Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:23:42.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spacing of children and changing patterns of childbearing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Christabel M. Young
Christabel M. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The first part of the paper traces changes in the length of the childbearing period and ages of women at the time of their first and last births among women in Australia married between 1905–09 and 1965–69. The source of information was survey data concerning the respondents themselves (once married, currently married women aged under 60 years at 1971) and information that they gave concerning their mothers' childbearing experience. The main observations are that the trend towards smaller families was more marked among the mothers and that the change in the size distribution of families was the major factor in reducing the length of the childbearing period for marriages occurring up to the Second World War, while closer spacing of children was the major factor since then. The second part of the paper examines more detailed supplementary information about the respondents, including changes in the dispersion of the timing of births, the rapid rate of childbearing among the 1955–59 marriage cohort, reasons for delaying the first birth, and differences in behaviour according to education and religion. The discussion raises the question of the rationality of the trend towards closer spacing of children, with special reference to the interaction between a woman's work role and family role.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 201 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © 1977, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, J. (1974) Can we believe recent data on birth expectations in the United States?. Demography, 11, 25.Google Scholar
Browning, H. (1968) Life expectancy and the life cycle—some interrelations. In: World Population—The View Ahead, p. 227. Edited by Farmer, R.N. et al. Bureau of Business Research, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. & Ware, H. (1973) The evolution of family planning in Australia. Popul. Stud. 27, 7.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C., Young, C.M., Ware, H., Lavis, D.R. & Davis, A.T. (1973) Australia: knoweledge, attitudes and practice of family planning in Melbourne, 1971. Stud. Fam. Plann. 4, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, H.T. (1963) Childspacing analysis via record linkage: new data. Marriage and Family Living, 25, 272.Google Scholar
Day, L.H. (1965) Differentials in age of women at completion of childbearing in Australia. Popul. Stud. 18, 251.Google Scholar
Farid, S.M. (1974) On the tempo of childbearing in England and Wales. Popul. Stud. 28, 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitagawa, E.M. (1955) Components of a difference between two rates. J. Am. statist. Ass. 50, 1168.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, E.M. (1964) Standardized comparisons in population research. Demography, 1, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauriat, P. (1969) The effect of marital dissolution on fertility. J. Marriage & Fam. 31, 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavis, D.R. (1974) Oral Contraception in Melbourne, 1961–1971. PhD thesis. Department of Demography, Australian National University.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.F. (1973) Marriage in Australia: Age at First Marriage and Proportions Marrying, 1860–1971 Monograph No. 2 of the Australian Family Formation Project. Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Mørkerberg, H. (1976) Fødsters Placering I Familiens Livsforløb [Childspacing] Publication 68, Danish National Institute of Social Research. Teknish Forlag, Copenhagen. (In Danish with English abstract, summary and table titles.).Google Scholar
Pohlman, E. (1968) The timing of the first birth: a review of effects. Eugen. Q. 15, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, G.N. (1972) The independence of the intervals between confinements. J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, G.N. (1975) The interval between confinements. J. Biosoc. Sci. 7, 411.Google Scholar
Rindfuss, R.R. & Sweet, J.A. (1975) The Pervasiveness of Post-war Fertility Trends in the United States. Working Paper 75–25, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Ross, S.G. (1974) The Timing and Spacing of Births and Women’s Labor Force Participation: an Economic Analysis. Working paper No. 30, Center for Economic Analysis of Human Behavior and Social Institutions, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, L.T. (1976) Age at marriage and timing of the first birth. Popul. Stud. 30, (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryder, N.B. (1969) The emergence of a modern fertility pattern, United States, 1917–1966. In. Fertility and Family Planning: A World View, p. 99. Edited by Behrman, S.J. et al. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Whelpton, P.K. (1964) Trends and differentials in the spacing of births. Demography, 1, 83.Google Scholar