Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:18:25.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexuality, birth control and abortion: a decision-making sequence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Milton Diamond ,
Patricia G. Steinhoff ,
James A. Palmore  and
Roy G. Smith
Milton Diamond
Affiliation:
Hawaii Pregnancy, Birth Control and Abortion Study, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
Patricia G. Steinhoff
Affiliation:
Hawaii Pregnancy, Birth Control and Abortion Study, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
James A. Palmore
Affiliation:
Hawaii Pregnancy, Birth Control and Abortion Study, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
Roy G. Smith
Affiliation:
Hawaii Pregnancy, Birth Control and Abortion Study, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A matched group of women who conceived during a 2-month period in 1971 was used to trace some parameters involved in their decision to carry their pregnancies to term or to seek an abortion.

Several specific indices to the decision were considered: whether coitus was anticipated; whether the pregnancy was planned; whether birth control methods were used; and how the pregnancy ended. The effects of age, marital status, religion, reasons for the abortion or carrying the pregnancy to term, and attitude towards a possible delivery were also studied.

It was found that coitus was anticipated by the majority of women, but pregnancy was unplanned for. Two-thirds of the women who did not want to become pregnant were not using a contraceptive method; yet, regardless of whether pregnancy was planned or unplanned, one of three women chose to have an abortion.

Among the most common reasons for women indicating that contraceptive measures were not used were: ‘I didn't want sex to seem planned’ and ‘I thought I was in a safe period’. The decision to have an abortion usually depended upon the woman's marital status, age, religion, and previous use of birth control. Surprisingly, among women who had not planned to become pregnant, the percentage of women choosing abortion was the same from both subgroups of women who used or did not use contraception. It was also surprising that no strong relationship seemed to exist between the type of contraceptive technique used and the decision to have an abortion.

Women who planned ahead to have an abortion if they became pregnant were more often using contraception; thus for these women abortion was not a primary method of family planning but a back-up for failed contraception. Women who had their babies, infrequently considered abortion as an alternative.

It was predicted and found true that women who positively viewed the prospect of having a child chose to carry the pregnancy to term while those who expressed unhappiness at having a baby chose abortion. Unexpectedly, we found the overwhelming majority of women who claimed ‘I would be neither happy nor unhappy to have this baby’ chose to have an abortion. Thus a woman's so-called neutral statement regarding a desire was generally seen not to be neutral.

Our use of a pregnant population of women who conceived at the same time (conception cohort) for the analysis of the decision of whether to have an abortion or carry to term, when abortion is legal, thus seemed to be feasible and practical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 347 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkov, B. & Sklar, J. (1972) The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Fertility in California. Preliminary Paper No. 1, Results of Current Research in Demography, International Population and Urban Research, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Diamond, M., Palmore, J.A., Smith, R.G. & Steinhoff, P.G. (1972) Abortion by request in Hawaii: indications from and for legal reform. Family Planning Perspectives (in press).Google Scholar
Duffy, E.A. (1971) The Effect of Changes in the State Abortion Laws. US Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Friendman, H.L. (1972) An Approach to Psychosocial Research in Fertility Behavior. Working Paper No. 3, presented to the International Conference on Contraception, Abortion,Sterilization, and Prostaglandins,Paris.Google Scholar
Gebhard, P.H., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. & Christenson, C.V. (1958) Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion. Hoeber-Harper, New York.Google Scholar
Pakter, J. & Nelson, F. (1971) Abortion in New York City: the first nine months. Family Planning Perspectives, 3, 5.Google Scholar
Russell, J. (1969) Therapeutic abortions in California. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 105, 757.Google Scholar
Smith, R.G., Steinhoff, P.G., Diamond, M. & Brown, N. (1971) Abortion in Hawaii: the first 124 days. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 61, 530.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, P.G., Smith, R.G. & Diamond, M. (1972) The characteristics and motivations of women receiving abortions. Sociological Symposium (in press).Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Lewtt, S. (1972) Joint Program for the Study of Abortion (JPSA): early medical complications of legal abortions. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, 97.Google Scholar