No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Role of cervical cytology in family planning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Special Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1974, Cambridge University Press
References
Ishihama, A., Kagabu, T., Imai, T. & Shima, M. (1970) Cytologic studies after insertion of intrauterine devices. Acta cytol. 14, 35.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S., Ito, T., Shiozaki, T., Iijima, T. & Tamada, T. (1968) Influences of long-term use of intrauterine devices on reproductive organs. Int. J. Fert. 13, 326.Google ScholarPubMed
Melamed, M.R., Koss, L.G., Flehinger, B.J., Kelisky, R.P. & Dubrow, H. (1969) Prevalence rates of uterine cervical carcinoma in situ for women using the diaphragm or contraceptive oral steroids. Br. med. J. iii, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, R.M. & Baron, B.A. (1967) The intrauterine device and cervical neoplasia. A prospective study of patients with cervical dysplasia. J. Am. med. Ass. 99, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, A., Clark, V.A. & Coffelt, C.F. (1970) Contraceptives and dysplasia: higher rate for pill choosers. Science, N. Y. 169, 497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1968) Hormonal steroids in contraception. Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. No. 386.Google Scholar