Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:11:52.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The status of women and fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

K. B. Piepmeier
Affiliation:
International Planned Parenthood Federation, 18–20 Lower Regent Street, London, S. W. 1, and King's College, Cambridge
T. S. Adkins
Affiliation:
International Planned Parenthood Federation, 18–20 Lower Regent Street, London, S. W. 1, and King's College, Cambridge

Summary

There is a great deal of interest in the relation between the status of women and fertility—by humanists, academics and policy-makers concerned with bringing about fertility declines. The three aspects of women's status most frequently linked to fertility are their education, employment and type of husband-wife interaction. Research to date has not given us a clear and consistent explanation of these relationships and has not confirmed causality. The effects of these three factors on fertility vary considerably across national boundaries and even within different sectors of the same society. Some of the assumptions held by both researchers and policymakers must be re-thought in the interests of more useful future research and of sounder policy.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatnagar, N.K. (1972) Status of women and family planning in India. J. Family Welfare, 18, 21.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1965) Demographic science and the redirection of population policy. J. chron. Dis. 18, 1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, J. (1967) Reproductive ideals and educational attainment among white Americans 1943–1960. Popul. Stud. 21, 159.Google ScholarPubMed
Blake, R.R., Inske, C.A., Cialdini, R.B. & Chiakin, A.L. (1969) Beliefs and Attitudes about Contraception among the Poor. Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. (1970) Women's Role in Economic Development. George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Bumpass, L. (1969) Age at marriage as a variable in socio-economic differentials in fertility. Demography, 6, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, B.M., Palmore, J.A., Lee, S.J. & Lee, S.J. (1972) Psychological Perspectives: Family Planning in Korea. Hollym Corporation, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Collver, A. (1968) Women's work participation and fertility in metropolitan areas. Demography, 5, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collver, A. & Langlois, E. (1962) The female labor force in metropolitan areas: an international comparison. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, E.D. (1963) Differential Fertility in Central India. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federici, N. (1968) The influence of women's employment on fertility. In: World Views of Population Problems, p. 77. Edited by Szabady, E.. Akadémiai Kaidó, Budapest.Google Scholar
Freedman, R. & Takeshita, S.Y. (1969) Family Planning in Taiwan. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, R., Whelpton, P.K. & Campbell, A.A. (1959) Family Planning, Sterility and Population Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Gendell, M. (1965) The influence of family building activity on women's rate of economic activity. Proceedings of UN World Population Conference, p. 4. New York.Google Scholar
Gendell, M., Maraviglia, M.N. & Mitner, D.C. (1970) Fertility and economic activity of women in Guatemala City, 1964. Demography, 7, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1972) The influence of labour force participation and education on fertility in Thailand. Popul. Stud. 26, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, P.H. (1972) Maternal role incompatibility and fertility in urban Latin America. J. Soc. Issues, 28, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorn, G. (1970) The Sociology of Fertility. Collier-MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
Heer, D.M. (1971) Educational advance and fertility change. In: Proceedings of International Population Conference, London, 1969, III, p. 1903. IUSSP, Liège.Google Scholar
Hill, R., Stycos, J.M. & Back, K. (1965) The Family and Population Control. College and University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Hubback, J. (1957) Wives Who Went to College. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.J. & Azumi, K. (1960) The birth rate and cottage industries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A.M. & Choldin, H.M. (1965) New ‘family planners’ in rural East Pakistan. Demography, 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, C.V. (1971) Educational differentials in fertility in relation to the demographic transition In: Proceedings of International Population Conference, London, 1969, III, p. 1926. IUSSP, Liège.Google Scholar
Mason, K. O., David, A.S., Gerstel, E.K., Lindsey, Q.W. & Rulison, M.E. (1971) Social and Economic Correlates of Family Fertility: a Survey of the Evidence. Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Mazur, P. (1968) Birth control and regional differentials in the Soviet Union. Popul. Stud.22, 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkler, M. (1970) Fertility and labour force participation in India: survey of workers in Old Delhi area. J. Family Welfare, 17, 31.Google Scholar
Miro, C.A. & Mertens, W. (1968) Influences affecting fertility in urban and rural Latin America Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 46, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.E. (1972) Husband-wife relations and family planning practices in urban Hong-Kong. J. Marr. & Fam. Feb., 130.Google Scholar
Namboodiri, N.K. (1964) The wife's work experience and child spacing. Milbank memi Fund Q. Bull. 42, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prachvabmosh, V. (1967) Factors affecting desire or lack of desire for additional progeny in Thailand. In: Sociological Contributions to Family Planning Research. Edited by Bogue, D.J.. Community and Family Study Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosen, B.C. & Simmons, A.B. (1971) Industrialization, family and fertility: a structural psychological analysis of the Brazilian case. Demography, 8, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stycos, J.M. (1965) Female employment and fertility in Lima, Peru. Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 43, 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stycos, J.M. (1968) Human Fertility in Latin America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Stycos, J.M. & Weller, R.H. (1967) Female working roles and fertility. Demography, 4, 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, G.F. & Wunderlich, G.S. (1967) Estimating marital fertility rate by education attainment using a survey of new mothers. Demography, 4, 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (1953) Determinants and consequences of population trends. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN ST/504/Series A/17, 53, XIII, 3, New York.Google Scholar
Weller, R.H. (1968) The employment of wives, role incompatibility and fertility: a study among lower and middle class residents of San Juan, Puerto Rico. Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 46, 507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. & Potvin, R. (1967) College Women and Fertility Values. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, P.K., Campbell, A.A. & Patterson, J.E. (1966) Fertility and Family Planning in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaukey, D. (1961) Fertility Differences in a Modernizing Country. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar