We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Ishihama, A., Kagabu, T., Imai, T. & Shima, M. (1970) Cytologic studies after insertion of intrauterine devices. Acta cytol.14, 35.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S., Ito, T., Shiozaki, T., Iijima, T. & Tamada, T. (1968) Influences of long-term use of intrauterine devices on reproductive organs. Int. J. Fert.13, 326.Google ScholarPubMed
Melamed, M.R., Koss, L.G., Flehinger, B.J., Kelisky, R.P. & Dubrow, H. (1969) Prevalence rates of uterine cervical carcinoma in situ for women using the diaphragm or contraceptive oral steroids. Br. med. J.iii, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, R.M. & Baron, B.A. (1967) The intrauterine device and cervical neoplasia. A prospective study of patients with cervical dysplasia. J. Am. med. Ass.99, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, A., Clark, V.A. & Coffelt, C.F. (1970) Contraceptives and dysplasia: higher rate for pill choosers. Science, N. Y.169, 497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1968) Hormonal steroids in contraception. Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. No. 386.Google Scholar