T. (1973) Australia: knowledge, attitudes and practice of family planning in Melbourne, 1971. Stud. Fam. Plann. 4, 49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callan, V. (1980) The Value of Children to Australian, Greek and Italian Parents in Sydney. Papers of the East–West Population Institute No. 60-C, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. (1976) How Many Children? Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Francis, M. (1982) Choice of Contraceptive Sterilization: Vasectomy or Tubal Sterilization. MSc thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. (1983) Australian family planning surveys: some problems of comparability. J. biosoc. Sci. 15, 357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, P. (1983) Marriage and divorce in Australia. In: Population of Australia, Vol. 1, p. 183. New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
Presser, H. & Bumpass, L. (1972) Demographic and social aspects of contraceptive sterilization in the United States: 1965–1970. In: Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth, p. 511. Edited by C., Westoff and R., Parke. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Salter, W., Selwood, T. & Leeton, J. (1977) Non-attendance among post-natal women at a hospital family planning clinic. In: Family Planning and Health Care for Infants and Mothers, p. 31. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Selwood, T. & Leeton, J. (1980) Sterilization operations in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2, 499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trlin, A. & Perry, P. (1981) Manawatu Family Growth Study. Department of Health, Wellington.Google Scholar
Young, C. & Ware, H. (1979) Contraceptive use in Australia. Aust. N.Z. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusuf, F. (1980) Use of contraception among married women in New South Wales, Australia. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed